Engelbert
Thu Jul 06 12:05:29 CDT 2006
There is I think a Turkish version of WSS v2. You should install that rather
than the English version.
If you already have installed the English version and don't want to do a
re-install with the Turkish version, you can run the Multi-language add-on.
(www.wssfaq.com/ MS Articles / Downloads category for a link) but then I
think you can't change the language of the top-site.
I would in any case if I were you do a re-install with the Turkish version.
Add sites to Quick Launch bar.
You can add code (<A http=...>Title</A> to the defauult.aspx page (for
instance with FP 2003. I would personally add Sites below the Quick Launch
bar or would put them in a Links list and put the web part of that Links
list below the Quick Launch bar.
(Experiment with this a bit before you ask questions on it)
Engelbert
"AydinDMZ" <AydinDMZ@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:9FDF55F1-5D67-4055-9593-EFFAE2E3C769@microsoft.com...
> Finally i installed WSS 2 for the test puposes :))
>
> Had alot of things to do.. But 2 questions for the moment ..
> 1. I couldn't change the language to Turkish, on top site and the sub
> sites
> also,
> 2. How can I add the sites to quick lunch bar. On the default theme, there
> is no zone to change for quick lunch. Must be some vay to add them to bar.
>
> By the way, I would like to thanks for four valuable feedbacks.
> Regards
>
> "Engelbert" wrote:
>
>> The beta version is fairly reliable, but it is a beta version and I
>> wouldn't
>> run full-scale production on it. I would however run internal
>> proof-of-concepts on it in its present state. It doesn't crash. (touches
>> wood)
>>
>> I agree on the costs of SPS 2003 and I don't know anything about the
>> rules
>> for moving these licences across to MOSS 2007 so it might be wise before
>> the
>> v3 products come out to just use the free WSSv2.
>>
>> Sorry I haven't used a hosted service.
>>
>> Engelbert
>>
>> "AydinDMZ" <AydinDMZ@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:5BBDC2FD-BE01-4AEA-82FD-E80D7F42A0C5@microsoft.com...
>> >
>> > Agree.. It depends what you want to have. I guess, I will be in group
>> > to
>> > while start to implement v2.
>> > Does it effect to use beta version, I couldn't decide to use v3. Do you
>> > have
>> > any suggestion more over than workflow (actually about reliability of
>> > beta
>> > version).
>> >
>> > The other important subject is to upgrade system to SPS 2003. It brings
>> > so
>> > much cost of ownership. Server license, web connector, CAL's and more..
>> >
>> > Do you have any idea of the hosted sharepoint services, also. for
>> > example
>> > APPTIX
http://www.sharepointsite.com/
>> >
>> > will be keep in touch, regards
>> >
>> > "Engelbert" wrote:
>> >
>> >> WSS is a good place to store information and to access it from.
>> >>
>> >> SPS 2003 offers more functionality (but still doesn't have decent
>> >> workflow!).
>> >>
>> >> Usually once the company is above a certain size it's obvious that
>> >> there
>> >> will be a postive payback for the additional cost of SPS 2003.
>> >>
>> >> But when talking about the word "portal" that's all I was talking
>> >> about -
>> >> the *word*.
>> >>
>> >> Whether you use WSSv2 or SPS 2003 depends on what you want to achieve
>> >> with
>> >> the product. Apart from workflow, which neither have, what you said
>> >> you
>> >> wanted seemed to suit WSSv2 (provided what you meant with legacy
>> >> systems
>> >> was
>> >> what I said we used it for).
>> >>
>> >> Engelbert
>> >>
>> >> "AydinDMZ" <AydinDMZ@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:64EC7EF2-7AB6-4DEE-A2A2-6B094D13D690@microsoft.com...
>> >> > Right, but v3 still beta and will (hopefully) published in last
>> >> > quarter
>> >> > of
>> >> > 2006. I thougth this will be the starting point for the right
>> >> > solution.
>> >> > i
>> >> > plan to move v3 when it is a need.
>> >> >
>> >> > It is not easy to move people to a large system, who is not familiar
>> >> > this
>> >> > kind technologies..
>> >> >
>> >> > I had some feelings from your words, wss is not a quite solution
>> >> > just
>> >> > for
>> >> > a
>> >> > company information portal, is it?
>> >> >
>> >> > "Engelbert" wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Forget v2 as far as workflow is concerned. You'll need to use
>> >> >> third-party
>> >> >> products to provide anything decent.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Instead spend your time on getting up to speed on v3 which includes
>> >> >> quality
>> >> >> workflow out-of-the-box.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Engelbert
>> >> >>
>> >> >> P.S. "Reporting some legacy info" - if all you mean is putting
>> >> >> charts
>> >> >> and
>> >> >> tables that derive from legacy systems in (say) .doc; .xls or .pdf
>> >> >> form
>> >> >> into WSS doc libs, that is fine and is what we do to show users the
>> >> >> stats
>> >> >> of
>> >> >> our mainframe systems. If you mean on-line live data from legacy
>> >> >> systems,
>> >> >> forget WSS and think of SPS 2003 (or MOSS 2007) together with
>> >> >> BizTalk
>> >> >> (and
>> >> >> even then it won't be easy).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> P.P.S. Avoid use of "portal" with WSS - it's reserved in SharePoint
>> >> >> land
>> >> >> for
>> >> >> SPS 2003 (SharePoint Portal Server).
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "AydinDMZ" <AydinDMZ@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> >> >> news:341222AB-7576-43D4-9AC9-9E730B7CC31E@microsoft.com...
>> >> >> > Hi,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > We plan to use WSS 2.0 as a company portal solution..(mainly
>> >> >> > content
>> >> >> > publishing, workflow and reporting some legacy info). Within the
>> >> >> > ready
>> >> >> > components, It seams to be a good starting point and version 3.0
>> >> >> > will
>> >> >> > give
>> >> >> > some extra features also. I would like to have your opinnion,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks in advance
>> >> >> > Aydin
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>