Pat
Tue Feb 14 11:44:44 CST 2006
No not massive. I guess it depends how full you let your folders get.
But a very nice feature.
"Joe Letter" <nojunk@nojunk.com> wrote in message
news:uVjrDRuJGHA.1452@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Are the PDF's _huge_ ??
>
>
> "Pat Horridge" <pat@remove-spam.vet.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:dr80dh$66t$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk...
>> Slightly off topic but:
>> Discovered the other day that Adobe Acrobat Prof V7 has an outlook
>> feature that allows a whole folder to be converted to a PDF document.
>> With a contents table that shows sorted by, date, subject, and sender.
>> Makes an ideal way to archive those very old e-mails off the exchange
>> server but still have them at hand and searchable.
>> I've been using it a lot to archive things. Much more flexible than .pst
>> files.
>>
>> "SuperGumby [SBS MVP]" <not@your.nellie> wrote in message
>> news:%2300aCZZIGHA.1312@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>>> the limit has never been an "SBS" limit, it is a limit of Exchange
>>> Server Standard Edition. ALL Exch server standard editions were
>>> similarly limited.
>>>
>>> Exchange Server 2003 SP2 has expanded the database limit to 75GB.
>>>
>>> I believe this is a bad idea. People should be encouraged to MANAGE
>>> their email, not archiving but DELETING old mail, not using Exchange as
>>> a file store but properly moving those files to either filespace or
>>> companyweb.
>>>
>>> I also believe I'm as bad as the worst of your users. My mailbox is 2GB,
>>> most of which I haven't referenced in 5 years and probably won't ever
>>> call upon again, but it's there, and handy.
>>>
>>> Do as I say, NOT as I do. :-)
>>>
>>> "Music Lover" <music@my-heart.org> wrote in message
>>> news:OFwafbXIGHA.2668@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>>>> does the 16G limit also applies to public information store?
>>>> pub1.edb+pub1.stm cannot be > 16GB?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> "Steve" <newsgroup@public.lan> wrote in message
>>>> news:uaNR4WXIGHA.2696@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>>>> Yes best to remove it. Any reason you're not upgrading to SBS 2003?
>>>> With
>>>> Exchange 2003 SP1 the database limit is increased and SBS 2003 has so
>>>> many
>>>> good features at a very reasonable upgrade price.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Music Lover" <music@my-heart.org> wrote in message
>>>> news:O7LH$uWIGHA.1876@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>>>>>I have increased the 16G limit to 17G according to this article
>>>>>
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/813051
>>>>>
>>>>> after that I have deleted many emails and do the offline defrag
>>>>>
>>>>> now priv1.edb+priv1.stm shrink to 7GB, which is well below the limit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Shall I just removed that registry key now?
>>>>>
>>>>> as I read this in the article
>>>>>
>>>>> "Apply it only to systems that specifically require it."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>