Re: proccessor at 100% after RAM upgrade. by Bond
Bond
Tue Jul 08 10:41:11 CDT 2003
As a general practice I do set the RAM in size order, biggest goes to zero.
so it is set up 512-0 256-1 256-1.
but I will remove the NEW RAm tommorrow to check..
"Ken F" <TechAdmin@NO-SPAM.IwantIntegrity.com> wrote in message
news:%231e7XZWRDHA.560@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Take out the new RAM and see if the issue resolves. Also, some PE
> machines....I am not sure about the 1400 require that you place the
largest
> module in slot 0, so for instance if your 1GB was broken down into 3
DIMMs,
> you would put the 512 in slot 0 and the 2- 256 DIMMs in slots 1 and 2
>
> Hope this helps
> "Bond..James Bond" <kciyber@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:eF$TFQWRDHA.1688@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > Dell Poweredge 1400SC SBS2K,
> > (not SBSSP1)
> > ISA SP1
> > win2kSP3
> > EXchange SP4
> > had 512Megs upgraded to 1 gig Ram
> > DSL connection Dual NIC setup
> > Upgraded the RAM to 1 GB, restarted and now REPGEN.exe is killing the
> > processor. it runs between 87 and 100% and there are 3 instances of
> > repgen.exe working at the same time. the one that takes all the
processor
> > also has an increasing amount of ram being allocated to it, the other 2
> are
> > stable. after theRam aloocates to about 50,000KB it recycles and starts
> over
> > at 12,000 KB
> >
> > am i being paranoid or is this normal??
> >
> >
>
>