We have Shavlik Netchk Protect ver 5.9 that allows you to use a remote SQL
Server DB for the backend. The product is much more robust when configured
this way.

Before configuring however, I need to upgrade our instance of SQL Server
installed on the SBS to at least SP3. A quick search tells me that the
latest SQL Server 2000 service pack is SP4.

When I looked at the MS documentation for the service pack, it did not list
Small Business Server 2000 in teh list of "supported operating systems".

Can someone confirm for me if it will be ok to download and install SP4 on
our Windows 2000 SBS machine?

Thanks, Brad

Re: installing the latest SQL Server service pack on SBS by Dave

Dave
Fri Dec 07 11:23:08 PST 2007


"Brad Pears" <bradp@truenorthloghomes.com> wrote in message
news:%23kHOszPOIHA.5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> We have Shavlik Netchk Protect ver 5.9 that allows you to use a remote SQL
> Server DB for the backend. The product is much more robust when configured
> this way.
>
> Before configuring however, I need to upgrade our instance of SQL Server
> installed on the SBS to at least SP3. A quick search tells me that the
> latest SQL Server 2000 service pack is SP4.
>
> When I looked at the MS documentation for the service pack, it did not
> list Small Business Server 2000 in teh list of "supported operating
> systems".
>
> Can someone confirm for me if it will be ok to download and install SP4 on
> our Windows 2000 SBS machine?
>
> Thanks, Brad
>

It should be no problem, but since I have no knowledge of what software you
might be running that uses the SQL instance, I would just point out that you
should research any "gotchas" that could occur with said software when
upgrading the DBMS.

DS



Re: installing the latest SQL Server service pack on SBS by Brad

Brad
Fri Dec 07 11:56:26 PST 2007

Thanks...

Actually at this point, we are not really using SQL Server on our SBS box
very much at all. I am using it as a test environment for our .NET apps that
use SQL Server (we have a separate "live" Windows 2000 SQL server box but I
do not want Shavliks patch DB on that machine) and it is also being used for
our Blackberry Enterprise Server db and that is it. So I should be good to
go really. However, I will pose the question to blackberry to make sure that
their stuff will still run on SP4.

Thanks for the help.

Brad


"Dave Stoecker" <david_stoecker@hotCOFFEEmail.com> wrote in message
news:uRXccaQOIHA.4752@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>
> "Brad Pears" <bradp@truenorthloghomes.com> wrote in message
> news:%23kHOszPOIHA.5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> We have Shavlik Netchk Protect ver 5.9 that allows you to use a remote
>> SQL Server DB for the backend. The product is much more robust when
>> configured this way.
>>
>> Before configuring however, I need to upgrade our instance of SQL Server
>> installed on the SBS to at least SP3. A quick search tells me that the
>> latest SQL Server 2000 service pack is SP4.
>>
>> When I looked at the MS documentation for the service pack, it did not
>> list Small Business Server 2000 in teh list of "supported operating
>> systems".
>>
>> Can someone confirm for me if it will be ok to download and install SP4
>> on our Windows 2000 SBS machine?
>>
>> Thanks, Brad
>>
>
> It should be no problem, but since I have no knowledge of what software
> you might be running that uses the SQL instance, I would just point out
> that you should research any "gotchas" that could occur with said software
> when upgrading the DBMS.
>
> DS
>



Re: installing the latest SQL Server service pack on SBS by Cris

Cris
Fri Dec 07 12:52:56 PST 2007

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_00F3_01C838E0.DA76FD00
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

SP4 for SQL has been out for quite a while...and I don't think you'll =
have any issues...remember that it will also need to update MSDE =
instannces


--=20
Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
-------------------------------------------------
Microsoft MVPs
Independent Experts (MVPs do not work for MS)
Real World Answers
---------------------------------------------------------
Please do not contact me directly regarding issues

"Brad Pears" <bradp@truenorthloghomes.com> wrote in message =
news:%23ifQtqQOIHA.3816@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
Thanks...

Actually at this point, we are not really using SQL Server on our SBS =
box=20
very much at all. I am using it as a test environment for our .NET =
apps that=20
use SQL Server (we have a separate "live" Windows 2000 SQL server box =
but I=20
do not want Shavliks patch DB on that machine) and it is also being =
used for=20
our Blackberry Enterprise Server db and that is it. So I should be =
good to=20
go really. However, I will pose the question to blackberry to make =
sure that=20
their stuff will still run on SP4.

Thanks for the help.

Brad


"Dave Stoecker" <david_stoecker@hotCOFFEEmail.com> wrote in message=20
news:uRXccaQOIHA.4752@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>
> "Brad Pears" <bradp@truenorthloghomes.com> wrote in message=20
> news:%23kHOszPOIHA.5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> We have Shavlik Netchk Protect ver 5.9 that allows you to use a =
remote=20
>> SQL Server DB for the backend. The product is much more robust when =

>> configured this way.
>>
>> Before configuring however, I need to upgrade our instance of SQL =
Server=20
>> installed on the SBS to at least SP3. A quick search tells me that =
the=20
>> latest SQL Server 2000 service pack is SP4.
>>
>> When I looked at the MS documentation for the service pack, it did =
not=20
>> list Small Business Server 2000 in teh list of "supported operating =

>> systems".
>>
>> Can someone confirm for me if it will be ok to download and install =
SP4=20
>> on our Windows 2000 SBS machine?
>>
>> Thanks, Brad
>>
>
> It should be no problem, but since I have no knowledge of what =
software=20
> you might be running that uses the SQL instance, I would just point =
out=20
> that you should research any "gotchas" that could occur with said =
software=20
> when upgrading the DBMS.
>
> DS
>=20


------=_NextPart_000_00F3_01C838E0.DA76FD00
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.3199" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>SP4 for SQL has been out for quite a =
while...and I=20
don't think you'll have any issues...remember that it will also need to =
update=20
MSDE instannces</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><BR>-- <BR>Cris Hanna=20
[SBS-MVP]<BR>-------------------------------------------------<BR>Microso=
ft=20
MVPs<BR>&nbsp;Independent Experts (MVPs do not work for MS)<BR>Real =
World=20
Answers<BR>---------------------------------------------------------<BR>P=
lease=20
do not contact me directly regarding issues<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Brad Pears" &lt;<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:bradp@truenorthloghomes.com">bradp@truenorthloghomes.com</=
A>&gt;=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:%23ifQtqQOIHA.3816@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl">news:%23ifQtqQOIHA.=
3816@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl</A>...</DIV>Thanks...<BR><BR>Actually=20
at this point, we are not really using SQL Server on our SBS box =
<BR>very much=20
at all. I am using it as a test environment for our .NET apps that =
<BR>use SQL=20
Server (we have a separate "live" Windows 2000 SQL server box but I =
<BR>do not=20
want Shavliks patch DB on that machine) and it is also being used for =
<BR>our=20
Blackberry Enterprise Server db and that is it. So I should be good to =
<BR>go=20
really. However, I will pose the question to blackberry to make sure =
that=20
<BR>their stuff will still run on SP4.<BR><BR>Thanks for the=20
help.<BR><BR>Brad<BR><BR><BR>"Dave Stoecker" &lt;<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:david_stoecker@hotCOFFEEmail.com">david_stoecker@hotCOFFEE=
mail.com</A>&gt;=20
wrote in message <BR><A=20
=
href=3D"news:uRXccaQOIHA.4752@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl">news:uRXccaQOIHA.4752=
@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl</A>...<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;=20
"Brad Pears" &lt;<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:bradp@truenorthloghomes.com">bradp@truenorthloghomes.com</=
A>&gt;=20
wrote in message <BR>&gt; <A=20
=
href=3D"news:%23kHOszPOIHA.5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl">news:%23kHOszPOIHA.=
5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl</A>...<BR>&gt;&gt;=20
We have Shavlik Netchk Protect ver 5.9 that allows you to use a remote =

<BR>&gt;&gt; SQL Server DB for the backend. The product is much more =
robust=20
when <BR>&gt;&gt; configured this way.<BR>&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt;&gt; Before=20
configuring however, I need to upgrade our instance of SQL Server =
<BR>&gt;&gt;=20
installed on the SBS to at least SP3. A quick search tells me that the =

<BR>&gt;&gt; latest SQL Server 2000 service pack is=20
SP4.<BR>&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt;&gt; When I looked at the MS documentation for =
the=20
service pack, it did not <BR>&gt;&gt; list Small Business Server 2000 =
in teh=20
list of "supported operating <BR>&gt;&gt; =
systems".<BR>&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt;&gt;=20
Can someone confirm for me if it will be ok to download and install =
SP4=20
<BR>&gt;&gt; on our Windows 2000 SBS machine?<BR>&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt;&gt; =
Thanks,=20
Brad<BR>&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; It should be no problem, but since I =
have no=20
knowledge of what software <BR>&gt; you might be running that uses the =
SQL=20
instance, I would just point out <BR>&gt; that you should research any =

"gotchas" that could occur with said software <BR>&gt; when upgrading =
the=20
DBMS.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; DS<BR>&gt; <BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_00F3_01C838E0.DA76FD00--