Hi

I have recently set up two new SBS 2000 servers on identical hardware and am
getting strange results:-

Both servers are Fujitsu RX300 servers c/w 2.6 GHZ Xeons, and 1gb RAM and
36Gb RAID 1 HD.

The servvers also have dual 1gb Broadcom ethernet cards built in.

On server 1 and 2 when restarting I get an error stating that there is a
duplicate name on the network and to use nbtstat -n.

On server 2 when i try to run the SBSconsole config for internet it tells me
that one of the lan cards is disabled, to renable then run the wizard again.
neither card is disabled and i can ping the i/p's of both cards.

Both machines are not on the network at the same time and they are set up as
follows.:

Server1
Machine name: Main
Domain :Opera

Card 1 Details:-

IP 10.0.0.5
sub 255.0.0.0
Gateway 10.0.0.1
DNS 10.0.0.5

Card 2 Details

IP 10.0.0.6
sub 255.0.0.0
Gateway 10.0.0.1
DNS 10.0.0.5

Server2
Machine name: HYDRASBS01
Domain :hydraclean

Card 1 Details:-

IP 10.0.0.2
sub 255.0.0.0
Gateway 10.0.0.1
DNS 10.0.0.2

Card 2 Details

IP 10.0.0.3
sub 255.0.0.0
Gateway 10.0.0.1
DNS 10.0.0.2

Any one any ideas?

Re: New SBS Install Problems by Derek

Derek
Thu Sep 18 13:11:07 CDT 2003

PS I am not using ISA server

"Derek Daly" <derek.daly@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:uLN4C%23gfDHA.2400@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Hi
>
> I have recently set up two new SBS 2000 servers on identical hardware and
am
> getting strange results:-
>
> Both servers are Fujitsu RX300 servers c/w 2.6 GHZ Xeons, and 1gb RAM and
> 36Gb RAID 1 HD.
>
> The servvers also have dual 1gb Broadcom ethernet cards built in.
>
> On server 1 and 2 when restarting I get an error stating that there is a
> duplicate name on the network and to use nbtstat -n.
>
> On server 2 when i try to run the SBSconsole config for internet it tells
me
> that one of the lan cards is disabled, to renable then run the wizard
again.
> neither card is disabled and i can ping the i/p's of both cards.
>
> Both machines are not on the network at the same time and they are set up
as
> follows.:
>
> Server1
> Machine name: Main
> Domain :Opera
>
> Card 1 Details:-
>
> IP 10.0.0.5
> sub 255.0.0.0
> Gateway 10.0.0.1
> DNS 10.0.0.5
>
> Card 2 Details
>
> IP 10.0.0.6
> sub 255.0.0.0
> Gateway 10.0.0.1
> DNS 10.0.0.5
>
> Server2
> Machine name: HYDRASBS01
> Domain :hydraclean
>
> Card 1 Details:-
>
> IP 10.0.0.2
> sub 255.0.0.0
> Gateway 10.0.0.1
> DNS 10.0.0.2
>
> Card 2 Details
>
> IP 10.0.0.3
> sub 255.0.0.0
> Gateway 10.0.0.1
> DNS 10.0.0.2
>
> Any one any ideas?
>
>



Re: New SBS Install Problems by Marina

Marina
Thu Sep 18 13:12:18 CDT 2003

Your internal nic should have a blanc gateway.
Your second nic: what are you using it for? Connecting to a router or
something? It should be in a different IP-range.
Same for the second server.

Marina

"Derek Daly" <derek.daly@btopenworld.com> schreef in bericht
news:uLN4C%23gfDHA.2400@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Hi
>
> I have recently set up two new SBS 2000 servers on identical hardware and
am
> getting strange results:-
>
> Both servers are Fujitsu RX300 servers c/w 2.6 GHZ Xeons, and 1gb RAM and
> 36Gb RAID 1 HD.
>
> The servvers also have dual 1gb Broadcom ethernet cards built in.
>
> On server 1 and 2 when restarting I get an error stating that there is a
> duplicate name on the network and to use nbtstat -n.
>
> On server 2 when i try to run the SBSconsole config for internet it tells
me
> that one of the lan cards is disabled, to renable then run the wizard
again.
> neither card is disabled and i can ping the i/p's of both cards.
>
> Both machines are not on the network at the same time and they are set up
as
> follows.:
>
> Server1
> Machine name: Main
> Domain :Opera
>
> Card 1 Details:-
>
> IP 10.0.0.5
> sub 255.0.0.0
> Gateway 10.0.0.1
> DNS 10.0.0.5
>
> Card 2 Details
>
> IP 10.0.0.6
> sub 255.0.0.0
> Gateway 10.0.0.1
> DNS 10.0.0.5
>
> Server2
> Machine name: HYDRASBS01
> Domain :hydraclean
>
> Card 1 Details:-
>
> IP 10.0.0.2
> sub 255.0.0.0
> Gateway 10.0.0.1
> DNS 10.0.0.2
>
> Card 2 Details
>
> IP 10.0.0.3
> sub 255.0.0.0
> Gateway 10.0.0.1
> DNS 10.0.0.2
>
> Any one any ideas?
>
>



Re: New SBS Install Problems by Les

Les
Thu Sep 18 13:45:42 CDT 2003

Hi Derek,

Best thing at this point is to go to
http://www.smallbizserver.net/sbs2000/network.aspx , pick your setup, and
get a graphical representation of the correct configuration.

--
Les Connor [SBS MVP]
-------------------------------------
SBS Rocks !



"Derek Daly" <derek.daly@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:#A6et$gfDHA.892@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> PS I am not using ISA server
>
> "Derek Daly" <derek.daly@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
> news:uLN4C%23gfDHA.2400@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > Hi
> >
> > I have recently set up two new SBS 2000 servers on identical hardware
and
> am
> > getting strange results:-
> >
> > Both servers are Fujitsu RX300 servers c/w 2.6 GHZ Xeons, and 1gb RAM
and
> > 36Gb RAID 1 HD.
> >
> > The servvers also have dual 1gb Broadcom ethernet cards built in.
> >
> > On server 1 and 2 when restarting I get an error stating that there is a
> > duplicate name on the network and to use nbtstat -n.
> >
> > On server 2 when i try to run the SBSconsole config for internet it
tells
> me
> > that one of the lan cards is disabled, to renable then run the wizard
> again.
> > neither card is disabled and i can ping the i/p's of both cards.
> >
> > Both machines are not on the network at the same time and they are set
up
> as
> > follows.:
> >
> > Server1
> > Machine name: Main
> > Domain :Opera
> >
> > Card 1 Details:-
> >
> > IP 10.0.0.5
> > sub 255.0.0.0
> > Gateway 10.0.0.1
> > DNS 10.0.0.5
> >
> > Card 2 Details
> >
> > IP 10.0.0.6
> > sub 255.0.0.0
> > Gateway 10.0.0.1
> > DNS 10.0.0.5
> >
> > Server2
> > Machine name: HYDRASBS01
> > Domain :hydraclean
> >
> > Card 1 Details:-
> >
> > IP 10.0.0.2
> > sub 255.0.0.0
> > Gateway 10.0.0.1
> > DNS 10.0.0.2
> >
> > Card 2 Details
> >
> > IP 10.0.0.3
> > sub 255.0.0.0
> > Gateway 10.0.0.1
> > DNS 10.0.0.2
> >
> > Any one any ideas?
> >
> >
>
>



Re: New SBS Install Problems by Derek

Derek
Thu Sep 18 18:58:13 CDT 2003

Hi,

The second nic is just being used because it is there. I was have got 2 24
port switches and was going to plug each nic into each switch.

on the ohter server I am it as the dc with a win2003 server which also has
two nicsm i was thinking of using a crossover cable to connect the two
servers together.


"Marina Roos" <marina@roos.nodontwantspam.nl.com> wrote in message
news:6Amab.106671$506.105813@typhoon.bart.nl...
> Your internal nic should have a blanc gateway.
> Your second nic: what are you using it for? Connecting to a router or
> something? It should be in a different IP-range.
> Same for the second server.
>
> Marina
>
> "Derek Daly" <derek.daly@btopenworld.com> schreef in bericht
> news:uLN4C%23gfDHA.2400@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > Hi
> >
> > I have recently set up two new SBS 2000 servers on identical hardware
and
> am
> > getting strange results:-
> >
> > Both servers are Fujitsu RX300 servers c/w 2.6 GHZ Xeons, and 1gb RAM
and
> > 36Gb RAID 1 HD.
> >
> > The servvers also have dual 1gb Broadcom ethernet cards built in.
> >
> > On server 1 and 2 when restarting I get an error stating that there is a
> > duplicate name on the network and to use nbtstat -n.
> >
> > On server 2 when i try to run the SBSconsole config for internet it
tells
> me
> > that one of the lan cards is disabled, to renable then run the wizard
> again.
> > neither card is disabled and i can ping the i/p's of both cards.
> >
> > Both machines are not on the network at the same time and they are set
up
> as
> > follows.:
> >
> > Server1
> > Machine name: Main
> > Domain :Opera
> >
> > Card 1 Details:-
> >
> > IP 10.0.0.5
> > sub 255.0.0.0
> > Gateway 10.0.0.1
> > DNS 10.0.0.5
> >
> > Card 2 Details
> >
> > IP 10.0.0.6
> > sub 255.0.0.0
> > Gateway 10.0.0.1
> > DNS 10.0.0.5
> >
> > Server2
> > Machine name: HYDRASBS01
> > Domain :hydraclean
> >
> > Card 1 Details:-
> >
> > IP 10.0.0.2
> > sub 255.0.0.0
> > Gateway 10.0.0.1
> > DNS 10.0.0.2
> >
> > Card 2 Details
> >
> > IP 10.0.0.3
> > sub 255.0.0.0
> > Gateway 10.0.0.1
> > DNS 10.0.0.2
> >
> > Any one any ideas?
> >
> >
>
>