Re: Distribution List and Outlook 2003 by Dave
Dave
Tue Feb 10 15:49:13 CST 2004
Kevin - I'm hoping that cached Exchange mode works better with Exchange 2003
than it does with 2000, where it seems to be a lot of trouble for no
benefit. Actually, the junk e-mail filter seems to require cached mode, and
I was having pretty good luck with that feature.
"Kevin Weilbacher" <kweilbacMVP@gte.net> wrote in message
news:%23TP8YjB8DHA.2572@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Dave, indeed during a sync (F9) did the trick.
>
> --
> Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP]
> "The days pass by so quickly now, the nights are seldom long"
>
>
>
> "Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]" <gwdibble@NOSPAM.frontiernet.net> wrote in
message
> news:ekDZjc$7DHA.2460@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > Try synchronizing his mailbox (F9). Assuming you're running in cached
> > Exchange mode, that may fix it. I've seen some unusual (to say the
least)
> > behavior running cached mode on Exchange 2000, including that at one
point
> I
> > could not get any messages dated on the current date.
> >
> >
> > "Kevin Weilbacher" <kweilbacMVP@gte.net> wrote in message
> > news:e6naUV$7DHA.2752@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > > I have a customer with SBS2000. I created some new distribution lists
in
> > the
> > > GAL. Everyone can see the new distribution listx except for the boss.
> And
> > > the only difference that I can see is that his computer (laptop) is
> > running
> > > Office 2003, while everyone else is running Outlook 2000/2002/XP.
> > >
> > > Any ideas? I will be going to Slipstick in a moment.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > --
> > > Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP]
> > > "The days pass by so quickly now, the nights are seldom long"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>