Terminal Services Logon

TheMSsForum.com: The Microsoft Software Forum

The MSS Forum ‹ smallbiz
- Archive
  - Biz
  - MCSE
  - CRM
  - Drivers
  - Framework
  - ADO
  - ASP
  - Compact
  - Forms
  - Dotnet
  - C#
  - VB
  - FontpageGen
  - Excel
  - WorkSheet
  - Exchange
  - Setup
  - Fox
  - Fontpage
  - ASP
  - IIS
  - Entourage
  - Money
  - Messanger
  - PocketPC
  - Powerpoint
  - Project
  - Publisher
  - Excel
  - VB
  - Security
  - Portal
  - Services
  - SQLServerDev
  - SVCS
  - SQLServer
  - VB
  - VC
  - MFC
  - ExcelGen

- Previous
  - 1
    - USER LAN Settings access. Hi, I have a group of users who need on a regular basis to be able to change the LAN settings (more correctly enable or disable proxy settings) in Internet Explorer. I.E. Tools > Internet Options > Connections > LAN Settings. I would like to create a group in AD to achieve this that I can then add the necessary users to. One way I am aware is to add these users to the Domain Admins group, I don't want to do this! Could anyone advise on this please? Thanks Gawen. Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179554
  - 2
    - Must Read An excellent resource on ISA Server providing in depth knowledge of configuration, ISA Control service, Single-homed ISA server features and much more. Worth reading!! http://www.brsx.co.uk/Networking/Articles/ISAServer/isaart.asp Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179553
  - 3
    - Moving shared folders Hi I've just added some additional space to my RAID array, and want to move some existing shared folders/files to better balance disk space usage. How can I do this without cutting off my users? Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179549
  - 4
    - hi hi, all friends....... Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179548
  - 5
    - Limit external email access Hi to all, I have a user that the owner wants restricted external mail to Send/Receive from only 2 specific external addresses (mother & sister). Does anyone know of a way to do this? I can filter the "Receive" with Sunbelt Messaging Ninja but I can't find anything on the "Send". SBS 2000 Exchange 2000 Thanks, Teddy Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179540
  - 6
    - Great Computing Surface for Road Warriors I'm sharing with you my secret of the ultimate comfort using a laptop. Working with a laptop desk helps cool my laptop and it's a lot more easier to handle. The painful experience of aching wrists, strained neck and back is a story of the past with ergonomic typing and viewing angles. I feel more at ease with the wide mousing area and raised screen. It only pops-up one question in my mind "Why didn't I buy it earlier? Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179539
  - 7
    - MI5 Persecution: Goldfish and Piranha 29/9/95 (5481) I just thought I'd let you know what I've been reading into the "Crusader" spam. I don't want to post this to usenet because somebody might try to tie that in to my posts in some way (someone already has, in uk.misc). First of all, I'd like to ask you to believe that my phone line in my apartment is bugged, and has been for many months. I have moved a couple of times this year, but "they" have faithfully been on my trail. Anyway, let's suppose my phone line is bugged. Now, when I talk to my internet service provider, it's over a SLIP (now PPP) connection. So if you wanted to bug what was said, either you'd listen in over the line and have to decode the transmission, or you could go to the service provider (more difficult) and ask them to decode a particular user's connection. OK, so now they're listening to everything I do over my SLIP/PPP connection. A couple of months ago I was messing around with faking articles through nntp servers and through anonymous remailers. I chose a nice inconspicuous newsgroup for my little tests, something no-one would ever notice. Guess which newsgroup I chose??? Yes, _FISH_!!! or rec.aquaria to be precise And guess what articles I tried to post? Goldfish, Koi carp and, you'll never guess... PIRANHA!!! The goldfish article and the Koi went through, but the piranha didn';t appear. by now you probably think this is too silly for words. But if you look in the papers a few eeks ago you will find John Major, Tonny Blair and Paddy Ashdown sharing a "private joke" about Major's sunburnt goldfish. We haven't had anything about Koi yet (they must be too dull ). Now, sent by someone who clearly knew what they were doing (they chose an Italian backbone site for their launch point) we have many thousands of messages to people all over the globe. All about piranha, and with the punchline "that gives you something to think about, doesn't it?" The way it works is that they're trying to kill two birds with one stone again. I don't knoiw why they should be against these national alliance people, but my interpretation is that they simultaneously try to discredit them, and stem the flow of Corley articles. ================================================================= In article <DFnE55.8tF.0.bloor@torfree.net>, Mike Corley <bu765@torfree.net> wrote: > >John J Smith (J.J.Smith@ftel.co.uk) wrote: > >: b) we do know who you are. Or are you someone else we don't know about? >: You are currently known as "That bloody persistant net nutter, who's >: expanding from uk.misc to the rest of the world". > >I think the point I was trying to make is that I could tell you things >from my personal life, at home and at work, which would add credibility >to my story. But if I named people, then (a) they would object violently >to being included in this shenanigans, and (b) I would be revealing my >identity which would be bad for my personal life and my work life. Of >course some people in my personal life, and at work, do know who "mike >corley" is. But at least we're observing a studied silence for now. :People can always be called "MR X", to save them being named. : :I'm completely perplexed as to what you mean by b). Revealing identity? :To who? And why would this be bad for any part of your life when you :already have a less than respectful reputation here? I'll just enumerate one or two things that I can still remember. Sometime around August/Sept 1992 I was living in a house in Oxford, and coming out of the house was physically attacked by someone - not punched, just grabbed by the coat, with some verbals thrown in for good measure. That was something the people at work shouldn't have known about... but soon after a couple of people were talking right in front of me about, "yeah, I heard he was attacked". Again, one I went for a walk in some woods outside Oxford. The next day, at work, someone said "you know he went to the forest yesterday". I don't want to put details on usenet of what happened because to do so would be to risk it happening again. If you put ideas in peoples' heads then you can find them reflecting back at you, and I don't want that. Also I can't remember that much from three years ago. From november 1992 I started taking "major tranquilizers" and just blotted the whole thing from my mind. >This is a feature time and time again, that the security services >(presumed) get at you by manipulating other people around you to get at >you. If you have their contacts, manpower, resources and technology then >you can do that sort of thing. :But why? Are you a threat? They pretend they "have" to get at me. After the first few weeks they had to find a reason to spy and abuse. You can't abuse someone unless they're in the wrong in some way. What I did "wrong" was to be ill. So it became "nutter" and "monster" and "he's going to attack us" coupled with "ha ha ha, he can't do anything to defend himself, it was so funny". That obvious contradiction within their propaganda is something they blithely ignore. :So, the Security Services never *actually* appear, and you assume that :they get someone else to do your dirty work. This is a bit of a big :logical step, here: That person doesn't like me, or is causing me trouble, :it's not because they've got problems themselves, it must be the "Security :Services". Yes. Because people are infallible. Or is there more? A single source is indicated because of the range of harassment. BBC + Capital + manipulated_public_at_large + set_up_situations, what does that add up to? Add in the technology to carry out the covert spying and the manpower and knowhow to follow you around for five years without being spotted. It smells very much of the security services, because there is no other organization (to my knowledge) which does the things I've seen these people do. Remember, they have deliberately chosen the softest of soft targets to victimize. They purposely chose a mentally ill person who they thought would be likely to kill himself anyway, so that they could get away with murder. And in all likelihood it will have started as a personal vendetta by someone. Who could that be? I don't know, but I can give you some clues. The first possibility (deep breath) is that someone from my college set me up. Six years ago I graduated from university in the UK, during the last year there I was steadily getting more and more ill. I know that I was talking in my sleep; although I don't know what I was saying, it got me a reputation, and if someone from my college talked afterwards to the "wrong" people then that could be the reason for all that has followed. I think that's the strongest contender for source. Directly beneath my room lived another bloke who frequently had his friends round late at night, after the time that I went to sleep. So they could have heard what I was saying in my sleep, and that could have got me the reputation for "talking to myself". What I don't know is why that should have rebounded a year after I left. You'd think it would have happened sooner; it's a bit odd to wait for a year and then start abuse. That leads me to question what in particular happened around May/June 1990 for them to start then. >What I don't know is how it looks from the other side, from the side of >the people who are being manipulated to get at me. On a couple of >occasions I have challenged people to tell the truth of the matter, but >they have alwats ducked the challenge. :Have you ever considered the possibility, that you have made a mistake, and :the people don't know what you are talking about? Yes. I am currently considering the possibility that some people around me know only what is being posted on Usenet, and have not been "contacted" by "them". But I _know_ that others have been contacted. :What words? Are they in common use? Could they be a catchphrase of a :popular comedian?: "Nice to see you, to see you nice"? In England the all-time No. 1 is "nutter". Easter this year, returning home from Clapham police station to report five years of harassment ("we're not saying it's happening and we're not saying it isn't happening"), another "not happening" incident of harassment when a cowardly little slut did her country proud by yelling "nutter, nutter, nutter" in the face of the hated enemy. What can you do about that? You can't yell abuse back in their face, because they know they're supported by their peers, by the media, by the murderers in the security forces. You can't put them down when the fascist establishment is on their side. You can't hit them, because they would deny their abuse, they would deny knowing anything, and bring charges against the "nutter" who attacked them "at random". >You know, you're >passing saomeone, they're hardly going to construct an argument for your >benefit, so they work a word of abuse into the conversation which they >can giggle at. :Abuse such as what? We're all adults here, we can take it. Is this abuse :aimed at you? How can you tell it is? I think I've said already what the words are. Thing is, at any given time the language is consistent. In January everyone's calling you X, then a few weeks later people stop calling you X and start calling you Y. You can tell it's aimed at me, because when people repeatedly say the same words are you walk past, then laugh, you would have to be hard of understanding not to recognize it. >Or they repeat something that's been said somewhere else... the PE thing >being a case in point. PE says it, then other people pick up the refrain. :Remind me who PE is again. PE = "Private Eye" >: >To give you an example, which I mentioned in another posting. In around >: >October 1992, Private Eye ran a cover with the heading "Major's support >: >lowest ever", with John calling to Norma on the cover "come back, Norma". >: >Only one obvious interpretation to that, isn';;t there? I certainly >: >thought so when I saw that cover. Wrongo!! Down the pub with people from work >: >Simon says to phil, "don';t you think it's wrong then?" phil says, "well >: >private eye are usuallyright"..."hislop strikes again.. > >: Erm. Mike? Heeeelllllooo? What are you on about. What is the other >: interpretation then? Norma having an affair? Seems a bit wrong, with the >: heading "Majors support Lowest ever"... > >No, this one isn't obvious , it really does need to be explained. I >certainly didn't understand it when I first saw it. You see, the kernel >of vitriol is in the words "come back". At the time, the themes of >abuse were centred around interpretations of those two words (stretch your >mind a little bit, I don't have to spell it out for you, surely). :You did in your mail item. : :You seem to be scouting about something called a "Double Entendre". The :inference being "Come" = Ejaculation, "Back" = Anus (not the first part :of the body I would have went for, I would have foolishly gone for "Back", :silly old me). : :You see to have picked a sodomy double entendre out of a Private Eye :headline. They are everywhere. The English language has much double :meaning in it, and if you put your mind to it, you could pull a double :entendre out of a randomly chosen page of the bible. So what? >The point is that when Simon pointed it out to Phil, he did recognise >what it meant after a moment's thought... and so did I... and so did the >people who repeated it several times later... so however murky it may >seem to you, that is the meaning they intended it to have... I still don't really know if the meaning was intended when that headline was written, or if it was simply "found" after the fact. The reason I think it might be the former is that I got quite a lot of abuse along the lines of "sound-alike" or "double-entendre" at work, in particularly from Steve. So "double" inevitably came to mean split-personality, "two people in one"; "back" inevitably came to mean "backside", "come" inevitably meant you-know- what, "split" (well, we'd better split now) again you can guess, "bent" (of a similar bent), the list goes on forever. These aren't "nice" double- entendres intended for comedy, they're nasty words to humiliate and cause pain. If I could turn the clock back three years then I would sue my former employers for harassment and I would almost certainly win. I had to take pills after a year of Oxford, so they wouldn't be able to lie their way out of it. Actually, I could still take them to court - the main obstacle being that three years after the fact is a bit late and much of what happened, the details that would be necessary for a case to go to court, has just been obliterated by time. : Smid ============================================== From: flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk (Peter Kr|ger) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,alt.conspiracy,uk.media,uk.legal Subject: Re: Mike Corley - a (helpful) suggestion Date: Mon Oct 2 05:43:42 1995 In article <812551172snz@objmedia.demon.co.uk>, Snail <snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk> says: >Indeed, I feel that my Usenet access is censored simply because I don't want >to download groups he is partaking in, because of his behaviour. > >I wasn't that bothered, but I am starting to get seriously pissed off >with him. Which takes a lot. Hi Snail This person Corley seems quite interesting for three reasons. I put the following at the end of a post in another thread just to see if he was reading any other threads in uk.media. It seems he is probably not. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Heres an interesting little story from back in the early days of CCD technology. There was this miniature camera which was designed to fit behind the infrared receiver lens of the remote control system (just beside the IR sensor itself) the camera clocked out the data in 256 lines of 256 pixels from a Fairchild chip and fed it out, a line at a time, into the VBI within the TV set itself. The signal could be picked up remotely from a standard license detector van from where it was stripped out of the surrounding RF signal and relayed back to the TV station where it was displayed as a slowscan monochrome image in a corner of the news readers monitor. 5481 Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179538
  - 8
    - MI5 Persecution: Watch Out, Forger About 27/9/95 (3967) From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995 In referenced article, David Wooding says... >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative. > >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me. Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it is a forgery. Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's mail to news gateway, which is strange. Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g. <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net. One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups - he would not have had access to their address in that case. >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14 +0500 >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury 1.20); > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500 >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94) > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk, > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk, > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, > mikeh@mordor.com, > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk, > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk, > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk, > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk, > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk, > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk, > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk, > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk, > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk, > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british, soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) >Subject: Oops! Sorry! >Organization: Toronto Free-Net >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT >Lines: 27 >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560 -- Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050 Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225 ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749 3967 Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179537
  - 9
    - MI5 Persecution: Question and Answer 27/9/95 (2453) In article <DFGxnF.Cr8.0.bloor@torfree.net> bu765@torfree.net "Mike Corley" writes: >>> ##: There were also a few other things said at the trial >>> ##: relating to this which I won't repeat here; it was in the papers >>> ##: at the time anyway. This quote and others said by and about this >>> ##: witness were repeating things that had been said by and about >>> ##: me at around that time. When, where and by whom ? Let's have some details that can be checked. I'm not going to repeat them. They're hurtful to me because they contained abuse that was directed against me by someone else at the time and which got picked up and thrown again in the trial. It is a matter of record but I won't repeat it here. >>> PM: >Who's character is being assassinated? It isn't clear from the post. >>> PM: >Are we talking about Grenville Janner? I thought he was a spook >>> PM: >himself? He's certainly able to hold his own on the issue you cite. >>> ##: Mine, mainly. The reason for putting that episode at the top >>> ##: of the posting is that they tried to kill two birds with one stone >>> ##: at the Beck trial - they simultaneously put words into the mouth >>> ##: of their invented "witness" to smear Janner, and repeated exactly, >>> ##: word-for-word, stuff which had been said by and about me. Why would "they" wish to assassinate your character? Well, let's put it this way - just because this is the first time it's happened in this way, from these people, on this scale, doesn't mean that it hasn't happened before, on a lesser scale. At university there were people who quite overtly hated me and would have wished something nasty to happen to me. Because of where I went making the wrong sort of enemies is pretty deadly. "They" would wish to assassinate my character because it had all been done before, and because they knew I would not be able to react in any other way than I'd reacted previously. >>> ##: They invaded my home with their bugs, they repeated what I >>> ##: was saying in the privacy of my home, and they laughed that it >>> ##: was "so funny", that I was impotent and could not even communicate >>> ##: what was going on. Who did this? Our friends on BBC television, >>> ##: our friends in ITN, last but not least our friends in Capital >>> ##: Radio in London and on Radio 1. Please give details of when, where and by whom these comments were made, so that they can be checked. This was four, five years ago... sorry, I don't remember. I can remember individual incidents, words which were repeated by different people at different times in different locations. Around the end of 1992 Private Eye rtan a front-cover with John and Norma Major, with the title "Major's support lowest ever" and John saying to Norma "Come back norma" on the front cover. What can you read in to that? Not a lot, seems like standard fare for PE. The first time I saw it I was in the pub with some people from work. One was expressing doubts to the other (let's call the first one Simon, shall we? and the second one Phil?) about whether what was going on was right. Phil's answer was that if Private Eye was doing it then it must be ok, "they're usually right". A few days later, again near work, there were some students laughing in the street, "Were you COMING BACK later? But I thought you said you were COMING BACK ha ha ha?" Play on words, you see. Not very nice, either. I had start medication soon afterwards. Clever people, these chaps who think up PE titles. Just slightly lacking in any sense of morality. >>> ##: How did they do this? I'll give you an example. About a year ago, >>> ##: I was listening to Chris Tarrant (Capital Radio DJ among other >>> ##: pursuits) on his radio morning show, when he said, talking about >>> ##: someone he didn't identify, "you know this bloke? he says we're >>> ##: trying to kill him. We should be done for attempted manslaughter" >>> ##: which mirrored something I had said a day or two before. >>> ##: Now that got broadcast to the whole of London - if any recordings >>> ##: are kept of the shows then it'll be there. What was the date of the broadcast ? Out of 2 million plus listeners, why should you be the only one that Tarrant was allegedly referring to ? Sometyime in spring 1994. I can't remember the date, I heard the broadcast in the car - I was going into the office from London that day and just happened to snap on the radio, and hey presto! Mr Tarrant gives us the benefit of his excellent understanding. >>> ##: That's exactly what we did. We went to a competent, professional >>> ##: detective agency in London, paid them over 400 quid to debug our house. >>> ##: They found nothing. What was the name of the detective agency and their address ? I don't see why I should tell you that, but they're in Yellow Pages; they're a well-established outfit. >>> PM: >What? Spend a quarter mil. a year to amuse themselves? And why not >>> PM: >change every now and again? Why keep watching you? (Unless you _are_ >>> PM: >doing something, and I don't think you are, though you may have some >>> PM: >deep, dark secret in your past.) >>> >>> ##: See the above. Is there a deep dark secret in your past ? Apart from "it's all happened before in a different way", no. >>> ##: In a couple of cases people have even known my name - when I was in >>> ##: London over Easter somebody (no idea who they were, just some bloke with >>> ##: his girlfriend) called me by name - quite clearly, and my name is >>> ##: distinctive. Is your name truly Mike Corley, or are you using it as an alias ? It's an alias. I'm not English by ethnic origin. If someone manages to pronounce my name as well as that guy did then they must have been really trying. >>> ##: There's a little story behind this. First of all, in 1992 I worked >>> ##: for a company where the people made clear they knew what was going on, >>> ##: first of all directly (the very first evening I was there I went out to >>> ##: the pub with them and the Technical Director said to another guy, >>> ##: "is this the bloke who's been on TV?" "yeah, I think so") Have you appeared, or been reported by name on TV ? When, where and by whom ? No. Never. Not directly. >>> ##: Also, in summer 1992 I went on a trip abroad to Europe by coach, What was the name of the coach company and your date of departure ? It was a national express coach. At dover we boarded a ferry for Holland somewhere. The company that organized the trip went out of business some time ago, so they won't have records of passengers - so we can't get any corroboration from anyone else that way. We tried all that last summer, ran into a brick wall. The other thing is in summer 1992 I was visibly ill, so other people in the party might remember that more than anyone getting at me on the coach trip. >>> ##: >>Yes, this gets me. I think the answer is that I was set up by >>> ##: >>someone. I was very aware when this started back in 1990 that I >>> ##: >>was being painted as a "threat" to which people had to "react" Why were you being painted as a "threat"; is this related to a "deep,dark, secret" ? Aaaarrrrgh. I think I should make clear that that's their created justification rather than the real reason. They started harassing first and then came up with the reasons for it. >>> >>> ##: I think I know who set me up. Who ? Someone who knew me some time ago. Someone who would have been able to talk this little campaign into existence. >>> ##: The bloke can't even control his own mind without medicine. Is this true ? What is the medication and dosage ? Yes, I'm afraid so. Sulpiride, 200mg a day. It's designed to stop people coming up with the sort of ideas you've heard here for the last few weeks. Give him a higher dose!! In the long term it causes tardive dyskinesia, tardive dementia and general nasty stuff to your brain. So it's three years of sulpiride talking to you here. >-- >john heelan 2453 Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179536
  - 10
    - MI5 Persecution: Options 21/9/95 (939) From: john heelan <john@lorca.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups: uk.misc,alt.current-events.net-abuse,alt.journalism Subject: Re: CENSORHSIP IS IMMORAL, UNJUST AND WRONG Date: Thu, 21 Sep 95 19:17:30 GMT Organization: (Private) Lines: 65 Message-ID: <811711050snz@lorca.demon.co.uk> References: <DF8DMu.Dqu.0.bloor@torfree.net> <43qpdh$iki@news3.digex.net> Reply-To: john@lorca.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: lorca.demon.co.uk X-Newsreader: Demon Internet Simple News v1.29 You have to admit that Mike is persistent and obviously feels deeply that he is being hounded by the "Security Services" and there is a Conspiracy out to get him personally. If that is true, then we should be concerned; if he is just paranoid, then we should empathise with his sickness. What we should not do is to invite censorship....that just could be implicitly joining in the putative Conspiracy. Let's look at Mike's potential options (and the alleged responses he has received): > 1. Complain to the Police: (their alleged response > "Don't be silly, Sir"; Mike's rationale "They are part > of the Conspiracy") > I don't think the police as an organisation are part of it. They're certainly not the source. The officer I spoke to at Easter clearly didn't know anything about it. And that was at my local police station in London - if anyone in the police knew you would think the people at your local cop shop would. A couple of years ago I had to go into the station after a motoring infraction, the guy I spoke to then said something about "brain like a computer sir" which my suspicions latched on to - (I'm alleged to be a programmer as some people reading this know) - but as per the usual "can';t prove nuthin" and you ask yourself if you're just being stupid suspecting on the basis of a straw > 2. Complain to a Member of Parliament (Mike's rationale: "Can't > because they are part of the Conspiracy") > I could do that actually. But he would probably tell me to go see the police, for which see above. > 3. Make it visible through the UK Press. (Mike's rationale: > "Can't because they are part of the Conspiracy") > They are actually. There's a difference though in the way journalists react to this stuff when they're "got to" by the security service. This is completely giving the game away, but the trouble originally started with my reading into stuff that was being written by Times columnists, in particular our antagonistic friend Mr Levin. But you see that some journalists are taking part in the conspiracy and others are only doing it because their puppet masters have been feeding them information which they can't allow themselves to ignore. The security services have their hooks into the UK media, this case shows that very explicitly. You also see how things get gradualkly wqorse with a particular journalist; a couple of weeks ago Peter Tory in the Express was writing about "nerds seeking their revenge on him through the Net", guess what that was about. > 4. Complain to the UK Security Services. (Mike's rationale: "Can't > because they ARE the Cnspiracy") > Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? If the fascist Gestapo bastards plot to see you dead then who's going to deal with it? Not the security services, that's for sure. > 5. Make it visible through Internet: (Mike has done this > suvccessfully; but any gainsayers are "part of the Conspiracy". > I don;t think you';re part of the consipracy if you refuse to believe or email the postmaster. Those who do know are keeping their silence. > 6. Complain to the Canadian National and State Governments. (Has > Mike done this yet ?) > No. It's a UK problem so that's where it should be dealt with. The perpetrators are UK residents, are unidentified, and would be difficult to deal with through the Canadian courts. Ditto the police in Canada, ditto the press - it isn't their problem, it's caused by UK people against someone from the UK. Of course Canadian laws are being broken relating to harassment and "stalking" which do not exist in the UK, but the Canadian police do not have a very good record of enforcing those laws anyway. > 7. Complain to the Canadian Security Services (Has Mike done this > yet ?) > > 8. Complain to the Canadian Press. (Has Mike done this yet ?) > I think if they didn't knoiw, they'd just think you were having delusions; and if they did, then they would side with the people with the power, the smiling English people with their knives out. Remember, nobody uis going to side with the person who has less power in a copfrontation. The team over here in Canada have the resources of their organization behind them, other broadcasters etc in the UK would have influence with their counterparts in Canada; after all, this was once a British colony, there is still a feeling of "looking up to" the UK among many Canadians, so if a team of security services arrives from the UK with apparently limitless resources to pursue their target, people over here will forget anything they ever knew about basic human rights and go along with what they are told to do and how they are told to behave. > 9. Complain to non-UK TV Watchdogs (Does Canada have an "Oprah > Winfrey ? Has Mike done this yet ?) > > 10. Complain to the EC Court of Human Rights. (Has Mike done > this yet ?) > > ........or...are 6,7,8,9,10 also all part of > the Conspiracy ? > > > > -- > john heelan 939 Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179535
  - 11
    - Email collected by POP connector but not being delivered Hi all, I have a customer whose POP3 connector is picking up the email from a global POP3 mailbox, collects the messages but none of it is being delivered to the users' mailboxes. It has been working fine for years up until this morning. I have upped the logging to max and it appears to collect the messages ok but I have no idea where they are going. Obviously this is quite a problem as it's all going down a black hole effectively. Please see the event viewer entries below. Would really appreciated any help. Thanks, Andy Event viewer messages: The POP3 agent is going to open the mailbox <postmaster@domainname.co.uk> on host <pop.clara.net> with the password <{ Secret Password }>. The authentication method is: Clear Text Password The delivery service is logging as a POP3 client on port 110 The POP3 host <pop.clara.net [80.168.70.82]> answered our connection with <+OK CPOP vCPOP_2_3_1 on minos.uk.clara.net Ready for Action> We have been granted access to <pop.clara.net [80.168.70.82]> logging as <postmaster@domainname.co.uk> There are 11 message(s) with a total of 4905557 byte(s) A message was downloaded from the POP3 server. The message ID is: MSG06072007-183052-1.MMD (11 of the same messages) The POP3 session transcript was: <G>: +OK CPOP vCPOP_2_3_1 on minos.uk.clara.net Ready for Action <C>: USER postmaster@domainname.co.uk <S>: +OK <C>: PASS <secret password> <S>: +OK <C>: STAT <S>: +OK 11 4905557 <C> { Downloaded and deleted messages if neccessary. } <C>: QUIT <S>: +OK Take it EZ The shared POP3 accounts have been checked for incoming messages Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179531
  - 12
    - Veritas backup At a client I have a SBS 2000 running where I want to backup both files and Exchange to a USB-harddrive. FOr a very long time backup from Veritas has been running like a dream, but for some reason it stopped a couple of weeks ago. I am able to do the full backup of the Exchange part and it will succeed and finish to verify the backup. However, this is not the case with the file share they are having - each time a backup is made from this the server will crash (i.e. all icons dissapear and the logon screen disappearr) and there is only the power swithc left to rescue us - ane I don't belive this has been the intention from MS or Veritas :-) Any experiences like this or any ideas on where to start looking to get my client start smiling again :-) Peter Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179527
  - 13
    - Custom Software Development iTechArt Group - Custom Software Development and Offshore outsourcing Company http://www.itechart.com/ Offshore custom software development company iTechArt - Web site and Content Management Solutions development, CMS consulting: Ektron, Drupal and DotNetNuke iTechArt Group provides high quality custom software development services and offshore software development. On December 2006, iTechArt Group became an authorized Microsoft Certified Partner. This means that our company has been recognized by Microsoft for our vast expertise and authorized to custom software development; provide IT service consulting and custom business solutions. Custom Software Development and Offshore outsourcing Company iTechArt has worked together since 2003 to design build and deliver .NET Web Content Management software solutions that help clients meet their strategic objectives. We are agile oriented development partner able to consistently deliver solid results. iTechArt software development team assemblies specialists in the development of custom software applications and offshore software outsourcing services. Working concepts of our company are based on proven approaches and international standards used for custom software development such as Capability Maturity Model Integration for Software Engineering (CMMI- SW). In the same breath we have our own standpoint on software development process management which is fully effective and comprehensible for our clients. iTechArt offers software development in the next main directions: 1. Custom Software Development (Offshore outsourcing for worldwide based software development companies.) 2. Software Development for Digital Signage (Media content development and remote displays / information kiosks Web-based software application management.) 3. Web Site Development (E-commerce solutions, CMS/DotNetNuke/Ektron/ Drupal, Web 2.0/PHP/MySQL/AJAX, Flash/Action script/Flex and many more.) 4. Offshore Development Center (Dedicated development team of software developers. Our offshore development centers operate as an extension to clients' existing software engineering business.) Contact iTechArt ( http://www.itechart.com/ )about custom software development, end-to-end software solutions, outsourcing software development, custom DotNetNuke module development, DotNetNuke consulting, dotnetnuke hosting, first class Java and .Net developers, software application design, software testing, Quality Assurance, functionality testing and defect analysis, performance and stress testing, usability testing, Microsoft Media Services and Adobe Media Flash Server solutions, digital signage solutions and custom development, Ektron CMS400.NET developers, CMS, .NET Web Content Management software solutions Web: http://www.itechart.com/ http://www.itechart.com/Pages/ProductsServices/HowWeWork.aspx http://www.itechart.com/Pages/ProductsServices/BusinessModels.aspx http://www.itechart.com/Pages/ProductsServices/CustomSoftwareDevelopment.aspx http://www.itechart.com/Pages/ProductsServices/DotNetNukeModuleDevelopment.aspx Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179525
  - 14
    - SBS 2000 transition to standard server Hi. One of the sites that I look after is currently running SBS 2000 but due to the company restructure and site locations I have started to rebuild the network into a single domain structure. This is the problem. I am going to purchase a new server with 2003 R2 standard edition and run all the usual services from it. It will be part of the new domain, location.groupname.local but I want the old SBS server to also join the domain to be the email, print and archive server as well as a second DC. Now I know I can buy a transition pack that will upgrade to SBS 2003 R2 but can i get a pack that will upgrade to 2003 R2 standard plus does it still retain Exchange do I loose it? Also if I can what are the pit falls? Thanks for your time. Jason Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179521
  - 15
    - URLScan has entries I can't understand Hello, all. This SBS2000 system has about 15 users, and the URLSCAN.yymmdd.LOG file is usually empty or contains obvious entries. However, I've noticed lately some regular entries that I can't account for. Two workstations are involved. Every day, at 2:15 AM, one client's inside IP address is listed as the source for these in the URLSCAN log: Raw URL='/COMPANY.bat' Raw URL='/COMPANY.cmd' Raw URL='/COMPANY.exe' Raw URL='/COMPANY.com' Raw URL='/COMPANY.bat' Raw URL='/COMPANY.cmd' Raw URL='/COMPANY.exe' Raw URL='/COMPANY.com' Raw URL='/CLIENT%20FILES.bat' Raw URL='/CLIENT%20FILES.cmd' Raw URL='/CLIENT%20FILES.exe' Raw URL='/CLIENT%20FILES.com' The other workstation is listed as the source for these, always at 2:30 AM: Raw URL='/Client%20Files.bat' Raw URL='/Client%20Files.cmd' Raw URL='/Client%20Files.exe' Raw URL='/Client%20Files.com' There is a mapped drive from every workstation to a share on the SBS machine called "\\servername\Client Files", and COMPANY is a sharename on the SBS that may be mapped on the workstation that is issuing those commands. I certainly don't know what the BAT CMD EXE COM series means except it looks like it's looking for something to run. There's no untoward behavior on the network or any of the workstations (including these), so I suspect this is something benign. Can anyone explain where this is coming from? Thanks. Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179519
  - 16
    - forex business You can earn upto $250 per day from currency business. for more details visit http://affiliates-online.blogspot.com Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179512
  - 17
    - forex business You can earn upto $250 per day from currency business. for more details visit http://affiliates-online.blogspot.com Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179511
  - 18
    - How do I remove a contact? Hi all, I created a contact on the server with an email address of advice@domainname.com but now I need to give it to a user instead but I can't as it already exists in the domain. How do I delete it so I can reassign it to a user? I've tried looking but can't find it anywhere. Thanks in advance, Andy. Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179510
  - 19
    - DHCP I am having problems with clients trying to join the domain. When they try to join they are showing little or no connectivity on their network connections. XP clients with sp 2. When I go to the server I show a blue exclamation mark on the server in the DHCP scope. When I look at the address leases I only show ten active leases however when I right click on the server and click on the statistics it shows 202 of 202 leases taken and 100% taken. I am stumped. Something is not releasing the leases. All VPN clients can connect to the server no problem. Are the VPN connections not releasing? -- Mark Hickinbotham Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179508
  - 20
    - Mailbox sharing / generic mailbox question Hi there, My client has a pop box called advice@domainname.com. This is pulled down and routed to an individual users mailbox via the POP connector. When this user is on holiday other users have to log on as this user to check for any mail coming to the advice mailbox. How do I give other users access to their mailbox? I have looked in the user account properties Exchange tabs but can't find the same options as available in SBS 2003. A better alternative long term would be to create a generic user called advice, have the email routed there and then give the other users permission to open that mailbox as well, but I need to know how to do the permission bit first I guess. Any help appreciated, Thanks, Andy. Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179505
  - 21
    - "User" cannot see newly created partitions Ran Disk Management "remotely" and sliced up the drive. created a 90 gig D: and a 10 gig P: logged off and on "remotely" and Administrator can see C: D: P: and F: (cdrom) logged in "remotely" as a User and cannot see D: and P: thanks for any pointers. Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179496
  - 22
    - New Orleans Conference a Huge Success I've just arrived home from Jeff Middleton's IT Pro 2007 Conference in New Orleans and I just wanted to let everyone know that it was a huge success...from the key note...to the various panel discussions, the deep dive sessions, Microsoft's presentation on Cougar, the vendors and of course New Orleans, Bourbon St. and last nights cruise on the Mississippi. There was overwhelming indications from those present that they would like to see this happen again next year and Jeff seemed to indicate he'd put efforts in that direction. And I know we all came home with lots to think about. It was nice to put a face to some of you from the NG's here and unfortunate that many more of you did not make it. Remember that Wayne Small, SBS - MVP and founder of SBSFAQ.com is hosting a seminar in Sydney Austrailia over Thanksgiving...he has a great line up and activities planned... And start planning now to join us for Jeff's IT PRO 2008 Conference (or whatever it winds up being called). Meantime, Jeff and others are continuing the conference aboard a cruise ship bound for Mexico. Bon Voyage. I'll be happy to answer any questions anyone might have about this conference. -- Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP] ------------------------------ Please do not contact me directly, only respond in the Newsgroups MVPs do not work for Microsoft ------------------------------ Send via Windows Mail on Vista Ultimate connected to SBS 2003 R2 Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179495
  - 23
    - <<Survey: SBS WW Community Survey 2007: >> Survey: SBS WW Community Survey 2007: http://connect.microsoft.com/SBSCommunity/Survey/Survey.aspx?SurveyID=3232 It's that time of year when Susan comes and says... guys I know you are busy (and hopefully some are like me getting ready for travel today or tomorrow for New Orleans) but getting feedback is important to me as well as it should be to you. So please, take some time to give feedback. And thank you for being here. Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179483
  - 24
    - Moving Old Company Data Hi All, I want to move data from The Company Drive which has not been accessed since 31 December 2005( for example) to a external drive and reduce the data content. How can i do this. If anyone can help me i would greatly appriciate. I like to move the data and keep the same folder structure too. Thank You Nalz Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179481
  - 25
    - Email Archiving Tools Naxian Digital Management Solutions offers a high functionality email archiving and compliance solution ideally suited to the smaller user. With licencing based closely on MS SBS Naxian Message Tracker is the ideal solution for those who need email archiving, the ability to track correspondence, compliance and a tool that adds value to data. For more info please feel free to visit www.naxian.co.za or drop me an email. Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179480
- Next
  - 1
    - Old user, old computer, new combination yields no rights I've got a small existing domain based on an SBS computer. There are 2 client machines running Win XP that see most of the use on this domain. (Well call them A and B.) One of my users has exclusively used machine A for several years now. This week I had her log in on machine B to get her set up, since A will soon be retired. Machine B is newer than A, but still nearly a year old and has been on the domain the entire time. She has no problem logging in on B, but once there, she appears to have no permissions, even to her own desktop and My Documents folder. For example, if she right-clicks the desktop and selects "New > Text Document" she gets an error dialog reading "Unable to create the file New Text Document.txt. Access is denied." She's set up with normal Domain User permissions (I generally don't use local permissions) and has no problem on the old machine (A). Other users on machine B aren't having problems. Am I missing something obvious in getting her set up on this other machine? Thanks, Andy Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179479
  - 2
    - SBS 2003 transition pack info needed Hello, We have a 70 user SBS2003 server and we want to get to 100 users. Is using the Transition pack the best approach? -- Thanks, Dan Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179475
  - 3
    - PROCESSOR RUNNING AT 100% Hi The processor is running at 100% all the time - SBS2000 Tried booting the server in 'safe' mode and the problem dissapeared I then re-booted in normal mode and went through all the services turning off each and checking for the processor to function normally - thought I'd found it when I turned off terminal services as the processor apperaed to start running at normal speed. When I looked in the Admin Console - Server Status - Health Monitor Alerts: I was seeing the following 2 messages still:- Severity Data Collector Alert Critical Network Interface WMI Status 2147749889 So I re-booted again but the problem with the processor running at 100% returned! Messages in Admin Console - Server Status - Health Monitor Alerts: are now different and as follows:- Severity Data Collector Threshold Alert Network Interface Bytes total/sec >500000 Network Interface Critical Condition WMI Status 2147749889 Network Interface Error code (from WMI) Network Interface Critical Condition WMI Status 2147749889 What is this? Have I got a dodgy network card possibly - or is it something else that is causing this? Any assistance would be greatly apprecieted. John Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179472
  - 4
    - Installing 2nd processor in SBS 2000 machine... We currently have a Dell SBS 2000 server running Exchange and SQL Server. We have purchased and are installing a 2nd processor into this machine. My question is this... Some PC Utilities and even SQL server already show the server as having two processors (right-click and select properties on the appropriate server group in SQL server enterprise manager and it shows number of processors = 2) when it does indeed only have ONE processor installed. I know for SQL server that this is definately by design. However, what will happen when it actually does have two processors??? Am I going to have to make some configuration changes to SQL server configuration etc.. (and whatever else) so that it will properly use two physical processors?? Help! Thanks, Brad Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179469
  - 5
    - SBS 2000 VPN Hi, I have a working VPN with the server at office (manage to set it up last couple of weeks withMerv Porter [SBS-MVP] ). Now I can login to it via my home pc. I tried to set another two clients, but they did get the error 800. Could anyone gide me how to sort this out Please. Thanks Ruwee Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179466
  - 6
    - WINS Error Hi We're running SBS 2000 (for about 4 years) We are seeing the following error in the event log AND the problem appears to be causing the processor to run at 100% all the time! -------------------------------------------- Event Type: Error Event Source: Service Control Manager Event Category: None Event ID: 7000 Date: 26/04/2007 Time: 08:05:25 User: N/A Computer: JCMSBS1 Description: The Windows Internet Name Service (WINS) service failed to start due to the following error: The system cannot find the file specified. ---------------------------------------------- Any suggestions would be greatly apprecieted. John Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179462
  - 7
    - sbs2000 to sbs2003 I'm planning to upgrade my sbs2000 to sbs2003 but I want to add new hard drives and create a raid1/5 scenario. Right now the server operates on one 36 gig drive. The box is an ibm x225 series server with 4 gig ram. What is the best way to get this accomplished? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Dlugo Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179459
  - 8
    - Configuring performance counters for Exchange... I want to monitor some Exchange counters on my Windows 2000 Small Business Server. The Microsoft Exchange IS service does not currerntly have performance counters enabled. So, I ran the WIndows 2000 resource kit tool called "EXCTRLST.exe" which allows you to "enable" performance monitoring on various objects simply by clicking the box there... SO I found the "MSExchangeIS" service in the list and clicked the "Performance Counters Enabled" box. If I go into the Performance monitor, I can select the associated performance counters right there to monitor. However, if I use the "Health" application to create a new performance counter under a "Data Group" I created, and select the "MSExchangeIS (MsExchangeIS)" object , there is no instances that show up at all, when I click on the 'Browse" button for instances. If I just click OK, it adds the performance monitpor but errors out with an "Enumeration Failed - object not found. Data Collector is misconfigured" error. Do I need to renoot my server after enabling performance counters using the EXCTRLST utility for this to work?? (even though it has enabled them in the registry) Thanks, Brad Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179458
  - 9
    - Accept mail relay from IP I need to know how to accept mail relay from an ip address on a server that is within the domain, but now within the local server. The web hosting server periodically sends mail to our customers, but, right now, the mail is not going out. It was suggested to me that the web hosting server's ip address is somehow blocked by smallbiz2000, so the mail isn't going out. If someone could point me in the right direction I would be grateful. Thanks in advance. -- Adrienne Boswell at work Administrator nextBlock.com http://atlas.nextblock.com/files/ Please respond to the group so others can share Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179454
  - 10
    - 100% CPU time (dredger.exe & Health Monitor)... OK, I've done a quite a few SBS 2000 installs over the years. Last week a server blew up (pretty much literally). The PSU exploded - the mobo was taken out, and all hard disks trashed. The only salvaged hardware was the DVD writer (even the floppy disk drive was destroyed). So I've rebuilt a temp server. And can I get a clean SBS install working? Not really. I downloaded the trial version of Acronis True Image (didn't work on this machine), and then a trial version of Paragon Drive Backup - which works brilliantly. During my installs I made a number of images. Some of the scenarios I tried: * installing SBS ontop of the W2KS install, as is * installing SBS ontop of a fully updated W2KS install (SP4 + all updates * and most things in between. Every single SBS install ended up with dredger.exe hammering away at 100% (yes, I left things overnight even to see if it would settle). The SBS install goes like this after it does its final reboot - putting updates (Exchange, SQL Server, ISA, ISA FP1 etc etc, other updates), incrementally on, does not rectify anything. (No connection to the internet was made to do any updates, nor during the install). I checked the NICS, and swapped slots, and swapped the NIC's re internal and external to SBS. I configured the NICS so that they were not in the 169... range (default) when the SBS install proceeded (per the readme). I just don't know what's causing it. I've read the Googled info - none of it helped. Removing Health Monitor has *sorta* helped. Dredger.exe still ran at 100%, so I renamed it so it couldn't fire up at all. Then svchost runs at 100% instead. I used Sysinternals pskill.exe to take the processes out - and this has temporarily sorted the problem. So at present, I have a temp server that is working, but on every reboot I have to take out the offending svchost running at 100%. And I have no nice management interface (which I can do without, as the new server will be sorted in the next week or two anyway). So while a resolution to this install problem is not a great issue, I'm wondering what the hells going on (anyway). Any ideas anyone? -- Duncan Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179453
  - 11
    - can I add a 2003 r2 server as DC in a 2000 sbs network? I have a sbs2000 network, can I add an other DC? Can I use a 2003 r2 server? If yes, do I have to do something else that run forestprer / domainprep ? Thank's Alessandro Belli Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179449
  - 12
    - ISA Excellence Marvelous stuff is available on ISA Server including bypassing the web proxy service, SSL connections, promoting standalone servers and many more you are eager to know. Don't Miss!!! http://it-techexperts.com/MCSE/HTISA01.asp Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179448
  - 13
    - Limit concurrent logins & access server console for basic user adm I want to limit some users (students in a small private college) to one login at a time. 1. Limit some users logon to one only at a time. I downloaded llogin.exe (had to download Netframework 1.1 maybe I should download NF 2??) went to install & was asking for Server 2003! This just seems a lot of work just to limit user logons. 2nd thing I want to do is to give two managers (using their login on their desktop) remote desktop access to the server console within the LAN environment (not dial-up or Internet access) to do basic USER administration tasks ie add users/change passwords/limit userspermissions etc. I managed to add the 2 managers to Server Operator's group but don't know how to access the server console from the client computers (managers' PC's) assuming this is the right thing to do. Lionelnz@yahoo.co.nz Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179446
  - 14
    - microsoft backup can any body help me? i have installed sbs 2003 std, hp dlt vs80 int tape drive. when i am taking microsoft backup it is showing dlt tape drive but after submitting backup it never finds the tape.can some body tel me any command for recognizing tape drive and do backup normally. Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179441
  - 15
    - Determine current license count on SBS2000 Although adding licenses is easy, seeing the current license count is not so transparent. I cannot remember where to find the current license count in SBS2000 to see if I am at my 50-CAL limit. Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179432
  - 16
    - Vanished Mail Messages to a handful of domains fail to be delivered. The logging was turned up via regedit to level 7, but there are no events that indicate a message was not sent, and there are no messages stuck in any queue. The majority of messages are sent without issue, and the server can receive messages from everyone, but a reply just vanishes. No errors, nothing in a queue, but the person never gets the sent message. No NDR report, and tracking indicates the messages have been sent. I am totally lost on this one. Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179428
  - 17
    - SBS 2000 VPN Setup Hi, Could anybody please guide me to how to setup VPN on SBS server 2000? I have followed few web sites but still I could manage to do it. Thanks Ruwee Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179422
  - 18
    - SBS2000 to Windows Server 2003 (not SBS 2003) Is it possible to move from SBS2000 to a Windows 2003 domain without building an entire new domain. I have an old SBS2000 server and I want to move it to Win2K3 R2 domain. I was told I cannot add the 2003 server to the existing SBS2000 domain and then promote it. I never used the Exchange portion of SBS and it currently only serving as a DC, DNS, DHCP, and file server. Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179414
  - 19
    - Free Network Marketing Home Business This Incredible system provides free training (visual, audio and text), websites, step by step setting up and continuous coaching. Find out how to earn legitimate comfortable monthly income. visit: http://classifieds.byindia.com/detail.php?siteid=5805&cityid=127&show_still=1&citydetail=1 General details Sold by Abdul Johar Email Contact seller Location Wint rd, Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179411
  - 20
    - netgear vpn - can't see shares I have a sbs 2000 server with windows 2k sp 4 on a small office lan with a netgear prosafe vpn firewall router that provides access to the Internet. This SBS machine used to be setup as a gateway/firewall running ISA server and using VPN. VPN worked that way but was extremely slow and the required ms firewall client & IE proxy settings were a nuisance to laptop users with home networks. So I introduced this netgear hardware firewall to improve the situation. ISA server has been removed via add/remove programs from the SBS server. The second NIC and RRAS has been disabled. The internal NIC of the SBS server is setup like this: ip: 10.0.0.2 mask: 255.255.0.0 gateway: 10.0.0.1 dns: 10.0.0.2 DNS is setup as a forwarder on the SBS server with the ISP's name servers listed. DHCP and WINS is running on the SBS server. DHCP is disabled on the Netgear router. The Netgear router's internal ip address is 10.0.0.1 Problem is, I can connect to the lan from a remote client using Netgear's client software fine. I can map drives to two other servers on the office lan but not the SBS 2000 machine. I am using local lmhosts and hosts files on the remote client to resolve names. I can ping the SBS server but that's all. I get error 53 if I try to use 'net use' or 'net view' at the command prompt. I get "network path can not be found" if I try to map the drive through windows explorer. I have tried specifiying a valid domain account including the administrator account. In windows explorer, it will return and ask for a valid domain account if I give it an invalid one, but it will still throw up the error "network path can not be found." I am testing with two remote clients: one is a windows xp pro workstation, the other is a windows 2000 sp4 laptop. The laptop has been joined to the domain while connected to the internal lan and I am attempting to connect via vpn with a cached domain user account. I get the same results with both clients. The local network I am using uses a 192.168.1.x address scheme. I have also tried connecting via dial-up with the laptop. I am two months and three long weekends into this problem and have exhausted the troubleshooting steps to find the issue. There are no software firewalls involved. I have tried disabling virusscanners and the remote hardware firewall which is a linksys router. Any ideas as to what to check would be greatly appreciated. Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179408
  - 21
    - Buy, Sell or Trade Mother's Day Gifts @ OzFree Looking for best buy gift ideas for Mother's day? You can definitely find it at http://classifieds.ozfreeonline.com , Australia's free online classifieds. Great deals for hard to find Collectibles, electronic gadgets, housewares, jewelry, garage sales and almost anything that can be a nice idea to give to Mommy on her special day! Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179400
  - 22
    - add another SBS box for SQL usage This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C78E6D.6B591C50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, Our company want to add a SQL server box for our computer modelling = people to use. Existing we have a SBS2000 domain box, and a W2k Std = Server box (as member). Our IT support contractor suggested us to buy a = new SBS2003 Std box and use the SQL server in there. My question is: 1. I heard two SBS cannot co-exist together in a domain, how can this = configuration work? 2. The modelling people use softwares called MOUSE and MIKE URBAN to do = modelling work. They use the new SQL server to store their GIS data and = let the modelling software to retrieve the data off it for processing = and then store the results back to it. If the SQL server is not in the = same domain as the logon of the user, can the software retrieve/store = the data off/to SQL? 3. If the user want to admin the SQL server, can he do it? how? 4. Can the user use MS Office (like Excel, Access) to access this SQL = server? 5. We have a backup tape which use BackupExec in the existing domain. = Can we use it to backup the data in that new SQL server? How to = configure the backup job? Any suggestion is welcome. We definitely also need new ideas and views. TIA, el ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C78E6D.6B591C50 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16414" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Trebuchet MS" size=3D2>Hi all,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Trebuchet MS" size=3D2>Our company want to add a SQL = server box=20 for our computer modelling people to use.  Existing we have a = SBS2000=20 domain box, and a W2k Std Server box (as member).  Our IT = support=20 contractor suggested us to buy a new SBS2003 Std box and use the SQL = server in=20 there.  My question is:</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Trebuchet MS" size=3D2>1.  I heard two SBS = cannot co-exist=20 together in a domain, how can this configuration work?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Trebuchet MS" size=3D2>2.  The modelling = people=20 use softwares called MOUSE and MIKE URBAN to do modelling = work. =20 They use the new SQL server to store their GIS data and let the = modelling=20 software to retrieve the data off it for processing and then store the = results=20 back to it.  If the SQL server is not in the same domain as the = logon of=20 the user, can the software retrieve/store the data off/to = SQL?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Trebuchet MS" size=3D2>3.  If the user want to = admin the SQL=20 server, can he do it? how?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Trebuchet MS" size=3D2>4.  Can the user use MS = Office (like=20 Excel, Access) to access this SQL server?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Trebuchet MS" size=3D2>5.  We have a backup tape = which use=20 BackupExec in the existing domain.  Can we use it to backup = the data=20 in that new SQL server?  How to configure the backup = job?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Trebuchet MS" size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Trebuchet MS" size=3D2>Any suggestion is = welcome.  We=20 definitely also need new ideas and views.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Trebuchet MS" size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Trebuchet MS" size=3D2>TIA,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Trebuchet MS" size=3D2>el</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C78E6D.6B591C50-- Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179397
  - 23
    - Critical security hotfix causes event log warnings I started getting Application warnings shortly after I installed the critical hotfix KB 925902 on my SBS 2000 server and restarted. They continued every 5 minutes apart until I uninstalled the hotfix a week later. Troubleshooting articles I found all suggested that the cause was some form of corruption in the security database. As directed, I ran "esentutl.exe /q C:\WINNT\security\database\secedit.sdb". I got no errors. I have had no problems looking at and changing security policies. What's the underlying cause of the problem? How do I fix this so that I can keep the hotfix installed? Is there a better newsgroup for this question? The SBS 2000 Server is running Exchange and SQL. All are on current service packs. Thanks, Joe M ---------------------------------------------- This is a cut/paste of the first warning event: Event Type: Warning Event Source: SceCli Event Category: None Event ID: 1202 Date: 4/9/2007 Time: 10:25:12 AM User: N/A Computer: MY-SBS Description: Security policies are propagated with warning. 0x4b8 : An extended error has occurred. For best results in resolving this event, log on with a non-administrative account and search http://support.microsoft.com for "Troubleshooting Event 1202s". I kept getting these warning events every 5 minutes until I uninstalled KB925902. After the restart I got: Event Type: Information Event Source: SceCli Event Category: None Event ID: 1704 Date: 4/17/2007 Time: 10:35:20 PM User: N/A Computer: BIAGINI-SBS Description: Security policy in the Group policy objects are applied successfully. I have had no SceCli warning events since. Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179389
  - 24
    - Constantly Running Low on Disk Space Up till recently we have been keeping a constant 40% ish free disk space on the C drive. Now the server over a couple of days runs down to 0%. Exchange DB's\logs, user folders etc are all on a seperate partition. If we reboot the server we regain the disk space back again. If I look at any of the folders there does not seem to be any dramatic increase in sizes to explain the loss of free space. Any help would be grateful. Thanks Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179376
  - 25
    - SBS Migration in general Is there any other way to do a swing migration other than purchasing a separate migration tool? In other words, will a user lose all their e-mail outlook data and book marks on their PC workstation once the change has been created from a new server installation? Also, can I manually do some backup of this onto a tape somehow and restore from a tape or external hard drive from a backup? I like to know my options on this case? I'd appreciate any feedback? Tag: Terminal Services Logon Tag: 179373

Windows 2000 SP4. New install and after a day or so the user is unable to
logon remotely to the server using terminal services. After a reboot the
issue is temporarily resolved. This has been an ongoing issu even after the
system has been reloaded several times. Event logs are not full and there
dosent seem to be an apparent reason for it to stop. The web server
functions normally. Local desktop logon is also restricted until restarted.
Shared file acces within the LAN is available. Any suggestions would be
greatly appreciated.

Top

Re: Terminal Services Logon by Larry

Larry
Sat Jun 16 14:12:38 CDT 2007

Hi:

This group is more or less dedicated to SBS 2000. If this is a terminal
services issue you might get more help in:

microsoft.public.windows.termainal_services

Larry Struckmeyer

"Frustrated Admin" <FrustratedAdmin@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:BDABA3BA-8AC2-444C-8677-65DF1C2BFEAA@microsoft.com...
> Windows 2000 SP4. New install and after a day or so the user is unable to
> logon remotely to the server using terminal services. After a reboot the
> issue is temporarily resolved. This has been an ongoing issu even after
> the
> system has been reloaded several times. Event logs are not full and there
> dosent seem to be an apparent reason for it to stop. The web server
> functions normally. Local desktop logon is also restricted until
> restarted.
> Shared file acces within the LAN is available. Any suggestions would be
> greatly appreciated.

Top