Aztech
Mon Jan 23 15:48:02 CST 2006
Thanks for the quick responses. I will try the SBS 2003 group.
"Steve" wrote:
> I wouldn't trust it but maybe someone else will chime in. You might also
> want to bring this over to the SBS 2003 newsgroup:
> microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
>
> "Aztech" <Aztech@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:68712521-5224-4CAD-AE2F-4A69FD57E5C9@microsoft.com...
> > They had already purchased Exchange 2003 a while ago. I went ahead and
> > purchased SBS 2003 that will be here tomorrow. Will the upgrade work?
> > Including Exchange?
> >
> > "Steve" wrote:
> >
> >> Not sure what to advise you but at the very least it looks like you have
> >> an
> >> unsupported configuration. Since the SBS 2003 upgrade is cheaper than
> >> standalone Exchange 2003 why didn't you follow the supported path in the
> >> first place?
> >>
> >> "Aztech" <Aztech@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news:7552D26B-4E8C-450F-88BA-72C9710F08D2@microsoft.com...
> >> >I have an SBS 2000 server which had surpassed the 16GB database limit. I
> >> > temporarily increased the database limit to 17GB and then upgraded
> >> > Exchange
> >> > to 2003 Standard edition with 5 users but SBS still has its 30 licenses
> >> > installed. Now I need to upgrade the Exchange 2003 licenses to 20 but
> >> > cannot
> >> > figure out how to add for Exchange only. Is there a way? Or what will
> >> > happen
> >> > if I upgrade SBS 2000 to 2003 now after having installed a non-SBS
> >> > version
> >> > of
> >> > Exchange?
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>