Not sure about this one but it kind of doesn't seem normal
to me so anyone who has words of wisdom, it's muchly
apprecaited.

For some reason the root of C: has one permission set,
everyone / full control.

Seems scary to me and I don't know how it exactly happened
but I have suspicisions. Is there anywhere changes to
permissions are logged and by whom?

I have TID's and documents suggested in a previous post but
they don't say much regarding the root of C except to say
adjust as necessary. I can't imagine root of C:
everyone/full access is necessary.

Suggestions? Thanks again.

Re: default permissions revisited by Martin

Martin
Thu Sep 09 16:09:19 CDT 2004

thanks anyway, figured it out

>>> Martin Stepanek<martin@image-technology.com> 09/09/2004
8:32:19 am >>>
Not sure about this one but it kind of doesn't seem normal
to me so anyone who has words of wisdom, it's muchly
apprecaited.

For some reason the root of C: has one permission set,
everyone / full control.

Seems scary to me and I don't know how it exactly happened
but I have suspicisions. Is there anywhere changes to
permissions are logged and by whom?

I have TID's and documents suggested in a previous post but
they don't say much regarding the root of C except to say
adjust as necessary. I can't imagine root of C:
everyone/full access is necessary.

Suggestions? Thanks again.




default permissions revisited by rick

rick
Sun Sep 12 17:38:58 CDT 2004

I think it's a default setting for share permissions,
which is actually limited by the NTFS permission
inheritance and any group policy. This whole area is a
bit of a minefield.

Cheers,

Rick

>-----Original Message-----
>Not sure about this one but it kind of doesn't seem normal
>to me so anyone who has words of wisdom, it's muchly
>apprecaited.
>
>For some reason the root of C: has one permission set,
>everyone / full control.
>
>Seems scary to me and I don't know how it exactly happened
>but I have suspicisions. Is there anywhere changes to
>permissions are logged and by whom?
>
>I have TID's and documents suggested in a previous post
but
>they don't say much regarding the root of C except to say
>adjust as necessary. I can't imagine root of C:
>everyone/full access is necessary.
>
>Suggestions? Thanks again.
>.
>