terminal server group policy

TheMSsForum.com: The Microsoft Software Forum

The MSS Forum ‹ smallbiz
- Archive
  - Biz
  - MCSE
  - CRM
  - Drivers
  - Framework
  - ADO
  - ASP
  - Compact
  - Forms
  - Dotnet
  - C#
  - VB
  - FontpageGen
  - Excel
  - WorkSheet
  - Exchange
  - Setup
  - Fox
  - Fontpage
  - ASP
  - IIS
  - Entourage
  - Money
  - Messanger
  - PocketPC
  - Powerpoint
  - Project
  - Publisher
  - Excel
  - VB
  - Security
  - Portal
  - Services
  - SQLServerDev
  - SVCS
  - SQLServer
  - VB
  - VC
  - MFC
  - ExcelGen

- Previous
  - 1
    - What's the database size limitation of SBS2K SQL?? Many Thx! Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179766
  - 2
    - Most Popular hEy, Please Visit http://www.familypk.com Familypk About Articles, Tutorials, Learning, Block checkers, Myspace, Twist, Daily news updates, Entertainment, Horoscopes, Movies, Stories, Kids, Woman, Kitchen, Islamic names, Hair style, Fashion, Home decoration, Songs, PTCL, Games, etc..... Please Visit http://www.enttwist.com Enttwist About Articles, Tutorials, Cheat Codes, Hacking News, Games Setup, Greeting Cards, E-Cards, Telephone Directry, Web Directry, Learning, Block checkers, Myspace, Twist, Daily news updates, Entertainment, Horoscopes, Movies, Stories, Kids, Woman, Kitchen, Islamic names, Hair style, Fashion, Home decoration, MSN Nicknames, Songs, PTCL, Games, etc.... please visit http://www.fashion.enttwist.com fashion about sarees, dresses,mahndi, makeup etc Thanx Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179762
  - 3
    - OWA has unusual behavior Has anyone experienced a problem with OWA (from Exchange 2003) where the outgoing message is routed to the Drafts folder and never reaches its destination? I also found that the text of the message was deleted but the addressee and the CC:'s remained intact. What gives? JoseIT Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179761
  - 4
    - Migratign to Windows Server 2003 AD I have a client with a single Small Business Server 2000. We need to upgrade to upgrade to Windows Server 2003. I am aware of the ADMT which can transfer user and computer accounts to a new domain, but this involves quite a bit of work on each workstation and would like to maintain the existing active directory domain to avoid that. Is it possible to do the upgrade in the following way? (I know it may be a long shot, but my creative brain has been working over-time) 1) Install new Windows 2000 Server, promote to DC in SBS domain. 2) Disconnect SBS server from network. 3) Seize FSMO Roles on Windows 2000 DC. 4) Install new Windows 2003 server, do forest prep, domain prep, etc on 2000 DC, then promote to DC in 2000 domain. 5) Transfer FSMO roles to 2003 6) Demote Windows 2000 DC to member server. 7) Restore SQL and file data from backup. If we manage to successfully do the upgrade in this way, will we be left with an Active Directory with the same limitations as SBS 2000 e.g. only 50 workstations, no domain trusts, etc.? Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179758
  - 5
    - Exchange virtual memory fragmentation error. Hello all. I am getting this error on an sbs2k3 server. Rebooting the server doesn't seem to fix it for more than a very short period. What would be my best course of action? Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: Performance Event ID: 9582 Date: 8/15/2007 Time: 12:34:40 PM User: N/A Computer: NETSERVER Description: The virtual memory necessary to run your Exchange server is fragmented in such a way that performance may be affected. It is highly recommended that you restart all Exchange services to correct this issue. Thanks! Joe. Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179755
  - 6
    - backup DC GPO settings... We have a Windows 2000 small business Server and are using a WIndwos 2003 server as a backup domain controller. There are group policy settings for terminal server (both computer and user settings) on the win2K3 server that do not exist on the win2K small bus server. I would like to use some of these policy settings in our environment if I can. It appears that I can set policy settings on the backup domain controller (WIn2K3) that I do not have on the win2K small bus server and it works - but will a replicate from the primary back to the backup erase them I wonder? I also noticed that when I went back over to teh win2K small bus server, and called up the group policy, I got errors when looking at the GPO setting that included the terminal server stuff I had changed on the win2k3 server. Is there a way that I can somehow ADD those settings from the win2k3 server to the older win2K small bus server so that it does not matter which server I use to manage the GPO settings? Thanks, Brad Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179750
  - 7
    - backup DC settings... We have a Windows 2000 small business Server and are using a WIndwos 2003 server as a backup domain controller. There are group policy settings for terminal server (both computer and user settings) on the win2K3 server that do not exist on the win2K small bus server. I would like to use some of these policy settings in our environment if I can. It appears I can set policy settings on the backup domain controller that I do not have on the win2K small bus server and it works - but will a replicate erase them? How does that work when you have your primary and backup domain controllers at different OS's? Thanks, Brad Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179749
  - 8
    - Send Internet Fax Online and Other Features for Free! Freeifax.com guarantees you a fast and efficient delivery of messages around the globe. It provides more reliability and security as well as offers free fax numbers. Messages can be accessed from anywhere. No need for any fax machine and fax paper, all you need is just a internet connection. 2.5 cents to send Free incoming No monthly fees! Visit us at: http://www.freeifax.com/ Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179747
  - 9
    - MSN article MSN article http://www.real-article.com/msn/index.php Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179745
  - 10
    - Replacing BDC Server This small company is on an extrememly tight budget. We replaced last year the primary server with a Proliant ML370. Our backup server is a sever year old dell optiplex desktop. I really want to replace it but management keeps up this financial pressure. Obviously another Proliant ML370 is out of the question. I'm thinking if I can find a server replacement for $500ish management would give in. Is there an afforadable backup domain server I can investigate? If it's new with warranty that would help; but, I'm thinking a used one may be my only option. Thanks for an insight into a small business with a tight budget needs for a server replacement. Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179738
  - 11
    - Determine if SBS installed On an older server (didn't initially configure) I'm receiving a warning that the "License usage for a product licensed in per server mode is nearing the maximum number of licenses purchased. Consult the Application event log or License Manager from the Administrative Tools folder for more information." When I try to go to Licensing in Control Panel or Administrative tools, I receive the following: "Not available in Microsoft BackOffice Small Business Server. To add client licenses, choose Manage Server from the Start Menu and select About Small Business Server" Manage Server is not available from the Start Menu. I suspect the original configurator of the server must have did a modified installation, though I'm not sure why. Is there an executible I could run to access this Manager Server program so I could determine the number of licenses we actually have on this server? If I do a winmsd, the Operating System is just listed as Windows 2000 Server. It says nothing about about it being a Small Business Server. Thanks much. Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179728
  - 12
    - SBS 2000 - 2003 R2 - Branch Office We have SBS 2000 at main office. We will have a branch office with no server, just PC's. Branch office PC's need to run an application on a server at the main office using RDP. 1. Should we get a seperate 2003 R2 server at the main office and install the application there that the branch PC's will access thru RDP ? 2. Should we completely replace the SBS 2000 server with an SBS 2003 R2 server at the main office and install the application there that the branch PC's will access thru RDP ? 3. Do we set up PPTP VPN from branch PC's to server at main office run the RDP connection thru that VPN ? Any other options ? Branch office will have their own Internet access thru mediacom. Thanks, Ray Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179725
  - 13
    - Migrating from SBS2000 to Server 2003 have been given the task of researching the problems, process and mis haps of migrating from Small Bussiness Server 2000 to Windows Server 2003 (not sbs2003), we are doing this as SBS is to restricting and is becoming more of a hindrance than a help. I found this topic on a forum with Google ( http://www.computing.net/windows2003/wwwboard/forum/3890.html ) but the internet seems to only want to help me migrate to sbs2003. If you know of any other links, hints, faq's, general help or problems please let me know. Many thanks, Jim. Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179720
  - 14
    - Scheduled NT - Backup Not Working Problem with NT-Backup in Win 2003 Standard Edition. Performing a manual backup on 4mm DDS tape works OK, but if a backup is scheduled, the backup fails and the log states: "Cannot locate the specified media or backup device. This backup operation will terminate." Opening up "scheduled tasks" in "control panel" doesn't reveal any obvious problems: the path shown is as follows: "@C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Application Data\Microsoft\Windows NT\NTBackup\data\System State.bks" /n "Media created 8/2/2007 at 5:13 PM" /d "Set created 8/2/2007 at 5:17 PM" /v:yes /r:yes /rs:no /hc:on /m normal /j "System State" /l:s /p "4mm DDS" In "services" both "removable storage" and "task schedular" are started and set at automatic. What could be the problem? Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179718
  - 15
    - Transferring AD from SBS2003 SP1 to W2K3 Server R2 Hi - I have a client who is currently on Small Business Server 2003, and have outgrown their setup. I'm replacing their SBS2003 box with a new W2K3 R2 server, and want to transfer Active Directory so as to simplify workstation reconfiguration. Please note the following: 1. Exchange is not used, so is not a factor. 2. The new server will not have the same name as the previous one (it was poorly named). 3. The SBS server will be reformatted and reinstalled as a Terminal Server. 4. I'm not interested in swing migration. I know SBS only supports 1 SBS server per domain, but have heard you can add a standard (full version) Windows server as a 2nd domain controller. I've also have heard SBS insists on holding the FSMO roles, and will shut down after a period of time if the roles are transferred. I have found an article that details what I feel to be the correct procedure, and it is here: http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Migrating-Small-Business-Server-2003-Exchange-Standard-Part1.html I know I may also have to run the R2 version of ADPREP to get the SBS 2003 SP1 Active Directory scheme up to date. I just need confirmation that this is a supported procedure, that SBS will allow you to transfer FMSO roles (even if it doesn't like it), and that there are no limitations or "poison pills" in the SBS version of AD that would keep it from operating correctly if transferred to a full W2K3 server. Thanks in advance for any advice! Sky Brower MCSE, A+ Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179717
  - 16
    - Routing Issue, Same domain name of server and hosted outside site When I type in domain.com name at any workstation I get a blank site. The DNS on each the workstations points to the server, as it should be. How do I get the outside domain name to resolve correctly? How do I resolve this , I think I need to update the routing table in DNS? Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179707
  - 17
    - SBS Domain with SQL ODBC ERROR Hi, I have SBS 2003 Domain with serveral Member Servers (mixed 2003 & 2000 SVR). I have just replaced the Server Hardware with a reinstalled SBS2003 and rejoined each of the member servers to the new domain. One of the Windows 2000 Member Servers hosts a WEB Application that connects to the SQL database on the Domain Controller. After Disjoining from the Old Server and rejoint to the new server (both old and new servers have the same server name) The Application (Crystal Enterprise 10) cant read the SQL data from the Domain Controler. If you user the OBDC Conneter to configure the OBDC Connection and test it the connectind test is OK. If you exit the ODBC and go back in just to test connection fails. We are using SQL user & Password Does any on have any idears? Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179702
  - 18
    - Can we upgrade the OEMSBS2000 to SBS2003 R2 Hi, I have OEM SBS2000 - my concern is that can I upgrade this to OEM SBS2003 R2 in to a different server PC(I would like to change the existing server PC) (I will buy a new Server PC plus the upgrade version of SBS2003 R2 - is that possible?) Kindly advise Rgds Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179698
  - 19
    - Anyone installed Thunderbird under sbs2000? Can a plain jane "User" run it? Can each user have their own profile under TB? Did you have to config user /install.....config user /execute? I ask because I was unable to run openoffice for multiple, simultaneous users. Thank you. Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179691
  - 20
    - SBS 2000 license Hi all, I have SBS2000 with me and need to add few more license, according to the vendor license no more available, is there any option? can we buy sbs2003 licene and use on top of my SBS2000? I heard sbs2003 license can only activate through internet and it is not like SBS2000 license setup from a floppy. Is there any workaround? kindly advise Rgds Anver Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179689
  - 21
    - SELL LAPTOP, HP, SOFTWARE, EBOOK AND STILL MANY AGAIN AT THE PRICE OF CHEAP Getting Laptop, HP, Software, E-Book and still many again with high qualities but at the price of cheap. Trust caw??.... please compare the price of with other online store?.... will know the place of where his buying?.... please justly visit of our store in: http://www.cheapmallonline.com Guaranteed, you'd Satisfy !!!!!!!! Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179688
  - 22
    - application mode or not? Hi. Am I going nuts? Can I or can I not install sbs 2000 in application mode? I selected it during setup and have people logging on with old 98 boxes just fine. I've pasted a comment from the terminal_services group. Unless he/she was talking about sbs 2003. Thank you. > Well..... I've installed sbs in application mode so all users will be > accessing it via old computers. >>Hi - note that this is a very bad idea. You shouldn't use your SBS box as a >>terminal server.....in 2003 it won't even let you. >>The best place for SBS2000 questions is >>microsoft.public.backoffice.smallbiz2000. Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179685
  - 23
    - Multiple SMTP QUEUE Hi There. I have an SBS 2000 sever. BUT- having serious problems sending and receiving EMail. When I look at the SMTP ques there are 50 (ish) "foreign" ques - e.g. giga.net.tw - remote delivery, ms32.hinet.net . In addition when i look at the logons - I have SMTP (FE065EC7-539D-4587-87951-32BDDDFA282) . Obviously the servr has bit breached by , I think a spammer- Any advice how I can clean this up and stop it happening. Thanks for any advice Fixit Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179679
  - 24
    - IP address already in use on new install I have done about 10 SBS2003 setups over the last 18 months and have not had this issue: Dual core 3.2 4 g system memory, two nic At setup both nics are identified, one external is disconnected and one internal just connected to a switch with no other users or DHCP. Next step configures local IP address and no matter what I put in there (192.168.x.254, 255.255.255.0, 192.168.x.254 or nothing for gateway) With a gateway in I get IP address already in use, with no gateway I get invalid IP address. Help Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179671
  - 25
    - procedure for SBS 2000 to Windows 2003 plus exchange 2007 Hi all, I have a SBS 2000 with exchange 2000 in a domain, and I want to reomve the SBS 2000 with the Windows 2003 plus exchange 2007. Is it possible to join the windows 2003 into the SBS 2000 domain, promote the windows 2003 to DC and install exchange 2007 into the windows 2003 DC? Is there any reference in microsoft web talking about this scenario? regards, Samson Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179667
- Next
  - 1
    - VPN to SBS2000 Shares I have a Widows XP PRo Desktop at a remote location, that is NOT a part of the SBS2000 Domain. I have connected to my SBS2000 Server via Native Windows VPN connector, connected successfully, and then tried to MAP a drive and Create a Network place. Both failed. Is there a way to connect to a share without establishing a DOMAIN relationship? jdc Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179663
  - 2
    - Updating Windows server 2000 Is it possible to update server 2000 to Server 2003 small business premium edition or do you have to buy and install server 2003. Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179660
  - 3
    - How to move from Windows 2000SBS environment to Windows 2003 stand Hi, Our client has Windows 2000 SBS, including exchange in use. They now determined to move Windows 2003 Std environment, as their business is growing. They use also Roaming profiles. They have already purchased new hardware and operating systems. So the future scenario should be, that they have 2 Windows 2003 std servers, where server A would have all file and printing services, and server B would be exchange 2007 std server. Any suggestions what would be the easiest way to make this operation. I have read about sbsmigration, but is it useful, when moving to Windows standard domain? Thanks in advance, Jouko Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179658
  - 4
    - JW Personal Shop JW Personal Shop I have good price on my items. I sell Jade, CZ, Pearl rings, new and used items. All used items are on excellent condition. All items are free shipping. Now, you get more easy to make payment on my website. I accept credit cards and paypal. www.jwpersonalshop.com Sterling Silver Layered CZ Tennis Bracelet This is sterling silver Layered CZ Tennis Bracelet. This bracelet is flexible and will fit any wrist size. It consists of 40 CZs claw set in a stunning tennis bracelet. Silver layered jewellery is made from solid silver which is layered over other alloys such as rhodium (a member of the platinum family) and brass. Silver layered jewellery wears, looks and lasts like solid silver because its outer surface IS solid silver. Everything you can see and touch is pure silver. Size: 1.8" (Width) Weight: 6g TIMBERLAND Brown Steel Toe WORK SHOES Brand New *TIMBERLAND* Footwear Brown Leather ?Dissipator? Steel Toe Work Shoes Size: Men?s 7 Medium US Original Retail: $80.00 Brand New in Original Box TIMBERLAND PRO Titan COMP TOE WORK BOOTS Brand New *TIMBERLAND* Footwear Brown ?Titan Composite Toe? Work Boots Size: Men?s 7 Medium US Original Retail: $120.00 Brand New in Original Box TIMBERLAND Sport Shoes This is NEW Timberland sport shoes. Off White Leather 'Ambler' Sport Shoes Size: Men's 7 Medium US Original Retail: $90.00 Brand New in Original Box Jade 18K white gold plated Ring. This is High Quality Malay Jade white gold plated ring. It made with plated white gold and heigh quality Malay jade. Elegant ring and popular style. The jade size is 0.5 inch, and the ring size is 7. NEW! Freshwater pearl white gold plated ring with CZs. This is freshwater pearl 18k white gold plated ring with CZs. One natural pearl with CZs around. Contact me : jw@jwpersonalshop.com Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179656
  - 5
    - DNS Domain Name and Pre-Win2K Domain Name divergence in SBS 2K Hi there Gents! Oh please, listen to my plea: Exists a Win 2000 SBS Premium, named "ZX", or better "ZX.CO.local". We wish to add two more DCs so that ? among other things - we may speed up user authentication in two remote sites. However for reasons beyond the scope of this message (previous admin) DNS Domain Name and Pre-Win2K Domain Name differ in our installation. The first is "CO.local" while the second is "NWTRADERS" (fictitious names altogether). This divergence seems to inhibit adding AD servers in our domain. We did in fact manage to add a second AD server recently, one that was already present as a member server from the initial NT4 domain days. Still, a problem in File Replication Service (NTFRS errors 13506 ?a? 13555 appearing in the DC event log) prevents it from sharing its SYSVOL and becoming an active AD server. Newly installed servers can?t even perform dcpromo: Having selected that we wish to set up an "additional domain controller for an existing domain" we reach the point where we provide user credentials and select a domain. Alas, we are immediately informed of an imminent shutdown in the next 60 seconds provoked by NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM and that "The system process C:\WINNT\SYSTEM32\SERVICES.EXE terminated unexpectedly with status code 128". Please note that these new AD server candidates run Win2K Server and that all machines are fully patched. As I considered that it was due to an erroneous/quirky installation of the new servers, I looked into this direction first. Unfortunately, my search using the status code mentioned above didn?t really provide any clues. This same problem was supposedly fixed by Win2K SP2. However, during the umpteenth installation and dcpromo I noticed that should I change ? in the 60 secs I have until the system shuts down ? the domain name that appears in the screen from "CO.local" to "NWTRADERS" (i.e. from DNS name to pre-Win2K domain name) dcpromo can indeed proceed. Needless to say it can never finish, as the system powers down, but it seems that it could finish the task. Following this I found a KB article (KB257623) that seems to be applicable to our case. Although no mention is made of the error code or of the forced shutdown, it really seems to point to a new direction. Netdiag reports no errors to speak of. What could I do to either impede the dcpromo error from incurring or reconcile the differing domain names? Is the latter going to have a negative impact to the Exchange in my SBS server? Would I have to remove and then add / reset all computer memberships in our domain? Thanks in advance for your time and consideration. Any idea or suggestion would be most welcome. Manos Petridis Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179653
  - 6
    - Login error when retrieving messages via POP3 Hello, I have a user who just got a Motorola Q phone. He wants to receive messages from our SBS 2000 server. The Q phone has options to receive mail using either POP3 or IMAP4. I configured it for POP3, but kept getting a login error. To test I also tried Outlook Express and get the same login error. The user does have remote login enabled and can view his messages via OWA. Next I tried using the administrator account on the phone. That worked. I then gave the user administrator rights, but he is still not able to login. I have been searching for a place that enables POP3 logins. Can anyone help? The server has W2k SP4 and Exchange 2000 SP3. Thank you Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179646
  - 7
    - ACCPAC with Longhorn "Windows Server 2008" Hi Can somebody please let me know when will ACCPAC start supporting Windows Server 2008 / Longhorn. Thanks, Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179642
  - 8
    - MAS 90/200 and 500 support for Longhorn "Windows Server 2008" Hi Can somebody please let me know when will MAS 90/200 and MAS 500 start supporting Windows Server 2008 / Longhorn. Thanks, Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179641
  - 9
    - Vista PC connection to SBS 2000. Can I connect a Vista PC to SBS 2000? If so how? If not is the only solution to upgrade to SBS 2003 and run the patch? What will that run me? Thanks! Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179631
  - 10
    - <<<< LAST CALL>>>>>> Survey: SBS WW Community Survey 2007: http://connect.microsoft.com/SBSCommunity/Survey/Survey.aspx?SurveyID=3232 Last call for feedback... last call for the Tshirt contest. http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2007/06/20/community-tshirts.aspx Want to tell Microsoft what you like? What you don't like? What you like about the resources? Support offerings? Tell Kevin what you had/having for dinner? This is your last chance before he comes back from vacation on Monday to give your feedback. So tell Microsoft your thoughts..... Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179623
  - 11
    - slow disk response i have sbs 2000 installed with sp4 and am having an issue with slow disk response. the kb's say to ensure the drive is on a seperate ultra ata ribbon cable (done that) and to check bios (done that) check advanced properties for dma enabled (done that) and it is still the same. i found some info on disk.sys causing the hdd to slow donw with wrtie cache enabled. i have removed that (i have a ups on the server to ensure the data is not corrupted with a crash / loss of power) still the same. however i have checked the date and tried to update the hdd driver (disk.sys) and the date is 1999 and the update says it finds a newer driver and installs but the date is the same. i have seen disk.sys files shown in various kb's with dates as new as 2005, even the i386 original disks show 2001. QUESTION: can i just copy the newer disk.sys to the wnnt\system32\drivers directory without the chance of the data being corrupted? QUESTION: sp4 will not re-apply, it says sp already applied. how can i re-apply sp4 without removing it first and then running the risk of other newer programs installed not working properly? i hope some guru out there can help, especially since sbs 2000 is not supported anymore!! Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179616
  - 12
    - DHCP server Event ID 1053 Hello, I have a problem with the DHCP server ond my SBS server 2000. It wont start. I get the following message (eventID 1053): The DHCP/BINL service on this Small Business Server has encountered another server on this network with IP Address, 192.168.2.1, belonging to the domain: . I cannot ping this adress from any computer in the network (which are 192.168.16.x adresses) I have been doing a little searching this morning, and saw 2 possible causes/solutions, both of which do not seem to work. First and foremost... you have a router that is also a DHCP server. This is not the case, I checked and DHCP is disabled on the router. A second possible casue/solution I found here: http://forums.windrivers.com/archive/index.php/t-57658.html Now I am not really an expert in these things, but some searching led me to believe this is also not the case here. I think this because of the following: I go to Admin Tools\Routing and Remote Access I expand <the server>\IP Routing\ I only see General and Static Routes and I see nothing that has to do with NAT (you can add this, I tried this and the DHCP checkbox wasn't checked, and afterwards I deleted it again). As I said, I don't fully understand the last solution, so maybe something is to be gained there, but I have a feeling that also is not the problem. Any help would be greatly appriciated. Jurre Koning (Netherlands) Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179613
  - 13
    - Impact of Partitions on RAID I am running SBS 2000 with hardware RAID (3 disks in one RAID 5 container partitioned as C: & D:). I have the Exchange database and 2 SQL databases on partition D:. I recently also moved the page file to D: when I went to 2GB RAM because C: did not have enough room to hold it. Now, as you might guess, the disk activity is heavily weighted towards the D:. Is there any incentive to split the page file between C: & D:? Does a choice of partitions have any impact on speed when both are in the same container? Thanks, Joe M Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179611
  - 14
    - Client computer access for SBS2000 Hi, This may seem like an odd question but. I have a client computer that is successfully connected to our SBS, all working fine no problems. However, I have a requirement for that client computer to be able to access the Internet without going through the SBS. I have a laptop that can successfully connect to my router and access the net without going through the SBS but I cannot get this client to do the same. What I am looking for is for the hardwired network card and cable to go through the router but to use the wireless net connector to connect to router when I need to go without SBS. When I disconnect the hardwire connection and enable wireless it simply won't connect the router. Anyone have any ideas? Thanks in advance, Gary. Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179609
  - 15
    - ISA RAS configuration?? Hello. I have a question about ISA VPN configuration. I have sbs2000 with 2 NICS configured has infomation below: Z:\>ipconfig /all Windows 2000 IP Configuration Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : golias Primary DNS Suffix . . . . . . . : CANNONHYGIENE.local Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : CANNONHYGIENE.local Ethernet adapter Internal: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : Description . . . . . . . . . . . : HP NC7781 Gigabit Server Adapter Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-0B-CD-0C-5A-5B DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.0.1 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.0.1 Primary WINS Server . . . . . . . : 10.0.0.1 Ethernet adapter External: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : Description . . . . . . . . . . . : HP NC7771 Gigabit Server Adapter Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-11-0A-86-88-3D DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.100.10 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.100.2 DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.0.1 NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Disabled The router where the ISA external card is connected is 192.168.100.2. Our branches have routers with the following IP scheme: 10.0.2.2 mask 255.255.255.0 10.0.4.2 mask 255.255.255.0 10.0.5.2 mask 255.255.255.0 10.0.6.2 mask 255.255.255.0 10.0.7.2 mask 255.255.255.0 -When i try to acess one branck from another branche everything goes well. -If i try to access the SBS network ican connect to the SBS server but i can't connect to any of the machines inside the network. -If i try to connect one branch from the a computer inside the SBS network is also not possible, only if i connect directly from the ISA server. In some posts i have read that we need to configure RAS, i'm not sure if i need to do this. Could anyone give me some ideas about what i must do, if necessary please put some aditional questions. Nuno Santos Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179608
  - 16
    - Windows Deployment Services (WDS) is it supported on Win 2003 SBS And can I use it to deploy XP PRO images to workstations? Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179605
  - 17
    - enforcing logon times in Win2K Group Policy... I have an OU where all users in the OU have the same account logon hours set. I want to set it so that if the user happens to be logged on when the logon time expires, they will be notified and then be automatically logged off or disconnected. I have a windows 2000 small business server. I did some research and did find in group policy ->Computer Configuration->Windows Settings->Security Settings->Local Policies where you can enable the automatic log off setting. So I modified the exisiting group policy to enable this feature and I also have the security settings set for this group policy so that the box 'Enforce Group Policy' is checked for all "authenticated users". I even added an individual user in there for test purposes and made sure the enforce check box was checked... I then did a gpupdate/force on teh machine the test user woul dbe logging onto. Even after doing all of this, it does not seem to work. I logged a user on using a terminal server session and let their session sit idle. It passed the account expiry time I had set for that account and nothing happened. They continued to be logged on.. So I then logged the user off and when attempting to log the user back on again, it did indicate they were unable to do so due to account restrictions... So that was good. However, what else needs to be done to ensure that if a user is logged on when the account logon time expires, they will be notified and then be automatically logged off? Thanks, Brad Thanks, Brad Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179602
  - 18
    - Recommended Max Memory for SQL - MSFW, WSUS, SBSMonitoring, SharePoint It's well known that SQL takes as much memory as it can, and several experts tell us to manually set the memory size to xxx. But what number should I use for xxx? I often see "100" as the example. I assume this means 100MB. But why that number? How could I be more methodical in picking a number? In the SQL 2005 Enterprise Manager that comes with the Premium Edition, I can pick a SQL instance, choose properties, and select the 'Memory' page. Can I get the same result by entering 100 in the field called "Maximum server memory (in MB)"? What is the recommend Maximum and Minimum for: MSFW WSUS SBSMonitoring SharePoint Thanks for your help in fixing the slowness of some services. Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179597
  - 19
    - audit logins. I would like to start an audit trail of who has logged in/out on the network and when so that I can access the trail from time to time. Can that that be done? Thanks! Joe. Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179596
  - 20
    - wat the POP3 and SMTP servers? wat the POP3 and SMTP servers? Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179593
  - 21
    - ATM issue on VPN network connection Since we have setup some ATM there are lots of problem raised that we don't know the real cause of problem. But now we have mention something related to network that also raised some problem to us. We have notice that ATM location which are installed on network where is using lease line, micro wave or fiber optic are runnning well than ATM which are installed on VPN network. The problem is that, ATM goes out of service wothout reason event we can ping to ATM ip address. We have contact to ATM vender related to network speed requirement and they replied the network speed that ATM can work is 64 kbps and there is not because of VPN or other network type. There is true in this case because lots of problem are raised on the same ATM running on VPN network. Hi reader, you may understand well about problem we facing right? If you all have any commend related to this problem could share with us to sold it. Thanks you very much in advance. Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179592
  - 22
    - MI5 Persecution: Stasi 21/4/96 (16079) Subject: Chief Constable Alderson Condemns "Stasi" MI5 Newsgroups:uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,soc.culture.british Organization: Toronto Free-Net Summary: Keywords: John Alderson, former Chief Constable of Devon and Cornwall, had the following to say about the expansion of the Security Service's powers, in a recent magazine article; "It is fatal to let the secret service into the area of ordinary crime. MI5 is not under the same restraints as the police. They infiltrate organisations, people's jobs and lives. They operate almost like a cancer." "At the moment the acorn of a Stasi [the former East German communists' secret service] has been planted. It is there for future governments to build on." The message is clear. Criminal subversion and criminal harassment by an unpoliced minority not subject to the law, "infiltration of people's jobs and lives" is with us today. 16079 Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179591
  - 23
    - MI5 Persecution: Leant On 7/4/96 (14565) From: Green <Green@guidion.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: Why Aren't the British Police Doing Their Job? Reply-To: Green@guidion.demon.co.uk Date: Sun Apr 7 21:13:30 1996 In article <DpIE0r.736.0.bloor@torfree.net> bu765@torfree.net "Mike Corley" writes: > Last Easter (1995) I went into the local police station in London and spoke to > an officer about the harassment against me. But I couldn't provide tangible > evidence; what people said, in many cases years ago, is beyond proof, and > without something to support my statements I cannot expect a police officer to > take the complaint seriously. This in itself dos not suggest that the police have it in for you. The old bill operates on extremely tight spending limits forced on them by that pillock Michael Howard, and without evidence, they often have higher priorities than chasing something that cannot go to court. I doubt that the police are actually being leant on, but they probably realise that if they looked into this, they would be leant on hard. The met always stays away from anything that looks like it has Defence, Security or secret service interest already, because they realise that they are below these government agencies in the general pecking order. This attitude was made clear in a TV show where a left wing comedian heckled some aristocratic Tory candidate in a local election. The police officer gave the comic a ticking off, even though you could see that this young copper sympathised with the comedian, and regarded the Tory as an upper-crust wanker. He said, and I quote "I'm giving you the ticking off and not him because he's a Lord and I'm a Police Constable." If I walked into my local nick and complained that MI5 were snooping on me, they would show me the door without even looking at my evidence, because that bored desk seargant with only five years to go before he retires doesn't want to start fucking about with somebody who has incurred the wrath of Stella Rimington. He would rather deal with the lost dogs and driving licence producers, eat his cheese and pickle sandwiches and piss off home at the end of his shift than have some high ranking spook having a go at his boss and getting him a bollocking. In short, you have earned much sympathy but little surprise. Just remember that saying about the enemy of your enemies. Have a nice day. ******************************************* QUOTE OF THE DAY****************** * You have just read the opinons of : * "Common sense is merely the set * * * of prejudices a person acquires* ========================================================================= Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: Why Aren't the British Police Doing Their Job? Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british Followup-To: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british References: <DpIE0r.736.0.bloor@torfree.net> Organization: Toronto Free-Net Distribution: >This in itself dos not suggest that the police have it in for you. >The old bill operates on extremely tight spending limits forced on >them by that pillock Michael Howard, and without evidence, they >often have higher priorities than chasing something that cannot go >to court. I think the police know well what's going on. It is up to them to do something about it. They know I've made a complaint at a police station. I could probably do more to try to help myself (I think someone suggested making a written complaint to the chief constable) but even then I nthink they would not take action. > >I doubt that the police are actually being leant on, but they probably >realise that if they looked into this, they would be leant on hard. >The met always stays away from anything that looks like it has Defence, >Security or secret service interest already, because they realise that >they are below these government agencies in the general pecking order. > So we have a situation where the security service breaks the law, everyone knows MI5 breaks the law, and the police won't investigate crimes that would otherwise earn a jail sentence. Oh good, I'm really glad the UK is a democracy. (<sarcasm>, for those of you who didn't catch that) >If I walked into my local nick and complained that MI5 were snooping on me, >they would show me the door without even looking at my evidence, because >that bored desk seargant with only five years to go before he retires >doesn't want to start fucking about with somebody who has incurred the >wrath of Stella Rimington. He would rather deal with the lost dogs and >driving licence producers, eat his cheese and pickle sandwiches and piss >off home at the end of his shift than have some high ranking spook having >a go at his boss and getting him a bollocking. In this case I think it is 'high-ranking' police officers who are aware of the persecution, they know a complaint has been made, and they're doing nothing. What is more, I don't think there is anything I can do that would make them take action, both because they may be being 'leant on' and through the wider view that it could be deleterious to the state to have a persecution by state organs exposed. They're wrong in taking that point of view, because sooner or later this will all out anyway, and they it will be n years of police inaction (n>=6) that will be questioned. > >In short, you have earned much sympathy but little surprise. Just remember >that saying about the enemy of your enemies. > >Have a nice day. 14565 Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179590
  - 24
    - MI5 Persecution: Shoot to Kill 4/4/96 (13051) Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british From: jbaker@pobox.com (Jill Baker) Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: How and Why Did it Start? Reply-To: jbaker@pobox.com Date: Thu Apr 4 05:03:01 1996 jbaker@pobox.com (Jill Baker) wrote: >bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) wrote: >>Why would >>the security services expend hundreds of thousands of pounds and more than fiv >>years of manpower to try to kill a British citizen? Because ... >So why didn't they just shoot you dead? >It would have been a lot cheaper. Please make the effort to respond to this point Mike. It was a serious question. Jill (my opinions are entirely my own, no-one else's) ================================================================= Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: How and Why Did it Start? Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british Followup-To: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british References: <Dp5IAr.1EB.0.bloor@torfree.net> Organization: Toronto Free-Net Distribution: jbaker@pobox.com (Jill Baker) wrote: >bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) wrote: >>Why would >>the security services expend hundreds of thousands of pounds and more than fiv >>years of manpower to try to kill a British citizen? Because ... >So why didn't they just shoot you dead? >It would have been a lot cheaper. I think there are two reasons nobody has taken physical action as opposed to verbal; a) A lot of people "know". Perhaps you the reader might not know, but lots of people in the media etc do. Remember, I was born in the UK and lived there until a couple of years ago. I don't think these people would condone state-sponsored murder of someone who might be seen on a good day as one of their own. b) Rather than doind anything directly, they're going for spying, verbal harassment, media harassment, every form of persecution short of the physical. Because as soon as anything turns physical, the police become involved; and unless it turns physical, the police can shrug and say 'not our problem'. So they persecute you and try to get you to react, either by hitting one of them (in which case I clearly find myself in the wrong as far as the police are concerned), or by trying to harm myself (in which case they can pretend they weren't responsible). It's a pretty unproductive form of harassment actually, because if you don't react then they're wasting they're time. Or perhaps they're just cheap bullies and trying to wreck someone's life, without any ulterior motive? 13051 Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179589
  - 25
    - MI5 Persecution: Email Cruelty 11/3/96 (11537) From: D.S.Toube@qmw.ac.uk (David Toube) Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.legal,uk.media,soc.culture.british Subject: Re: Why Censorship Must Not Be Allowed on Uk.* Reply-To: D.S.Toube@qmw.ac.uk Date: Mon Mar 11 11:47:13 1996 A OSHINEYE <TA5330@QMWCC7.qmw.ac.uk> wrote: :D.S.Toube@qmw.ac.uk (David Toube) wrote: :>I would also be very pleased if Mike Corley would not mailbomb me :>via my university account with messages entitled 'This Is What :>You Get For Censorship', thus closing down the entire college :>email system. :> :>Although it does not personally inconvenience me, it is rather :>dull for the college. :When did this happen? BTW you can always use Pegasus Mail to send all :email from Corley's address back to him and see how he likes it. :--Ade : This weekend. The result, Mike Corley will be gratified to hear, was that all users of the college system were prevented from using email. I suspect that there is no stopping Mike Corley. If mail is automatically returned to him, he will return it back to you tenfold. If he is thrown off his account, as he surely will be, he will find another one. I do not care whether Mike Corley has an email account or not. It is a matter of supreme indifference to me whether his fanciful account of persecution is aired or not. If he thinks that he has been persecuted by M15 and Chris Tarrant, then that is a matter for him. But there is a world of difference between repeatedly spamming usenet - which is unacceptable - and setting up a Web Site containing his post, which is entirely acceptable. Then it will be possible to choose whether or not to partake of his fantasy. However although I would not like to see the censorship of posts because they demonstrate evidence of mental illness, I suspect that Mike Corley will inevitably be censored by his ISP following a number of complaints of usenet abuse and mailbombing. ---- David Toube Lecturer in Law QMW, University of London WWW: http://www.qmw.ac.uk/~ugtl027/index.html David Boothroyd's British Elections Home Page WWW: http://www.qmw.ac.uk/~laws/election/home.html 11537 Tag: terminal server group policy Tag: 179588

I have set the 'Environment' tab in many users AD user profile to start a
particular application at logon. This has been working just fine - UNTIL I
modifed a GPO by adding the terminal server policies to my Windows 2000 SBS
machine and then set some of the computer 'Terminal Server' policies
settings. I did NOT set the policy where you can specify a program to run at
start up entitled 'Start a program on connection'. It shows as 'Not
Configured' for both the computer and user configurations. However, now what
is happening is that when a user logs onto our terminal server they are
seeing the desktop instead of it starting the application I specified in the
environment settings in their user profile.

Any idea what may be happening here and what I can do tomake sure that the
startup program specified in a users profile is run when they log on?

Thanks, Brad

Top

Re: terminal server group policy by John

John
Mon Aug 20 15:20:45 CDT 2007

If you turn off the GPO Policy does the application run on the user login?

--
John Oliver, Jr
MCSE, MCT, CCNA
Exchange MVP 2007
Microsoft Certified Partner

"Brad Pears" <bradp@truenorthloghomes.com> wrote in message
news:evUeii04HHA.600@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>I have set the 'Environment' tab in many users AD user profile to start a
>particular application at logon. This has been working just fine - UNTIL I
>modifed a GPO by adding the terminal server policies to my Windows 2000 SBS
>machine and then set some of the computer 'Terminal Server' policies
>settings. I did NOT set the policy where you can specify a program to run
>at start up entitled 'Start a program on connection'. It shows as 'Not
>Configured' for both the computer and user configurations. However, now
>what is happening is that when a user logs onto our terminal server they
>are seeing the desktop instead of it starting the application I specified
>in the environment settings in their user profile.
>
> Any idea what may be happening here and what I can do tomake sure that the
> startup program specified in a users profile is run when they log on?
>
> Thanks, Brad
>

Top