Mike
Wed Jan 07 23:48:08 CST 2004
D (!)
By now I've probably lost the list of what you did, so if you could, could
you send that too !
Mike Walsh, Helsinki, Finland
"D. Glenn" <dggcoop@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:df1fabe8.0401070708.74a4db40@posting.google.com...
> Just a FYI, I have some time and I am making comments to all the
> obviously ignorant statements on that webpage. I will send out my
> comments soon. Sure to get another laugh! :)
> By the way, Mike, I haven't forgotten about sending you the reasons
> behind why we chose to move to another SQL server for our WSS sites
> (and why we chose our method). I will get those to you soon.
>
> D.Glenn
>
> "Mike Walsh [MVP]" <englantilainen@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<uBJRGBO1DHA.2180@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>...
> > I never got that far. It seems to me that this page (on a site otherwise
> > dedicated to (ancient) commodore computers) is there only to attract
Google
> > hits in the hope that people will click on his internal links for which
> > Google will give him money.
> >
> > The relevance to Commodore escapes me. I wonder how many other such
pages -
> > for other products - are hidden on that site.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > "Edward Lee" <elee@ulgm.org> wrote in message
> > news:%23XZxD0K1DHA.3216@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > > Check out this statement made in the closing paragraph...
> > >
> > > "The bottom line is that you currently have only three decent
resources
> > for
> > > WSS: the Admin Guide; the Security video; and this page."
> > >
> > > The author has clearly missed the phenomenal wss.collutions.com :-)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Mike Walsh [MVP]" <englantilainen@mvps.org> wrote in message
> > > news:eSKhyDF1DHA.2336@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > > >
http://www.commodore.ca/misc/misc/wss/windows_sharepoint_services.htm
> > > >
> > > > is an article called "Microsoft Windows 2003 Server Windows
SharePoint
> > > > Services Explained"
> > > >
> > > > Newsgroup users may want to read this if only for laughs (starting
at
> > that
> > > > title of course)
> > > >
> > > > Here's a sample
> > > >
> > > > "Windows SharePoint Team Services (often referred to by MS staff as
WSS
> > 1.0
> > > > or STS) was a product that MS made available in 2002 and early 2003.
It
> > was
> > > > unstable, very limited in functionality and (I think) highly
unpopular.
> > > > WSS1.0 has become MS Office SharePoint Portal Server 2003."
> > > >
> > > > The last sentence is complete nonsense of course.
> > > >
> > > > I have never heard anyone refer to STS as WSS 1.0; it was made
available
> > in
> > > > 2001; it was not unstable (I've had a production site running for
21
> > months
> > > > and it has never crashed); not *very* limited (although of course
WSS
> > has
> > > > more functionality); and it wasn't highly unpopular just highly
unknown.
> > > > [Was it ever called "*Windows* Sharepoint Team Services"?]
> > > >
> > > > I'll leave it to you all (the masochists among you) to find all the
> > other
> > > > errors that are no doubt there. (I gave up after the above para)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike Walsh, Helsinki, Finland
> > > > WSS FAQ at wss.collutions.com
> > > > Please reply to the newsgroup
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >