Re: content databases by Mike
Mike
Wed Jul 07 01:20:48 CDT 2004
> under certain circumstances
I was asking "why many content databases" to try to find if these "certain
crcumstances" applied.
I got the clear impression that he thought many content databases was the
only way to have two sites on the same server.
I think you'll agree that many content databases is only for large set-ups
(you quote 100 sites per content database for instance - he seemed to be
talking about 2 sites and 2 content databases)
Mike Walsh, Helsinki, Finland
"Philip Colmer" <pcolmer@newsgroups.nospam> wrote in message
news:u8xGfm2YEHA.2844@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>
> "Ashton" <colin.ashton@nww-tr.wales.nhs.uk> wrote in message
> news:eGHQUozYEHA.4092@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > Can connect sites under my top level to point to different content
> databases
> > or do I need to create a virtual server?
>
> You can (and indeed should, under certain circumstances) have multiple
> content databases. One of the reasons for having multiple DBs is to reduce
> the amount of time required to restore a part of the system if you need
to.
> In other words, if all of your sites are in one content database, you need
> to restore ALL of that in order to recover whatever you are after. On the
> other hand, if you've got five content databases, each with 100 sites,
> you've got a fifth of the recovery time that you would have had.
>
> If you've got multiple databases, it looks as if SharePoint prefers to use
> the latest content database created unless you mark that DB as "offline".
> That essentially stops SP from creating any new sites in that DB but
doesn't
> stop existing sites from working.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> --Philip
>
>