Cris
Thu Apr 27 19:00:06 CDT 2006
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C66A2C.CC8CE990
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
didn't even look at the link
You simply cannot have additional domains with SBS
As for moving the users...I've not played with it, but I believe what =
you are going to need is the ADMT (Active Directory Migration Too)
--=20
Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
--------------------------------------
Please do not respond directly to me, but only post in the newsgroup so =
all can take advantage
"briandwest" <briandwest@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message =
news:04B7175A-FCFA-46E4-863B-DF66B7C977F6@microsoft.com...
Okay... that was what I thought initially. But I keep coming across =
web=20
pages and posts that seem to say that if the SBS domain is still in =
control=20
of the forest, then other domains can be added to that forest. Here's =
an=20
example:
http://fac.ce.vreau.eu.org/sbs.html Is this not the case?
I don't know if this helps or not, but the server that's =
currently=20
running SBS2K is eventually going to be reformatted to have Win2K =
Advanced=20
installed on it. Point being, we won't need both domains to work =
together=20
permanently. But right now all the users are authenticating off of =
the SBS'=20
domain. So I guess the item of primary importance is being able to =
move=20
those users from the SBS2K machine to the domain where a Win2K =
Advanced and a=20
Win2K3 Enterprise servers are DCs. Do the two domains need to be in =
the same=20
forest for this to be possible?
"Cris Hanna (SBS-MVP)" wrote:
> Sorry Brian
> You are out of luck
> SBS must be the first server at the root of the AD Domain and Forest =
and does not support trusts.
>=20
> You will simply have to migrate those users and any data to the =
Win2k3 domain.
>=20
> --=20
> Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
> --------------------------------------
> Please do not respond directly to me, but only post in the newsgroup =
so all can take advantage
> "briandwest" <briandwest@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in =
message news:1636453D-0201-4054-889E-BF95EB229C6C@microsoft.com...
> I was hired a few months ago to a company that currently is using =
two=20
> domains. The SBS2K server (domain1) is being used as a web and =
file server. =20
> I don't know the whole history of why they did this, but at this =
point some=20
> of the users and all the computers have been moved over to the =
other domain=20
> (domain2). Our ultimate goal is to get rid of domain1. Domain2 =
has two=20
> DC's--one is Win2K3 Enterprise (our Exchange server) and the other =
is Win2K=20
> Advanced.
> We want to:
> 1) Migrate the users and settings from domain1 to domain2
> 2) Set up a DFS between the SBS2K and a Win2K Advanced server in =
domain2
> 3) Change both domains from mixed mode to Win2K mode.
> It seems to me that combining the two domains into one forest =
will make=20
> both of these goals easier (or at least the DFS).
>=20
> What "gotchas" can we expect in attempting these? Is my basic =
thinking=20
> sound? I've tried to review as much info and documentation as =
possible, but=20
> I'm not 100% sure about all of this.
> Thanks for your help.
>=20
> Brian West
> Johnson City, TN
------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C66A2C.CC8CE990
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="Utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=EF=BB=BF<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2802" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>didn't even look at the =
link</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>You simply cannot have additional =
domains with=20
SBS</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>As for moving the users...I've not =
played with it,=20
but I believe what you are going to need is the ADMT (Active Directory =
Migration=20
Too)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><BR>-- <BR>Cris Hanna=20
[SBS-MVP]<BR>--------------------------------------<BR>Please do not =
respond=20
directly to me, but only post in the newsgroup so all can take =
advantage</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"briandwest" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:briandwest@discussions.microsoft.com">briandwest@discussio=
ns.microsoft.com</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:04B7175A-FCFA-46E4-863B-DF66B7C977F6@microsoft.com">news:04B=
7175A-FCFA-46E4-863B-DF66B7C977F6@microsoft.com</A>...</DIV>Okay...=20
that was what I thought initially. But I keep coming across web=20
<BR>pages and posts that seem to say that if the SBS domain is still =
in=20
control <BR>of the forest, then other domains can be added to that=20
forest. Here's an <BR>example: <A=20
=
href=3D"
http://fac.ce.vreau.eu.org/sbs.html">http://fac.ce.vreau.eu.org/s=
bs.html</A> =20
Is this not the case?<BR> I don't know if this =
helps=20
or not, but the server that's currently <BR>running SBS2K is =
eventually going=20
to be reformatted to have Win2K Advanced <BR>installed on it. =
Point=20
being, we won't need both domains to work together =
<BR>permanently. But=20
right now all the users are authenticating off of the SBS' =
<BR>domain. =20
So I guess the item of primary importance is being able to move =
<BR>those=20
users from the SBS2K machine to the domain where a Win2K Advanced and =
a=20
<BR>Win2K3 Enterprise servers are DCs. Do the two domains need =
to be in=20
the same <BR>forest for this to be possible?<BR><BR><BR><BR>"Cris =
Hanna=20
(SBS-MVP)" wrote:<BR><BR>> Sorry Brian<BR>> You are out of =
luck<BR>>=20
SBS must be the first server at the root of the AD Domain and Forest =
and does=20
not support trusts.<BR>> <BR>> You will simply have to migrate =
those=20
users and any data to the Win2k3 domain.<BR>> <BR>> -- <BR>> =
Cris=20
Hanna [SBS-MVP]<BR>> --------------------------------------<BR>> =
Please=20
do not respond directly to me, but only post in the newsgroup so all =
can take=20
advantage<BR>> "briandwest" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:briandwest@discussions.microsoft.com">briandwest@discussio=
ns.microsoft.com</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:1636453D-0201-4054-889E-BF95EB229C6C@microsoft.com">news:163=
6453D-0201-4054-889E-BF95EB229C6C@microsoft.com</A>...<BR>>  =
;=20
I was hired a few months ago to a company that currently is using two=20
<BR>> domains. The SBS2K server (domain1) is =
being used=20
as a web and file server. <BR>> I don't know the =
whole=20
history of why they did this, but at this point some =
<BR>> of=20
the users and all the computers have been moved over to the other =
domain=20
<BR>> (domain2). Our ultimate goal is to get rid =
of=20
domain1. Domain2 has two <BR>> DC's--one is =
Win2K3=20
Enterprise (our Exchange server) and the other is Win2K =
<BR>> =20
Advanced.<BR>> We want=20
to:<BR>> 1) Migrate the users and settings from domain1 =
to=20
domain2<BR>> 2) Set up a DFS between the SBS2K and a =
Win2K=20
Advanced server in domain2<BR>> 3) Change both domains =
from=20
mixed mode to Win2K =
mode.<BR>> It=20
seems to me that combining the two domains into one forest will make=20
<BR>> both of these goals easier (or at least the =
DFS).<BR>>=20
<BR>> What "gotchas" can we expect in attempting =
these? =20
Is my basic thinking <BR>> sound? I've tried to =
review as=20
much info and documentation as possible, but <BR>> I'm =
not 100%=20
sure about all of =
this.<BR>> =20
Thanks for your help.<BR>> <BR>> Brian=20
West<BR>> Johnson City, TN</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C66A2C.CC8CE990--