Hi All

I need to set up an SBS 2000 to allow access to a computer on the
external side of the server.

The server has the standard 2 NICs, one internal and one external.
Clients connected to internal and external used for broadband internet
(and now this computer).

We need to have a cache that stores specific things that it updates from
the internet. It's complicated but suffice to say that I don't have any
control over this aspect.

The external NIC on SBS has 10.81.10.1 as it address. The external PC
has 10.81.10.250

I have already setup:
1. Site & Content Rules
an "Allow ALL" access policy (this is what I use when testing
only)
all destinations, always, allow,
applies to any request, all HTTP content

2. Protocol Rules
an "Allow ALL" access policy (this is what I use when testing
only)
All IP traffic, always, applies to any request

3. IP Packet Filters
There are lots of filters. I have setup one as:
enables, predefined HTTP Server (port 80)
Local computer and remore computer I have
tried different settings

The external network does not appear in the LAT nor the LDT.

I can Ping the 10.81.10.250 from an internal client and the server so I
know it exists and that the server is forwarding the ping requests. I
tried 10.81.10.249 and it didn't work (as I expected).

Should I have an entry in the Network Configuration - Routing list. If
so what are the settings?

Please help as I am really stuck. After 5 frustrating hours I still
can't get it to work.

Cheers

SmegHead

Re: Access to "external" computer by Dave

Dave
Sat Dec 11 13:58:35 CST 2004

Can you please give a more detailed description of what you're trying to
accomplish? I'm assuming the external box is on your premises since the
10.x address would not be Internet-routable. So why does it have to be on
the WAN side of the SBS instead of on the local network?

What are you trying to access on the external PC? ISA would not be blocking
an internally-generated request, so maybe the external PC's settings are
blocking the incoming attempt? Wouldn't it be easier to have the PC inside
your network as part of your domain, then allow it outbound access through
ISA to get the information it needs, similarly to how the AV downloads
signature files for distribution to the local network PCs?

Sorry to be obtuse but I don't understand your situation : -)


"Smeg Head" <here.there@everywhere> wrote in message
news:Xns95BBE5B33C5BCherethereeverywhere@207.46.248.16...
> Hi All
>
> I need to set up an SBS 2000 to allow access to a computer on the
> external side of the server.
>
> The server has the standard 2 NICs, one internal and one external.
> Clients connected to internal and external used for broadband internet
> (and now this computer).
>
> We need to have a cache that stores specific things that it updates from
> the internet. It's complicated but suffice to say that I don't have any
> control over this aspect.
>
> The external NIC on SBS has 10.81.10.1 as it address. The external PC
> has 10.81.10.250
>
> I have already setup:
> 1. Site & Content Rules
> an "Allow ALL" access policy (this is what I use when testing
> only)
> all destinations, always, allow,
> applies to any request, all HTTP content
>
> 2. Protocol Rules
> an "Allow ALL" access policy (this is what I use when testing
> only)
> All IP traffic, always, applies to any request
>
> 3. IP Packet Filters
> There are lots of filters. I have setup one as:
> enables, predefined HTTP Server (port 80)
> Local computer and remore computer I have
> tried different settings
>
> The external network does not appear in the LAT nor the LDT.
>
> I can Ping the 10.81.10.250 from an internal client and the server so I
> know it exists and that the server is forwarding the ping requests. I
> tried 10.81.10.249 and it didn't work (as I expected).
>
> Should I have an entry in the Network Configuration - Routing list. If
> so what are the settings?
>
> Please help as I am really stuck. After 5 frustrating hours I still
> can't get it to work.
>
> Cheers
>
> SmegHead



Re: Access to "external" computer by Smeg

Smeg
Sun Dec 12 12:11:51 CST 2004

Thanks for the reply.

The setup is in a school and the education authority have provided a PC
(which I have no control over) to act as a cache and source of education
software. The idea is that certain education websites can be completely
cached (or mirrored) so that when a Teacher comes to do the lesson it is
guaranteed that the website can be accessed i.e on this local machine.
This PC must have direct access to the internet (or so they say). Anyway
I have no control over it so that's how it works. All I know is that I
access it using its IP address in Internet Explorer with a certain path
name, userid and password.

So, the external box is on the premises. The hardware setup is:

Internal workstations are connected to the SBS2000 server on a 10.0.0.X
network via an "internal" ethernet switch. The Server has a second NIC
connected to another ethernet switch. This switch has a broadband modem
connected. (As an aside the "external" switch also has the
administrative PCs connected i.e the secretary, head teacher plus one
other but that's not really relevant here).


The "external" switch has this cache PC connected to it and I need to
have Internet Explorer access this PC - IP address 10.81.10.250. The
external NIC in the Server is address 10.81.10.1

I currently have a proxy forward setup to the education authority
intrAnet which then forwards normal internet access from there.

The argument I am getting from the education authority is that I can
"turn off" ISA as they provide enough intrusion protection. But I would
prefer to maintain the current setup because:
1. It works
2. I think of security like layers of an onion skin, the more you have
the better. (is that a bit over the top!!).

Thanks for any help

Smeghead




"Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]" <gwdibble@NOSPAM.frontiernet.net> wrote in
news:#vMLOv73EHA.2608@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl:

> Can you please give a more detailed description of what you're trying
> to accomplish? I'm assuming the external box is on your premises
> since the 10.x address would not be Internet-routable. So why does it
> have to be on the WAN side of the SBS instead of on the local network?
>
> What are you trying to access on the external PC? ISA would not be
> blocking an internally-generated request, so maybe the external PC's
> settings are blocking the incoming attempt? Wouldn't it be easier to
> have the PC inside your network as part of your domain, then allow it
> outbound access through ISA to get the information it needs, similarly
> to how the AV downloads signature files for distribution to the local
> network PCs?
>
> Sorry to be obtuse but I don't understand your situation : -)
>
>
> "Smeg Head" <here.there@everywhere> wrote in message
> news:Xns95BBE5B33C5BCherethereeverywhere@207.46.248.16...
>> Hi All
>>
>> I need to set up an SBS 2000 to allow access to a computer on the
>> external side of the server.
>>
>> The server has the standard 2 NICs, one internal and one external.
>> Clients connected to internal and external used for broadband
>> internet (and now this computer).
>>
>> We need to have a cache that stores specific things that it updates
>> from the internet. It's complicated but suffice to say that I don't
>> have any control over this aspect.
>>
>> The external NIC on SBS has 10.81.10.1 as it address. The external PC
>> has 10.81.10.250
>>
>> I have already setup:
>> 1. Site & Content Rules
>> an "Allow ALL" access policy (this is what I use when testing
>> only)
>> all destinations, always, allow,
>> applies to any request, all HTTP content
>>
>> 2. Protocol Rules
>> an "Allow ALL" access policy (this is what I use when testing
>> only)
>> All IP traffic, always, applies to any request
>>
>> 3. IP Packet Filters
>> There are lots of filters. I have setup one as:
>> enables, predefined HTTP Server (port 80)
>> Local computer and remore computer I have
>> tried different settings
>>
>> The external network does not appear in the LAT nor the LDT.
>>
>> I can Ping the 10.81.10.250 from an internal client and the server so
>> I know it exists and that the server is forwarding the ping requests.
>> I tried 10.81.10.249 and it didn't work (as I expected).
>>
>> Should I have an entry in the Network Configuration - Routing list.
>> If so what are the settings?
>>
>> Please help as I am really stuck. After 5 frustrating hours I still
>> can't get it to work.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> SmegHead
>
>


Re: Access to "external" computer by Dave

Dave
Mon Dec 13 15:20:51 CST 2004

I'm not sure I get the answer, but at least I get the question : -)

Is the cache PC pulling the information from the source(s), or is the
information being pushed to the cache PC by the sources? It seems that the
cache box could be inside the LAN and that ISA would just allow it to go out
and get the information it needs. I agree with you that it would be foolish
to give up the protection provided by ISA, especially since if this is a
conventional broadband connection, I don't see anywhere that they are
providing firewall protection - it's all ISA in my understanding of the
situation.

It can't be a routing thing since you can ping the server. I was going to
say create a destination set for that IP, then a site and content rule to
allow access to the destination set. Since it appears that you've done
that, and since the cache PC is still not responding, I wonder if it's the
cache PC that's blocking the request rather than ISA.

What I would do now is to temporarily stick a PC on the external switch and
attempt to access the cache box. That way you'll have an idea what result
you should be seeing through ISA. And, if the cache PC doesn't respond as
expected, you'll know it's not an ISA issue.

If this is normal http traffic, ISA wouldn't be blocking it, right? I'd
expect that you'd be able to access http://10.81.10.250 just as you do
http://www.cnn.com.


"Smeg Head" <here.there@everywhere> wrote in message
news:Xns95BDB92181313herethereeverywhere@207.46.248.16...
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> The setup is in a school and the education authority have provided a PC
> (which I have no control over) to act as a cache and source of education
> software. The idea is that certain education websites can be completely
> cached (or mirrored) so that when a Teacher comes to do the lesson it is
> guaranteed that the website can be accessed i.e on this local machine.
> This PC must have direct access to the internet (or so they say). Anyway
> I have no control over it so that's how it works. All I know is that I
> access it using its IP address in Internet Explorer with a certain path
> name, userid and password.
>
> So, the external box is on the premises. The hardware setup is:
>
> Internal workstations are connected to the SBS2000 server on a 10.0.0.X
> network via an "internal" ethernet switch. The Server has a second NIC
> connected to another ethernet switch. This switch has a broadband modem
> connected. (As an aside the "external" switch also has the
> administrative PCs connected i.e the secretary, head teacher plus one
> other but that's not really relevant here).
>
>
> The "external" switch has this cache PC connected to it and I need to
> have Internet Explorer access this PC - IP address 10.81.10.250. The
> external NIC in the Server is address 10.81.10.1
>
> I currently have a proxy forward setup to the education authority
> intrAnet which then forwards normal internet access from there.
>
> The argument I am getting from the education authority is that I can
> "turn off" ISA as they provide enough intrusion protection. But I would
> prefer to maintain the current setup because:
> 1. It works
> 2. I think of security like layers of an onion skin, the more you have
> the better. (is that a bit over the top!!).
>
> Thanks for any help
>
> Smeghead
>
>
>
>
> "Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]" <gwdibble@NOSPAM.frontiernet.net> wrote in
> news:#vMLOv73EHA.2608@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl:
>
>> Can you please give a more detailed description of what you're trying
>> to accomplish? I'm assuming the external box is on your premises
>> since the 10.x address would not be Internet-routable. So why does it
>> have to be on the WAN side of the SBS instead of on the local network?
>>
>> What are you trying to access on the external PC? ISA would not be
>> blocking an internally-generated request, so maybe the external PC's
>> settings are blocking the incoming attempt? Wouldn't it be easier to
>> have the PC inside your network as part of your domain, then allow it
>> outbound access through ISA to get the information it needs, similarly
>> to how the AV downloads signature files for distribution to the local
>> network PCs?
>>
>> Sorry to be obtuse but I don't understand your situation : -)
>>
>>
>> "Smeg Head" <here.there@everywhere> wrote in message
>> news:Xns95BBE5B33C5BCherethereeverywhere@207.46.248.16...
>>> Hi All
>>>
>>> I need to set up an SBS 2000 to allow access to a computer on the
>>> external side of the server.
>>>
>>> The server has the standard 2 NICs, one internal and one external.
>>> Clients connected to internal and external used for broadband
>>> internet (and now this computer).
>>>
>>> We need to have a cache that stores specific things that it updates
>>> from the internet. It's complicated but suffice to say that I don't
>>> have any control over this aspect.
>>>
>>> The external NIC on SBS has 10.81.10.1 as it address. The external PC
>>> has 10.81.10.250
>>>
>>> I have already setup:
>>> 1. Site & Content Rules
>>> an "Allow ALL" access policy (this is what I use when testing
>>> only)
>>> all destinations, always, allow,
>>> applies to any request, all HTTP content
>>>
>>> 2. Protocol Rules
>>> an "Allow ALL" access policy (this is what I use when testing
>>> only)
>>> All IP traffic, always, applies to any request
>>>
>>> 3. IP Packet Filters
>>> There are lots of filters. I have setup one as:
>>> enables, predefined HTTP Server (port 80)
>>> Local computer and remore computer I have
>>> tried different settings
>>>
>>> The external network does not appear in the LAT nor the LDT.
>>>
>>> I can Ping the 10.81.10.250 from an internal client and the server so
>>> I know it exists and that the server is forwarding the ping requests.
>>> I tried 10.81.10.249 and it didn't work (as I expected).
>>>
>>> Should I have an entry in the Network Configuration - Routing list.
>>> If so what are the settings?
>>>
>>> Please help as I am really stuck. After 5 frustrating hours I still
>>> can't get it to work.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> SmegHead
>>
>>
>



Re: Access to "external" computer by Smeg

Smeg
Wed Dec 15 16:32:01 CST 2004

I have had some success with this but need to check if I have opened the
server up too much or made some kind of mistake.


I have attached a PC on the same "external" switch as the cache box and it
works (as per your suggestion). The access is via Internet Explorer with
the following in the address bar:
http://10.81.10.250/admin.html

The provided PC (cache box) has no monitor, kbd nor mouse. It's just a box.
Just for the sake of it I attached a monitor to it and it was on a
login/password screen that I have no access. Ah well.

> Is the cache PC pulling the information from the source(s), or is the
> information being pushed to the cache PC by the sources?
I think it's both from the brief instruction pack that we got with it.


Anyway, on to the real success story:
I found a flow chart on the internet of ISA security and followed it. The
last entry on the flowchart was to do with routing (and I think I have all
the others as OK)
I tried adding an entry in "ISA Management" as follows and it works.
Under "Servers and Arrays, then the server name
"Network Configuration"
I added another entry in "Routing" specifically for the "external PC"
It is "Order 1" i.e. top of the list

I can't remember all of the settings that I made but is this bad, apart
from the fact that it works now. If this is OK I will close down (one at a
time) my other changes that opened everything up to get things back to
normal.

I have disabled this new entry in "Routing" and my other "Allow All" tests
for the time being so it's back to not working at the moment for security
purposes.

Thanks for any help

Cheers

Smeghead



"Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]" <gwdibble@NOSPAM.frontiernet.net> wrote in
news:uENDhmV4EHA.524@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:

> I'm not sure I get the answer, but at least I get the question : -)
>
> Is the cache PC pulling the information from the source(s), or is the
> information being pushed to the cache PC by the sources? It seems
> that the cache box could be inside the LAN and that ISA would just
> allow it to go out and get the information it needs. I agree with you
> that it would be foolish to give up the protection provided by ISA,
> especially since if this is a conventional broadband connection, I
> don't see anywhere that they are providing firewall protection - it's
> all ISA in my understanding of the situation.
>
> It can't be a routing thing since you can ping the server. I was
> going to say create a destination set for that IP, then a site and
> content rule to allow access to the destination set. Since it appears
> that you've done that, and since the cache PC is still not responding,
> I wonder if it's the cache PC that's blocking the request rather than
> ISA.
>
> What I would do now is to temporarily stick a PC on the external
> switch and attempt to access the cache box. That way you'll have an
> idea what result you should be seeing through ISA. And, if the cache
> PC doesn't respond as expected, you'll know it's not an ISA issue.
>
> If this is normal http traffic, ISA wouldn't be blocking it, right?
> I'd expect that you'd be able to access http://10.81.10.250 just as
> you do http://www.cnn.com.
>
>
> "Smeg Head" <here.there@everywhere> wrote in message
> news:Xns95BDB92181313herethereeverywhere@207.46.248.16...
>> Thanks for the reply.
>>
>> The setup is in a school and the education authority have provided a
>> PC (which I have no control over) to act as a cache and source of
>> education software. The idea is that certain education websites can
>> be completely cached (or mirrored) so that when a Teacher comes to do
>> the lesson it is guaranteed that the website can be accessed i.e on
>> this local machine. This PC must have direct access to the internet
>> (or so they say). Anyway I have no control over it so that's how it
>> works. All I know is that I access it using its IP address in
>> Internet Explorer with a certain path name, userid and password.
>>
>> So, the external box is on the premises. The hardware setup is:
>>
>> Internal workstations are connected to the SBS2000 server on a
>> 10.0.0.X network via an "internal" ethernet switch. The Server has a
>> second NIC connected to another ethernet switch. This switch has a
>> broadband modem connected. (As an aside the "external" switch also
>> has the administrative PCs connected i.e the secretary, head teacher
>> plus one other but that's not really relevant here).
>>
>>
>> The "external" switch has this cache PC connected to it and I need to
>> have Internet Explorer access this PC - IP address 10.81.10.250. The
>> external NIC in the Server is address 10.81.10.1
>>
>> I currently have a proxy forward setup to the education authority
>> intrAnet which then forwards normal internet access from there.
>>
>> The argument I am getting from the education authority is that I can
>> "turn off" ISA as they provide enough intrusion protection. But I
>> would prefer to maintain the current setup because:
>> 1. It works
>> 2. I think of security like layers of an onion skin, the more you
>> have the better. (is that a bit over the top!!).
>>
>> Thanks for any help
>>
>> Smeghead
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]" <gwdibble@NOSPAM.frontiernet.net> wrote in
>> news:#vMLOv73EHA.2608@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl:
>>
>>> Can you please give a more detailed description of what you're
>>> trying to accomplish? I'm assuming the external box is on your
>>> premises since the 10.x address would not be Internet-routable. So
>>> why does it have to be on the WAN side of the SBS instead of on the
>>> local network?
>>>
>>> What are you trying to access on the external PC? ISA would not be
>>> blocking an internally-generated request, so maybe the external PC's
>>> settings are blocking the incoming attempt? Wouldn't it be easier
>>> to have the PC inside your network as part of your domain, then
>>> allow it outbound access through ISA to get the information it
>>> needs, similarly to how the AV downloads signature files for
>>> distribution to the local network PCs?
>>>
>>> Sorry to be obtuse but I don't understand your situation : -)
>>>
>>>
>>> "Smeg Head" <here.there@everywhere> wrote in message
>>> news:Xns95BBE5B33C5BCherethereeverywhere@207.46.248.16...
>>>> Hi All
>>>>
>>>> I need to set up an SBS 2000 to allow access to a computer on the
>>>> external side of the server.
>>>>
>>>> The server has the standard 2 NICs, one internal and one external.
>>>> Clients connected to internal and external used for broadband
>>>> internet (and now this computer).
>>>>
>>>> We need to have a cache that stores specific things that it updates
>>>> from the internet. It's complicated but suffice to say that I don't
>>>> have any control over this aspect.
>>>>
>>>> The external NIC on SBS has 10.81.10.1 as it address. The external
>>>> PC has 10.81.10.250
>>>>
>>>> I have already setup:
>>>> 1. Site & Content Rules
>>>> an "Allow ALL" access policy (this is what I use when
>>>> testing
>>>> only)
>>>> all destinations, always, allow,
>>>> applies to any request, all HTTP content
>>>>
>>>> 2. Protocol Rules
>>>> an "Allow ALL" access policy (this is what I use when
>>>> testing
>>>> only)
>>>> All IP traffic, always, applies to any request
>>>>
>>>> 3. IP Packet Filters
>>>> There are lots of filters. I have setup one as:
>>>> enables, predefined HTTP Server (port 80)
>>>> Local computer and remore computer I have
>>>> tried different settings
>>>>
>>>> The external network does not appear in the LAT nor the LDT.
>>>>
>>>> I can Ping the 10.81.10.250 from an internal client and the server
>>>> so I know it exists and that the server is forwarding the ping
>>>> requests. I tried 10.81.10.249 and it didn't work (as I expected).
>>>>
>>>> Should I have an entry in the Network Configuration - Routing list.
>>>> If so what are the settings?
>>>>
>>>> Please help as I am really stuck. After 5 frustrating hours I still
>>>> can't get it to work.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>> SmegHead
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>


Re: Access to "external" computer by Dave

Dave
Wed Dec 15 17:27:40 CST 2004

OK, so the routing rule is using a destination set that includes only the
external PC, right? In that case, it seems appropriate.

Thinking about it, ISA would be forwarding everything to the broadband
router's IP, which is why it's not finding the other PC on the WAN side. So
this solution makes sense to me, although I'm far from an ISA expert. (I
don't think I helped you any, but you definitely taught me something).

When you're finished, you could go to www.grc.com and run Shields Up to test
your ISA configuration for security, choosing the "all ports" option.


"Smeg Head" <here.there@everywhere> wrote in message
news:Xns95C0E53E98523herethereeverywhere@207.46.248.16...
>I have had some success with this but need to check if I have opened the
> server up too much or made some kind of mistake.
>
>
> I have attached a PC on the same "external" switch as the cache box and it
> works (as per your suggestion). The access is via Internet Explorer with
> the following in the address bar:
> http://10.81.10.250/admin.html
>
> The provided PC (cache box) has no monitor, kbd nor mouse. It's just a
> box.
> Just for the sake of it I attached a monitor to it and it was on a
> login/password screen that I have no access. Ah well.
>
>> Is the cache PC pulling the information from the source(s), or is the
>> information being pushed to the cache PC by the sources?
> I think it's both from the brief instruction pack that we got with it.
>
>
> Anyway, on to the real success story:
> I found a flow chart on the internet of ISA security and followed it. The
> last entry on the flowchart was to do with routing (and I think I have all
> the others as OK)
> I tried adding an entry in "ISA Management" as follows and it works.
> Under "Servers and Arrays, then the server name
> "Network Configuration"
> I added another entry in "Routing" specifically for the "external PC"
> It is "Order 1" i.e. top of the list
>
> I can't remember all of the settings that I made but is this bad, apart
> from the fact that it works now. If this is OK I will close down (one at a
> time) my other changes that opened everything up to get things back to
> normal.
>
> I have disabled this new entry in "Routing" and my other "Allow All" tests
> for the time being so it's back to not working at the moment for security
> purposes.
>
> Thanks for any help
>
> Cheers
>
> Smeghead
>
>
>
> "Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]" <gwdibble@NOSPAM.frontiernet.net> wrote in
> news:uENDhmV4EHA.524@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:
>
>> I'm not sure I get the answer, but at least I get the question : -)
>>
>> Is the cache PC pulling the information from the source(s), or is the
>> information being pushed to the cache PC by the sources? It seems
>> that the cache box could be inside the LAN and that ISA would just
>> allow it to go out and get the information it needs. I agree with you
>> that it would be foolish to give up the protection provided by ISA,
>> especially since if this is a conventional broadband connection, I
>> don't see anywhere that they are providing firewall protection - it's
>> all ISA in my understanding of the situation.
>>
>> It can't be a routing thing since you can ping the server. I was
>> going to say create a destination set for that IP, then a site and
>> content rule to allow access to the destination set. Since it appears
>> that you've done that, and since the cache PC is still not responding,
>> I wonder if it's the cache PC that's blocking the request rather than
>> ISA.
>>
>> What I would do now is to temporarily stick a PC on the external
>> switch and attempt to access the cache box. That way you'll have an
>> idea what result you should be seeing through ISA. And, if the cache
>> PC doesn't respond as expected, you'll know it's not an ISA issue.
>>
>> If this is normal http traffic, ISA wouldn't be blocking it, right?
>> I'd expect that you'd be able to access http://10.81.10.250 just as
>> you do http://www.cnn.com.
>>
>>
>> "Smeg Head" <here.there@everywhere> wrote in message
>> news:Xns95BDB92181313herethereeverywhere@207.46.248.16...
>>> Thanks for the reply.
>>>
>>> The setup is in a school and the education authority have provided a
>>> PC (which I have no control over) to act as a cache and source of
>>> education software. The idea is that certain education websites can
>>> be completely cached (or mirrored) so that when a Teacher comes to do
>>> the lesson it is guaranteed that the website can be accessed i.e on
>>> this local machine. This PC must have direct access to the internet
>>> (or so they say). Anyway I have no control over it so that's how it
>>> works. All I know is that I access it using its IP address in
>>> Internet Explorer with a certain path name, userid and password.
>>>
>>> So, the external box is on the premises. The hardware setup is:
>>>
>>> Internal workstations are connected to the SBS2000 server on a
>>> 10.0.0.X network via an "internal" ethernet switch. The Server has a
>>> second NIC connected to another ethernet switch. This switch has a
>>> broadband modem connected. (As an aside the "external" switch also
>>> has the administrative PCs connected i.e the secretary, head teacher
>>> plus one other but that's not really relevant here).
>>>
>>>
>>> The "external" switch has this cache PC connected to it and I need to
>>> have Internet Explorer access this PC - IP address 10.81.10.250. The
>>> external NIC in the Server is address 10.81.10.1
>>>
>>> I currently have a proxy forward setup to the education authority
>>> intrAnet which then forwards normal internet access from there.
>>>
>>> The argument I am getting from the education authority is that I can
>>> "turn off" ISA as they provide enough intrusion protection. But I
>>> would prefer to maintain the current setup because:
>>> 1. It works
>>> 2. I think of security like layers of an onion skin, the more you
>>> have the better. (is that a bit over the top!!).
>>>
>>> Thanks for any help
>>>
>>> Smeghead
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]" <gwdibble@NOSPAM.frontiernet.net> wrote in
>>> news:#vMLOv73EHA.2608@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl:
>>>
>>>> Can you please give a more detailed description of what you're
>>>> trying to accomplish? I'm assuming the external box is on your
>>>> premises since the 10.x address would not be Internet-routable. So
>>>> why does it have to be on the WAN side of the SBS instead of on the
>>>> local network?
>>>>
>>>> What are you trying to access on the external PC? ISA would not be
>>>> blocking an internally-generated request, so maybe the external PC's
>>>> settings are blocking the incoming attempt? Wouldn't it be easier
>>>> to have the PC inside your network as part of your domain, then
>>>> allow it outbound access through ISA to get the information it
>>>> needs, similarly to how the AV downloads signature files for
>>>> distribution to the local network PCs?
>>>>
>>>> Sorry to be obtuse but I don't understand your situation : -)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Smeg Head" <here.there@everywhere> wrote in message
>>>> news:Xns95BBE5B33C5BCherethereeverywhere@207.46.248.16...
>>>>> Hi All
>>>>>
>>>>> I need to set up an SBS 2000 to allow access to a computer on the
>>>>> external side of the server.
>>>>>
>>>>> The server has the standard 2 NICs, one internal and one external.
>>>>> Clients connected to internal and external used for broadband
>>>>> internet (and now this computer).
>>>>>
>>>>> We need to have a cache that stores specific things that it updates
>>>>> from the internet. It's complicated but suffice to say that I don't
>>>>> have any control over this aspect.
>>>>>
>>>>> The external NIC on SBS has 10.81.10.1 as it address. The external
>>>>> PC has 10.81.10.250
>>>>>
>>>>> I have already setup:
>>>>> 1. Site & Content Rules
>>>>> an "Allow ALL" access policy (this is what I use when
>>>>> testing
>>>>> only)
>>>>> all destinations, always, allow,
>>>>> applies to any request, all HTTP content
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. Protocol Rules
>>>>> an "Allow ALL" access policy (this is what I use when
>>>>> testing
>>>>> only)
>>>>> All IP traffic, always, applies to any request
>>>>>
>>>>> 3. IP Packet Filters
>>>>> There are lots of filters. I have setup one as:
>>>>> enables, predefined HTTP Server (port 80)
>>>>> Local computer and remore computer I have
>>>>> tried different settings
>>>>>
>>>>> The external network does not appear in the LAT nor the LDT.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can Ping the 10.81.10.250 from an internal client and the server
>>>>> so I know it exists and that the server is forwarding the ping
>>>>> requests. I tried 10.81.10.249 and it didn't work (as I expected).
>>>>>
>>>>> Should I have an entry in the Network Configuration - Routing list.
>>>>> If so what are the settings?
>>>>>
>>>>> Please help as I am really stuck. After 5 frustrating hours I still
>>>>> can't get it to work.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>
>>>>> SmegHead
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>



Re: Access to "external" computer by Smeg

Smeg
Fri Dec 17 17:13:42 CST 2004

That's what I fugure as well. I'll open up the server again to where
everything worked and then gradually close it down until I get to the
point where the only things are open that need to be.

Thanks for the help

Smeghead



"Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]" <gwdibble@NOSPAM.frontiernet.net> wrote in
news:#DZ1s2v4EHA.2788@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl:

> OK, so the routing rule is using a destination set that includes only
> the external PC, right? In that case, it seems appropriate.
>
> Thinking about it, ISA would be forwarding everything to the broadband
> router's IP, which is why it's not finding the other PC on the WAN
> side. So this solution makes sense to me, although I'm far from an
> ISA expert. (I don't think I helped you any, but you definitely
> taught me something).
>
> When you're finished, you could go to www.grc.com and run Shields Up
> to test your ISA configuration for security, choosing the "all ports"
> option.
>
>
> "Smeg Head" <here.there@everywhere> wrote in message
> news:Xns95C0E53E98523herethereeverywhere@207.46.248.16...
>>I have had some success with this but need to check if I have opened
>>the
>> server up too much or made some kind of mistake.
>>
>>
>> I have attached a PC on the same "external" switch as the cache box
>> and it works (as per your suggestion). The access is via Internet
>> Explorer with the following in the address bar:
>> http://10.81.10.250/admin.html
>>
>> The provided PC (cache box) has no monitor, kbd nor mouse. It's just
>> a box.
>> Just for the sake of it I attached a monitor to it and it was on a
>> login/password screen that I have no access. Ah well.
>>
>>> Is the cache PC pulling the information from the source(s), or is
>>> the information being pushed to the cache PC by the sources?
>> I think it's both from the brief instruction pack that we got with
>> it.
>>
>>
>> Anyway, on to the real success story:
>> I found a flow chart on the internet of ISA security and followed it.
>> The last entry on the flowchart was to do with routing (and I think I
>> have all the others as OK)
>> I tried adding an entry in "ISA Management" as follows and it works.
>> Under "Servers and Arrays, then the server name
>> "Network Configuration"
>> I added another entry in "Routing" specifically for the "external
>> PC" It is "Order 1" i.e. top of the list
>>
>> I can't remember all of the settings that I made but is this bad,
>> apart from the fact that it works now. If this is OK I will close
>> down (one at a time) my other changes that opened everything up to
>> get things back to normal.
>>
>> I have disabled this new entry in "Routing" and my other "Allow All"
>> tests for the time being so it's back to not working at the moment
>> for security purposes.
>>
>> Thanks for any help
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Smeghead
>>
>>
>>
>> "Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]" <gwdibble@NOSPAM.frontiernet.net> wrote in
>> news:uENDhmV4EHA.524@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:
>>
>>> I'm not sure I get the answer, but at least I get the question : -)
>>>
>>> Is the cache PC pulling the information from the source(s), or is
>>> the information being pushed to the cache PC by the sources? It
>>> seems that the cache box could be inside the LAN and that ISA would
>>> just allow it to go out and get the information it needs. I agree
>>> with you that it would be foolish to give up the protection provided
>>> by ISA, especially since if this is a conventional broadband
>>> connection, I don't see anywhere that they are providing firewall
>>> protection - it's all ISA in my understanding of the situation.
>>>
>>> It can't be a routing thing since you can ping the server. I was
>>> going to say create a destination set for that IP, then a site and
>>> content rule to allow access to the destination set. Since it
>>> appears that you've done that, and since the cache PC is still not
>>> responding, I wonder if it's the cache PC that's blocking the
>>> request rather than ISA.
>>>
>>> What I would do now is to temporarily stick a PC on the external
>>> switch and attempt to access the cache box. That way you'll have an
>>> idea what result you should be seeing through ISA. And, if the
>>> cache PC doesn't respond as expected, you'll know it's not an ISA
>>> issue.
>>>
>>> If this is normal http traffic, ISA wouldn't be blocking it, right?
>>> I'd expect that you'd be able to access http://10.81.10.250 just as
>>> you do http://www.cnn.com.
>>>
>>>
>>> "Smeg Head" <here.there@everywhere> wrote in message
>>> news:Xns95BDB92181313herethereeverywhere@207.46.248.16...
>>>> Thanks for the reply.
>>>>
>>>> The setup is in a school and the education authority have provided
>>>> a PC (which I have no control over) to act as a cache and source of
>>>> education software. The idea is that certain education websites can
>>>> be completely cached (or mirrored) so that when a Teacher comes to
>>>> do the lesson it is guaranteed that the website can be accessed i.e
>>>> on this local machine. This PC must have direct access to the
>>>> internet (or so they say). Anyway I have no control over it so
>>>> that's how it works. All I know is that I access it using its IP
>>>> address in Internet Explorer with a certain path name, userid and
>>>> password.
>>>>
>>>> So, the external box is on the premises. The hardware setup is:
>>>>
>>>> Internal workstations are connected to the SBS2000 server on a
>>>> 10.0.0.X network via an "internal" ethernet switch. The Server has
>>>> a second NIC connected to another ethernet switch. This switch has
>>>> a broadband modem connected. (As an aside the "external" switch
>>>> also has the administrative PCs connected i.e the secretary, head
>>>> teacher plus one other but that's not really relevant here).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The "external" switch has this cache PC connected to it and I need
>>>> to have Internet Explorer access this PC - IP address 10.81.10.250.
>>>> The external NIC in the Server is address 10.81.10.1
>>>>
>>>> I currently have a proxy forward setup to the education authority
>>>> intrAnet which then forwards normal internet access from there.
>>>>
>>>> The argument I am getting from the education authority is that I
>>>> can "turn off" ISA as they provide enough intrusion protection. But
>>>> I would prefer to maintain the current setup because:
>>>> 1. It works
>>>> 2. I think of security like layers of an onion skin, the more you
>>>> have the better. (is that a bit over the top!!).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for any help
>>>>
>>>> Smeghead
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]" <gwdibble@NOSPAM.frontiernet.net> wrote
>>>> in news:#vMLOv73EHA.2608@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl:
>>>>
>>>>> Can you please give a more detailed description of what you're
>>>>> trying to accomplish? I'm assuming the external box is on your
>>>>> premises since the 10.x address would not be Internet-routable.
>>>>> So why does it have to be on the WAN side of the SBS instead of on
>>>>> the local network?
>>>>>
>>>>> What are you trying to access on the external PC? ISA would not
>>>>> be blocking an internally-generated request, so maybe the external
>>>>> PC's settings are blocking the incoming attempt? Wouldn't it be
>>>>> easier to have the PC inside your network as part of your domain,
>>>>> then allow it outbound access through ISA to get the information
>>>>> it needs, similarly to how the AV downloads signature files for
>>>>> distribution to the local network PCs?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry to be obtuse but I don't understand your situation : -)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Smeg Head" <here.there@everywhere> wrote in message
>>>>> news:Xns95BBE5B33C5BCherethereeverywhere@207.46.248.16...
>>>>>> Hi All
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I need to set up an SBS 2000 to allow access to a computer on the
>>>>>> external side of the server.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The server has the standard 2 NICs, one internal and one
>>>>>> external. Clients connected to internal and external used for
>>>>>> broadband internet (and now this computer).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We need to have a cache that stores specific things that it
>>>>>> updates from the internet. It's complicated but suffice to say
>>>>>> that I don't have any control over this aspect.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The external NIC on SBS has 10.81.10.1 as it address. The
>>>>>> external PC has 10.81.10.250
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have already setup:
>>>>>> 1. Site & Content Rules
>>>>>> an "Allow ALL" access policy (this is what I use when
>>>>>> testing
>>>>>> only)
>>>>>> all destinations, always, allow,
>>>>>> applies to any request, all HTTP content
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. Protocol Rules
>>>>>> an "Allow ALL" access policy (this is what I use when
>>>>>> testing
>>>>>> only)
>>>>>> All IP traffic, always, applies to any request
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 3. IP Packet Filters
>>>>>> There are lots of filters. I have setup one as:
>>>>>> enables, predefined HTTP Server (port 80)
>>>>>> Local computer and remore computer I have
>>>>>> tried different settings
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The external network does not appear in the LAT nor the LDT.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can Ping the 10.81.10.250 from an internal client and the
>>>>>> server so I know it exists and that the server is forwarding the
>>>>>> ping requests. I tried 10.81.10.249 and it didn't work (as I
>>>>>> expected).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Should I have an entry in the Network Configuration - Routing
>>>>>> list. If so what are the settings?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please help as I am really stuck. After 5 frustrating hours I
>>>>>> still can't get it to work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SmegHead
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>