HFNETCHK (v. 4.0.76.6) doesn't seem to be interested in the new patches.
Full Scans (and Quick Scans) against three, fully patched servers turned up
no new patches... Anyone else notice this?
I scanned the systems at 6:56EST on 10.15.03

j*

This is normal was Re: HFNETCHK Pro not detecting need for latest by Susan

Susan
Wed Oct 15 19:06:05 CDT 2003

Give them time... it takes them a little bit of time to get the XMLfile
updated

This is normal dude.

mealsormissles wrote:
> HFNETCHK (v. 4.0.76.6) doesn't seem to be interested in the new patches.
> Full Scans (and Quick Scans) against three, fully patched servers turned up
> no new patches... Anyone else notice this?
> I scanned the systems at 6:56EST on 10.15.03
>
> j*
>
>

--
"Don't lose sight of security. Security is a state of being,
not a state of budget. He with the most firewalls still does
not win. Put down that honeypot and keep up to date on your
patches. Demand better security from vendors and hold them
responsible. Use what you have, and make sure you know how
to use it properly and effectively."
~Rain Forest Puppy
http://www.wiretrip.net/rfp/txt/evolution.txt


Re: This is normal was Re: HFNETCHK Pro not detecting need for latestpatches - 041,042,043,044,045 by mealsormissles

mealsormissles
Wed Oct 15 19:50:02 CDT 2003

I thought I was slow - didn't know I was ahead of the game this time.
Thanks Susan.

j*


Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] <sbradcpa@pacbell.net> wrote
in message news:OOP2fm3kDHA.2500@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Give them time... it takes them a little bit of time to get the XMLfile
> updated
>
> This is normal dude.
>
> mealsormissles wrote:
> > HFNETCHK (v. 4.0.76.6) doesn't seem to be interested in the new patches.
> > Full Scans (and Quick Scans) against three, fully patched servers turned
up
> > no new patches... Anyone else notice this?
> > I scanned the systems at 6:56EST on 10.15.03
> >
> > j*
> >
> >




Re: This is normal was Re: HFNETCHK Pro not detecting need for latestpatches by Susan

Susan
Wed Oct 15 19:53:26 CDT 2003

Subject: 7 new patches released from MS today
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 12:29:47 -0500
From: "Eric Schultze [Shavlik]" <eric@shavlik.com>
Newsgroups: shavlik.hfnetchk,shavlik.hfnetchklt,shavlik.hfnetchkpro

We are working on these patches now. We'll post another message later today
when the XML files are available with these patches.

http://news.shavlik.com/
Eric posts when the file is ready to go.....


mealsormissles wrote:
> I thought I was slow - didn't know I was ahead of the game this time.
> Thanks Susan.
>
> j*
>
>
> Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] <sbradcpa@pacbell.net> wrote
> in message news:OOP2fm3kDHA.2500@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>
>>Give them time... it takes them a little bit of time to get the XMLfile
>>updated
>>
>>This is normal dude.
>>
>>mealsormissles wrote:
>>
>>>HFNETCHK (v. 4.0.76.6) doesn't seem to be interested in the new patches.
>>>Full Scans (and Quick Scans) against three, fully patched servers turned
>
> up
>
>>>no new patches... Anyone else notice this?
>>>I scanned the systems at 6:56EST on 10.15.03
>>>
>>>j*
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>

--
"Don't lose sight of security. Security is a state of being,
not a state of budget. He with the most firewalls still does
not win. Put down that honeypot and keep up to date on your
patches. Demand better security from vendors and hold them
responsible. Use what you have, and make sure you know how
to use it properly and effectively."
~Rain Forest Puppy
http://www.wiretrip.net/rfp/txt/evolution.txt


Re: This is normal was Re: HFNETCHK Pro not detecting need for latestpatches by Susan

Susan
Wed Oct 15 22:19:32 CDT 2003

From Shavlik's newsgroup.....

Before we release the update XML files, we need to enter and test all the
assessment and deployment and rollback data for each patch. Unforunately,
this takes a while to do to ensure we get it right. We double and triple
check everything we do.

Today, there were 36 unique patch identies to enter and 33 unique patch
deployments to record. We enter assessment details for all 36 patches (WXP
Gold and SP1 use the same patch, but deploy different files, this one patch
has two separate patch assessment identities) , then enter the deployment
details for all patches across all platforms, SPs, etc. We need to test
each to ensure good assessment, as well as testing for deployment and
rollback for each patch. Our team works diligently from the moment the
patches are released from MS until we can release the XML files on the web.
We don't leave the office until this is done.

Hope that helps explain some of the process on our end.

Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] wrote:

> Subject: 7 new patches released from MS today
> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 12:29:47 -0500
> From: "Eric Schultze [Shavlik]" <eric@shavlik.com>
> Newsgroups: shavlik.hfnetchk,shavlik.hfnetchklt,shavlik.hfnetchkpro
>
> We are working on these patches now. We'll post another message later
> today
> when the XML files are available with these patches.
>
> http://news.shavlik.com/
> Eric posts when the file is ready to go.....
>
>
> mealsormissles wrote:
>
>> I thought I was slow - didn't know I was ahead of the game this time.
>> Thanks Susan.
>>
>> j*
>>
>>
>> Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] <sbradcpa@pacbell.net>
>> wrote
>> in message news:OOP2fm3kDHA.2500@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>>
>>> Give them time... it takes them a little bit of time to get the XMLfile
>>> updated
>>>
>>> This is normal dude.
>>>
>>> mealsormissles wrote:
>>>
>>>> HFNETCHK (v. 4.0.76.6) doesn't seem to be interested in the new
>>>> patches.
>>>> Full Scans (and Quick Scans) against three, fully patched servers
>>>> turned
>>
>>
>> up
>>
>>>> no new patches... Anyone else notice this?
>>>> I scanned the systems at 6:56EST on 10.15.03
>>>>
>>>> j*
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

--
"Don't lose sight of security. Security is a state of being,
not a state of budget. He with the most firewalls still does
not win. Put down that honeypot and keep up to date on your
patches. Demand better security from vendors and hold them
responsible. Use what you have, and make sure you know how
to use it properly and effectively."
~Rain Forest Puppy
http://www.wiretrip.net/rfp/txt/evolution.txt


Re: This is normal was Re: HFNETCHK Pro not detecting need for latestpatches - 041,042,043,044,045 by mealsormissles

mealsormissles
Thu Oct 16 12:28:01 CDT 2003

That's a lot of permutations.
Thanks for the detailed info Susan and Shavlik
Shavlik.


"Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]" <sbradcpa@pacbell.net>
wrote in message news:uft0lS5kDHA.2080@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> From Shavlik's newsgroup.....
>
> Before we release the update XML files, we need to enter and test all the
> assessment and deployment and rollback data for each patch. Unforunately,
> this takes a while to do to ensure we get it right. We double and triple
> check everything we do.
>
> Today, there were 36 unique patch identies to enter and 33 unique patch
> deployments to record. We enter assessment details for all 36 patches
(WXP
> Gold and SP1 use the same patch, but deploy different files, this one
patch
> has two separate patch assessment identities) , then enter the deployment
> details for all patches across all platforms, SPs, etc. We need to test
> each to ensure good assessment, as well as testing for deployment and
> rollback for each patch. Our team works diligently from the moment the
> patches are released from MS until we can release the XML files on the
web.
> We don't leave the office until this is done.
>
> Hope that helps explain some of the process on our end.
>
> Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] wrote:
>
> > Subject: 7 new patches released from MS today
> > Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 12:29:47 -0500
> > From: "Eric Schultze [Shavlik]" <eric@shavlik.com>
> > Newsgroups: shavlik.hfnetchk,shavlik.hfnetchklt,shavlik.hfnetchkpro
> >
> > We are working on these patches now. We'll post another message later
> > today
> > when the XML files are available with these patches.
> >
> > http://news.shavlik.com/
> > Eric posts when the file is ready to go.....
> >
> >
> > mealsormissles wrote:
> >
> >> I thought I was slow - didn't know I was ahead of the game this time.
> >> Thanks Susan.
> >>
> >> j*
> >>
> >>
> >> Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] <sbradcpa@pacbell.net>
> >> wrote
> >> in message news:OOP2fm3kDHA.2500@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> >>
> >>> Give them time... it takes them a little bit of time to get the
XMLfile
> >>> updated
> >>>
> >>> This is normal dude.
> >>>
> >>> mealsormissles wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> HFNETCHK (v. 4.0.76.6) doesn't seem to be interested in the new
> >>>> patches.
> >>>> Full Scans (and Quick Scans) against three, fully patched servers
> >>>> turned
> >>
> >>
> >> up
> >>
> >>>> no new patches... Anyone else notice this?
> >>>> I scanned the systems at 6:56EST on 10.15.03
> >>>>
> >>>> j*
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> --
> "Don't lose sight of security. Security is a state of being,
> not a state of budget. He with the most firewalls still does
> not win. Put down that honeypot and keep up to date on your
> patches. Demand better security from vendors and hold them
> responsible. Use what you have, and make sure you know how
> to use it properly and effectively."
> ~Rain Forest Puppy
> http://www.wiretrip.net/rfp/txt/evolution.txt
>