Dmitriy
Tue Sep 09 07:10:32 CDT 2003
Meaning absolutely no offense, I'd still say that the standard Windows Forms
DataGrid is sometimes extremely hard to customize and also seems to have
several minor bugs (as of Microsoft .NET 1.0), judging by posts to this
newsgroup and to related ones. When you need only basic functionality - it
works just fine. Should you want to add any advanced features - you will
likely choose some 3rd party grid where these features might be already
available or easily implemented.
P.S. I've read somewhere on Microsoft website that they expect to release a
much more improved DataGrid control in their next major release of the .NET
Framework.
--
Dmitriy Lapshin [C# / .NET MVP]
X-Unity Test Studio
http://x-unity.miik.com.ua/teststudio.aspx
Bring the power of unit testing to VS .NET IDE
"glenn" <glenn.a.eanes@CENSUS.GOV> wrote in message
news:cc446b00.0309080749.72ee87fe@posting.google.com...
> I have not done much work with .NET yet but we are trying to decide
> whether the grid that Microsoft provides is going to provide enough
> functionality for us. As far as VB 6, we use the Videosoft FlexGrid
> now and have found it to be very useful. Does anyone know what how
> good/bad the .NET grid is? Are there different versions for web forms
> versus windows forms?
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks!