Rohit
Sat Aug 04 03:41:40 CDT 2007
You mix up things and your posts are rude. Most of your responses are not
to the point. This is my opinion. Others feel free to disregard this. I have
my reasons to think why they answers are right. I can continue arguing about
it but not in public. If you wish, we can take this off-line and private.
My Apologies to everyone on this mailing for letting this happen.
Regards,
Rohit
"Mike Walsh" <englantilainen@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:edX8$$m1HHA.4476@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> > If this was the case, you should have directed me to the newsgoup which
> > you
> > advised below and not get into an argument why this newgroup is
> > incorrect
> > for this post in the first place.
>
> I advised you in my first reply that you could post to one of the new
> newsgroups. As you had already posted to .general,
> .setup_and_administration ought to have been the next logical choice.
>
> >>>>>This newsgroup is for people who are running either the WSS 2.0
> >>>>> *product* or the WSS 3.0 *product*.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Questions from people running SPS 2003 go to the parallel SPS
> >>>>> newsgroup which is microsoft.public.sharepoint.portalserver
> >>>>>
> >>>>> (or indeed to one of the new newsgroups, but that's where you came
> >>>>> from)
>
> I can't see why you are arguing. Why not just accept that this newsgroup
> is for people who have installed either the WSS 2.0 or WSS 3.0 products -
> everyone else has.
>
> You have already been given two suitable newsgroups for your question. If
> you post it to one of them with a sensible title you will probably get an
> answer to it.
>
>
> Mike Walsh
>
>
>
> Rohit Peyyeti wrote:
>> My response embedded below.
>>
>>> The fact is that for people like you who refuse to accept that that WSS
>>> newsgroup is for people who have installed a WSS product and the
>>> .portalserver newsgroup is for people who have installed the SPS 2003 or
>>> MOSS 2007 product there are newsgroups available for all products.
>>
>> Show me a place where it states that this newsgroup is only for WSS
>> product only and not WSS with SPS. This is a newgroup for exchanging
>> information and helping others regarding sharepoint services. If I think
>> that my product/query falls into this category, I will post it here.
>>
>>
>>> If you ask in one of them, no-one will say you have the wrong product
>>> for the newsgroup. (They might however say you have the wrong newsgroup
>>> for the question - if for instance you post an installation question to
>>> .development_and_development)
>>
>> If this was the case, you should have directed me to the newsgoup which
>> you advised below and not get into an argument why this newgroup is
>> incorrect for this post in the first place.
>>
>> My argument is that if it WSS related question, people have right to post
>> it here.
>>
>>> Why don't you just post your message to
>>> microsoft.public.sharepoint.setup_and_administration
>>>
>>> It's an admin question for a SharePoint product after all.
>>>
>>>
>>> Mike Walsh
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Rohit Peyyeti wrote:
>>>> I would like to disagree. If it is WSS 2.0 related
>>>> question..irrespective whether it is WSS 2.0 as a product or it is a
>>>> part of SPS 2003, I would think this newsgroup was correct for it. Is
>>>> the underlying code/functionality different for WSS 2.0 if installed as
>>>> a stand alone or clubbed with SPS 2003? I would not think so.
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>> Rohit
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Mike Walsh" <englantilainen@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:evzUtem1HHA.6072@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>>> The WSS that comes with SPS 2003 is indeed WSS 2.0 but that still
>>>>> doesn't mean that this newsgroup is for people who are running SPS
>>>>> 2003.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is a clear division.
>>>>>
>>>>> WSS 2.0 *product* is here
>>>>>
>>>>> SPS 2003 *product* is .portalserver
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Restoring a WSS 2.0 site (whether from the WSS 2.0 product or from the
>>>>> WSS 2.0 part of SPS 2003) to an installation of SPS 2003 is a *SPS
>>>>> 2003 question.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If you consider it to be both a WSS 2.0 and an SPS 2003 question then
>>>>> one of the new newsgroups (which are for all SP products) is the place
>>>>> to post it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> To remind everyone, this is what you wrote "I ran smigrate program to
>>>>> restore these files into SharePoint Portal Server 2003 blank site" it
>>>>> is completely clear from this that you are restoring to an SPS 2003
>>>>> installation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike Walsh
>>>>>
>>>>> P.S. "Help" as a Subject is less than useful.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rohit Peyyeti wrote:
>>>>>> Yes. I have SPS 2003 but the blank site which I have created is in
>>>>>> services and I am trying restore the backup in a site which is
>>>>>> created in sharepoint services 2.0. I am also assuming that the
>>>>>> sharepoint services which comes along with SPS 2003 is 2.0. Hence the
>>>>>> post in this newsgroup.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> Rohit
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Mike Walsh" <englantilainen@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:%23sTzMKd1HHA.4476@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>> Obviously you have SPS 2003.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This newsgroup is for people who are running either the WSS 2.0
>>>>>>> *product* or the WSS 3.0 *product*.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Questions from people running SPS 2003 go to the parallel SPS
>>>>>>> newsgroup which is microsoft.public.sharepoint.portalserver
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (or indeed to one of the new newsgroups, but that's where you came
>>>>>>> from)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mike Walsh
>>>>>>> WSS FAQ
http://www.wssfaq.com
>>>>>>> no questions by e-mail please
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rohit Peyyeti wrote:
>>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I tried to get answers to this query on "sharepoint.general"
>>>>>>>> newsgroup but no one responded. Trying my luck here. Apologize for
>>>>>>>> double post!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Rohit
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Below is my post:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I made some improvement regarding restoring site from .fwp files.
>>>>>>>> There were some 150+ .fwp backup files (each averaging around 20-30
>>>>>>>> MB) which were numbered in sequential fashion. I ran smigrate
>>>>>>>> program to restore these files into SharePoint Portal Server 2003
>>>>>>>> blank site (created by using SharePoint services which comes along
>>>>>>>> with portal server).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The restoration starts fine (takes around 40 minutes) performing
>>>>>>>> various tasks and then comes to a section where it has to upload
>>>>>>>> files into the site. It successfully uploads around 2000+ files
>>>>>>>> before encountering a problem. There around 16000+ files which
>>>>>>>> needs to be uploaded (according to smigrate console message).
>>>>>>>> Smigrate keeps out putting this message "Web
>>>>>>>> server is busy. Please try again. Retrying, bad file <lists the
>>>>>>>> file name>"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This message keeps repeating for rest of the 14000+ files (I think
>>>>>>>> so..never had a chance to verify this). It then proceeds with
>>>>>>>> successful site restoration message before coming out of the
>>>>>>>> smigrate.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nobody is using the web server as I am restoring this site to a
>>>>>>>> dedicated server with plenty of HDD space and 1 GB RAM. Smigrate is
>>>>>>>> the only program working with the web server for site restoration.
>>>>>>>> I also checked the site settings on the web server and everything
>>>>>>>> looked fine. I have set the connections to unlimited in the IIS.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I haven't applied Service Packs to SharePoint Portal Server 2003 or
>>>>>>>> SharePoint services. Do you think the above problem was because SP
>>>>>>>> was not applied? Or was something else wrong? Can somebody please
>>>>>>>> guide me on this?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Rohit
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> P.S If I need to apply SP, can somebody send me a link to the SP
>>>>>>>> for both SharePoint Portal Server 2003 and SharePoint Services 2.0
>>>>>>>> (I think this is what is shipped with portal server 2003).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>