Mark
Thu Feb 12 07:52:37 CST 2004
no, file based defrag IS necessary. Not so much in RAID5 based systems due
to how data is physically put ojn the drive but in all other instances it is
something that should be routine. Those of us that lived through NT4 days
saw the need for it, especially with databases. I have a client with an EMR
package that the s/w vendor highly suggests daily defrags on the data
partition. I think that's a bit much but they are the developer of that
package.
--
Sincerely,
Mark Mancini, CCA, CCNA, Master CIW&CI, CNE 4&5, MCSE+I 4&2000
www.MCSE2000.com
www.AppLauncher.com
"Jussi" <jusu8.N.O.S.P.A.M@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:O262A3T8DHA.2480@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Thanks for the link Mariette.
>
> - So do you think that file based (not ESEUTIL /d) defraq is unnecessary?
> - *IF* you wanted to do it with Diskeeper how would you do it?
> (Has ESE some way of knowing where the datapages reside on the disk, that
> could be corrupted with data file (*.edb/*.stm) defragmentation?)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jussi
>
>
> "Mariette Knap [SBS MVP]" <mariette@smallbizserver.local> kirjoitti
> viestissä news:u$li5ET8DHA.2712@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > In news:OaslstO8DHA.2712@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl,
> > Jussi <jusu8888N.O.S.P.A.M@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Is there anything special I should know before trying to defrag these
> > > files? Dismount, defrag and mount again..?
> >
> > Smallbizserver.Net - FAQ > SBS 2000 > Server Issues on SBS 2000 > Do I
> need
> > to defrag the drives in my server?:
> >
http://www.smallbizserver.net/DesktopDefault.aspx?tabid=36
> >
> > --
> > Mariëtte Knap - MVP
> >
http://www.smallbizserver.net
> >
> >
>
>