Re: SBS 2000 Licensing issues - help ! by TomD
TomD
Tue Feb 05 20:10:00 CST 2008
Thanks Larry. I don't think the Schema mods will have too much impact. Keep
in mind this is a 2000 native domain, regardless that the Windows 2003 DC is
running 2003, the version of the Directory is 2000 native. I am still trying
to understand the other responses regarding 'issues or problems' with the
version I am running. When a 2003 domain controller is running in the 2000
native mode it is conforming to the way a SBS 2000 DC would present it's
schema. Hoping someone will really shed some light into this.
--
Thanks Bud
Tom
"Larry Struckmeyer" wrote:
> This is why I suggested taking this issue to the SBS 2003 ng. I am not an
> expert on the schema differences, but I am willing to bet there are enough
> of them that this is more headaches than you want to take on.
>
> OTOH, it may be easy... tweak this and that, add a bit of fairy dust, and
> some everything beans and viola!
>
> I might ask the q in the SBS 2003 ng along the lines of: I have this, I own
> it, can this be done?"
>
>
> --
> Larry
>
> "Tom D." <TomD@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:A125AA16-623A-4A00-9C1F-58E10DB0E596@microsoft.com...
> > One more question...
> > Is there an issue to installing SBS 2000 into a existing AD domain opposed
> > to installing 2003 SBS into an existing AD domain?
> > --
> >
> > Thanks
> > Tom
> >
> > "Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]" wrote:
> >
> >> crap...I can't read either...lol
> >> makes even less sense to install SBS 2000
> >> All kind of headaches there
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cris Hanna [SBS - MVP]
> >> -----------------------------------------------------------
> >> MVPs Do Not Work for Microsoft
> >> Please do not contact me directly regarding issues
> >> "Larry Struckmeyer" <lstruckmeyer(at)mis-wizards(dot)com> wrote in
> >> message news:%23yVhLzEaIHA.3828@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> >> I saw/see that Cris... just wanted him to get more feedback. Not many
> >> come here any more.
> >>
> >> Besides, you must mean an existing 2003 Domain... :-)
> >>
> >> Tom, imho, you should back this out and start over with SBS 2003 as
> >> Cris suggests.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Larry
> >>
> >> "Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]" <crisnospamhanna@cpunospamservices.net> wrote
> >> in message news:uOKisWEaIHA.2268@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> >> Larry he's installing SBS 2000
> >>
> >> Tom. Why are you installing a version of SBS that is so old when
> >> you have an existing 2000 domain
> >>
> >> At a minimum you should be installing SBS 2003. there is a white
> >> paper on the SBS 2003 into an existing AD domain
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cris Hanna [SBS - MVP]
> >> -----------------------------------------------------------
> >> MVPs Do Not Work for Microsoft
> >> Please do not contact me directly regarding issues
> >> "Larry Struckmeyer" <lstruckmeyer(at)mis-wizards(dot)com> wrote in
> >> message news:%23dw$VEEaIHA.2000@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> >> Because more eyes are watching, you may get more response in the
> >> SBS 2003
> >> Newsgroup.
> >>
> >> SBS public Newsgroups:
> >>
> >> SBS 4.x: microsoft.public.backoffice.smallbiz
> >> SBS 2000: microsoft.public.backoffice.smallbiz2000
> >> SBS 2003: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
> >>
> >> if your current news server does not carry the mentioned groups you
> >> should
> >> be able to connect directly to news.microsoft.com
> >>
> >> --
> >> Larry
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "Tom D." <TomD@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news:53A9226C-5B6E-434E-8DB1-736FE0A27713@microsoft.com...
> >> > Hello all
> >> > Here is my scenario...I have installed SBS 2000 into an existing
> >> 2003 AD
> >> > domain. The Active Directory is in 2000 native mode. I made the
> >> dumb
> >> > mistake
> >> > in assuming I could install the SBS as a member server and
> >> install
> >> > Exchange
> >> > from the installation binaries on Disk 3. (without the entire SBS
> >> package)
> >> > All was fine until I got licensing errors as I connected more
> >> than 10
> >> > people
> >> > to their new mailboxes.
> >> >
> >> > Does anyone have an intimate knowledge of SBS's licensing
> >> architecture? I
> >> > figured it would be OK because there is less than 25 users and I
> >> should
> >> > have
> >> > 50 and used the proper installation keys that came with the
> >> software. It
> >> > smells like it's the fact that it (SBS) is not the DC and the
> >> other DC
> >> > contains all of the roles (licensing in particular)