I hope I can find an answer for this. I am trying to get a connection to a SBS 2000 server over a VPN.

I have a Small Business Server 2000 network at the office. The Internal IP range is 10.0.0.x. The server is 10.0.0.1 and the clients are assigned similar IP addresses.

The other network card is plugged into the Cisco router. The IP addresses are 192.168.1.1 for the router, and 192.168.1.2 for the internal NIC.

The other end of the Cisco router VPN is at a home office. The router there is 192.168.2.1 and the computer it is connected to is 192.168.2.2.

The ISP that manages the routers assure me that the VPN is working fine. I can PING both ends of the VPN, but I cannot browse.

If I type \\192.168.1.2\share, I get an error message saying that it cannot find it. I know this share exists though.

Does anyone have any ideas what could be wrong?

Re: Cisco VPN in SBS 2000 by Chad

Chad
Mon Sep 29 10:53:57 CDT 2003

Hi Phil -

See my reply to your other thread

--
Chad A Gross - SBS Rocks!

Lerman's Law of Technology: Any technical problem can be overcome
given enough time and money.
Corollary: You are never given enough time or money.



Phil wrote:
> I hope I can find an answer for this. I am trying to get a
> connection to a SBS 2000 server over a VPN.
>
> I have a Small Business Server 2000 network at the office. The
> Internal IP range is 10.0.0.x. The server is 10.0.0.1 and the
> clients are assigned similar IP addresses.
>
> The other network card is plugged into the Cisco router. The IP
> addresses are 192.168.1.1 for the router, and 192.168.1.2 for the
> internal NIC.
>
> The other end of the Cisco router VPN is at a home office. The
> router there is 192.168.2.1 and the computer it is connected to is
> 192.168.2.2.
>
> The ISP that manages the routers assure me that the VPN is working
> fine. I can PING both ends of the VPN, but I cannot browse.
>
> If I type \\192.168.1.2\share, I get an error message saying that it
> cannot find it. I know this share exists though.
>
> Does anyone have any ideas what could be wrong?