We are adding another server(192.168.16.x) (linux) for a
time clock program a vendor provided. This time clock
needs to be accessed by two networks on my system, SBS2K's
192.168.16.x, and my static IP's on the 192.168.1.x
network. How can I let SBS2K see the 192.168.1.x network,
and visa versa? If I change the other non-SBS2K (Win98)
wkstns to dhcp, then they loose the default gateway of the
router, and can no longer browse the Internet. I would
also have the advantages of letting the non-SBS2K wkstns
of pulling down anti-virus updates, and other things. Is
it doable? Do we need to modify the LAT? The only entry
there is 192.168.16.1 - 192.168.16.254....

Re: Additional sub-nets 192.168.1.x by Mark

Mark
Wed Jan 14 20:47:18 CST 2004

you would normally use a router, you may be able to multi-home....but the
questions is...why the multiple networks?!?! I wouldn't work around a fix
but design it better.

--
Sincerely,
Mark Mancini, CCA, CCNA, Master CIW&CI, CNE 4&5, MCSE+I 4&2000
www.MCSE2000.com
www.AppLauncher.com



"t_ash" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:009d01c3dad4$d33ce090$a601280a@phx.gbl...
> We are adding another server(192.168.16.x) (linux) for a
> time clock program a vendor provided. This time clock
> needs to be accessed by two networks on my system, SBS2K's
> 192.168.16.x, and my static IP's on the 192.168.1.x
> network. How can I let SBS2K see the 192.168.1.x network,
> and visa versa? If I change the other non-SBS2K (Win98)
> wkstns to dhcp, then they loose the default gateway of the
> router, and can no longer browse the Internet. I would
> also have the advantages of letting the non-SBS2K wkstns
> of pulling down anti-virus updates, and other things. Is
> it doable? Do we need to modify the LAT? The only entry
> there is 192.168.16.1 - 192.168.16.254....