Re: linkage of free functions? by Igor
Igor
Tue Apr 11 19:08:47 CDT 2006
"Angel Tsankov" <fn42551@fmi.uni-sofia.bg> wrote in message
news:%23ZeQ4QbXGHA.752@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl
> Considering the following declarations
>
> void f1( );
> namespace {
> void f2( );
> }
>
> both f1 and f2 have external linkage, but may f2 be referred to from
> scopes of other translation units?
No. f2 effectively has a unique compiler-generated name that other
translation units don't know and thus can't refer to. Even though
technically f2 does have external linkage.
> If so, how? If no, then this constradicts the definition of "a name
> with external linkage"
I guess it kind of does. It does not really make any practical
difference though.
--
With best wishes,
Igor Tandetnik
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to
land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly
overhead. -- RFC 1925