Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user?

TheMSsForum.com: The Microsoft Software Forum

The MSS Forum ‹ Windows Services
- Archive
  - Biz
  - MCSE
  - CRM
  - Drivers
  - Framework
  - ADO
  - ASP
  - Compact
  - Forms
  - Dotnet
  - C#
  - VB
  - FontpageGen
  - Excel
  - WorkSheet
  - Exchange
  - Setup
  - Fox
  - Fontpage
  - ASP
  - IIS
  - Entourage
  - Money
  - Messanger
  - PocketPC
  - Powerpoint
  - Project
  - Publisher
  - Excel
  - VB
  - Security
  - Portal
  - Services
  - SQLServerDev
  - SVCS
  - SQLServer
  - VB
  - VC
  - MFC
  - ExcelGen

- Previous
  - 1
    - Multiple line enhanced rich text editor width When I add a multiple line column to a list, I can edit the number of lines for editing, but I don't see a way to make the resulting text box wider. Is there a way to increase the width of the text box, or better yet to make it size to the width of the browser? Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60469
  - 2
    - Exception in SPGlobalAdmin object Hi, I am new to sharepoint, and was trying to integrate SharePoint with my application which is written in C#.Net. Initially it was a window application and i was able to easily integrate sharepoint with my application. Now i have my application written in ASP.Net, an dnow i want to integrate sharepoint even in web application, but now i am in all sorts of problems. I always get a exception. SPGlobalAdmin globalAdmin = new SPGlobalAdmin(); when i try to create a object of type SPGlobalAdmin in my web application, it return me a exception " Input string was not in correct format". Can anyone help me out and let me knw where am i going wrong in web aplication, because thisis working fine in my windows application. I am using VS 2005 on windows 2003 with SP1 and sharepoint portal 2003. It would be of great help if some one could help me. This is my mail-id apondu@gmail.com, it would be great if u could mail me the solution at this id. Waiting for ur help Thanks for the help. Regards, Govardhan. Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60466
  - 3
    - Design Question - Linking to Documents in Libraries Across Sites I have a site with subsites - all in one site collection. I have a couple document libraris in the master site from which I would like to link documents in the subsites. I'd rather not use a standard URL link. Something like the Content Query Web Editor web part might work - except it's limited in its ability to select groups of files without tapping into metadata of those files. Any suggested approaches to this would be much appreciated! Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60465
  - 4
    - Vista & Sharepoint - problems not sure what the other person meant by "entering IP address of my machine" ? Wonder if there are any articles on MS or other places that also mention & discuss this issue ?? We only have 3 Vista users so far, the bleeding edge folks, but they are having a horrible time trying to access SP 2.0 across the Internet. "Franck" <Franck@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:B40C08A8-0583-4FED-8A5D-79D0E57A7228@microsoft.com... > Hi, > We've experiencing the same issue in our environment on all our Vista > migrated machines. The combination XP - Office 2003 or 2007 - Sharepoint 2003 > or 2007 worked, but we have authentication prompts on Vista in Office > products directly. That's just not an acceptable problem for end-users. > I'm amazed not to find any solution for that specific problem on Internet. > It makes me think that corporations using Sharepoint have not at all migrated > to Vista. > > If anybody has a solution, please keep me up to date > > Thanks > Franck > "Valor" wrote: > > > I've gotten a [temporary] workaround by entering the public, static IP of my > > machine. For some reason, if you don't do that, Vista ALWAYS looks for a SMB > > share, and never to an HTTP/WebDAV folder. > > > > This article may be of some help. I only have a handful of users, so I went > > the "low tech" route (above). > > > > "Will" wrote: > > > > > Having the same issue. XP + Office 2003 / 2007 works great with Sharepoint 2003 / 2007 but Vista seems to have some security issues with sharepoint or "web folders" in general. > > > > > > Any ideas or solutions would be handy here! > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > will > > > Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60464
  - 5
    - When trying to restore Production site to Dev Site get "Access Denied" I am trying to create a Dev site for our SharePoint 3.0 Intranet. The Dev site is running on a Virtual Server. Everytime I try to restore using stsadm.exe -o restore.... I get "Access is denied. <Exception from HRESULT: 0x80070005 <E_ACCESSDENIED>> The string I enter is as follows: staadm.exe -o restore -url http://servername -filename backup.dat - overwrite Anyone have any ideas or run across this problem? Al Pemberton Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60463
  - 6
    - Sharepoint 2007 Hope I am in the right group.... I am brand new to this tool and have a question about how to synchronize Sharepoint data with files in a file system. Considering just the first part of such a synchronization (supposing that the data I am interested in is something like Word docs stored in the SQLServer 2005 backend as BLOBs): what should I investigate to get the items from the database into the file system? Is there a web service to look at? An API? Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60462
  - 7
    - Error: Cannot copy file: The file exists. What is causing this error. It occurs when the user is copying, pasting from one sharepoint site to another; on different servers. User A cannot do this; User B can. Both are sites admins on both the destination and origination sites. Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60461
  - 8
    - Remove Delete Permission on WSS3 How can I remove just the delete permission on a particular list for a user ? In WSS2 I had Advanced Permissions, but I dont see (or cant find them) in WSS3. Where are they? Thanks Luis Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60459
  - 9
    - Can I bind a sproc to a Sharepoint List Can I create a List or some other data representation object in Sharepoint and then have this object bound to a SQL store procedure (no parameters). So everytime I view the object it represents the results of the stored procedure? Cheers Billy Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60454
  - 10
    - MOSS 2007 + Forefront=Broken E-mail Enabled Libraries? As soon as I install Microsoft Frontend Security for Sharepoint on my Sharepoint 2007 config (which works fine) mail enabled libaries stop working with the error: "OWSTIMER.EXE (0x0950) Windows SharePoint Services E-Mail 6874 Warning An error occurred while attempting to create an attachment for an item sent via e-mail. " I have looked all over the web and nobody seems to be able to get this working, there are a few workaround but they then cause more problems. I can find no patch to fix the issue. In my opinion this means that this product is broken, e-mail enabled libaries are a key feature of MOSS 2007 for Forefront to break them as soon as it is installed is annoying. As soon as I remove Forefront Security for Sharepoint everything works again. As I'm stuck with Forefront (already bought) and the Forefront CAL's is there any way to make it work with e-mail enabled libaries? Thanks, Owen Clark Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60453
  - 11
    - Preparing for exam 70-541 Greetings, I'm preparing for exam 70-541 (app development for WSS 3.0). I've obtained "Inside Microsoft Windows Sharepoint Services". It seems excellent so far (about 1/3rd of the way through). Does the community have any suggestions for preparing or other insight into the exam? Thanks and regards, --Paul Galvin Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60452
  - 12
    - SPD created workflow generated emails // links Greetings, I've created a workflow using SharePoint Designer. When it sends an email to one of my users who runs MS Outlook, embedded links appear as text. She has to copy/paste it to a browser to use it. When I get the email to another email like (gmail in this case), the link appears as a link. How do I correct this? Thanks and regards, --Paul Galvin, Conchango Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60451
  - 13
    - Create New User, User Information is not auto populated from AD Hi All, I have just deployed WSS in one of our server. When I authorized certain groups from AD to WSS, users of that ad groups are authorized to login to the server. However, we notice that user information, like Email Address, etc, is not auto-populated from Active Directory. The same things happen when administrator add directly certain username to WSS. Is there anyway that we can automate WSS to autopopulate user information? Thanks. Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60446
  - 14
    - Is new WIKI feature supported in free version? I have read about the new wiki feature in Microsoft Windows SharePoint Services 3.0. We are running Windows 2003 Server SP2. If we download the free Microsoft Windows SharePoint Services 3.0, is that all we need to use the new wiki features? Or is this Wiki feature only available with the the Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007 upgrade? Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60434
  - 15
    - New To Sharepoint, install question During install of sharepoint services 3 it asks where to store the files if using search features. It states these files can grow "quite large". Is there any documentation on this? ie, how large is "quite large"? 1G, 10G, 200G, etc? To me, logs that are 10G would be considered enormous for logs. Can anyone help? Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60432
  - 16
    - Can I put MOSS 2007 Enterprise on SBS 2003 Premium? Just had a conference call with a Sharepoint consultant for our needs and he mentioned MOSS 2007 for cross site searching, etc. Did a quick search of this NG from OE on MOSS and came up empty. Just want to hear if this is OK to install on SBS 2K3, and if there's any "lessons-learned". [also posted on microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs] If I can't do this and I have to install this on another server, can it still work with SBS? -- Mike Webb Platte River Whooping Crane Maintenance Trust, Inc. a 501 (c)(3) conservation non-profit organization Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60428
  - 17
    - LDAP Pluggable Authentication Provider for WSS 3.0 I know that to get the Pluggable Authentication Provider I need to upgrade to MOS2007 -- however, does anyone know of a 3rd party LDAP Pluggable Authentication Provider? Or has anyone created one themselves? Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60427
  - 18
    - How do I fix search? I restored my WSS 3.0 server to a new box last night and everything works but search. I tried to stop the windows service for search and then delete the current search files and then restart the service. But the files are in use and I cant delete or rename them. How do I get my search rebuilt? Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60425
  - 19
    - WSS 3.0 and Office 2003 Hi, does WSS 3.0 integrate with Office 2003 applications, especially Outlook? I.e. can you share WSS contacts and calendars in Outlook 2003? I know it integrated with Office 2007 but wasn't sure if it could still be done with 03? Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60413
  - 20
    - Report: calendar Question I have created a calendar that i want to give a custom view to. The default view shows events from today onward. if i create a custom view there doesnt seeem to be a way to filter it that way. when i go to the filter options the "start date" column isnt an option. Any clue on how to do this? Any idea where i might be able to get more info on this? Anywhere else i could post this that might be more helpful? been digging for ages and this just seems like a REALLY stupid problem to have. There should just be a check box for this! Thanks Justin PS sorry for cross post. Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60409
  - 21
    - Upload document with same name I have a document library in which I created a custom column. When I upload a document I want this custom column and te title to be the key in the library. Is this possible? Now Sharepoint only looks at the title of the document en tells me it already exists...... -- Greetings, Mike Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60408
  - 22
    - Overview defined alerts Hi, In which way (non-developer) can i find who has subscribed to an alert for a certain library ? Thanks, Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60404
  - 23
    - linking sharepoint 2007 tasks to outlook 2003 task list hi, can anyone please help me on this topic. i want to assign a task in sharepoint site and then that task to be emailed to the corresponding person. eventually ending up in his outlook task list plz help thanks, tinil. Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60397
  - 24
    - link .exe file to share point site hi, can anyone hepl me out. i wanted to link a .exe file on to my sharepoint site so that clicking on that webpage will run the program. can anyone pls suggest a way to do this????? i am using sharepoint 2007. thanks. t wilson. Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60396
  - 25
    - WSS 3.0 enabling search after restore? Whew, what a night. I got everything restored with the exception of search. I got an error message on that search. When I try to search on the site, I get no results. When I search the same thing on the old site I get results. So my search is broken. I think I read somewhere in past that you can delete search and recreate it? Can someone tell me how? Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60395
- Next
  - 1
    - error while restoring? I am trying to restore my WSS 3.0 site to a different server (getting rid of the old server). I have a recent backup created using the Operations Console backup wizard. I copied it locally and launch the restore from backup link. It prompts me to pick the location of the backup, I put in the c:\backup \spbr0007 I get this error: access to path c:\backup\spbr0007 is denied I checked and turned off the read-only property and applied to all contens below and still get the same error? What am I doing wrong? I am hoping that I can restore even though its a new server, different server name? Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60393
  - 2
    - How Many WSS3.0 Sites? Hello All Can someone let me know how many SP web applications can be created on a single server before performance takes a hit? I heard somewhere a while back that this was 10 max (or was this WSS2.0?) The server would be latest and greatest HP DL320 G5 with 2GB ram. I may need to specifiy different web.config file settings for each of my sites and therefore this means splitting each one out into their own Web application, something that I didn't want to do. Thanks AJ Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60377
  - 3
    - WSS FAQ additions and changes - 18th June - 24th June 2007 Note: All of the addresses of the KB / Articles - 2007 Products / MS / Non-MS Articles below were valid at the time I added them to the WSS FAQ site and to this file. I can't guarantee that they still are. (This is also posted to my blog at http://mikewalsh.bilsimser.com) (Items are added to the WSS FAQ throughout the week so you will find new items more quickly by checking at wss.collutions.com or www.wssfaq.com daily.) From 18th June - 24th June 2007 I 2007 KB Articles (*now only one section for WSS and MOSS*) New http://support.microsoft.com/kb/889647/en-us How to change the TCP port that SharePoint Portal Server or SharePoint Server uses to connect to SQL Server (ver 3.0) 13th June 2007 Modified http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;930147 Mobile browsers and devices that are supported in Windows SharePoint Services 3.0 and in SharePoint Server 2007 (ver 2.0) 13th June 2007 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;935504 Error message when you click "New" to create a new item in a list or when you click an existing item in SharePoint Server 2007 or in Windows SharePoint Services 3.0: "Invalid page URL" or "An unexpected error has occurred" (ver 2.0) 5th June 2007 II. Articles - 2007 Products (no longer with all links to articles for other Office 2007 and other 2007 Products) New A. Office 2007 Server Products http://www.sharepointblogs.com/jason/archive/2007/06/21/how-to-connect-web-parts-programmatically-in-wss-3.aspx How to connect Web Parts programmatically in WSS 3 (Blog - jason) 21st June 2007 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=513d97da-34b7-4346-a9e5-b8998170aade&displaylang=en&tm SharePoint Server 2007 Sample: Excel Services and Excel 2007 Windows Compute Cluster Server Job Submission Sample 21st June 2007 http://www.cjvandyk.com/blog/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?List=744536f4%2D127e%2D4c4a%2Dbcff%2Db85408e7e7e5&ID=109 SharePoint gradual migration "gotcha" to be aware of. (Blog - Cornelius van Dyk) 21st June 2007 http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb530302.aspx Development Tools and Techniques for Working with Code in Windows SharePoint Services 3.0 (Part 1 of 2) (MSDN - Patrick Tissgehem, U2U) 21st June 2007 http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb530301.aspx Development Tools and Techniques for Working with Code in Windows SharePoint Services 3.0 (Part 2 of 2) (MSDN - Patrick Tissgehem, U2U) 21st June 2007 http://sharepointnutsandbolts.blogspot.com/2007/06/using-delegate-control.html Using the Delegate Control (Chris O'Brien) 20th June 2007 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=67f93dcb-ada8-4db5-a47b-df17e14b2c74&displaylang=en&tm Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007 VHD 20th June 2007 http://www.sharepointblogs.com/teameli/archive/2007/06/20/modifying-the-workflow-association-data-in-sharepoint-2007-pre-initiation.aspx Modifying the Workflow Association Data in SharePoint 2007 Pre-Initiation (Blog - "Team Eli") 20th June 2007 http://www.sharepointblogs.com/smc750/archive/2007/06/20/custom-cross-list-search-development-pitfalls-part-two.aspx Custom Cross List Search Development Pitfalls (Part Two) (Blog - Steve Curran) 20th June 2007 http://www.sharepointblogs.com/smc750/archive/2007/06/20/custom-cross-list-search-development-pitfalls-part-one.aspx Custom Cross List Search Development Pitfalls (Part One) (Blog - Steve Curran) 20th June 2007 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=c49a6b00-e0aa-4102-b585-b25cd3cbb383&displaylang=en&tm Windows SharePoint Services Document: Application Templates for Windows SharePoint Services 3.0 - Under the Hood 20th June 2007 http://blogs.technet.com/wbaer/archive/2007/06/19/excel-calculation-services-for-cross-forest-deployments.aspx Excel Calculation Services for Cross-Forest Deployments (William Baer) 19th June 2007 http://www.sharepointblogs.com/teameli/archive/2007/06/19/adding-a-sites-listing-amp-setting-owner-from-wss-object-model.aspx Adding a Sites Listing (& Setting Owner) from WSS Object Model (Blog - "Team Eli") 19th June 2007 http://www.cjvandyk.com/blog/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?List=744536f4%2D127e%2D4c4a%2Dbcff%2Db85408e7e7e5&ID=107 Step-by-Step - A REAL world upgrade of a SharePoint Portal Server 2003 (SPS) farm to Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007 (MOSS) (Blog - Cornelius van Dyk) 19th June 2007 http://blogs.technet.com/stefan_gossner/archive/2007/06/19/adjusting-the-robots-meta-tag-for-3rd-party-search-engines.aspx Adjusting the MOSS ROBOTS meta tag for 3rd party search engines (Blog - Stefan Goßner) 19th June 2007 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=585dca89-c9fe-442f-91f6-cdaaa2e9939d&displaylang=en&tm 2007 Office Sample: Using the Business Data Catalog and Smart Tags with the 2007 Office System (ver 0707) 19th June 2007 http://www.u2u.info/Blogs/Patrick/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=1744 Making the Quick Launch appear again on Web Part pages stored in a document library (Blog - Patrick Tisseghem) 19th June 2007 https://msevents.microsoft.com/CUI/WebCastRegistrationConfirmation.aspx?culture=en-US&RegistrationID=1291187712 MSDN Webcast: Sites and Templates in SharePoint Server 2007 and Visual Studio (Level 200) (Mike Benkovich, Lynn Langit) 15th June 2007 http://technet2.microsoft.com/Office/en-us/library/21dcf8aa-8a6e-4325-aa17-0188e491361c1033.mspx?mfr=true Index for Stsadm operations and properties (Office SharePoint Server) 14th June 2007 http://technet2.microsoft.com/Office/en-us/library/21dcf8aa-8a6e-4325-aa17-0188e491361c1033.mspx?mfr=true Plan for administrative and service accounts (Office SharePoint Server) 14th June 2007 (says 14 December 2006 but this is wrong) http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=25836e52-1892-4e17-ac08-5df13cfc5295&displaylang=en Excel 2007 Add-in: Synchronizing Tables with SharePoint Lists 4th June 2007 http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb395217.aspx Working with Windows SharePoint Services 3.0 from Excel 2007 (1st) March 2007 B. Other Office 2007 products (selected few only since 1.1.2007) http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=f9956176-cf66-478b-b20d-b9b92dd0dbfa&displaylang=en&tm Microsoft Office 2007 Professional VHD 20th June 2007 C. Other New 2006/2007 Products (selected few only since 1.1.2007) None Modified None Deleted None III WSS v3 FAQ New http://www.asaris.de/sites/walsh/Lists/WSSv3%20FAQ/DispForm.aspx?ID=1112 III.55.02 Workflows: How do you turn on the Three-State Workflow that is included in WSS 3.0 http://www.asaris.de/sites/walsh/Lists/WSSv3%20FAQ/DispForm.aspx?ID=1113 III.95 Why does IE crash when I open Office documents stored in a SharePoint system and how do I fix it? http://www.asaris.de/sites/walsh/Lists/WSSv3%20FAQ/DispForm.aspx?ID=1109 VI.47 Security Explorer 6.5 for SharePoint (commercial - ScriptLogic) [Beta Jun 2007] http://www.asaris.de/sites/walsh/Lists/WSSv3%20FAQ/DispForm.aspx?ID=1115 VI.48 RadEditor for ASP.NET (commercial - Telerik) http://www.asaris.de/sites/walsh/Lists/WSSv3%20FAQ/DispForm.aspx?ID=1108 VII.22 Professional SharePoint 2007 Development (Wrox - ISBN 978-0-470-11756-9) (Chapter 11 *extract* - Creating Content Type Metadata for SharePoint 2007 Document Management Solutions) http://www.asaris.de/sites/walsh/Lists/WSSv3%20FAQ/EditForm.aspx?ID=1110 VII.23 Pro SharePoint Solution Development: Combining .NET, SharePoint and Office 2007 (Apress - ISBN: 1590598083) (Chapter 6 - Integrating Spreadsheets into the Enterprise) http://www.asaris.de/sites/walsh/Lists/WSSv3%20FAQ/EditForm.aspx?ID=1111 VIII.18 Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 Resource Kit (MS Press - Robert Larson, Janique Carbone, The Microsoft Virtual Server Team) http://www.asaris.de/sites/walsh/Lists/WSSv3%20FAQ/EditForm.aspx?ID=1114 X.58 SharePoint Spy (free - echoTechnology) http://www.asaris.de/sites/walsh/Lists/WSSv3%20FAQ/EditForm.aspx?ID=1116 X.59 SharePoint 2007 Flash Animation Web Part (free - Mahdi Abdulhamid) Modified http://www.asaris.de/sites/walsh/Lists/WSSv3%20FAQ/EditForm.aspx?ID=962 X.38 radEditor Lite for MOSS 2007 (free - telerik with Microsoft) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV WSSv2 KB Articles (plus SPS 2003 Hot fixes) New None Modified None V. MS Articles for WSSv2 New None Modified None VI Non-MS Articles for WSSv2 New None Modified None VII WSSv2 FAQ New None Modified None Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60373
  - 4
    - replace title field in Gantt view Hi, I am using a custom made (lookup) field throughout my site. I would like to use that field also instead of the titlefield in a gantt view. Is there a way to replace the title field for a custom field? Arnold Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60358
  - 5
    - Need help with site re-organizaton I have a WSS 3.0 site with about 10 main sites that match to departments in the company, Development, Federal Sales, Commerical Sales, Backoffce, IT, etc, etc. Many of the sites have sub-sites like Backoffice has accounting, hr, benefits, etc. All have unique permissions and not inherited from parent so we can control exactly who can see what. We just re-org and now I am being asked if I can put some of those site under a new highlevel site called Operations. So I need to move backoffice, it, pmo, under Operations. Any easy way to do this? Manually I could recreate and move the shared documents easy. I have no idea if I can move things like tasks, lists, links, discussions, etc. Help! Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60357
  - 6
    - MI5 Persecution: Stasi 21/4/96 (16179) Subject: Chief Constable Alderson Condemns "Stasi" MI5 Newsgroups:uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,soc.culture.british Organization: Toronto Free-Net Summary: Keywords: John Alderson, former Chief Constable of Devon and Cornwall, had the following to say about the expansion of the Security Service's powers, in a recent magazine article; "It is fatal to let the secret service into the area of ordinary crime. MI5 is not under the same restraints as the police. They infiltrate organisations, people's jobs and lives. They operate almost like a cancer." "At the moment the acorn of a Stasi [the former East German communists' secret service] has been planted. It is there for future governments to build on." The message is clear. Criminal subversion and criminal harassment by an unpoliced minority not subject to the law, "infiltration of people's jobs and lives" is with us today. 16179 Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60353
  - 7
    - MI5 Persecution: Leant On 7/4/96 (14665) From: Green <Green@guidion.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: Why Aren't the British Police Doing Their Job? Reply-To: Green@guidion.demon.co.uk Date: Sun Apr 7 21:13:30 1996 In article <DpIE0r.736.0.bloor@torfree.net> bu765@torfree.net "Mike Corley" writes: > Last Easter (1995) I went into the local police station in London and spoke to > an officer about the harassment against me. But I couldn't provide tangible > evidence; what people said, in many cases years ago, is beyond proof, and > without something to support my statements I cannot expect a police officer to > take the complaint seriously. This in itself dos not suggest that the police have it in for you. The old bill operates on extremely tight spending limits forced on them by that pillock Michael Howard, and without evidence, they often have higher priorities than chasing something that cannot go to court. I doubt that the police are actually being leant on, but they probably realise that if they looked into this, they would be leant on hard. The met always stays away from anything that looks like it has Defence, Security or secret service interest already, because they realise that they are below these government agencies in the general pecking order. This attitude was made clear in a TV show where a left wing comedian heckled some aristocratic Tory candidate in a local election. The police officer gave the comic a ticking off, even though you could see that this young copper sympathised with the comedian, and regarded the Tory as an upper-crust wanker. He said, and I quote "I'm giving you the ticking off and not him because he's a Lord and I'm a Police Constable." If I walked into my local nick and complained that MI5 were snooping on me, they would show me the door without even looking at my evidence, because that bored desk seargant with only five years to go before he retires doesn't want to start fucking about with somebody who has incurred the wrath of Stella Rimington. He would rather deal with the lost dogs and driving licence producers, eat his cheese and pickle sandwiches and piss off home at the end of his shift than have some high ranking spook having a go at his boss and getting him a bollocking. In short, you have earned much sympathy but little surprise. Just remember that saying about the enemy of your enemies. Have a nice day. ******************************************* QUOTE OF THE DAY****************** * You have just read the opinons of : * "Common sense is merely the set * * * of prejudices a person acquires* ========================================================================= Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: Why Aren't the British Police Doing Their Job? Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british Followup-To: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british References: <DpIE0r.736.0.bloor@torfree.net> Organization: Toronto Free-Net Distribution: >This in itself dos not suggest that the police have it in for you. >The old bill operates on extremely tight spending limits forced on >them by that pillock Michael Howard, and without evidence, they >often have higher priorities than chasing something that cannot go >to court. I think the police know well what's going on. It is up to them to do something about it. They know I've made a complaint at a police station. I could probably do more to try to help myself (I think someone suggested making a written complaint to the chief constable) but even then I nthink they would not take action. > >I doubt that the police are actually being leant on, but they probably >realise that if they looked into this, they would be leant on hard. >The met always stays away from anything that looks like it has Defence, >Security or secret service interest already, because they realise that >they are below these government agencies in the general pecking order. > So we have a situation where the security service breaks the law, everyone knows MI5 breaks the law, and the police won't investigate crimes that would otherwise earn a jail sentence. Oh good, I'm really glad the UK is a democracy. (<sarcasm>, for those of you who didn't catch that) >If I walked into my local nick and complained that MI5 were snooping on me, >they would show me the door without even looking at my evidence, because >that bored desk seargant with only five years to go before he retires >doesn't want to start fucking about with somebody who has incurred the >wrath of Stella Rimington. He would rather deal with the lost dogs and >driving licence producers, eat his cheese and pickle sandwiches and piss >off home at the end of his shift than have some high ranking spook having >a go at his boss and getting him a bollocking. In this case I think it is 'high-ranking' police officers who are aware of the persecution, they know a complaint has been made, and they're doing nothing. What is more, I don't think there is anything I can do that would make them take action, both because they may be being 'leant on' and through the wider view that it could be deleterious to the state to have a persecution by state organs exposed. They're wrong in taking that point of view, because sooner or later this will all out anyway, and they it will be n years of police inaction (n>=6) that will be questioned. > >In short, you have earned much sympathy but little surprise. Just remember >that saying about the enemy of your enemies. > >Have a nice day. 14665 Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60352
  - 8
    - MI5 Persecution: Shoot to Kill 4/4/96 (13151) Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british From: jbaker@pobox.com (Jill Baker) Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: How and Why Did it Start? Reply-To: jbaker@pobox.com Date: Thu Apr 4 05:03:01 1996 jbaker@pobox.com (Jill Baker) wrote: >bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) wrote: >>Why would >>the security services expend hundreds of thousands of pounds and more than fiv >>years of manpower to try to kill a British citizen? Because ... >So why didn't they just shoot you dead? >It would have been a lot cheaper. Please make the effort to respond to this point Mike. It was a serious question. Jill (my opinions are entirely my own, no-one else's) ================================================================= Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: How and Why Did it Start? Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british Followup-To: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british References: <Dp5IAr.1EB.0.bloor@torfree.net> Organization: Toronto Free-Net Distribution: jbaker@pobox.com (Jill Baker) wrote: >bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) wrote: >>Why would >>the security services expend hundreds of thousands of pounds and more than fiv >>years of manpower to try to kill a British citizen? Because ... >So why didn't they just shoot you dead? >It would have been a lot cheaper. I think there are two reasons nobody has taken physical action as opposed to verbal; a) A lot of people "know". Perhaps you the reader might not know, but lots of people in the media etc do. Remember, I was born in the UK and lived there until a couple of years ago. I don't think these people would condone state-sponsored murder of someone who might be seen on a good day as one of their own. b) Rather than doind anything directly, they're going for spying, verbal harassment, media harassment, every form of persecution short of the physical. Because as soon as anything turns physical, the police become involved; and unless it turns physical, the police can shrug and say 'not our problem'. So they persecute you and try to get you to react, either by hitting one of them (in which case I clearly find myself in the wrong as far as the police are concerned), or by trying to harm myself (in which case they can pretend they weren't responsible). It's a pretty unproductive form of harassment actually, because if you don't react then they're wasting they're time. Or perhaps they're just cheap bullies and trying to wreck someone's life, without any ulterior motive? 13151 Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60351
  - 9
    - MI5 Persecution: Email Cruelty 11/3/96 (11637) From: D.S.Toube@qmw.ac.uk (David Toube) Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.legal,uk.media,soc.culture.british Subject: Re: Why Censorship Must Not Be Allowed on Uk.* Reply-To: D.S.Toube@qmw.ac.uk Date: Mon Mar 11 11:47:13 1996 A OSHINEYE <TA5330@QMWCC7.qmw.ac.uk> wrote: :D.S.Toube@qmw.ac.uk (David Toube) wrote: :>I would also be very pleased if Mike Corley would not mailbomb me :>via my university account with messages entitled 'This Is What :>You Get For Censorship', thus closing down the entire college :>email system. :> :>Although it does not personally inconvenience me, it is rather :>dull for the college. :When did this happen? BTW you can always use Pegasus Mail to send all :email from Corley's address back to him and see how he likes it. :--Ade : This weekend. The result, Mike Corley will be gratified to hear, was that all users of the college system were prevented from using email. I suspect that there is no stopping Mike Corley. If mail is automatically returned to him, he will return it back to you tenfold. If he is thrown off his account, as he surely will be, he will find another one. I do not care whether Mike Corley has an email account or not. It is a matter of supreme indifference to me whether his fanciful account of persecution is aired or not. If he thinks that he has been persecuted by M15 and Chris Tarrant, then that is a matter for him. But there is a world of difference between repeatedly spamming usenet - which is unacceptable - and setting up a Web Site containing his post, which is entirely acceptable. Then it will be possible to choose whether or not to partake of his fantasy. However although I would not like to see the censorship of posts because they demonstrate evidence of mental illness, I suspect that Mike Corley will inevitably be censored by his ISP following a number of complaints of usenet abuse and mailbombing. ---- David Toube Lecturer in Law QMW, University of London WWW: http://www.qmw.ac.uk/~ugtl027/index.html David Boothroyd's British Elections Home Page WWW: http://www.qmw.ac.uk/~laws/election/home.html 11637 Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60349
  - 10
    - MI5 Persecution: Jeff Rooker MP 5/3/96 (10123) From: rael@midnight.org (Rael A. Fenchurch) Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K. Date: Tue Mar 5 04:37:52 1996 Mike, >"go away" replies, and one from a Labour MP saying he was aware of my situation >but wouldn't help me because he regarded me as the "bad guy". Gee thanks, they >do this and then offload the shame they should feel onto you by telling you "oh >but it's your fault". It's a mad world. Do you happen to have a copy of this MPs letter? After all, a scanned copy of it would lend great weight to your case here. At the moment, you've offered us nothing in the way of evidence, which is one of the main reasons we all think you've truly gone fishing. So? Rael... ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Rael A. Fenchurch (rael@midnight.org, http://www.midnight.org/rael/) --- --- "I don't think compassion's the language of our time" --- --- "Doubt or Die" --- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ========================================================================== From: Andy Howard <andy@kiss100.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K. Reply-To: andy@kiss100.demon.co.uk Date: Tue Mar 5 06:06:15 1996 In article: <DnrMsq.239.0.bloor@torfree.net> bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) wr I got a few > "go away" replies, and one from a Labour MP saying he was aware of my situatio > but wouldn't help me because he regarded me as the "bad guy". Which Labour MP Mike? > -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Andy Howard EMail andy@kiss100.demon.co.uk | | My opinions, not my employer's (Jolly nice people though they are). | | If my employers shared my opinions... Well, frankly I'd be amazed | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ==================================================================== Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K. Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.br$ Followup-To: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.b$ References: <DnFtLs.E37.0.bloor@torfree.net> <4h45nq$87o_002@leeds.ac.uk> <4h6gkb$ivc$ Organization: Toronto Free-Net Distribution: Mike Corley (bu765@torfree.net) wrote: : >Do you happen to have a copy of this MPs letter? After all, a scanned : >copy of it would lend great weight to your case here. At the moment, : >you've offered us nothing in the way of evidence, which is one of the : >main reasons we all think you've truly gone fishing. So? : The letter was by email, not on paper. (In addition to snail-mailing, I : emailed all the relevant addresses I could find.) I'll see if I can find : it, I keep a record of most of this correspondence so I may still have it. I'm afraid I don't have a copy of the correspondence. In future I will keep useful letters, so with luck there may be a "next time". The MP was Jeff Rooker, Labour MP. Having looked again at the Labour web page I find he doesn't have an address listed, but I have a record of his address as having been jeff.rooker@geo2.poptel.org.uk. I don't know where I got the address from. I'm so disorganised! ==================================================================== Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british From: J.J.Smith@ftel.co.uk (John J Smith) Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K. X-Nntp-Posting-Host: death-on-the-rock.ftel.co.uk Message-ID: <Dnw49L.D1H@ftel.co.uk> Sender: smid@death-on-the-rock.ftel.co.uk (RFC931) Organization: Fujitsu Telecommunications Europe Ltd References: <DnFtLs.E37.0.bloor@torfree.net> <DnrMsq.239.0.bloor@torfree.net> <Dnsrnu.Jr1.0.bloor@torfree.net> <DntKEo.86E.0.bloor@torfree.net> Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 09:12:56 GMT Lines: 54 In article <DntKEo.86E.0.bloor@torfree.net>, Mike Corley <bu765@torfree.net> wrote: >Mike Corley (bu765@torfree.net) wrote: >: >Do you happen to have a copy of this MPs letter? After all, a scanned >: >copy of it would lend great weight to your case here. At the moment, >: >you've offered us nothing in the way of evidence, which is one of the >: >main reasons we all think you've truly gone fishing. So? > >: The letter was by email, not on paper. (In addition to snail-mailing, I >: emailed all the relevant addresses I could find.) I'll see if I can find >: it, I keep a record of most of this correspondence so I may still have it. > >I'm afraid I don't have a copy of the correspondence. In future I will keep >useful letters, so with luck there may be a "next time". Don't believe you. Because that might be proof, and we just *cant* have that. >The MP was Jeff Rooker, Labour MP. Having looked again at the Labour web page I >find he doesn't have an address listed, but I have a record of his address as >having been jeff.rooker@geo2.poptel.org.uk. I don't know where I got the >address from. I'm so disorganised! I did Email this MP yesterday. This is what I wrote: Smid>I am sorry to bother you, but there is a person with a known Smid>personality disorder on the internet usenet, claiming that you Smid>as an MP have backed up his claims that he is being persecuted Smid>by MI5. Smid>His name is Mike Corely, and posts from canada (email address Smid>available if you require). Smid> Smid>He claims that you have told him that his claims that the Smid>"television is watching him", are justified, yet cannot find the Smid>email in which he did so.. Smid>I'd be interested in what you have said to him, because we have Smid>had a long term battle to convince him that he really is schizophrenic Smid>and that Chris Tarrent, MI5 and Martin Lewis from News On Ten are Smid>persecuting him... If you do have the original Email, then that'd Smid>be nice... Smid>If you nothing of this subject, it would not suprise me, however. His reply, surpise, suprise was: MP>No idea what you are on about. I am getting really sick of some of MP>the junk on E mail. I just dump it so he may have contacted MP>but as to an answer I 've better things to do. Your move, Mike. Smid 10123 Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60347
  - 11
    - MI5 Persecution: Flight or fight 7/1/96 (8609) From: huge@axalotl.demon.co.uk (Hugh Davies) Newsgroups: uk.misc Subject: Re: persecution rant (re-post) Reply-To: huge@axalotl.demon.co.uk Date: Sun Jan 7 04:43:41 1996 Yo, Mike, Happy New Year! Haven't you killed yourself yet? In article <DKMIs5.158.0.bloor@torfree.net>, bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) wri >For anyone who hasn't yet read this, There is no-one in the known Universe who hasn't read this at least 5 times. >and really really wants to then here No-one wants to read it, Mike. It's drivel. >is the article that was posted last year in this newsgroup.... Over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again.... -- Regards, Huge. ================================================== Subject: persecution rant (re-post) Newsgroups: uk.misc Organization: Toronto Free-Net Summary: Keywords: >Yo, Mike, Happy New Year! Haven't you killed yourself yet? But I can't, you see then I wouldn't know how things would turn out ("we're only doing this because we don't know how it's all going to end" - logic error in line 100) >There is no-one in the known Universe who hasn't read this at least 5 times. It doesn't seem to have done a whole lot of good since the good old persecution stuff is still going on. Over Christmas I was flying BA and got hassled by a couple of people on the flight (sounds like something you've heard before, doesn't it?). All the usual stuff about the town I'd been staying, "he doesn't know who we are", self-justification that we're doing it because he's a "nutter" etc. Real friendly like. Also a fairly obvious wind-up and attempt to get some reaction. I think they're trying quite hard to get a reaction. If I hit someone on a flight over the Atlantic, am I actually breaking any laws, and if so whose? Is a BA aircraft British territory subject to British laws while it's in mid-flight? It is really tempting to "reply" and that's obviously what they want, so who am I to refuse a blow to the head for people who ask for it so consistently? 8609 Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60346
  - 12
    - MI5 Persecution: Dihydrocodeine 26/11/95 (7095) From: michaelm@easynet.co.uk (michaelm@easynet.co.uk) Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.media,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,alt.radio.uk Subject: Re: Britain's Shame (repost) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 1995 09:19:13 GMT Organization: ------------ Lines: 89 Message-ID: <817374781.20251@michaelm.easynet.co.uk> References: <DIM34L.755.0.bloor@torfree.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: michaelm.easynet.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: michaelm.easynet.co.uk X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corblymee) wrote: | In June 1990 a horrifying campaign of harassment was initiated in London by | what are believed to be elements of the security services. The harassment has | continued for over five years, starting from the broadcast and print media, | and encompassing abuse through set-up situations and by people in public | places. It has been brought to the attention of the police and they are aware | what is happening, but are not taking any action to prevent it. <whopping great snip of 884 lines> corley, you puzzle me! i've narrowed your possible motives down to one or more of the following: 1) you work on behalf of the british government with a hidden agenda of furthering the largely right wing (most to hide) censorship brigade's cause, "a drug-crazed psycho posting dangerous nonsense - how very very sad - but in the public interest,we must act." draft internet (censorship) bills rolling off hm govt's banders at this very moment, I don't doubt it! 2) you work for the daily mail which has started to feel the "internet pinch" as it suddenly clicks in the chronically adled minds of yet more and more of their readers - that shudder-inducing realisation that the entire editorial staff at the mail are scaremongering, imbecilic, blood-leeching , totalitarian twats - can any else sense a coordinated campaign on its way ??- "Mail urges (their) government to act - internet safety endangered by uncontrolled surfing lunatics - boys hands blown off by internet maniacs - net porn responsible for 392323rd rape " .net porn responsible for 392324th rape " .net porn responsible for 392325th rape " .net porn responsible for 392326th rape " .net porn responsible for 392327th rape " net porn responsible for 392328th rape " .net porn responsible for 392329th rape " <yawn> .net porn responsible for 392330th rape " .net porn responsible for 392331st rape " .net porn responsible for 392332nd rape " net porn responsible for 392333rd rape " <yawn> .net porn responsible for 392334th rape " .net porn responsible for 392335th rape " .net porn responsible for 392336th rape " .net porn responsible for 392337th rape " net porn responsible for 392338th rape " etcetera, straight from the old nag's mouth.. lee-potter (and english), take particular note.. (how ever you two common ********* managed to avoid encarceration for what was, quite evidently,wilful contempt of court in the regina v taylforth & knights case, is frankly beyond me.. those dreaded and now all too familiar words "endemic corruption" were muttered by at least one Q.C. >3) you (at least) believe there's (some) substance to your claim(s) and you >have a genuine axe to grind. If so, bloody well go for it, but scrape the >heavy layer of steaming dung off the top (that's assuming you're even >capable of distinguishing fantasy from reality.) 4) you (as an email address) are serving as some bizarre "educational" programme orchestrated by the psychiatric industry - ever keen to justify enforced electrical lobotomies, electroshock and dwugs .All poised for the echo? - "corley frigging well needs lobotomising" 5) you're just clinically insane with absolutely no comprehension or insight into the consequences you will possibly face as a result of repeatedly posting what, certainly on the face of it, looks like complete and utter bullshit. 6) you're some weirdo prankster(s) - probably a group of student psychiatrists having a cheap crack whilst high as kites on pilfered dihydrocodeine. 7) You are infact working for the ss yourself, gauging public awareness of the extent and methods of bugging - infinity transmitters, microwave surveillance devices, satellite tracking equipment, 'chipping' of black crims, say no more. 8) You're fuelling the central usenet administration committee, who, it is believed, are keen to see the introduction of a wide-reaching framework of self-created powers relating to posting cancellation. (see the 'son of RFC1036') my bet's on (5) - but just fuck off corley- irritate the lard-arsed canucks instead. The cia's financing of "professor" cameron's brain-washing experiments in montreal.. would be a good starting point ... or perhaps "professor" watts and his widely admired masterful double eye-jabbing trick - a couple of wallops with an icepick. such a waste of perfectly edible four year old hispanics !!!!.. Perhaps the old marylebone rd posse could fill us in with a few more facts on this one...?? You are all on the .net now ????? A very warm welcome :-) ... christmas rapidly approaching.. >business booming?? Do we all get a look in at flotation ??!! ====================================================== From: Gulliver <kst2co@herts.ac.uk> Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.media,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,alt.radio.uk Subject: Re: Britain's Shame (repost) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 1995 18:25:32 +0000 Organization: University of Hertfordshire Lines: 12 Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951126182156.16879B-100000@altair.herts.ac.uk> References: <DIM34L.755.0.bloor@torfree.net> <817343873snz@objmedia.demon.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: altair.herts.ac.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII In-Reply-To: <817343873snz@objmedia.demon.co.uk> Actually, upon thinking about Mike's story it reminds me of someone I heard about who suffered from a persecution copmlex. He was an immigrant from some Eastern Bloc country who believed that 30 years after he emigrated the KGB were still after him. He would blame them if he had difficulty unlocking his car for instance (he reckoned they were putting something into the locks!). Something is very wrong, probably in Mike's head but what the hell, loonies make life more fun! -- Angus Gulliver ======================================================= Subject: Castrate the depraved MI5 buggers now Newsgroups: uk.misc Organization: Toronto Free-Net >Something is very wrong, probably in Mike's head but what the hell, >loonies make life more fun! Something is very wrong when the security services abandon their usual target of politicians and the well-known, to pursue the hitherto unknown nonentities such as myself. >corley, you puzzle me! Why? Because of my pathological truthfulness? >3) you (at least) believe there's (some) substance to your claim(s) and you >have a genuine axe to grind. If so, bloody well go for it, but scrape the >heavy layer of steaming dung off the top (that's assuming you're even >capable of distinguishing fantasy from reality.) Bloody well go for it I will. I think the "standard spiel" is quite studded with facts actually. There's plenty of "meat" there if the appropriate people can be motivated to get their act together and pursue the case. >my bet's on (5) - but just fuck off corley- irritate the lard-arsed canucks >instead. The cia's financing of "professor" cameron's brain-washing the lard-arsed canucks (?) are irritating me, but you don't want to hear about that >business booming?? Do we all get a look in at flotation ??!! 7095 Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60345
  - 13
    - MI5 Persecution: A new Kafka? 3/10/95 (5581) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,uk.media,uk.politics From: jackson@soldev.tti.com (Dick Jackson) Subject: Re: What it's like to be watched by the security services Message-ID: <1995Oct13.225312.6514@ttinews.tti.com> Sender: usenet@ttinews.tti.com (Usenet Admin) Nntp-Posting-Host: soldev Organization: Citicorp-TTI at Santa Monica (CA) by the Sea References: <DFy9tB.3JK.0.bloor@torfree.net> <813188298snz129.os2.7@blackcat.demon.co.uk> <DGE7uJ.8tF.0.bloor@torfree.net> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 22:53:12 GMT Lines: 34 In article <DGE7uJ.8tF.0.bloor@torfree.net> bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) writes: > >Strangers in the street have recognized me on sight many times, and shown >awareness of the current thread of abuse. To give you one example, in 1992 >I was seriously ill, and a manager at work somewhat humouroursly said that >"it wasn't fair" that people were bullying me. A few days later, I >attended for the first time a clinic in London as an outpatient, and on my >way out was accosted by someone who asked if "they had paid my fare", with >emphasis on the word "fare". He repeated the word several times in this >different context; that they should have paid my "fare", each time >emphasising the word. > >For two and a half years from the time their harassment started until >November 1992 I refused to see a psychiatrist, because I reasoned that I >was not ill of my own action or fault, but through the stress caused by >harassment, and that a lessening of the illness would have to be >consequent to a removal of its immediate cause, in other words a cessation >of harassment. I also reasoned that since they were taunting me with jokes >about mental illness, if I were to seek treatment then the abusers would >think that they had "won" and been proved "right". <I've deleted a lot, but I think this gives the idea> I have so far not contributed to this tread, it has been unpleasant in my opinion. However, I was struck by the resemblance of the above passages to the writing of Franz Kafka. Viz. while from an objective viewpoint it seems to refer to a abnormal world, in a strange way it does resonate strongly at other levels. Mr. Corley, have you tried to write for publication? I honestly think it might lead somewhere positive. Dick Jackson (serious for a change and expecting to get beaten up) 5581 Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60344
  - 14
    - MI5 Persecution: Do they fear truth? 3/10/95 (4067) From: flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk (Peter Krüger) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,uk.politics,alt.politics.british Subject: Re: What it's like to be watched by the security services Date: 3 Oct 1995 15:38:20 GMT Organization: Steinkrug Publications Lines: 66 Message-ID: <44rldc$nrm@news.cityscape.co.uk> References: <DFus24.HxB.0.bloor@torfree.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: aa040.du.pipex.com X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.6+ In article <DFus24.HxB.0.bloor@torfree.net>, bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) says: > >It completely mystifies me how it can be done. One night in June 1992 I >was in a bed-and-breakfast in Oxford (some hard facts now, you?ll be >bored of the generalisations). I booked the B&B from the office phone. >So if they had the office bugged, or the phone system bugged, they could >have heard the call. If it was as late as 1992 then there was already a system available to feed digital video out of a domestic TV via the mains. Each raster of video was preceded by a sixteen bit address which identified the television set. All that was needed was a decoder box plugged into the mains somewhere between your room and the grid transformer. The signal was decoded and then fed down to the phone line. They probably even had a PC which enabled them to see the picture as well. By 1992 the technology had moved on from slowscan to near real time video with the advent of devices from Brooktree and Harris etc. >the newsreader reacted. Breathed deeply, as if in psychological relief. Maybe, or perhaps as if in:- sci.psychology.announce sci.psychology.consciousness sci.psychology.journals.psyche sci.psychology.journals.psycoloquy sci.psychology.misc sci.psychology.personality sci.psychology.psychotherapy sci.psychology.research sci.psychology.theory >I can't describe to you what goes through your mind when you know >someone on TV is "seeing" you the viewer. You?re doing OK so far. >Your instinct is to switch the TV off, to change channel, Not much point unless you switch off the TV at the mains >like an ostrich, Looks like Ostrich farming is going to catch on in the UK as you may have seen in some of the other uk newsgroups >The one time I did directly ask someone in the company who knew what was >going on, first he spewed wool about, "well we have to think what is >reality and what is proof anyway", then went into barefaced denial liar >mode. It opens your eyes, if they can't say out loud what they keep >saying in a disguised fashion, they must fear exposure, they must fear >the truth. wool_ barefaced_ denial_ liar_ eyes_ fashion_ fear_ exposure, How is your mother these days Mike? And BTW - How is the thesis coming along? Peter Kruger ------------------------------------------------------------ http://www.gold.net/flames/ flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk 4067 Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60343
  - 15
    - MI5 Persecution: Grievous Bodily Harm 2/10/95 (2553) From: jeibisch@revolver.demon.co.uk (James Eibisch) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,uk.politics,uk.media,rec.arts.tv.uk.misc Subject: Re: Auntie gets it in the emails Reply-To: jeibisch@revolver.demon.co.uk Date: Mon Oct 2 19:44:19 1995 lig0007@queens-belfast.ac.uk (TOM OATES) wrote: >However, I'm pleased to say that, in the past couple of days, Mike Corley has >stopped doing it and he appears (I say this cautiously) to be acting more >reasonably. True, his postings are still based on paranoid delusions. >However, so long as he doesn't go back to his old practices of multiple, >identical, unreadable postings, I'm sure that most people on this newsgroup >are willing to put up with him. Time to come out of the woodwork of this thread (or variations thereof)... I find it annoying that discussion of Mike's situation is spread over multiple threads - it makes it hard to follow, and especially to follow up. If it could be consolidated into one thread on relevant newsgroups (I'm reading this on uk.media btw). I'm a little surprised with the volume of abuse Mike has received, but believe strongly in freedom of speech if such a thing were to exist, which clearly includes abuse as much as anything. One thing which has been missing from this discussion is this simple prognosis: that maybe Mike is right and that, despite his admitted mental condition, there really is a campaign against him organised by now-influential ex-students of his university. Does anyone remember the TV series GBH, a fictional account of security service and governmental power games? Fictional, certainly, but one of the most powerful pieces of TV drama I've seen in many years, fascinating and quite believable, even. The fact is, as Mike has pointed out (oh, so many times :-), that the security services _do_ have the influence, contacts, resources, and time to conduct such a campaign of surveillance and even psychological terror if they so chose. If they have this power, then they will surely use it We still don't have all the facts from Mike, and the most pertinent here I think would be about his time at university - the people who took against him, the ringleaders. We need to know far more about Mike: his political and social affiliations, put in context with his univeristy years, the enemies he made, the reasons people ganged up on him at the very early stages. I don't subscribe to conspiracy theories generally, but I know there is far more that goes on in the universities, old boy's clubs, civil and secret services and Parliament than is ever made public. Mike, I leave it to you to construct a _single_ thread in a relevant newsgroup about this topic and keep to this thread to give us new information and answer questions about your situation. Ignore the 'Mike Corley is a nutter' posts unless they are relevant. Give us more detail. Who knows? It may be true, stranger things have happened. _ James Eibisch ('v') N : E : T : A : D : E : L : I : C : A Reading, U.K. (,_,) http://metro.turnpike.net/J/jeibisch/ ======= ------------------------------- Tue, 03 Oct 1995 04:01:34 uk.misc Thread 3 of 14 Lines 58 Re: Auntie gets it in the emails Respno 16 of 16 J.J.Smith@ftel.co.uk John J Smith at Fujitsu Telecommunications Europe Ltd In article <812677261.12841@revolver.demon.co.uk>, James Eibisch <jeibisch@revolver.demon.co.uk> wrote: >lig0007@queens-belfast.ac.uk (TOM OATES) wrote: >One thing which has been missing from this discussion is this simple >prognosis: that maybe Mike is right and that, despite his admitted >mental condition, there really is a campaign against him organised by >now-influential ex-students of his university. We're trying to find this out on uk.misc. He's posted some *new* *huge* replies (which I'd have to give up my day job to reply to), detailing some things like: a) Mike Corley is *not* his real name b) Exactly what the "abuse" is (it seems be such things, as taking completely unrelated newspaper articles, striving to make them a disgusting insult, then redirecting against himself). c) How he came to the conclusion. I think he's doing rather better nowadays.. >Does anyone remember the TV series GBH, a fictional account of security >service and governmental power games? Fictional, certainly, but one of >the most powerful pieces of TV drama I've seen in many years, >fascinating and quite believable, even. This would be a point, apart from the fact that this was directed against someone of political importance. I don't believe Mike is... >The fact is, as Mike has pointed out (oh, so many times :-), that the >security services _do_ have the influence, contacts, resources, and time >to conduct such a campaign of surveillance and even psychological terror >if they so chose. If they have this power, then they will surely use it >at some point against some people. It appears he has formed the Security Service conclusion, because they are the only ones capable of doing it. A "searching for an enemy capable of it". >We still don't have all the facts from Mike, and the most pertinent here >I think would be about his time at university - the people who took >against him, the ringleaders. We need to know far more about Mike: his >political and social affiliations, put in context with his univeristy >years, the enemies he made, the reasons people ganged up on him at the >very early stages. I'm beginning to think that we never will get all the facts from Mike. We may, however, get enough... >Mike, I leave it to you to construct a _single_ thread in a relevant >newsgroup about this topic and keep to this thread to give us new >information and answer questions about your situation. Ignore the 'Mike >Corley is a nutter' posts unless they are relevant. Uk.misc, me boy... Smid ========================================================== From: flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk (Peter Kr|ger) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,uk.media,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,alt.conspiracy Subject: Re: What it's like to be watched by the security services Date: Tue Oct 3 15:41:54 1995 In article <44rrrh$t6v@news.ox.ac.uk>, idaniel@jesus.ox.ac.uk (Illtud Daniel) says: > >And what do you mean when you state that the symptoms are too >'textbook'? Are the textbooks wrong? I think what is meant by 'textbook' is that some of the symptoms of 'illness' displayed in the posts seem to have been lifted from textbooks describing mental instability and personality disorders. I must admit I haven't seen Mike's postings before has he only just started posting again? Peter Kruger ------------------------------------------------------------ http://www.gold.net/flames/ flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk 2553 Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60342
  - 16
    - MI5 Persecution: Goldfish and Piranha 29/9/95 (1039) I just thought I'd let you know what I've been reading into the "Crusader" spam. I don't want to post this to usenet because somebody might try to tie that in to my posts in some way (someone already has, in uk.misc). First of all, I'd like to ask you to believe that my phone line in my apartment is bugged, and has been for many months. I have moved a couple of times this year, but "they" have faithfully been on my trail. Anyway, let's suppose my phone line is bugged. Now, when I talk to my internet service provider, it's over a SLIP (now PPP) connection. So if you wanted to bug what was said, either you'd listen in over the line and have to decode the transmission, or you could go to the service provider (more difficult) and ask them to decode a particular user's connection. OK, so now they're listening to everything I do over my SLIP/PPP connection. A couple of months ago I was messing around with faking articles through nntp servers and through anonymous remailers. I chose a nice inconspicuous newsgroup for my little tests, something no-one would ever notice. Guess which newsgroup I chose??? Yes, _FISH_!!! or rec.aquaria to be precise And guess what articles I tried to post? Goldfish, Koi carp and, you'll never guess... PIRANHA!!! The goldfish article and the Koi went through, but the piranha didn';t appear. by now you probably think this is too silly for words. But if you look in the papers a few eeks ago you will find John Major, Tonny Blair and Paddy Ashdown sharing a "private joke" about Major's sunburnt goldfish. We haven't had anything about Koi yet (they must be too dull ). Now, sent by someone who clearly knew what they were doing (they chose an Italian backbone site for their launch point) we have many thousands of messages to people all over the globe. All about piranha, and with the punchline "that gives you something to think about, doesn't it?" The way it works is that they're trying to kill two birds with one stone again. I don't knoiw why they should be against these national alliance people, but my interpretation is that they simultaneously try to discredit them, and stem the flow of Corley articles. ================================================================= In article <DFnE55.8tF.0.bloor@torfree.net>, Mike Corley <bu765@torfree.net> wrote: > >John J Smith (J.J.Smith@ftel.co.uk) wrote: > >: b) we do know who you are. Or are you someone else we don't know about? >: You are currently known as "That bloody persistant net nutter, who's >: expanding from uk.misc to the rest of the world". > >I think the point I was trying to make is that I could tell you things >from my personal life, at home and at work, which would add credibility >to my story. But if I named people, then (a) they would object violently >to being included in this shenanigans, and (b) I would be revealing my >identity which would be bad for my personal life and my work life. Of >course some people in my personal life, and at work, do know who "mike >corley" is. But at least we're observing a studied silence for now. :People can always be called "MR X", to save them being named. : :I'm completely perplexed as to what you mean by b). Revealing identity? :To who? And why would this be bad for any part of your life when you :already have a less than respectful reputation here? I'll just enumerate one or two things that I can still remember. Sometime around August/Sept 1992 I was living in a house in Oxford, and coming out of the house was physically attacked by someone - not punched, just grabbed by the coat, with some verbals thrown in for good measure. That was something the people at work shouldn't have known about... but soon after a couple of people were talking right in front of me about, "yeah, I heard he was attacked". Again, one I went for a walk in some woods outside Oxford. The next day, at work, someone said "you know he went to the forest yesterday". I don't want to put details on usenet of what happened because to do so would be to risk it happening again. If you put ideas in peoples' heads then you can find them reflecting back at you, and I don't want that. Also I can't remember that much from three years ago. From november 1992 I started taking "major tranquilizers" and just blotted the whole thing from my mind. >This is a feature time and time again, that the security services >(presumed) get at you by manipulating other people around you to get at >you. If you have their contacts, manpower, resources and technology then >you can do that sort of thing. :But why? Are you a threat? They pretend they "have" to get at me. After the first few weeks they had to find a reason to spy and abuse. You can't abuse someone unless they're in the wrong in some way. What I did "wrong" was to be ill. So it became "nutter" and "monster" and "he's going to attack us" coupled with "ha ha ha, he can't do anything to defend himself, it was so funny". That obvious contradiction within their propaganda is something they blithely ignore. :So, the Security Services never *actually* appear, and you assume that :they get someone else to do your dirty work. This is a bit of a big :logical step, here: That person doesn't like me, or is causing me trouble, :it's not because they've got problems themselves, it must be the "Security :Services". Yes. Because people are infallible. Or is there more? A single source is indicated because of the range of harassment. BBC + Capital + manipulated_public_at_large + set_up_situations, what does that add up to? Add in the technology to carry out the covert spying and the manpower and knowhow to follow you around for five years without being spotted. It smells very much of the security services, because there is no other organization (to my knowledge) which does the things I've seen these people do. Remember, they have deliberately chosen the softest of soft targets to victimize. They purposely chose a mentally ill person who they thought would be likely to kill himself anyway, so that they could get away with murder. And in all likelihood it will have started as a personal vendetta by someone. Who could that be? I don't know, but I can give you some clues. The first possibility (deep breath) is that someone from my college set me up. Six years ago I graduated from university in the UK, during the last year there I was steadily getting more and more ill. I know that I was talking in my sleep; although I don't know what I was saying, it got me a reputation, and if someone from my college talked afterwards to the "wrong" people then that could be the reason for all that has followed. I think that's the strongest contender for source. Directly beneath my room lived another bloke who frequently had his friends round late at night, after the time that I went to sleep. So they could have heard what I was saying in my sleep, and that could have got me the reputation for "talking to myself". What I don't know is why that should have rebounded a year after I left. You'd think it would have happened sooner; it's a bit odd to wait for a year and then start abuse. That leads me to question what in particular happened around May/June 1990 for them to start then. >What I don't know is how it looks from the other side, from the side of >the people who are being manipulated to get at me. On a couple of >occasions I have challenged people to tell the truth of the matter, but >they have alwats ducked the challenge. :Have you ever considered the possibility, that you have made a mistake, and :the people don't know what you are talking about? Yes. I am currently considering the possibility that some people around me know only what is being posted on Usenet, and have not been "contacted" by "them". But I _know_ that others have been contacted. :What words? Are they in common use? Could they be a catchphrase of a :popular comedian?: "Nice to see you, to see you nice"? In England the all-time No. 1 is "nutter". Easter this year, returning home from Clapham police station to report five years of harassment ("we're not saying it's happening and we're not saying it isn't happening"), another "not happening" incident of harassment when a cowardly little slut did her country proud by yelling "nutter, nutter, nutter" in the face of the hated enemy. What can you do about that? You can't yell abuse back in their face, because they know they're supported by their peers, by the media, by the murderers in the security forces. You can't put them down when the fascist establishment is on their side. You can't hit them, because they would deny their abuse, they would deny knowing anything, and bring charges against the "nutter" who attacked them "at random". >You know, you're >passing saomeone, they're hardly going to construct an argument for your >benefit, so they work a word of abuse into the conversation which they >can giggle at. :Abuse such as what? We're all adults here, we can take it. Is this abuse :aimed at you? How can you tell it is? I think I've said already what the words are. Thing is, at any given time the language is consistent. In January everyone's calling you X, then a few weeks later people stop calling you X and start calling you Y. You can tell it's aimed at me, because when people repeatedly say the same words are you walk past, then laugh, you would have to be hard of understanding not to recognize it. >Or they repeat something that's been said somewhere else... the PE thing >being a case in point. PE says it, then other people pick up the refrain. :Remind me who PE is again. PE = "Private Eye" >: >To give you an example, which I mentioned in another posting. In around >: >October 1992, Private Eye ran a cover with the heading "Major's support >: >lowest ever", with John calling to Norma on the cover "come back, Norma". >: >Only one obvious interpretation to that, isn';;t there? I certainly >: >thought so when I saw that cover. Wrongo!! Down the pub with people from work >: >Simon says to phil, "don';t you think it's wrong then?" phil says, "well >: >private eye are usuallyright"..."hislop strikes again.. > >: Erm. Mike? Heeeelllllooo? What are you on about. What is the other >: interpretation then? Norma having an affair? Seems a bit wrong, with the >: heading "Majors support Lowest ever"... > >No, this one isn't obvious , it really does need to be explained. I >certainly didn't understand it when I first saw it. You see, the kernel >of vitriol is in the words "come back". At the time, the themes of >abuse were centred around interpretations of those two words (stretch your >mind a little bit, I don't have to spell it out for you, surely). :You did in your mail item. : :You seem to be scouting about something called a "Double Entendre". The :inference being "Come" = Ejaculation, "Back" = Anus (not the first part :of the body I would have went for, I would have foolishly gone for "Back", :silly old me). : :You see to have picked a sodomy double entendre out of a Private Eye :headline. They are everywhere. The English language has much double :meaning in it, and if you put your mind to it, you could pull a double :entendre out of a randomly chosen page of the bible. So what? >The point is that when Simon pointed it out to Phil, he did recognise >what it meant after a moment's thought... and so did I... and so did the >people who repeated it several times later... so however murky it may >seem to you, that is the meaning they intended it to have... I still don't really know if the meaning was intended when that headline was written, or if it was simply "found" after the fact. The reason I think it might be the former is that I got quite a lot of abuse along the lines of "sound-alike" or "double-entendre" at work, in particularly from Steve. So "double" inevitably came to mean split-personality, "two people in one"; "back" inevitably came to mean "backside", "come" inevitably meant you-know- what, "split" (well, we'd better split now) again you can guess, "bent" (of a similar bent), the list goes on forever. These aren't "nice" double- entendres intended for comedy, they're nasty words to humiliate and cause pain. If I could turn the clock back three years then I would sue my former employers for harassment and I would almost certainly win. I had to take pills after a year of Oxford, so they wouldn't be able to lie their way out of it. Actually, I could still take them to court - the main obstacle being that three years after the fact is a bit late and much of what happened, the details that would be necessary for a case to go to court, has just been obliterated by time. : Smid ============================================== From: flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk (Peter Kr|ger) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,alt.conspiracy,uk.media,uk.legal Subject: Re: Mike Corley - a (helpful) suggestion Date: Mon Oct 2 05:43:42 1995 In article <812551172snz@objmedia.demon.co.uk>, Snail <snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk> says: >Indeed, I feel that my Usenet access is censored simply because I don't want >to download groups he is partaking in, because of his behaviour. > >I wasn't that bothered, but I am starting to get seriously pissed off >with him. Which takes a lot. Hi Snail This person Corley seems quite interesting for three reasons. I put the following at the end of a post in another thread just to see if he was reading any other threads in uk.media. It seems he is probably not. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Heres an interesting little story from back in the early days of CCD technology. There was this miniature camera which was designed to fit behind the infrared receiver lens of the remote control system (just beside the IR sensor itself) the camera clocked out the data in 256 lines of 256 pixels from a Fairchild chip and fed it out, a line at a time, into the VBI within the TV set itself. The signal could be picked up remotely from a standard license detector van from where it was stripped out of the surrounding RF signal and relayed back to the TV station where it was displayed as a slowscan monochrome image in a corner of the news readers monitor. 1039 Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60341
  - 17
    - Some users are unable to access a site in sharepoint We have one of our sites that we have setup access to. We have a group that has view rights to this page and some users in this group get prompted for login when they try to access it. Most of the users in that group can access this page, but some cannot. I have attempted to add these users using just there user account but that does not work. I have searched to ensure that thier are no denies. When one of these users tries to access the page we get this error on our sharepoint webservers: Access is denied. at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequestInternalClass.OpenWeb(String bstrUrl, String& pbstrServerRelativeUrl, String& pbstrTitle, String& pbstrDescription, Guid& pguidID, UInt32& pnAuthorID, UInt32& pnLanguage, UInt32& pnLocale, UInt16& pnTimeZone, Boolean& bTime24, Int16& pnCollation, UInt32& pnCollationLCID, Int16& pnCalendarType, Int16& pnAdjustHijriDays, Int16& pnMeetingCount, Int32& plFlags, Boolean& bConnectedToPortal, Int32& plWebTemplateId, Int16& pnProvisionConfig, String& pbstrDefaultTheme, String& pbstrDefaultThemeCSSUrl, String& pbstrAlternateCSSUrl, String& pbstrCustomJSUrl, String& pbstrAlternateHeaderUrl, Int32& pAnonymousState, Boolean& bUserIsSiteAdmin, Boolean& bHasUniquePerm) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.a.a(String A_0, String& A_1, String& A_2, String& A_3, Guid& A_4, UInt32& A_5, UInt32& A_6, UInt32& A_7, UInt16& A_8, Boolean& A_9, Int16& A_10, UInt32& A_11, Int16& A_12, Int16& A_13, Int16& A_14, Int32& A_15, Boolean& A_16, Int32& A_17, Int16& A_18, String& A_19, String& A_20, String& A_21, String& A_22, String& A_23, Int32& A_24, Boolean& A_25, Boolean& A_26) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPWeb.g() at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPWeb.get_Title() at FISS.SharePoint.WebParts.IS.SystemStatus.BaseCreateChildControls() at FISS.SharePoint.WebParts.IS.BaseWebPart.CreateChildControls() For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. I know it is some type of permissions issue because if I adde one of the users account to the administrators group on the sharepoint web servers they can access the site. Is there anyway to pull what permissions a user has in sharepoint, and is there anyway to find out what these users are being denied access to Thank you for your help Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60340
  - 18
    - Uninstall Sharepoint 2003 Error I must have uninstalled sharepoint services and portal in incorrect order and now I can't uninstall or repair to uninstall. Installer crashes out. When I did a repair it complained that the service portal admin couldn't start. Indeed it can't start, it does have the permissions. How do I remove this so I can start over again? Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60338
  - 19
    - Task list Assigned To email issue I am noticing a strange thing with our WSS 3.0 installation. I have several child sites and inside each child site is a Task List with Tasks assigned to users. People in one task list are getting emails when someone edits a task in another task list on another child site. The email shows that they were removed from the assigned to even though these users were never assigned to the task. Everytime that task is changed it emails them an updated email. Does anyone know why this is happening? Scott Swann Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60337
  - 20
    - disable Document Library connections to Outlook?? Is there a way to disable the menu option Action | Connect to Outlook from a document library? I'd rather not give anonymous (or authenticated) users the ability to synchronize several GB worth of documents offline. Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60336
  - 21
    - stsadmin -o export can't get child site Hi peeps, I have one WSS 3.0 installation (w/SQL 2000 backend) that I have scripted backups for. I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong with the stsadm.exe command line to backup my 2nd site. site 1: https://mycompany.com site 2: https://mycompany.com/sites/global When I [stsadm -o export] the site 1 url it works fine, but the log file says that it's not backing up site 2. when I [stsadm -o export -url https://mycompany.com/sites/global...] then it only backs up the users associated with this child site, but not the content, which is what I need to have happen. Any ideas what I'm doing wrong? Thanks! JP -- JP Bourget, MCSE Arnold Magnetic Technologies Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60329
  - 22
    - Does WSS V3 Search use/require SQL Full Text Search? I prefer to disable unused services for performance and security. I know that V2 Search used SQL Full Text Search, but cannot see whether this service is used in V3. Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60319
  - 23
    - Sharepoint server 2003 installation problem Hi, I am new to SharePoint, I am trying to install SharePoint Server 2003 on my system, which is as a configuration : OS : Windows Server 2003 with SP1 ADS Enabled Visual Studio Microsoft DotNet 2005. Whn i try to install SharePoint Portal 2003 on my system i get the following warning when i try to assign the user for the DataBase "warning: sharepoint portal server could not verify the windows NT account you entered. This account will be used to access and modify settings in the configuration database" I had one more query, it was mentioned that the account user must be a member of Poer Users, But i am confused as we don't have the power uers group in Windows Server 2003. Can some help me out in solving this mystery and help me out in installin gSharePoint Server 2003. Thanks for the help people are providing here. Regards, Govardhan. Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60318
  - 24
    - newsgroups - general vs WSS so - what would be the difference for posting in ...General vs ...WindowsServices ? Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60316
  - 25
    - Restoring files and lists for WSS 2.0 Hi, I was wondering if there is a tool to restore just files, an dlists for a WSS 2.0 sites. I do not want to restore the entire site for gettign my docuemtns back. We have a very big database for all of our sites and if we need to restore in normal way it will take a long way to restore them all to recover a file for a single site. Thanks, Bob, Tag: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? Tag: 60315

Hi,

I have a sharepoint website containing a view of a list of documents
created or uploaded by various users. When a user visits the site, I
like to show only the documents uploaded by the original user.

However, the standard show filter does not allow me to do this:
"Created By" equal to "visiting user".

Is what I am trying to do possible?

Thank you.

Ray

Top

Re: Restrict viewing of certain items in a view by user? by Daniel

Daniel
Wed Jun 27 16:10:30 CDT 2007

Have you tried [me]?

/Daniel Bugday

<rayyu888@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1182902767.195656.22620@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> Hi,
>
> I have a sharepoint website containing a view of a list of documents
> created or uploaded by various users. When a user visits the site, I
> like to show only the documents uploaded by the original user.
>
> However, the standard show filter does not allow me to do this:
> "Created By" equal to "visiting user".
>
> Is what I am trying to do possible?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Ray
>

Top