mspbd71.dll not found

TheMSsForum.com: The Microsoft Software Forum

The MSS Forum ‹ VC
- Archive
  - Biz
  - MCSE
  - CRM
  - Drivers
  - Framework
  - ADO
  - ASP
  - Compact
  - Forms
  - Dotnet
  - C#
  - VB
  - FontpageGen
  - Excel
  - WorkSheet
  - Exchange
  - Setup
  - Fox
  - Fontpage
  - ASP
  - IIS
  - Entourage
  - Money
  - Messanger
  - PocketPC
  - Powerpoint
  - Project
  - Publisher
  - Excel
  - VB
  - Security
  - Portal
  - Services
  - SQLServerDev
  - SVCS
  - SQLServer
  - VB
  - VC
  - MFC
  - ExcelGen

- Previous
  - 1
    - Stack Overflow when using runtime Multi-threaded DLL I have a piece of unmanaged C++ code that runs perfecting well when it's final form is a console application that is linked to the static runtime multi-threaded library. However, when I use it in a web service, which necessitates the using of the DLL version of the runtime library, there will get stack overflow errors very easily. Is that any way I can increase the stack size for web services? If not, is there any possible work around? BTW, the code concerned is generated by bison, a parser generator. Thanks. Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278340
  - 2
    - Floating window beside the main app window Hi everybody, I am experiencing a problem that I cannot somehow properly comprehend... In my project there is a thread function that runs OK. This function calls just after the thread start another func CreateScreenWindow(theApp.m_hInstance); Its purpose is to create an additional window displaying some extra output data. The func has the following content : static void CreateScreenWindow(HINSTANCE hInst) { const char* className = "ScreenWindow"; WNDCLASS wc; memset(&wc, 0, sizeof(WNDCLASS)); wc.style = CS_OWNDC; wc.lpfnWndProc = (WNDPROC)WndProc; wc.hInstance = hInst; wc.hCursor = LoadCursor(NULL, IDC_ARROW); wc.hbrBackground = (HBRUSH)(COLOR_WINDOW + 1); wc.lpszClassName = className; if (RegisterClass(&wc) == 0) { char buf[128]; sprintf(buf, "Failed to register class (%d)", GetLastError()); MessageBox(NULL, buf, NULL, MB_OK); return; } else { char buf[128]; sprintf(buf, "Class registered"); MessageBox(NULL, buf, NULL, MB_OK); } RECT clientSize; clientSize.top = 0; clientSize.left = 0; clientSize.right = 400; clientSize.bottom = 250; DWORD style = WS_BORDER | WS_CAPTION; AdjustWindowRect(&clientSize, style, FALSE); int winWidth = clientSize.right - clientSize.left; int winHeight = clientSize.bottom - clientSize.top; int winLeft = (GetSystemMetrics(SM_CXSCREEN) - winWidth) / 2; int winTop = (GetSystemMetrics(SM_CYSCREEN) - winHeight) / 2; hScreen = CreateWindow(className, "toolscreen", style, winLeft, winTop, winWidth, winHeight, 0, 0, hInst, 0); if (hScreen == 0) { char buf[128]; sprintf(buf, "Failed to create window (%d)", GetLastError()); MessageBox(NULL, buf, NULL, MB_OK); return; } ShowWindow(hScreen, SW_SHOW); UpdateWindow(hScreen); MoveWindow(hScreen, winLeft, winTop, winWidth, winHeight, TRUE); } Indeed, the windows appears on the screen and has wanted size and caption, but not the position and the color. What is even worse, it does not have the arrow cursor but only the sand glass - obviously being too busy with something that I cannot identify... This window cannot be moved either... The thread that has created this window runs happily further and works also properly (its task is not involved with the window - yet, but should do later). I tryed to comment out the both last code lines (Update.. and Move..) with no difference in the behaviour. I would highly appreciate any ideas aiding to solve my problem. Kind regards Victor Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278339
  - 3
    - singleton in a DLL loaded class I have a class loaded from a DLL that I would like to implement as a multi-threadable singleton. Unfortunately, I seem to still be getting two distinct instances of this class. It is implemented as below. The only funny thing I am doing is to load the DLL from two threads simultaneously (thus the need for the singleton). But, according to other posts I've read, the OS will point them both to the same instance of the DLL so that only one thread actually loads the DLL. Can anybody point out where I may be going wrong? Thanks, PaulH //singletonclass.h class SingletonClass : BaseClass { public: static SingletonClass& Instance(); ~SingletonClass(); //... Implement BaseClass functions private: static std::auto_ptr< SingletonClass > _theInstance; static Mutex* _m; } //singletonclass.cpp std::auto_ptr< SingletonClass > SingletonClass::_theInstance; Mutex* SingletonClass::_m; /*static*/ SingletonClass& SingletonClass::Instance() { Mutex::Create( &_m ); _m->lock(); if( _theInstance.get() == NULL ) _theInstance.reset( new SingletonClass() ); _m->unlock(); return *_theInstance; } //dll.cpp MY_API BaseClass* Create() { return &SingletonClass::Instance(); } Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278317
  - 4
    - tutorial help hey all, I found this tutorial that has a basic example of Assembler and recommended TASM (Turbo Assembler) if I wanted to walk along. Is there any Microsoft Product that contains something similar so I can do the walkthrough? thanks, rodchar Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278311
  - 5
    - Managed code into project using unmanaged code Hello Everybody, I am developing a managed lib (using Microsoft Web Services) and I am including it into a c++ project. The project doesn't use /clr optionk, so when I include my linbrary's header file vs 2005 show me an error saying I have to use /clr option. Doing this I have a incompatibility with /EHs command line option (error D8016), but changing from EHs to no exception handling I obtain a huge ammount of error from all other previously working included libs. Any suggestion is welcome. Thank you in advance. Daniele Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278292
  - 6
    - function lookup class A { virtual void Test(void*) { } }; class B : public A { virtual void Test(void*, void*) { } }; void main() { B test; test.Test(0); } this code doesn't compile: test.cpp(18) : error C2660: 'B::Test' : function does not take 1 arguments Why? Test(void*) is a member of the base class of B, so why the compiler can't find it? Thank you very much. -- Alessandro Vergani Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278280
  - 7
    - vsprintf in std Hello, I have been searching in help but I found that was hard to search. What I looking for was the std counterpart of CRT vsprintf. :) I did find something like std::vsprintf in help, but still not sure about how to use it original code with CRT, vsprintf (strTab->str[strTab->numLines], format, args); Any help is greatly appreciated Thanks Jack Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278272
  - 8
    - vc6 exceptions not caught by vs2005 Hi, My application has a small JNI piece written in C++. This piece was developed using VC++ 2k5. We statically link with some .lib's which were built using vc6. I see that exceptions thrown by some api's in these .lib's are not getting caught but are causing the app to crash. When this code was "ported" to vc6 this wasn't observed. It so happens we also support HPUX n Solaris n it works fine there too. Why's this happening? Any workarounds? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278270
  - 9
    - Warning C4503: who can explain it? Out of curiosity: who can explain why the code below generates three C4503 ("decorated name length exceeded, name was truncated") warnings? Compiled with cl /Ox -EHsc test.cpp #include <string> #include <set> #include <map> using namespace std; map<string,set<string> > a; int main() { return (a["a"].find("c")!=a["a"].end()); } TIA, Luc K Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278269
  - 10
    - tree structures in std hello, std::vector ----> array std::list---------> linked list What is the corresponding structure for trees in std? Thanks Jack Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278262
  - 11
    - 'return' statement in wndProc() hi everyone, is it allowed to put a 'return' statement in the 1st line of wndProc(), to 'disable' it? marco Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278257
  - 12
    - enormous library size I have a big header file.(produced by some code-generation tool) ,that contains some typedefs for class template instatiations and also some structs that are composed of this typedefs(akin to PODs),add in some stl headers and one or two boost headers, so the mere inclusion of the aforementioned header file increases the object file size by some 800kb. I also have lots of source files(hundreds) which are to be compiled into a library that indirectly includes this header file.And it goes like; classA.h ------------ #include "bigHeader.h" class A{ public: const Double1 & getSomeAttribute(); void setSomeAttribute(const Double1& val); private: Double1 someAttribute_; }; classA.cpp ---------- #include "classA.h" //class A implementation classB.h --------- #include "classA.h" class B: public A{ public: void setSomeAttribute(...); ... getSomeAttribute(); private: WorldLocationStruct someAttribute_; ... }; classB.cpp ---------- #include "classB.h" //class B implementation and so on.... Thing is , when i generate the library, linker just packs up the object files and I end up with 800Mb library file that I cannot distribute.So can I prevent the inclusion of this duplicate symbols in the library seeing the objectfile for classB.cpp includes everything classA.cpp has? I tried to strip object files with cygwin utility strip, altohugh it decreased object file size by half, it nowhere near enough good.. Any pointers would be greatly appreciated Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278255
  - 13
    - string conversions with std::string and int * Hello, I think I have asked this question before,but I couldn't find it in my thread collections. My question is sprintf (name, "str%ld", ++(*i)); How do I convert i with str%ld to "name" when it is of type std::string rather than char *? i is int* Please let me know if you got the answer. Thanks in advance Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278248
  - 14
    - MI5 Persecution: Stasi 21/4/96 (16193) Subject: Chief Constable Alderson Condemns "Stasi" MI5 Newsgroups:uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,soc.culture.british Organization: Toronto Free-Net Summary: Keywords: John Alderson, former Chief Constable of Devon and Cornwall, had the following to say about the expansion of the Security Service's powers, in a recent magazine article; "It is fatal to let the secret service into the area of ordinary crime. MI5 is not under the same restraints as the police. They infiltrate organisations, people's jobs and lives. They operate almost like a cancer." "At the moment the acorn of a Stasi [the former East German communists' secret service] has been planted. It is there for future governments to build on." The message is clear. Criminal subversion and criminal harassment by an unpoliced minority not subject to the law, "infiltration of people's jobs and lives" is with us today. 16193 Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278245
  - 15
    - MI5 Persecution: Leant On 7/4/96 (14679) From: Green <Green@guidion.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: Why Aren't the British Police Doing Their Job? Reply-To: Green@guidion.demon.co.uk Date: Sun Apr 7 21:13:30 1996 In article <DpIE0r.736.0.bloor@torfree.net> bu765@torfree.net "Mike Corley" writes: > Last Easter (1995) I went into the local police station in London and spoke to > an officer about the harassment against me. But I couldn't provide tangible > evidence; what people said, in many cases years ago, is beyond proof, and > without something to support my statements I cannot expect a police officer to > take the complaint seriously. This in itself dos not suggest that the police have it in for you. The old bill operates on extremely tight spending limits forced on them by that pillock Michael Howard, and without evidence, they often have higher priorities than chasing something that cannot go to court. I doubt that the police are actually being leant on, but they probably realise that if they looked into this, they would be leant on hard. The met always stays away from anything that looks like it has Defence, Security or secret service interest already, because they realise that they are below these government agencies in the general pecking order. This attitude was made clear in a TV show where a left wing comedian heckled some aristocratic Tory candidate in a local election. The police officer gave the comic a ticking off, even though you could see that this young copper sympathised with the comedian, and regarded the Tory as an upper-crust wanker. He said, and I quote "I'm giving you the ticking off and not him because he's a Lord and I'm a Police Constable." If I walked into my local nick and complained that MI5 were snooping on me, they would show me the door without even looking at my evidence, because that bored desk seargant with only five years to go before he retires doesn't want to start fucking about with somebody who has incurred the wrath of Stella Rimington. He would rather deal with the lost dogs and driving licence producers, eat his cheese and pickle sandwiches and piss off home at the end of his shift than have some high ranking spook having a go at his boss and getting him a bollocking. In short, you have earned much sympathy but little surprise. Just remember that saying about the enemy of your enemies. Have a nice day. ******************************************* QUOTE OF THE DAY****************** * You have just read the opinons of : * "Common sense is merely the set * * * of prejudices a person acquires* ========================================================================= Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: Why Aren't the British Police Doing Their Job? Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british Followup-To: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british References: <DpIE0r.736.0.bloor@torfree.net> Organization: Toronto Free-Net Distribution: >This in itself dos not suggest that the police have it in for you. >The old bill operates on extremely tight spending limits forced on >them by that pillock Michael Howard, and without evidence, they >often have higher priorities than chasing something that cannot go >to court. I think the police know well what's going on. It is up to them to do something about it. They know I've made a complaint at a police station. I could probably do more to try to help myself (I think someone suggested making a written complaint to the chief constable) but even then I nthink they would not take action. > >I doubt that the police are actually being leant on, but they probably >realise that if they looked into this, they would be leant on hard. >The met always stays away from anything that looks like it has Defence, >Security or secret service interest already, because they realise that >they are below these government agencies in the general pecking order. > So we have a situation where the security service breaks the law, everyone knows MI5 breaks the law, and the police won't investigate crimes that would otherwise earn a jail sentence. Oh good, I'm really glad the UK is a democracy. (<sarcasm>, for those of you who didn't catch that) >If I walked into my local nick and complained that MI5 were snooping on me, >they would show me the door without even looking at my evidence, because >that bored desk seargant with only five years to go before he retires >doesn't want to start fucking about with somebody who has incurred the >wrath of Stella Rimington. He would rather deal with the lost dogs and >driving licence producers, eat his cheese and pickle sandwiches and piss >off home at the end of his shift than have some high ranking spook having >a go at his boss and getting him a bollocking. In this case I think it is 'high-ranking' police officers who are aware of the persecution, they know a complaint has been made, and they're doing nothing. What is more, I don't think there is anything I can do that would make them take action, both because they may be being 'leant on' and through the wider view that it could be deleterious to the state to have a persecution by state organs exposed. They're wrong in taking that point of view, because sooner or later this will all out anyway, and they it will be n years of police inaction (n>=6) that will be questioned. > >In short, you have earned much sympathy but little surprise. Just remember >that saying about the enemy of your enemies. > >Have a nice day. 14679 Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278244
  - 16
    - MI5 Persecution: Shoot to Kill 4/4/96 (13165) Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british From: jbaker@pobox.com (Jill Baker) Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: How and Why Did it Start? Reply-To: jbaker@pobox.com Date: Thu Apr 4 05:03:01 1996 jbaker@pobox.com (Jill Baker) wrote: >bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) wrote: >>Why would >>the security services expend hundreds of thousands of pounds and more than fiv >>years of manpower to try to kill a British citizen? Because ... >So why didn't they just shoot you dead? >It would have been a lot cheaper. Please make the effort to respond to this point Mike. It was a serious question. Jill (my opinions are entirely my own, no-one else's) ================================================================= Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: How and Why Did it Start? Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british Followup-To: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british References: <Dp5IAr.1EB.0.bloor@torfree.net> Organization: Toronto Free-Net Distribution: jbaker@pobox.com (Jill Baker) wrote: >bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) wrote: >>Why would >>the security services expend hundreds of thousands of pounds and more than fiv >>years of manpower to try to kill a British citizen? Because ... >So why didn't they just shoot you dead? >It would have been a lot cheaper. I think there are two reasons nobody has taken physical action as opposed to verbal; a) A lot of people "know". Perhaps you the reader might not know, but lots of people in the media etc do. Remember, I was born in the UK and lived there until a couple of years ago. I don't think these people would condone state-sponsored murder of someone who might be seen on a good day as one of their own. b) Rather than doind anything directly, they're going for spying, verbal harassment, media harassment, every form of persecution short of the physical. Because as soon as anything turns physical, the police become involved; and unless it turns physical, the police can shrug and say 'not our problem'. So they persecute you and try to get you to react, either by hitting one of them (in which case I clearly find myself in the wrong as far as the police are concerned), or by trying to harm myself (in which case they can pretend they weren't responsible). It's a pretty unproductive form of harassment actually, because if you don't react then they're wasting they're time. Or perhaps they're just cheap bullies and trying to wreck someone's life, without any ulterior motive? 13165 Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278243
  - 17
    - MI5 Persecution: Email Cruelty 11/3/96 (11651) From: D.S.Toube@qmw.ac.uk (David Toube) Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.legal,uk.media,soc.culture.british Subject: Re: Why Censorship Must Not Be Allowed on Uk.* Reply-To: D.S.Toube@qmw.ac.uk Date: Mon Mar 11 11:47:13 1996 A OSHINEYE <TA5330@QMWCC7.qmw.ac.uk> wrote: :D.S.Toube@qmw.ac.uk (David Toube) wrote: :>I would also be very pleased if Mike Corley would not mailbomb me :>via my university account with messages entitled 'This Is What :>You Get For Censorship', thus closing down the entire college :>email system. :> :>Although it does not personally inconvenience me, it is rather :>dull for the college. :When did this happen? BTW you can always use Pegasus Mail to send all :email from Corley's address back to him and see how he likes it. :--Ade : This weekend. The result, Mike Corley will be gratified to hear, was that all users of the college system were prevented from using email. I suspect that there is no stopping Mike Corley. If mail is automatically returned to him, he will return it back to you tenfold. If he is thrown off his account, as he surely will be, he will find another one. I do not care whether Mike Corley has an email account or not. It is a matter of supreme indifference to me whether his fanciful account of persecution is aired or not. If he thinks that he has been persecuted by M15 and Chris Tarrant, then that is a matter for him. But there is a world of difference between repeatedly spamming usenet - which is unacceptable - and setting up a Web Site containing his post, which is entirely acceptable. Then it will be possible to choose whether or not to partake of his fantasy. However although I would not like to see the censorship of posts because they demonstrate evidence of mental illness, I suspect that Mike Corley will inevitably be censored by his ISP following a number of complaints of usenet abuse and mailbombing. ---- David Toube Lecturer in Law QMW, University of London WWW: http://www.qmw.ac.uk/~ugtl027/index.html David Boothroyd's British Elections Home Page WWW: http://www.qmw.ac.uk/~laws/election/home.html 11651 Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278242
  - 18
    - MI5 Persecution: Jeff Rooker MP 5/3/96 (10137) From: rael@midnight.org (Rael A. Fenchurch) Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K. Date: Tue Mar 5 04:37:52 1996 Mike, >"go away" replies, and one from a Labour MP saying he was aware of my situation >but wouldn't help me because he regarded me as the "bad guy". Gee thanks, they >do this and then offload the shame they should feel onto you by telling you "oh >but it's your fault". It's a mad world. Do you happen to have a copy of this MPs letter? After all, a scanned copy of it would lend great weight to your case here. At the moment, you've offered us nothing in the way of evidence, which is one of the main reasons we all think you've truly gone fishing. So? Rael... ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Rael A. Fenchurch (rael@midnight.org, http://www.midnight.org/rael/) --- --- "I don't think compassion's the language of our time" --- --- "Doubt or Die" --- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ========================================================================== From: Andy Howard <andy@kiss100.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K. Reply-To: andy@kiss100.demon.co.uk Date: Tue Mar 5 06:06:15 1996 In article: <DnrMsq.239.0.bloor@torfree.net> bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) wr I got a few > "go away" replies, and one from a Labour MP saying he was aware of my situatio > but wouldn't help me because he regarded me as the "bad guy". Which Labour MP Mike? > -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Andy Howard EMail andy@kiss100.demon.co.uk | | My opinions, not my employer's (Jolly nice people though they are). | | If my employers shared my opinions... Well, frankly I'd be amazed | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ==================================================================== Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K. Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.br$ Followup-To: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.b$ References: <DnFtLs.E37.0.bloor@torfree.net> <4h45nq$87o_002@leeds.ac.uk> <4h6gkb$ivc$ Organization: Toronto Free-Net Distribution: Mike Corley (bu765@torfree.net) wrote: : >Do you happen to have a copy of this MPs letter? After all, a scanned : >copy of it would lend great weight to your case here. At the moment, : >you've offered us nothing in the way of evidence, which is one of the : >main reasons we all think you've truly gone fishing. So? : The letter was by email, not on paper. (In addition to snail-mailing, I : emailed all the relevant addresses I could find.) I'll see if I can find : it, I keep a record of most of this correspondence so I may still have it. I'm afraid I don't have a copy of the correspondence. In future I will keep useful letters, so with luck there may be a "next time". The MP was Jeff Rooker, Labour MP. Having looked again at the Labour web page I find he doesn't have an address listed, but I have a record of his address as having been jeff.rooker@geo2.poptel.org.uk. I don't know where I got the address from. I'm so disorganised! ==================================================================== Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british From: J.J.Smith@ftel.co.uk (John J Smith) Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K. X-Nntp-Posting-Host: death-on-the-rock.ftel.co.uk Message-ID: <Dnw49L.D1H@ftel.co.uk> Sender: smid@death-on-the-rock.ftel.co.uk (RFC931) Organization: Fujitsu Telecommunications Europe Ltd References: <DnFtLs.E37.0.bloor@torfree.net> <DnrMsq.239.0.bloor@torfree.net> <Dnsrnu.Jr1.0.bloor@torfree.net> <DntKEo.86E.0.bloor@torfree.net> Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 09:12:56 GMT Lines: 54 In article <DntKEo.86E.0.bloor@torfree.net>, Mike Corley <bu765@torfree.net> wrote: >Mike Corley (bu765@torfree.net) wrote: >: >Do you happen to have a copy of this MPs letter? After all, a scanned >: >copy of it would lend great weight to your case here. At the moment, >: >you've offered us nothing in the way of evidence, which is one of the >: >main reasons we all think you've truly gone fishing. So? > >: The letter was by email, not on paper. (In addition to snail-mailing, I >: emailed all the relevant addresses I could find.) I'll see if I can find >: it, I keep a record of most of this correspondence so I may still have it. > >I'm afraid I don't have a copy of the correspondence. In future I will keep >useful letters, so with luck there may be a "next time". Don't believe you. Because that might be proof, and we just *cant* have that. >The MP was Jeff Rooker, Labour MP. Having looked again at the Labour web page I >find he doesn't have an address listed, but I have a record of his address as >having been jeff.rooker@geo2.poptel.org.uk. I don't know where I got the >address from. I'm so disorganised! I did Email this MP yesterday. This is what I wrote: Smid>I am sorry to bother you, but there is a person with a known Smid>personality disorder on the internet usenet, claiming that you Smid>as an MP have backed up his claims that he is being persecuted Smid>by MI5. Smid>His name is Mike Corely, and posts from canada (email address Smid>available if you require). Smid> Smid>He claims that you have told him that his claims that the Smid>"television is watching him", are justified, yet cannot find the Smid>email in which he did so.. Smid>I'd be interested in what you have said to him, because we have Smid>had a long term battle to convince him that he really is schizophrenic Smid>and that Chris Tarrent, MI5 and Martin Lewis from News On Ten are Smid>persecuting him... If you do have the original Email, then that'd Smid>be nice... Smid>If you nothing of this subject, it would not suprise me, however. His reply, surpise, suprise was: MP>No idea what you are on about. I am getting really sick of some of MP>the junk on E mail. I just dump it so he may have contacted MP>but as to an answer I 've better things to do. Your move, Mike. Smid 10137 Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278241
  - 19
    - MI5 Persecution: Flight or fight 7/1/96 (8623) From: huge@axalotl.demon.co.uk (Hugh Davies) Newsgroups: uk.misc Subject: Re: persecution rant (re-post) Reply-To: huge@axalotl.demon.co.uk Date: Sun Jan 7 04:43:41 1996 Yo, Mike, Happy New Year! Haven't you killed yourself yet? In article <DKMIs5.158.0.bloor@torfree.net>, bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) wri >For anyone who hasn't yet read this, There is no-one in the known Universe who hasn't read this at least 5 times. >and really really wants to then here No-one wants to read it, Mike. It's drivel. >is the article that was posted last year in this newsgroup.... Over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again.... -- Regards, Huge. ================================================== Subject: persecution rant (re-post) Newsgroups: uk.misc Organization: Toronto Free-Net Summary: Keywords: >Yo, Mike, Happy New Year! Haven't you killed yourself yet? But I can't, you see then I wouldn't know how things would turn out ("we're only doing this because we don't know how it's all going to end" - logic error in line 100) >There is no-one in the known Universe who hasn't read this at least 5 times. It doesn't seem to have done a whole lot of good since the good old persecution stuff is still going on. Over Christmas I was flying BA and got hassled by a couple of people on the flight (sounds like something you've heard before, doesn't it?). All the usual stuff about the town I'd been staying, "he doesn't know who we are", self-justification that we're doing it because he's a "nutter" etc. Real friendly like. Also a fairly obvious wind-up and attempt to get some reaction. I think they're trying quite hard to get a reaction. If I hit someone on a flight over the Atlantic, am I actually breaking any laws, and if so whose? Is a BA aircraft British territory subject to British laws while it's in mid-flight? It is really tempting to "reply" and that's obviously what they want, so who am I to refuse a blow to the head for people who ask for it so consistently? 8623 Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278240
  - 20
    - MI5 Persecution: Dihydrocodeine 26/11/95 (7109) From: michaelm@easynet.co.uk (michaelm@easynet.co.uk) Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.media,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,alt.radio.uk Subject: Re: Britain's Shame (repost) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 1995 09:19:13 GMT Organization: ------------ Lines: 89 Message-ID: <817374781.20251@michaelm.easynet.co.uk> References: <DIM34L.755.0.bloor@torfree.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: michaelm.easynet.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: michaelm.easynet.co.uk X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corblymee) wrote: | In June 1990 a horrifying campaign of harassment was initiated in London by | what are believed to be elements of the security services. The harassment has | continued for over five years, starting from the broadcast and print media, | and encompassing abuse through set-up situations and by people in public | places. It has been brought to the attention of the police and they are aware | what is happening, but are not taking any action to prevent it. <whopping great snip of 884 lines> corley, you puzzle me! i've narrowed your possible motives down to one or more of the following: 1) you work on behalf of the british government with a hidden agenda of furthering the largely right wing (most to hide) censorship brigade's cause, "a drug-crazed psycho posting dangerous nonsense - how very very sad - but in the public interest,we must act." draft internet (censorship) bills rolling off hm govt's banders at this very moment, I don't doubt it! 2) you work for the daily mail which has started to feel the "internet pinch" as it suddenly clicks in the chronically adled minds of yet more and more of their readers - that shudder-inducing realisation that the entire editorial staff at the mail are scaremongering, imbecilic, blood-leeching , totalitarian twats - can any else sense a coordinated campaign on its way ??- "Mail urges (their) government to act - internet safety endangered by uncontrolled surfing lunatics - boys hands blown off by internet maniacs - net porn responsible for 392323rd rape " .net porn responsible for 392324th rape " .net porn responsible for 392325th rape " .net porn responsible for 392326th rape " .net porn responsible for 392327th rape " net porn responsible for 392328th rape " .net porn responsible for 392329th rape " <yawn> .net porn responsible for 392330th rape " .net porn responsible for 392331st rape " .net porn responsible for 392332nd rape " net porn responsible for 392333rd rape " <yawn> .net porn responsible for 392334th rape " .net porn responsible for 392335th rape " .net porn responsible for 392336th rape " .net porn responsible for 392337th rape " net porn responsible for 392338th rape " etcetera, straight from the old nag's mouth.. lee-potter (and english), take particular note.. (how ever you two common ********* managed to avoid encarceration for what was, quite evidently,wilful contempt of court in the regina v taylforth & knights case, is frankly beyond me.. those dreaded and now all too familiar words "endemic corruption" were muttered by at least one Q.C. >3) you (at least) believe there's (some) substance to your claim(s) and you >have a genuine axe to grind. If so, bloody well go for it, but scrape the >heavy layer of steaming dung off the top (that's assuming you're even >capable of distinguishing fantasy from reality.) 4) you (as an email address) are serving as some bizarre "educational" programme orchestrated by the psychiatric industry - ever keen to justify enforced electrical lobotomies, electroshock and dwugs .All poised for the echo? - "corley frigging well needs lobotomising" 5) you're just clinically insane with absolutely no comprehension or insight into the consequences you will possibly face as a result of repeatedly posting what, certainly on the face of it, looks like complete and utter bullshit. 6) you're some weirdo prankster(s) - probably a group of student psychiatrists having a cheap crack whilst high as kites on pilfered dihydrocodeine. 7) You are infact working for the ss yourself, gauging public awareness of the extent and methods of bugging - infinity transmitters, microwave surveillance devices, satellite tracking equipment, 'chipping' of black crims, say no more. 8) You're fuelling the central usenet administration committee, who, it is believed, are keen to see the introduction of a wide-reaching framework of self-created powers relating to posting cancellation. (see the 'son of RFC1036') my bet's on (5) - but just fuck off corley- irritate the lard-arsed canucks instead. The cia's financing of "professor" cameron's brain-washing experiments in montreal.. would be a good starting point ... or perhaps "professor" watts and his widely admired masterful double eye-jabbing trick - a couple of wallops with an icepick. such a waste of perfectly edible four year old hispanics !!!!.. Perhaps the old marylebone rd posse could fill us in with a few more facts on this one...?? You are all on the .net now ????? A very warm welcome :-) ... christmas rapidly approaching.. >business booming?? Do we all get a look in at flotation ??!! ====================================================== From: Gulliver <kst2co@herts.ac.uk> Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.media,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,alt.radio.uk Subject: Re: Britain's Shame (repost) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 1995 18:25:32 +0000 Organization: University of Hertfordshire Lines: 12 Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951126182156.16879B-100000@altair.herts.ac.uk> References: <DIM34L.755.0.bloor@torfree.net> <817343873snz@objmedia.demon.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: altair.herts.ac.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII In-Reply-To: <817343873snz@objmedia.demon.co.uk> Actually, upon thinking about Mike's story it reminds me of someone I heard about who suffered from a persecution copmlex. He was an immigrant from some Eastern Bloc country who believed that 30 years after he emigrated the KGB were still after him. He would blame them if he had difficulty unlocking his car for instance (he reckoned they were putting something into the locks!). Something is very wrong, probably in Mike's head but what the hell, loonies make life more fun! -- Angus Gulliver ======================================================= Subject: Castrate the depraved MI5 buggers now Newsgroups: uk.misc Organization: Toronto Free-Net >Something is very wrong, probably in Mike's head but what the hell, >loonies make life more fun! Something is very wrong when the security services abandon their usual target of politicians and the well-known, to pursue the hitherto unknown nonentities such as myself. >corley, you puzzle me! Why? Because of my pathological truthfulness? >3) you (at least) believe there's (some) substance to your claim(s) and you >have a genuine axe to grind. If so, bloody well go for it, but scrape the >heavy layer of steaming dung off the top (that's assuming you're even >capable of distinguishing fantasy from reality.) Bloody well go for it I will. I think the "standard spiel" is quite studded with facts actually. There's plenty of "meat" there if the appropriate people can be motivated to get their act together and pursue the case. >my bet's on (5) - but just fuck off corley- irritate the lard-arsed canucks >instead. The cia's financing of "professor" cameron's brain-washing the lard-arsed canucks (?) are irritating me, but you don't want to hear about that >business booming?? Do we all get a look in at flotation ??!! 7109 Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278239
  - 21
    - MI5 Persecution: A new Kafka? 3/10/95 (5595) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,uk.media,uk.politics From: jackson@soldev.tti.com (Dick Jackson) Subject: Re: What it's like to be watched by the security services Message-ID: <1995Oct13.225312.6514@ttinews.tti.com> Sender: usenet@ttinews.tti.com (Usenet Admin) Nntp-Posting-Host: soldev Organization: Citicorp-TTI at Santa Monica (CA) by the Sea References: <DFy9tB.3JK.0.bloor@torfree.net> <813188298snz129.os2.7@blackcat.demon.co.uk> <DGE7uJ.8tF.0.bloor@torfree.net> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 22:53:12 GMT Lines: 34 In article <DGE7uJ.8tF.0.bloor@torfree.net> bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) writes: > >Strangers in the street have recognized me on sight many times, and shown >awareness of the current thread of abuse. To give you one example, in 1992 >I was seriously ill, and a manager at work somewhat humouroursly said that >"it wasn't fair" that people were bullying me. A few days later, I >attended for the first time a clinic in London as an outpatient, and on my >way out was accosted by someone who asked if "they had paid my fare", with >emphasis on the word "fare". He repeated the word several times in this >different context; that they should have paid my "fare", each time >emphasising the word. > >For two and a half years from the time their harassment started until >November 1992 I refused to see a psychiatrist, because I reasoned that I >was not ill of my own action or fault, but through the stress caused by >harassment, and that a lessening of the illness would have to be >consequent to a removal of its immediate cause, in other words a cessation >of harassment. I also reasoned that since they were taunting me with jokes >about mental illness, if I were to seek treatment then the abusers would >think that they had "won" and been proved "right". <I've deleted a lot, but I think this gives the idea> I have so far not contributed to this tread, it has been unpleasant in my opinion. However, I was struck by the resemblance of the above passages to the writing of Franz Kafka. Viz. while from an objective viewpoint it seems to refer to a abnormal world, in a strange way it does resonate strongly at other levels. Mr. Corley, have you tried to write for publication? I honestly think it might lead somewhere positive. Dick Jackson (serious for a change and expecting to get beaten up) 5595 Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278238
  - 22
    - MI5 Persecution: Do they fear truth? 3/10/95 (4081) From: flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk (Peter Krüger) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,uk.politics,alt.politics.british Subject: Re: What it's like to be watched by the security services Date: 3 Oct 1995 15:38:20 GMT Organization: Steinkrug Publications Lines: 66 Message-ID: <44rldc$nrm@news.cityscape.co.uk> References: <DFus24.HxB.0.bloor@torfree.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: aa040.du.pipex.com X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.6+ In article <DFus24.HxB.0.bloor@torfree.net>, bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) says: > >It completely mystifies me how it can be done. One night in June 1992 I >was in a bed-and-breakfast in Oxford (some hard facts now, you?ll be >bored of the generalisations). I booked the B&B from the office phone. >So if they had the office bugged, or the phone system bugged, they could >have heard the call. If it was as late as 1992 then there was already a system available to feed digital video out of a domestic TV via the mains. Each raster of video was preceded by a sixteen bit address which identified the television set. All that was needed was a decoder box plugged into the mains somewhere between your room and the grid transformer. The signal was decoded and then fed down to the phone line. They probably even had a PC which enabled them to see the picture as well. By 1992 the technology had moved on from slowscan to near real time video with the advent of devices from Brooktree and Harris etc. >the newsreader reacted. Breathed deeply, as if in psychological relief. Maybe, or perhaps as if in:- sci.psychology.announce sci.psychology.consciousness sci.psychology.journals.psyche sci.psychology.journals.psycoloquy sci.psychology.misc sci.psychology.personality sci.psychology.psychotherapy sci.psychology.research sci.psychology.theory >I can't describe to you what goes through your mind when you know >someone on TV is "seeing" you the viewer. You?re doing OK so far. >Your instinct is to switch the TV off, to change channel, Not much point unless you switch off the TV at the mains >like an ostrich, Looks like Ostrich farming is going to catch on in the UK as you may have seen in some of the other uk newsgroups >The one time I did directly ask someone in the company who knew what was >going on, first he spewed wool about, "well we have to think what is >reality and what is proof anyway", then went into barefaced denial liar >mode. It opens your eyes, if they can't say out loud what they keep >saying in a disguised fashion, they must fear exposure, they must fear >the truth. wool_ barefaced_ denial_ liar_ eyes_ fashion_ fear_ exposure, How is your mother these days Mike? And BTW - How is the thesis coming along? Peter Kruger ------------------------------------------------------------ http://www.gold.net/flames/ flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk 4081 Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278237
  - 23
    - MI5 Persecution: Grievous Bodily Harm 2/10/95 (2567) From: jeibisch@revolver.demon.co.uk (James Eibisch) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,uk.politics,uk.media,rec.arts.tv.uk.misc Subject: Re: Auntie gets it in the emails Reply-To: jeibisch@revolver.demon.co.uk Date: Mon Oct 2 19:44:19 1995 lig0007@queens-belfast.ac.uk (TOM OATES) wrote: >However, I'm pleased to say that, in the past couple of days, Mike Corley has >stopped doing it and he appears (I say this cautiously) to be acting more >reasonably. True, his postings are still based on paranoid delusions. >However, so long as he doesn't go back to his old practices of multiple, >identical, unreadable postings, I'm sure that most people on this newsgroup >are willing to put up with him. Time to come out of the woodwork of this thread (or variations thereof)... I find it annoying that discussion of Mike's situation is spread over multiple threads - it makes it hard to follow, and especially to follow up. If it could be consolidated into one thread on relevant newsgroups (I'm reading this on uk.media btw). I'm a little surprised with the volume of abuse Mike has received, but believe strongly in freedom of speech if such a thing were to exist, which clearly includes abuse as much as anything. One thing which has been missing from this discussion is this simple prognosis: that maybe Mike is right and that, despite his admitted mental condition, there really is a campaign against him organised by now-influential ex-students of his university. Does anyone remember the TV series GBH, a fictional account of security service and governmental power games? Fictional, certainly, but one of the most powerful pieces of TV drama I've seen in many years, fascinating and quite believable, even. The fact is, as Mike has pointed out (oh, so many times :-), that the security services _do_ have the influence, contacts, resources, and time to conduct such a campaign of surveillance and even psychological terror if they so chose. If they have this power, then they will surely use it We still don't have all the facts from Mike, and the most pertinent here I think would be about his time at university - the people who took against him, the ringleaders. We need to know far more about Mike: his political and social affiliations, put in context with his univeristy years, the enemies he made, the reasons people ganged up on him at the very early stages. I don't subscribe to conspiracy theories generally, but I know there is far more that goes on in the universities, old boy's clubs, civil and secret services and Parliament than is ever made public. Mike, I leave it to you to construct a _single_ thread in a relevant newsgroup about this topic and keep to this thread to give us new information and answer questions about your situation. Ignore the 'Mike Corley is a nutter' posts unless they are relevant. Give us more detail. Who knows? It may be true, stranger things have happened. _ James Eibisch ('v') N : E : T : A : D : E : L : I : C : A Reading, U.K. (,_,) http://metro.turnpike.net/J/jeibisch/ ======= ------------------------------- Tue, 03 Oct 1995 04:01:34 uk.misc Thread 3 of 14 Lines 58 Re: Auntie gets it in the emails Respno 16 of 16 J.J.Smith@ftel.co.uk John J Smith at Fujitsu Telecommunications Europe Ltd In article <812677261.12841@revolver.demon.co.uk>, James Eibisch <jeibisch@revolver.demon.co.uk> wrote: >lig0007@queens-belfast.ac.uk (TOM OATES) wrote: >One thing which has been missing from this discussion is this simple >prognosis: that maybe Mike is right and that, despite his admitted >mental condition, there really is a campaign against him organised by >now-influential ex-students of his university. We're trying to find this out on uk.misc. He's posted some *new* *huge* replies (which I'd have to give up my day job to reply to), detailing some things like: a) Mike Corley is *not* his real name b) Exactly what the "abuse" is (it seems be such things, as taking completely unrelated newspaper articles, striving to make them a disgusting insult, then redirecting against himself). c) How he came to the conclusion. I think he's doing rather better nowadays.. >Does anyone remember the TV series GBH, a fictional account of security >service and governmental power games? Fictional, certainly, but one of >the most powerful pieces of TV drama I've seen in many years, >fascinating and quite believable, even. This would be a point, apart from the fact that this was directed against someone of political importance. I don't believe Mike is... >The fact is, as Mike has pointed out (oh, so many times :-), that the >security services _do_ have the influence, contacts, resources, and time >to conduct such a campaign of surveillance and even psychological terror >if they so chose. If they have this power, then they will surely use it >at some point against some people. It appears he has formed the Security Service conclusion, because they are the only ones capable of doing it. A "searching for an enemy capable of it". >We still don't have all the facts from Mike, and the most pertinent here >I think would be about his time at university - the people who took >against him, the ringleaders. We need to know far more about Mike: his >political and social affiliations, put in context with his univeristy >years, the enemies he made, the reasons people ganged up on him at the >very early stages. I'm beginning to think that we never will get all the facts from Mike. We may, however, get enough... >Mike, I leave it to you to construct a _single_ thread in a relevant >newsgroup about this topic and keep to this thread to give us new >information and answer questions about your situation. Ignore the 'Mike >Corley is a nutter' posts unless they are relevant. Uk.misc, me boy... Smid ========================================================== From: flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk (Peter Kr|ger) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,uk.media,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,alt.conspiracy Subject: Re: What it's like to be watched by the security services Date: Tue Oct 3 15:41:54 1995 In article <44rrrh$t6v@news.ox.ac.uk>, idaniel@jesus.ox.ac.uk (Illtud Daniel) says: > >And what do you mean when you state that the symptoms are too >'textbook'? Are the textbooks wrong? I think what is meant by 'textbook' is that some of the symptoms of 'illness' displayed in the posts seem to have been lifted from textbooks describing mental instability and personality disorders. I must admit I haven't seen Mike's postings before has he only just started posting again? Peter Kruger ------------------------------------------------------------ http://www.gold.net/flames/ flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk 2567 Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278236
  - 24
    - MI5 Persecution: Goldfish and Piranha 29/9/95 (1053) I just thought I'd let you know what I've been reading into the "Crusader" spam. I don't want to post this to usenet because somebody might try to tie that in to my posts in some way (someone already has, in uk.misc). First of all, I'd like to ask you to believe that my phone line in my apartment is bugged, and has been for many months. I have moved a couple of times this year, but "they" have faithfully been on my trail. Anyway, let's suppose my phone line is bugged. Now, when I talk to my internet service provider, it's over a SLIP (now PPP) connection. So if you wanted to bug what was said, either you'd listen in over the line and have to decode the transmission, or you could go to the service provider (more difficult) and ask them to decode a particular user's connection. OK, so now they're listening to everything I do over my SLIP/PPP connection. A couple of months ago I was messing around with faking articles through nntp servers and through anonymous remailers. I chose a nice inconspicuous newsgroup for my little tests, something no-one would ever notice. Guess which newsgroup I chose??? Yes, _FISH_!!! or rec.aquaria to be precise And guess what articles I tried to post? Goldfish, Koi carp and, you'll never guess... PIRANHA!!! The goldfish article and the Koi went through, but the piranha didn';t appear. by now you probably think this is too silly for words. But if you look in the papers a few eeks ago you will find John Major, Tonny Blair and Paddy Ashdown sharing a "private joke" about Major's sunburnt goldfish. We haven't had anything about Koi yet (they must be too dull ). Now, sent by someone who clearly knew what they were doing (they chose an Italian backbone site for their launch point) we have many thousands of messages to people all over the globe. All about piranha, and with the punchline "that gives you something to think about, doesn't it?" The way it works is that they're trying to kill two birds with one stone again. I don't knoiw why they should be against these national alliance people, but my interpretation is that they simultaneously try to discredit them, and stem the flow of Corley articles. ================================================================= In article <DFnE55.8tF.0.bloor@torfree.net>, Mike Corley <bu765@torfree.net> wrote: > >John J Smith (J.J.Smith@ftel.co.uk) wrote: > >: b) we do know who you are. Or are you someone else we don't know about? >: You are currently known as "That bloody persistant net nutter, who's >: expanding from uk.misc to the rest of the world". > >I think the point I was trying to make is that I could tell you things >from my personal life, at home and at work, which would add credibility >to my story. But if I named people, then (a) they would object violently >to being included in this shenanigans, and (b) I would be revealing my >identity which would be bad for my personal life and my work life. Of >course some people in my personal life, and at work, do know who "mike >corley" is. But at least we're observing a studied silence for now. :People can always be called "MR X", to save them being named. : :I'm completely perplexed as to what you mean by b). Revealing identity? :To who? And why would this be bad for any part of your life when you :already have a less than respectful reputation here? I'll just enumerate one or two things that I can still remember. Sometime around August/Sept 1992 I was living in a house in Oxford, and coming out of the house was physically attacked by someone - not punched, just grabbed by the coat, with some verbals thrown in for good measure. That was something the people at work shouldn't have known about... but soon after a couple of people were talking right in front of me about, "yeah, I heard he was attacked". Again, one I went for a walk in some woods outside Oxford. The next day, at work, someone said "you know he went to the forest yesterday". I don't want to put details on usenet of what happened because to do so would be to risk it happening again. If you put ideas in peoples' heads then you can find them reflecting back at you, and I don't want that. Also I can't remember that much from three years ago. From november 1992 I started taking "major tranquilizers" and just blotted the whole thing from my mind. >This is a feature time and time again, that the security services >(presumed) get at you by manipulating other people around you to get at >you. If you have their contacts, manpower, resources and technology then >you can do that sort of thing. :But why? Are you a threat? They pretend they "have" to get at me. After the first few weeks they had to find a reason to spy and abuse. You can't abuse someone unless they're in the wrong in some way. What I did "wrong" was to be ill. So it became "nutter" and "monster" and "he's going to attack us" coupled with "ha ha ha, he can't do anything to defend himself, it was so funny". That obvious contradiction within their propaganda is something they blithely ignore. :So, the Security Services never *actually* appear, and you assume that :they get someone else to do your dirty work. This is a bit of a big :logical step, here: That person doesn't like me, or is causing me trouble, :it's not because they've got problems themselves, it must be the "Security :Services". Yes. Because people are infallible. Or is there more? A single source is indicated because of the range of harassment. BBC + Capital + manipulated_public_at_large + set_up_situations, what does that add up to? Add in the technology to carry out the covert spying and the manpower and knowhow to follow you around for five years without being spotted. It smells very much of the security services, because there is no other organization (to my knowledge) which does the things I've seen these people do. Remember, they have deliberately chosen the softest of soft targets to victimize. They purposely chose a mentally ill person who they thought would be likely to kill himself anyway, so that they could get away with murder. And in all likelihood it will have started as a personal vendetta by someone. Who could that be? I don't know, but I can give you some clues. The first possibility (deep breath) is that someone from my college set me up. Six years ago I graduated from university in the UK, during the last year there I was steadily getting more and more ill. I know that I was talking in my sleep; although I don't know what I was saying, it got me a reputation, and if someone from my college talked afterwards to the "wrong" people then that could be the reason for all that has followed. I think that's the strongest contender for source. Directly beneath my room lived another bloke who frequently had his friends round late at night, after the time that I went to sleep. So they could have heard what I was saying in my sleep, and that could have got me the reputation for "talking to myself". What I don't know is why that should have rebounded a year after I left. You'd think it would have happened sooner; it's a bit odd to wait for a year and then start abuse. That leads me to question what in particular happened around May/June 1990 for them to start then. >What I don't know is how it looks from the other side, from the side of >the people who are being manipulated to get at me. On a couple of >occasions I have challenged people to tell the truth of the matter, but >they have alwats ducked the challenge. :Have you ever considered the possibility, that you have made a mistake, and :the people don't know what you are talking about? Yes. I am currently considering the possibility that some people around me know only what is being posted on Usenet, and have not been "contacted" by "them". But I _know_ that others have been contacted. :What words? Are they in common use? Could they be a catchphrase of a :popular comedian?: "Nice to see you, to see you nice"? In England the all-time No. 1 is "nutter". Easter this year, returning home from Clapham police station to report five years of harassment ("we're not saying it's happening and we're not saying it isn't happening"), another "not happening" incident of harassment when a cowardly little slut did her country proud by yelling "nutter, nutter, nutter" in the face of the hated enemy. What can you do about that? You can't yell abuse back in their face, because they know they're supported by their peers, by the media, by the murderers in the security forces. You can't put them down when the fascist establishment is on their side. You can't hit them, because they would deny their abuse, they would deny knowing anything, and bring charges against the "nutter" who attacked them "at random". >You know, you're >passing saomeone, they're hardly going to construct an argument for your >benefit, so they work a word of abuse into the conversation which they >can giggle at. :Abuse such as what? We're all adults here, we can take it. Is this abuse :aimed at you? How can you tell it is? I think I've said already what the words are. Thing is, at any given time the language is consistent. In January everyone's calling you X, then a few weeks later people stop calling you X and start calling you Y. You can tell it's aimed at me, because when people repeatedly say the same words are you walk past, then laugh, you would have to be hard of understanding not to recognize it. >Or they repeat something that's been said somewhere else... the PE thing >being a case in point. PE says it, then other people pick up the refrain. :Remind me who PE is again. PE = "Private Eye" >: >To give you an example, which I mentioned in another posting. In around >: >October 1992, Private Eye ran a cover with the heading "Major's support >: >lowest ever", with John calling to Norma on the cover "come back, Norma". >: >Only one obvious interpretation to that, isn';;t there? I certainly >: >thought so when I saw that cover. Wrongo!! Down the pub with people from work >: >Simon says to phil, "don';t you think it's wrong then?" phil says, "well >: >private eye are usuallyright"..."hislop strikes again.. > >: Erm. Mike? Heeeelllllooo? What are you on about. What is the other >: interpretation then? Norma having an affair? Seems a bit wrong, with the >: heading "Majors support Lowest ever"... > >No, this one isn't obvious , it really does need to be explained. I >certainly didn't understand it when I first saw it. You see, the kernel >of vitriol is in the words "come back". At the time, the themes of >abuse were centred around interpretations of those two words (stretch your >mind a little bit, I don't have to spell it out for you, surely). :You did in your mail item. : :You seem to be scouting about something called a "Double Entendre". The :inference being "Come" = Ejaculation, "Back" = Anus (not the first part :of the body I would have went for, I would have foolishly gone for "Back", :silly old me). : :You see to have picked a sodomy double entendre out of a Private Eye :headline. They are everywhere. The English language has much double :meaning in it, and if you put your mind to it, you could pull a double :entendre out of a randomly chosen page of the bible. So what? >The point is that when Simon pointed it out to Phil, he did recognise >what it meant after a moment's thought... and so did I... and so did the >people who repeated it several times later... so however murky it may >seem to you, that is the meaning they intended it to have... I still don't really know if the meaning was intended when that headline was written, or if it was simply "found" after the fact. The reason I think it might be the former is that I got quite a lot of abuse along the lines of "sound-alike" or "double-entendre" at work, in particularly from Steve. So "double" inevitably came to mean split-personality, "two people in one"; "back" inevitably came to mean "backside", "come" inevitably meant you-know- what, "split" (well, we'd better split now) again you can guess, "bent" (of a similar bent), the list goes on forever. These aren't "nice" double- entendres intended for comedy, they're nasty words to humiliate and cause pain. If I could turn the clock back three years then I would sue my former employers for harassment and I would almost certainly win. I had to take pills after a year of Oxford, so they wouldn't be able to lie their way out of it. Actually, I could still take them to court - the main obstacle being that three years after the fact is a bit late and much of what happened, the details that would be necessary for a case to go to court, has just been obliterated by time. : Smid ============================================== From: flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk (Peter Kr|ger) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,alt.conspiracy,uk.media,uk.legal Subject: Re: Mike Corley - a (helpful) suggestion Date: Mon Oct 2 05:43:42 1995 In article <812551172snz@objmedia.demon.co.uk>, Snail <snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk> says: >Indeed, I feel that my Usenet access is censored simply because I don't want >to download groups he is partaking in, because of his behaviour. > >I wasn't that bothered, but I am starting to get seriously pissed off >with him. Which takes a lot. Hi Snail This person Corley seems quite interesting for three reasons. I put the following at the end of a post in another thread just to see if he was reading any other threads in uk.media. It seems he is probably not. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Heres an interesting little story from back in the early days of CCD technology. There was this miniature camera which was designed to fit behind the infrared receiver lens of the remote control system (just beside the IR sensor itself) the camera clocked out the data in 256 lines of 256 pixels from a Fairchild chip and fed it out, a line at a time, into the VBI within the TV set itself. The signal could be picked up remotely from a standard license detector van from where it was stripped out of the surrounding RF signal and relayed back to the TV station where it was displayed as a slowscan monochrome image in a corner of the news readers monitor. 1053 Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278235
  - 25
    - Scrolling with ScrollWindow and WM_PAINT in Petzold, Chapter 4 - SysMets3 Hello, I'm having a bit of trouble with Charles Petzold's "Programming Windows" 5th Edition, Chapter 4, the "SysMets3" program, specifically in the WM_PAINT handler. It appears to me that his 'for' loop in WM_PAINT needlessly paints 2 lines when called after a WM_VSCROLL SB_LINEUP or SB_LINEDOWN event. For example, if I scroll down one line, and I have ten lines visible in the window (where the window is 200 units and cyChar is 20) the iVertPos becomes 1, and the invalid rectangle top and bottom is 180 and 200 (one line at the bottom). But the 'for' loop begins with iPaintBeg at 10 and iPaintEnd at 11. The first statements in the for loop will set the vertical top to 'y' to be 180 for the last line in the window, and then TextOut vertical position is 180. All is good, but the for loop includes the next line - in this case will be painting from 200 to 220 (beyond the 200 client height). If I understand correctly, this will be clipped. But I don't understand why it is included in the loop - why not just include only the one line that needs to be painted? Obviously I'm missing something, for when I adjust the for loop to paint only one line, my window doesn't get painted correctly when I try scrolling down one line at a time. Any help is much appreciated! Thank you. The complete program and the separate header file are pasted below. Most of the main file, sysmets3.c is basic stuff. thanks, Brian /*---------------------------------------------------- SYSMETS3.C -- System Metrics Display Program No. 3 (c) Charles Petzold, 1998 ----------------------------------------------------*/ #include <windows.h> #include "sysmets.h" LRESULT CALLBACK WndProc (HWND, UINT, WPARAM, LPARAM) ; int WINAPI WinMain (HINSTANCE hInstance, HINSTANCE hPrevInstance, PSTR szCmdLine, int iCmdShow) { static TCHAR szAppName[] = TEXT ("SysMets3") ; HWND hwnd ; MSG msg ; WNDCLASS wndclass ; wndclass.style = CS_HREDRAW | CS_VREDRAW ; wndclass.lpfnWndProc = WndProc ; wndclass.cbClsExtra = 0 ; wndclass.cbWndExtra = 0 ; wndclass.hInstance = hInstance ; wndclass.hIcon = LoadIcon (NULL, IDI_APPLICATION) ; wndclass.hCursor = LoadCursor (NULL, IDC_ARROW) ; wndclass.hbrBackground = (HBRUSH) GetStockObject (WHITE_BRUSH) ; wndclass.lpszMenuName = NULL ; wndclass.lpszClassName = szAppName ; if (!RegisterClass (&wndclass)) { MessageBox (NULL, TEXT ("Program requires Windows NT!"), szAppName, MB_ICONERROR) ; return 0 ; } hwnd = CreateWindow (szAppName, TEXT ("Get System Metrics No. 3"), WS_OVERLAPPEDWINDOW | WS_VSCROLL | WS_HSCROLL, CW_USEDEFAULT, CW_USEDEFAULT, CW_USEDEFAULT, CW_USEDEFAULT, NULL, NULL, hInstance, NULL) ; ShowWindow (hwnd, iCmdShow) ; UpdateWindow (hwnd) ; while (GetMessage (&msg, NULL, 0, 0)) { TranslateMessage (&msg) ; DispatchMessage (&msg) ; } return msg.wParam ; } LRESULT CALLBACK WndProc (HWND hwnd, UINT message, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam) { static int cxChar, cxCaps, cyChar, cxClient, cyClient, iMaxWidth ; HDC hdc ; int i, x, y, iVertPos, iHorzPos, iPaintBeg, iPaintEnd ; PAINTSTRUCT ps ; SCROLLINFO si ; TCHAR szBuffer[10] ; TEXTMETRIC tm ; switch (message) { case WM_CREATE: hdc = GetDC (hwnd) ; GetTextMetrics (hdc, &tm) ; cxChar = tm.tmAveCharWidth ; cxCaps = (tm.tmPitchAndFamily & 1 ? 3 : 2) * cxChar / 2 ; cyChar = tm.tmHeight + tm.tmExternalLeading ; ReleaseDC (hwnd, hdc) ; // Save the width of the three columns iMaxWidth = 40 * cxChar + 22 * cxCaps ; return 0 ; case WM_SIZE: cxClient = LOWORD (lParam) ; cyClient = HIWORD (lParam) ; // Set vertical scroll bar range and page size si.cbSize = sizeof (si) ; si.fMask = SIF_RANGE | SIF_PAGE ; si.nMin = 0 ; si.nMax = NUMLINES - 1 ; si.nPage = cyClient / cyChar ; SetScrollInfo (hwnd, SB_VERT, &si, TRUE) ; // Set horizontal scroll bar range and page size si.cbSize = sizeof (si) ; si.fMask = SIF_RANGE | SIF_PAGE ; si.nMin = 0 ; si.nMax = 2 + iMaxWidth / cxChar ; si.nPage = cxClient / cxChar ; SetScrollInfo (hwnd, SB_HORZ, &si, TRUE) ; return 0 ; case WM_VSCROLL: // Get all the vertical scroll bar information si.cbSize = sizeof (si) ; si.fMask = SIF_ALL ; GetScrollInfo (hwnd, SB_VERT, &si) ; // Save the position for comparison later on iVertPos = si.nPos ; switch (LOWORD (wParam)) { case SB_TOP: si.nPos = si.nMin ; break ; case SB_BOTTOM: si.nPos = si.nMax ; break ; case SB_LINEUP: si.nPos -= 1 ; break ; case SB_LINEDOWN: si.nPos += 1 ; break ; case SB_PAGEUP: si.nPos -= si.nPage ; break ; case SB_PAGEDOWN: si.nPos += si.nPage ; break ; case SB_THUMBTRACK: si.nPos = si.nTrackPos ; break ; default: break ; } // Set the position and then retrieve it. Due to adjustments // by Windows it may not be the same as the value set. si.fMask = SIF_POS ; SetScrollInfo (hwnd, SB_VERT, &si, TRUE) ; GetScrollInfo (hwnd, SB_VERT, &si) ; // If the position has changed, scroll the window and update it if (si.nPos != iVertPos) { ScrollWindow (hwnd, 0, cyChar * (iVertPos - si.nPos), NULL, NULL) ; UpdateWindow (hwnd) ; } return 0 ; case WM_HSCROLL: // Get all the vertical scroll bar information si.cbSize = sizeof (si) ; si.fMask = SIF_ALL ; // Save the position for comparison later on GetScrollInfo (hwnd, SB_HORZ, &si) ; iHorzPos = si.nPos ; switch (LOWORD (wParam)) { case SB_LINELEFT: si.nPos -= 1 ; break ; case SB_LINERIGHT: si.nPos += 1 ; break ; case SB_PAGELEFT: si.nPos -= si.nPage ; break ; case SB_PAGERIGHT: si.nPos += si.nPage ; break ; case SB_THUMBPOSITION: si.nPos = si.nTrackPos ; break ; default : break ; } // Set the position and then retrieve it. Due to adjustments // by Windows it may not be the same as the value set. si.fMask = SIF_POS ; SetScrollInfo (hwnd, SB_HORZ, &si, TRUE) ; GetScrollInfo (hwnd, SB_HORZ, &si) ; // If the position has changed, scroll the window if (si.nPos != iHorzPos) { ScrollWindow (hwnd, cxChar * (iHorzPos - si.nPos), 0, NULL, NULL) ; } return 0 ; case WM_PAINT : hdc = BeginPaint (hwnd, &ps) ; // Get vertical scroll bar position si.cbSize = sizeof (si) ; si.fMask = SIF_POS ; GetScrollInfo (hwnd, SB_VERT, &si) ; iVertPos = si.nPos ; // Get horizontal scroll bar position GetScrollInfo (hwnd, SB_HORZ, &si) ; iHorzPos = si.nPos ; // Find painting limits iPaintBeg = max (0, iVertPos + ps.rcPaint.top / cyChar) ; iPaintEnd = min (NUMLINES - 1, iVertPos + ps.rcPaint.bottom / cyChar) ; for (i = iPaintBeg ; i <= iPaintEnd ; i++) { x = cxChar * (1 - iHorzPos) ; y = cyChar * (i - iVertPos) ; TextOut (hdc, x, y, sysmetrics[i].szLabel, lstrlen (sysmetrics[i].szLabel)) ; TextOut (hdc, x + 22 * cxCaps, y, sysmetrics[i].szDesc, lstrlen (sysmetrics[i].szDesc)) ; SetTextAlign (hdc, TA_RIGHT | TA_TOP) ; TextOut (hdc, x + 22 * cxCaps + 40 * cxChar, y, szBuffer, wsprintf (szBuffer, TEXT ("%5d"), GetSystemMetrics (sysmetrics[i].iIndex))) ; SetTextAlign (hdc, TA_LEFT | TA_TOP) ; } EndPaint (hwnd, &ps) ; return 0 ; case WM_DESTROY : PostQuitMessage (0) ; return 0 ; } return DefWindowProc (hwnd, message, wParam, lParam) ; } //------------------end cpp-------------------------- //-----------------begin header--------------------- // here is the header file with the sysmetric struct /*----------------------------------------------- SYSMETS.H -- System metrics display structure -----------------------------------------------*/ #define NUMLINES ((int) (sizeof sysmetrics / sizeof sysmetrics [0])) struct { int iIndex ; TCHAR * szLabel ; TCHAR * szDesc ; } sysmetrics [] = { SM_CXSCREEN, TEXT ("SM_CXSCREEN"), TEXT ("Screen width in pixels"), SM_CYSCREEN, TEXT ("SM_CYSCREEN"), TEXT ("Screen height in pixels"), SM_CXVSCROLL, TEXT ("SM_CXVSCROLL"), TEXT ("Vertical scroll width"), SM_CYHSCROLL, TEXT ("SM_CYHSCROLL"), TEXT ("Horizontal scroll height"), SM_CYCAPTION, TEXT ("SM_CYCAPTION"), TEXT ("Caption bar height"), SM_CXBORDER, TEXT ("SM_CXBORDER"), TEXT ("Window border width"), SM_CYBORDER, TEXT ("SM_CYBORDER"), TEXT ("Window border height"), SM_CXFIXEDFRAME, TEXT ("SM_CXFIXEDFRAME"), TEXT ("Dialog window frame width"), SM_CYFIXEDFRAME, TEXT ("SM_CYFIXEDFRAME"), TEXT ("Dialog window frame height"), SM_CYVTHUMB, TEXT ("SM_CYVTHUMB"), TEXT ("Vertical scroll thumb height"), SM_CXHTHUMB, TEXT ("SM_CXHTHUMB"), TEXT ("Horizontal scroll thumb width"), SM_CXICON, TEXT ("SM_CXICON"), TEXT ("Icon width"), SM_CYICON, TEXT ("SM_CYICON"), TEXT ("Icon height"), SM_CXCURSOR, TEXT ("SM_CXCURSOR"), TEXT ("Cursor width"), SM_CYCURSOR, TEXT ("SM_CYCURSOR"), TEXT ("Cursor height"), SM_CYMENU, TEXT ("SM_CYMENU"), TEXT ("Menu bar height"), SM_CXFULLSCREEN, TEXT ("SM_CXFULLSCREEN"), TEXT ("Full screen client area width"), SM_CYFULLSCREEN, TEXT ("SM_CYFULLSCREEN"), TEXT ("Full screen client area height"), SM_CYKANJIWINDOW, TEXT ("SM_CYKANJIWINDOW"), TEXT ("Kanji window height"), SM_MOUSEPRESENT, TEXT ("SM_MOUSEPRESENT"), TEXT ("Mouse present flag"), SM_CYVSCROLL, TEXT ("SM_CYVSCROLL"), TEXT ("Vertical scroll arrow height"), SM_CXHSCROLL, TEXT ("SM_CXHSCROLL"), TEXT ("Horizontal scroll arrow width"), SM_DEBUG, TEXT ("SM_DEBUG"), TEXT ("Debug version flag"), SM_SWAPBUTTON, TEXT ("SM_SWAPBUTTON"), TEXT ("Mouse buttons swapped flag"), SM_CXMIN, TEXT ("SM_CXMIN"), TEXT ("Minimum window width"), SM_CYMIN, TEXT ("SM_CYMIN"), TEXT ("Minimum window height"), SM_CXSIZE, TEXT ("SM_CXSIZE"), TEXT ("Min/Max/Close button width"), SM_CYSIZE, TEXT ("SM_CYSIZE"), TEXT ("Min/Max/Close button height"), SM_CXSIZEFRAME, TEXT ("SM_CXSIZEFRAME"), TEXT ("Window sizing frame width"), SM_CYSIZEFRAME, TEXT ("SM_CYSIZEFRAME"), TEXT ("Window sizing frame height"), SM_CXMINTRACK, TEXT ("SM_CXMINTRACK"), TEXT ("Minimum window tracking width"), SM_CYMINTRACK, TEXT ("SM_CYMINTRACK"), TEXT ("Minimum window tracking height"), SM_CXDOUBLECLK, TEXT ("SM_CXDOUBLECLK"), TEXT ("Double click x tolerance"), SM_CYDOUBLECLK, TEXT ("SM_CYDOUBLECLK"), TEXT ("Double click y tolerance"), SM_CXICONSPACING, TEXT ("SM_CXICONSPACING"), TEXT ("Horizontal icon spacing"), SM_CYICONSPACING, TEXT ("SM_CYICONSPACING"), TEXT ("Vertical icon spacing"), SM_MENUDROPALIGNMENT, TEXT ("SM_MENUDROPALIGNMENT"), TEXT ("Left or right menu drop"), SM_PENWINDOWS, TEXT ("SM_PENWINDOWS"), TEXT ("Pen extensions installed"), SM_DBCSENABLED, TEXT ("SM_DBCSENABLED"), TEXT ("Double-Byte Char Set enabled"), SM_CMOUSEBUTTONS, TEXT ("SM_CMOUSEBUTTONS"), TEXT ("Number of mouse buttons"), SM_SECURE, TEXT ("SM_SECURE"), TEXT ("Security present flag"), SM_CXEDGE, TEXT ("SM_CXEDGE"), TEXT ("3-D border width"), SM_CYEDGE, TEXT ("SM_CYEDGE"), TEXT ("3-D border height"), SM_CXMINSPACING, TEXT ("SM_CXMINSPACING"), TEXT ("Minimized window spacing width"), SM_CYMINSPACING, TEXT ("SM_CYMINSPACING"), TEXT ("Minimized window spacing height"), SM_CXSMICON, TEXT ("SM_CXSMICON"), TEXT ("Small icon width"), SM_CYSMICON, TEXT ("SM_CYSMICON"), TEXT ("Small icon height"), SM_CYSMCAPTION, TEXT ("SM_CYSMCAPTION"), TEXT ("Small caption height"), SM_CXSMSIZE, TEXT ("SM_CXSMSIZE"), TEXT ("Small caption button width"), SM_CYSMSIZE, TEXT ("SM_CYSMSIZE"), TEXT ("Small caption button height"), SM_CXMENUSIZE, TEXT ("SM_CXMENUSIZE"), TEXT ("Menu bar button width"), SM_CYMENUSIZE, TEXT ("SM_CYMENUSIZE"), TEXT ("Menu bar button height"), SM_ARRANGE, TEXT ("SM_ARRANGE"), TEXT ("How minimized windows arranged"), SM_CXMINIMIZED, TEXT ("SM_CXMINIMIZED"), TEXT ("Minimized window width"), SM_CYMINIMIZED, TEXT ("SM_CYMINIMIZED"), TEXT ("Minimized window height"), SM_CXMAXTRACK, TEXT ("SM_CXMAXTRACK"), TEXT ("Maximum draggable width"), SM_CYMAXTRACK, TEXT ("SM_CYMAXTRACK"), TEXT ("Maximum draggable height"), SM_CXMAXIMIZED, TEXT ("SM_CXMAXIMIZED"), TEXT ("Width of maximized window"), SM_CYMAXIMIZED, TEXT ("SM_CYMAXIMIZED"), TEXT ("Height of maximized window"), SM_NETWORK, TEXT ("SM_NETWORK"), TEXT ("Network present flag"), SM_CLEANBOOT, TEXT ("SM_CLEANBOOT"), TEXT ("How system was booted"), SM_CXDRAG, TEXT ("SM_CXDRAG"), TEXT ("Avoid drag x tolerance"), SM_CYDRAG, TEXT ("SM_CYDRAG"), TEXT ("Avoid drag y tolerance"), SM_SHOWSOUNDS, TEXT ("SM_SHOWSOUNDS"), TEXT ("Present sounds visually"), SM_CXMENUCHECK, TEXT ("SM_CXMENUCHECK"), TEXT ("Menu check-mark width"), SM_CYMENUCHECK, TEXT ("SM_CYMENUCHECK"), TEXT ("Menu check-mark height"), SM_SLOWMACHINE, TEXT ("SM_SLOWMACHINE"), TEXT ("Slow processor flag"), SM_MIDEASTENABLED, TEXT ("SM_MIDEASTENABLED"), TEXT ("Hebrew and Arabic enabled flag"), SM_MOUSEWHEELPRESENT, TEXT ("SM_MOUSEWHEELPRESENT"), TEXT ("Mouse wheel present flag"), SM_XVIRTUALSCREEN, TEXT ("SM_XVIRTUALSCREEN"), TEXT ("Virtual screen x origin"), SM_YVIRTUALSCREEN, TEXT ("SM_YVIRTUALSCREEN"), TEXT ("Virtual screen y origin"), SM_CXVIRTUALSCREEN, TEXT ("SM_CXVIRTUALSCREEN"), TEXT ("Virtual screen width"), SM_CYVIRTUALSCREEN, TEXT ("SM_CYVIRTUALSCREEN"), TEXT ("Virtual screen height"), SM_CMONITORS, TEXT ("SM_CMONITORS"), TEXT ("Number of monitors"), SM_SAMEDISPLAYFORMAT, TEXT ("SM_SAMEDISPLAYFORMAT"), TEXT ("Same color format flag") } ; Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278227
- Next
  - 1
    - pre .net hey all, before .net what was the widely used way of connecting to sql server or any database server? thanks, rodchar Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278223
  - 2
    - OpenMP and UI Integration Does anyone have any tips/tricks regarding OpenMP and integrating with the UI. We are beginning to intergrate OpenMP with our existing single threaded MFC application. So far OpenMP has added huge performance gains to our application, with few bugs and few code changes. However I am experiencing issues when OpenMP threads interact with UI objects created in the main thread. The following code crashes the application, It is suppose to just increment a progress control in a CDialog //ctrl set to CProgressCtrl* #pragma omp parallel for private(j) for (i = 1; i <= 50; i++) for ( j = 1; j <= 1000; j++){ #pragma omp critical { counter++; ctrl->SendMessage(PBM_SETPOS, counter, 0L); } } However if I Post a message to the progress bar. //ctrl set to CProgressCtrl* #pragma omp parallel for private(j) for (i = 1; i <= 50; i++) for ( j = 1; j <= 1000; j++){ #pragma omp critical { counter++; ctrl->PostMessage(PBM_SETPOS, counter, 0L); } } the loop completes correctly. However the CProgressCtrl only processes its messages after the parallel for loop has finished. The UI thread seems to get halted when OMP starts the #pragma omp parallel for, and only starts up again after omp is finished. Is there anyway can tell the UI thread to process messages? Does any one have recommendations on interfacing OMP and the UI? Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278212
  - 3
    - No XcvDataA? Is there any reason why there should only XcvDataW and no XcvDataA? Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278210
  - 4
    - How to replace a substring in TCHAR[] or tstring? I know CString has a powful method Replace(), is there any similiar method for replacement in tstring? My problem is I got a TCHAR[] in my code, and I need to replace a substring of it. It seems I should use tstring, but I didn't find any Replace() method in tstring... Thanks Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278202
  - 5
    - Speed in accessing class members If I have a class something like this... class C{ public: double num; double GetNum(void){return num;}; }; Is there any difference in speed between these lines of code? double num = C.num; double num = C.GetNum( ); Regards, Ron Francis www.RonaldFrancis.com Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278200
  - 6
    - How to ? out argument in managed c++ Hello gurus, I have the following C# function signature: void TheFunction(Dictionary<string, MyClassObj> dicName, out int nOne, out int nTwo, out int nThree, out int nFour); And it works fine. I'm trying to write a managed C++ function that will save the save signature, but till now I've got all kind of compiler error. Can anyone tell me how a managed C++ function signature should look like that will do the job like the one I showed above? -- Thanks Sharon Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278187
  - 7
    - Enter / Leave Critical Section in different threads First, I thought that it was wrong to enter a critical section from one thread and then leave the same critical section from another thread. I wrote a small program and it indicates that there is no error to do so: #include <windows.h> #include <process.h> #include <stdio.h> struct threadparameter { CRITICAL_SECTION *criticalsection; int threadid; }; // enter / leave critical section in different threads void testcriticalsection(void *params){ threadparameter *parameter = (threadparameter*)params; int threadid = parameter->threadid; switch (threadid) { case 0: EnterCriticalSection(parameter->criticalsection); printf("thread %d entered critical section, error code: %d\n", threadid,GetLastError()); Sleep(9000); break; case 1: LeaveCriticalSection(parameter->criticalsection); printf("thread %d left critical section, error code: %d\n", threadid,GetLastError()); Sleep(5000); break; case 2: printf("thread %d enter critical section\n", threadid); EnterCriticalSection(parameter->criticalsection); printf("thread %d entered critical section, error code: %d\n", threadid,GetLastError()); break; } printf("thread %d is done\n", threadid); } int main() { CRITICAL_SECTION criticalsection; InitializeCriticalSection(&criticalsection); printf("testing different thread enter / leave critical section\n"); const int threadcount = 3; threadparameter param[threadcount]; HANDLE th[threadcount]; for (int i = 0; i<threadcount; ++i) { param[i].threadid = i; param[i].criticalsection=&criticalsection; th[i] = (HANDLE)_beginthread(testcriticalsection,0, &param[i]); } Sleep(1000); WaitForMultipleObjects(2, th, TRUE, INFINITE); DeleteCriticalSection(&criticalsection); printf("main exits\n"); return 0; } The first thread call EnterCriticalSection, the second calls Leave and third calls Enter again. If the Leave call in the second thread has no effect (since it doesn't own it), the third thread should be blocked. But it was NOT. If the second thread doesn't call Leave, the third thread IS blocked which is as expected. To prevent critical section become undefined (when its owner thread dies), I put some sleep call in the code (certainly, real application should not use or minimize Sleep). Why a thread doesn't own a critical section could release the lock? Is there something wrong in the code so this is not a valid test? Another issue illustrated in the code is WaitForMultipleObject. The first parameter is the number of objects in handle array. in the above example, the object count should be 3. However, if I put it 3 over there, the call always returns as soon as ONE thread is done. So, my second question is why WaitForMultipleObject doesn't wait for all objects to signal? It is quite possible that the small program has a fundamental fault and hence, above issues are just my fault. In that case, I am eagerly waiting for someone to point it out. Thanks. J Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278186
  - 8
    - deploying dll's using depends.exe to assess <needed> modules hi everyone, i got lost in a thread, which actually stopped. so i would like to rephrase some questions, which weren't really answered, about deploying dll's analyzed by dependancy walker: 1. what happens if you deploy (using setup pro) a dll that's already present on the target systm? 2. do you need to deploy 'delay load' (according to dep walker) linked modules? i suppose it's: 'yes'! 3. how do i distinguish (in dep walker) between always present system modules, and modules i need to deploy myself? marco Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278185
  - 9
    - LNK2019 problem My C program compiles, but I get LNK2019-errors during linking. The cause is some symbols that are defined in some C-files that are not in my project. In VS6, these files ended up under "External dependencies", and everything went smoothly. I am now using VS7. How do I tell "the system" that it needs to also compile (and link) these files, without taking them into my project (which I don't want to do, since it is a lot of files, which I didn't make)? I'm probably using the wrong terms, but hopefully you understand what I am asking. TIA, Lars Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278182
  - 10
    - Setting up 3D Array I would like to change the following static array to be dynamically created. Does someone have some sample code to show how to create a three dimensional array of doubles? double dArrValues[2][9][24]; TIA, Tom Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278171
  - 11
    - time conversion function ? I have a variable time in the number of days such as 1 to 366 and I was wondering if there is a simple function that will convert it to the month and day of the month. I can do it myself, but I was just wondering if there is an easy builtin function that I could use. I am using Visual C++. Normally, I use strftime as it is very useful and has many options, but I did not see a way to convert the days of the year to month and day. Z.K. Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278157
  - 12
    - OpenPrinter in Administrative mode in network in remote PC in VC++ Hi I have a small problem in my application. How to open printer in administrative mode in VC++ particulerly. Do i need to do ant changes in Printer settings in Remote PC...? Thanks Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278150
  - 13
    - VC++ security problem using WMI Hi, I found some code from codeproject site using WMI in VC++. I have created a method having the following code in it. It works fine when I am running into "Admin" accound in Windows XP Pro while in "Restricted user account", its not able to run. It's giving error messsage "Could not enumerate" so it seems "pEnumObject" seems null or empty. Please help, Thanks in advance, Code: CoInitialize(NULL); //Security needs to be initialized in XP first and this was the major problem //why it was not working in XP. if(CoInitializeSecurity( NULL, -1, NULL, NULL, RPC_C_AUTHN_LEVEL_PKT, RPC_C_IMP_LEVEL_IMPERSONATE, NULL, EOAC_NONE, 0 ) != S_OK) return; IWbemLocator * pIWbemLocator = NULL; IWbemServices * pWbemServices = NULL; IEnumWbemClassObject * pEnumObject = NULL; BSTR bstrNamespace = (L"root\\cimv2"); if(CoCreateInstance ( CLSID_WbemAdministrativeLocator, NULL , CLSCTX_INPROC_SERVER | CLSCTX_LOCAL_SERVER , IID_IUnknown , ( void ** ) & pIWbemLocator ) != S_OK) return; if(pIWbemLocator->ConnectServer( bstrNamespace, // Namespace NULL, // Userid NULL, // PW NULL, // Locale 0, // flags NULL, // Authority NULL, // Context &pWbemServices ) != S_OK) return; HRESULT hRes; // BSTR strQuery = (L"Select * from Win32_PhysicalMedia"); BSTR strQuery = (L"Select * from Win32_PhysicalMedia"); BSTR strQL = (L"WQL"); hRes = pWbemServices->ExecQuery(strQL, strQuery,WBEM_FLAG_RETURN_IMMEDIATELY,NULL,&pEnumObject); if(hRes != S_OK) { MessageBox("Could not execute Query"); return; } ULONG uCount = 1, uReturned; IWbemClassObject * pClassObject = NULL; hRes = pEnumObject->Reset(); if(hRes != S_OK) { MessageBox("Could not Enumerate"); return; } hRes = pEnumObject->Next(WBEM_INFINITE,uCount, &pClassObject, &uReturned); if(hRes != S_OK) { MessageBox("Could not Enumerate"); return; } VARIANT v; //BSTR strClassProp = SysAllocString(L"SerialNumber"); //Product BSTR strClassProp = SysAllocString(L"SerialNumber"); hRes = pClassObject->Get(strClassProp, 0, &v, 0, 0); if(hRes != S_OK) { MessageBox("Could not Get Value"); return; } SysFreeString(strClassProp); _bstr_t bstrPath = &v; //Just to convert BSTR to ANSI char* strPath=(char*)bstrPath; if (SUCCEEDED(hRes)) { VariantClear( &v ); pIWbemLocator->Release(); pWbemServices->Release(); pEnumObject->Release(); pClassObject->Release(); CoUninitialize(); return strPath; } else { MessageBox("Error in getting object"); return; } VariantClear( &v ); pIWbemLocator->Release(); pWbemServices->Release(); pEnumObject->Release(); pClassObject->Release(); CoUninitialize(); return; Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278145
  - 14
    - Need advice on creating COM interfaces Hello! I want to design a plug-in architecture for our application. It will be used to do conversion between data formats. I have the ideas thought out as C++ abstract base classes, and I would like to transfer this to the world of COM. We are currently using VC7.1, mostly in C++. Now I would like to get some tips on how to proceed. I don't have any experience creating COM servers. There seem to be so many options of how to define the interfaces: * Write interfaces in MIDL. This I don't really want to do (complex). * Write classes in C++ and use attributes (this will generate idl for me?) * Write interfaces in a .NET assembly, and #import them into C++. This sounds like the easiest way to get started. It is important that I am able to share our interfaces with 3rd parties that use Visual Studio. Let's say I choose the third option. If I understand correctly, I would distribute the .NET assembly with the interfaces. Anyone can then create COM servers that implement the interfaces. Is this a good way to do it? I will greatly appreciate any recommendations! -- Daniel Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278132
  - 15
    - C++ 101 dumb question I'm new to C++ and I'm trying to get my head round how memory is managed. Take a look at this:- Class CMyClass { private: char * m_str; public: CMyClass(char * str) { m_str = str; } ~CMyClass(void) { // Do I need to anything with m_str } } function a() { CMyClass ThingInA; ThingInA = b(); } function b() { CMyClass ThingInB("Hello World"); return ThingInB; } If I understand things correctly both ThingInA and ThingInB are allocated off the stack. return in functon b()copies the contents fo ThingInB to ThingInA. Has a constructor been executed for ThingInA before b is executed? There isn't one defined for void. When b returns does a destructor happen for the contents of ThingInA first? Where is the memory to store the "Hello World" string allocated? I guess it's in the module somewhere and is treated as const, in which case I should be using const char above right? TIA for patient answers, Anthony. Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278131
  - 16
    - [unicode] arabic general code -> context form code Hello @ All ! I have a problem with arabic unicode, and I hope you can help me. I was searching the last 2 days for a solution, but without success.. So, my problem: I have a database with a table with one field which content is a arabic string. I get the data in the arabic general unicode format [0600-06FF]. BUT I have to convert this one into the Contextual Forms Unicode (depends on the position of the character e.g. Initial, Medial, Final and Isolated). Is there a algorithm in visual studio or in windows or something like that? I am not a specialist in arabic language, so I don't know in which case the character has to be in which form and code. Hope, my english is good enough for understanding my problem! Hope, you can help me, too :) Thanks a lot in advance, Greetings, Matze Mueller Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278122
  - 17
    - The System cannot execute the specificed program I am using VC++ creating a program running SendMessageTimeout to changing global environment variables without reboot. SendMessageTimeout(HWND_BROADCAST, WM_SETTINGCHANGE, 0, (LPARAM) "Environment", SMTO_ABORTIFHUNG, 5000, &dwReturnValue); refer to the link http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3ben-us%3b104011 after I created the exe program and run it. it run without error on my laptop, without error on my test Window2003 server, but some machine had "The System cannot execute the specificed program". Secondly, I open 2 dos prompt to test the environment is changed. 1 dos prompt set a new variable in the environment, then run the program with sendmessagetimeout, then type set on the 2nd dos prompt, the new variable did not appear on the 2nd dos prompt. ??? I have 2 problem. 1. why some machine cannot run the executable? 2. how to changing the environment variable and make it effective, without reboot the machine? help Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278120
  - 18
    - File compression in .NET - for very large files Hi I want to compress and decomress files. There is GZipStream class in .Net. However this class requires to allocate buffer equal to the file length to zip it (at least all sample code I saw were like that). The file size in my case can be really very large and hence I want something which does not require to load entire file in memory. Is there any way? Thanks and best regards Amit Dedhia Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278112
  - 19
    - corrupt intellisense This post is just informative and relates to Visual Studio 2005. My Class View wasn't updating after changing variables in a class and was also showing a class that didn't exist in the solution (I had removed any reference to it and actually deleted the files). The solution compiled and ran without a problem. As a test, I deleted the solution's *.ncb file, the intellisense database. VS built a new database and the problem was solved. (The old file was 23 meg and the new one 11kb.) Regards, Ron Francis www.RonaldFrancis.com Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278103
  - 20
    - Synchronous Queue in VC++ I'm porting an application from a Unix like system to Windows. The application uses FIFO queues to pass data between threads. The calling thread has the option of either suspending until data arrives on the queue or returning with NULL after a timeout if no data arrives. Is there any similar component provided by VC++, Visual Studio 2005? Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278099
  - 21
    - _CrtIsValidHeapPointer Assertion in C++/CLI Application Debug mode. Hi, I am getting _CrtIsValidHeapPointer Assertion in C++/CLI Application Debug mode in VS 2005. Expression: _CrtIsValidHeapPointer(pUserData) ****************************** It is breaking in dgbheap.c. Here are steps: 1) I created application in VS2005 : Project type - VC++ Visual Studio Installed Template - WindowsFormsApplication. I added a dialog resource to this project and a class to the dialog which is MFC dialog class. I also changed the following project properties and their values: a) CLR - /clr b) Use MFC as Shared DLL c) Linker ->advanced -> CLR Unmanaged Code Check - Apply Unmanaged Code Check (/CLRUNMANAGEDCODECHECK) When I run this app in the debug mode I get the assertion with Expression: _CrtIsValidHeapPointer(pUserData). Any help/url is appreciated. Thanks a lot, Arti Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278087
  - 22
    - top-posting I have read the term top-posting twice now so I looked it up to see what it was. I gather some here frown on top-posting and would prefer bottom-posting? When scanning through the posts, it seems to be a mixed bag. So, is there an etiquette here on how to post? If there is, I use Email Express, and by default, it top-posts. I had a quick look through the options and help and couldn't find any way to change its settings so I'm wondering how others deal with it. If it's not an issue, then I won't bother because I actually prefer top-posting. Regards, Ron Francis www.RonaldFrancis.com Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278075
  - 23
    - GetScrollRange(, &maxpos) & GetScrollLimit() Env: WindowsXP, VC++6.00 Who would like to tell me why maxpos1 != maxpos2 by the following two functions CScrollBar *pScrollBar; int maxpos1; int maxpos2; (1)pScrollBar->GetScrollRange(, &maxpos1) ; (2)maxpos2 = pScrollBar->GetScrollLimit(); TIA William Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278073
  - 24
    - Generating a Random Number How would I generate a random number within a range for example between 128 and 1400 ? Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278069
  - 25
    - Heap reallocation Hi, Conventionally when you do this, the pointer gets invalidated. a = malloc (100); a = realloc (a, 200); With the second statement, the "a" no longer points to where the original "a" points to. So My question is if under the new heap management methods (using "new") the pointer would not be invalidated? and also would be automatically managed (when doing resize etc) Thanks Tag: mspbd71.dll not found Tag: 278037

hey all,
this is the closest place i know to ask, please forgive if out of topic but
i'm sure this is a smart forum.

i'm trying to using masm that's in vsnet2003 and the particular command i'm
having trouble with is the LINK.EXE command.

whenever i try to type it in on the command line link /? i get an error
message saying that the dll can't be found and i should reinstall.

thanks,
rodchar

Top

Re: mspbd71.dll not found by Carl

Carl
Tue Jun 26 16:06:32 CDT 2007

"rodchar" <rodchar@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:2B961A7B-6C87-44B0-9F3D-6229368D04CB@microsoft.com...
> hey all,
> this is the closest place i know to ask, please forgive if out of topic
> but
> i'm sure this is a smart forum.
>
> i'm trying to using masm that's in vsnet2003 and the particular command
> i'm
> having trouble with is the LINK.EXE command.
>
> whenever i try to type it in on the command line link /? i get an error
> message saying that the dll can't be found and i should reinstall.

That means that the DLL can't be found and you probably should reinstall -
or at least check your environment for correct PATH.

The error suggests that link.exe from VC7.1 is found on the path, but
mspdb71.dll cannot be found on the path. I would expect mspdb71.dll to be
found in <vs-install-dir>\Common7\IDE, while link.exe would be in
<vs-install-dir>\vc7\bin.

-cd

Top

Re: mspbd71.dll not found by Matt

Matt
Wed Jun 27 09:45:13 CDT 2007

"rodchar" <rodchar@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:2B961A7B-6C87-44B0-9F3D-6229368D04CB@microsoft.com...
> i'm trying to using masm that's in vsnet2003 and the particular command
> i'm
> having trouble with is the LINK.EXE command.
>
> whenever i try to type it in on the command line link /? i get an error
> message saying that the dll can't be found and i should reinstall.

IIRC, that module doesn't exist in either the .NET 2003 package or the SDK.
Building a release version should work.

Top