I had an smigrate (backup) job running against a server elsewhere on the
network. I then left it running while I went home (Friday evening) for the
weekend. Thinking it would be finished before the server was moved later
that weekend so I'd have a frsh backup just in case.

Obviously some people's idea of a weekend move is different to mine as a bit
later that Friday evening the server was turned off and its location moved
(name and network name etc. remained the same however). When the server was
re-started the smigrate job stayed at the tilt (can't connect ..) status
until I signed in again to the portable on in fact Tuesday at which time it
just took off where it left off.

It quite surprised me :)

Engelbert

RE: smigrate more robust than I thought by c

c
Tue Feb 21 08:13:28 CST 2006

WOW! I'm amazed too! Will wonders never cease in SharePoint land? :-)

Thanks
C
http://spaces.msn.com/cjvandyk



"Engelbert" wrote:

> I had an smigrate (backup) job running against a server elsewhere on the
> network. I then left it running while I went home (Friday evening) for the
> weekend. Thinking it would be finished before the server was moved later
> that weekend so I'd have a frsh backup just in case.
>
> Obviously some people's idea of a weekend move is different to mine as a bit
> later that Friday evening the server was turned off and its location moved
> (name and network name etc. remained the same however). When the server was
> re-started the smigrate job stayed at the tilt (can't connect ..) status
> until I signed in again to the portable on in fact Tuesday at which time it
> just took off where it left off.
>
> It quite surprised me :)
>
> Engelbert
>
>
>

Re: smigrate more robust than I thought by adam

adam
Tue Feb 21 15:05:54 CST 2006

That is pretty neat, a situation I have never heard of but very cool!

Adam Buenz
http://www.cyberlaundering.com