Dave
Tue May 04 13:25:23 CDT 2004
Personally, I would leave ISA and DHCP alone. ISA is a second line of
defense for anything missed by the Cisco, as well as providing access
control and caching. As Susan will tell you, a layered defense is best -
it's far less likely for both the Cisco and ISA to be vulnerable to the same
attack. As for DHCP, I believe in leaving SBS as close to its default
configuration as possible in the absence of a reason to do otherwise. I'd
prefer to leave my DHCP server in SBS alone, especially since it's working
fine, and disable DHCP on the Cisco.
"Howard" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6e3701c42f1c$abe703d0$a101280a@phx.gbl...
> My SBS 2k system is running fine but I am looking at a
> couple of changes which will impact the architecture -
> just not sure how...
>
> We are adding an office several hundred miles away. Both
> local and remote have T-1 access. The VOIP folks want to
> include a Cisco PIX501 VPN router at each end. Seems
> like an opportunity to replace ISA, DHCP and Proxy with a
> hardware solution?
>
> Any thoughts, experiences and or recommendations?
>
> Howard