Anyone else noticed that SUS 1.x suddenly seemed to 'un-approve' (i.e.
display as unticked) lots of previously 'approved' patches?

Re: SUS oddity after WMF patch by Dave

Dave
Mon Jan 09 12:50:54 CST 2006

Did this happen to you more than once, or have you not run SUS since
December 12? I saw the issue reported in this article, but it didn't happen
again with the most recent updates.

Previously approved software updates may be unapproved if you synchronize a
server that is running SUS 1.0 with SP1 after December 12, 2005
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/912307/en-us


"Nous" <nouser@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:etv2YKSFGHA.1312@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Anyone else noticed that SUS 1.x suddenly seemed to 'un-approve' (i.e.
> display as unticked) lots of previously 'approved' patches?
>
>
>



Re: SUS oddity after WMF patch by Nous

Nous
Tue Jan 10 19:14:49 CST 2006

Thanks for this, had missed it.

May be Dec 12 thing - has occurred on 2 servers so shall check it out.




"Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]" <gwdibble@NOSPAM.frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:OIqkg2UFGHA.2012@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> Did this happen to you more than once, or have you not run SUS since
> December 12? I saw the issue reported in this article, but it didn't
> happen again with the most recent updates.
>
> Previously approved software updates may be unapproved if you synchronize
> a server that is running SUS 1.0 with SP1 after December 12, 2005
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/912307/en-us
>
>
> "Nous" <nouser@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:etv2YKSFGHA.1312@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> Anyone else noticed that SUS 1.x suddenly seemed to 'un-approve' (i.e.
>> display as unticked) lots of previously 'approved' patches?
>>
>>
>>
>
>