issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map

TheMSsForum.com: The Microsoft Software Forum

The MSS Forum ‹ VC
- Archive
  - Biz
  - MCSE
  - CRM
  - Drivers
  - Framework
  - ADO
  - ASP
  - Compact
  - Forms
  - Dotnet
  - C#
  - VB
  - FontpageGen
  - Excel
  - WorkSheet
  - Exchange
  - Setup
  - Fox
  - Fontpage
  - ASP
  - IIS
  - Entourage
  - Money
  - Messanger
  - PocketPC
  - Powerpoint
  - Project
  - Publisher
  - Excel
  - VB
  - Security
  - Portal
  - Services
  - SQLServerDev
  - SVCS
  - SQLServer
  - VB
  - VC
  - MFC
  - ExcelGen

- Previous
  - 1
    - working set, virtual bytes and private bytes Hello everyone, I am using Windows Server 2003 Performance Counter tool to monitor the memory consumed by my process. The interested terms are working set, virtual bytes and private bytes. My questions are, 1. If I want to watch the real physical memory consumed by current process, which one should I monitor? 2. If I want to watch the physical memory + swap file consumed by current process, which one should I monitor? 3. Any more clear description of what these terms mean? I read the help from Performance Counter tool, but still confused which one(s) identifies the real used physical memory, and which one(s) identifies the real used physical memory + page swap file, and which one(s) identifies the required memory (may not be really allocated either in physical memory or in swap page file). If there are any related learning resource about the concepts, it is appreciated if you could recommend some. :-) thanks in advance, George Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285662
  - 2
    - Web Browser Control Hi there, I have a WTL app with a dialog that contains the MS Web browser control in the center of it. The dialog is borderless and is being placed as a child onto my main form. The dialog appears where I expect it to, but the Web browser control appears at the top left of the screen, as if it is not parented to the dialog. I don't seem to be able to move it back, even after explicitly setting it's parent to the dialog. Any ideas what I could be doing wrong? TIA. Nick. Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285660
  - 3
    - Sweet deal, Free SEO Services I am so glad that I found this seo firm, someone actually reccomended them to me. http://seoservicesextreme.googlepages.com/seoexpertservices Before them, I was getting ripped off by pay per click advertising. What do you guys think of their pricing? http://seoservicesextreme.googlepages.com/seoexpertservices Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285652
  - 4
    - Professional Seminar - Windows Kernel Debugging An exclusive Seminar on Windows Kernel Debugging (With)Lab An unrivaled seminar first time in India. This highly technical seminar will provide a learning forum for in-depth technical knowledge on Kernel Debugging. It will provide you debugging techniques and demonstrations designed to help you avoid common pitfalls in your system design. When Windows detects an inconsistency within the operating system that's too big to ignore, it crashes and displays the infamous Blue Screen of Death. Optionally, the system also writes the contents of memory at the time of the crash to a crash dump file. The successful analysis of a crash dump requires a good background in Windows internals and data structures. But it also lends itself to a rigorous, methodical approach. Crash analysis is a skill that can be taught and learned. And that's precisely what we do in this hands-on seminar. Seminar Contents: Setup Procedures Using Windbg Symbol Setup Debugging Options Elementary Debugging Techniques Basic Kernel Debugging Techniques Multithreading debugging Stack Trace GFlags Finding out Memory leaks in User mode Finding out Memory leaks in Kernel Debugging Deadlock Driver Verifier Interpreting System Bug Check Information & Crash Dump Analysis Pre-requisite: * This is a beginner-level seminar offering for active practitioners. * All attendees are expected to understand operating system concepts in general, and the basic concepts of the Windows operating system. * Attendees must have previous hands-on experience working with Windows, including some (moderate) applications or driver level development experience. It is a hands-on class intended to give students real, practical experience in using the Windows kernel debugger (WinDBG) Why you should attend the seminar: * Learn from developers who work only with Windows. * Learn concepts & techniques by Industry professionals that you can apply over & over. * Save time and money by learning what common mistakes to avoid. * Take Aways : Windbg CD Registration on first come first serve basis. (Kindly confirm your seat with registration amount at the earliest as limited seats are offered.) Dates : January 20, 2008 Time : 2.30 to 5.30 PM (Sunday) Venue : Concepts Systems Educational Services Division 602-603, The Pentagon, Shahu College Road, Next to Pune-Satara Road, Near Panchami Hotel, Parvati. Pune - 411009. www.conceptssys.com Phone: +91-020-2421 6888 / 099606 38738 (Entry restricted to registered candidates only.) Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285651
  - 5
    - resolving relative #include statements Hi... I'm re-organizing on some of my projects, and I've run into an odd case. It's making me think that relative #include statements will match not only relative to the code doing the including but also if there is any relative match applied to any of the directories in the project's AdditionalIncludeDirectories. Is this correct? E.g. if your project has AdditionalIncludeDirectories="..\..\overhere", then a #include "..\Foo\Bar.h" in your code will find the include at either ..\Foo\Bar.h or ..\..\overhere\..\Foo\Bar.h I have a .h file that has #include "../3rdPartySource/zlib121/zlib.h" in it. Now, that directory/library was never one up and over from where this .h or vcproj were living. The actual location of the zlib.h was ../../3rdPartySource/zlib121/zlib.h In the AdditionalIncludeDirectories in the vcproj, I had AdditionalIncludeDirectories="..\include;..\..\3rdPartyBin" I was thinking the project compiled before because 3rdPartySource and 3rdPartyBin are peers, so ..\..\3rdPartyBin\..\3rdPartySource\zlib121\zlib.h was the include file found. Thanks Mark Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285632
  - 6
    - std::map problem I'm using a data structure of the type: std::map<std::set<int>,std::set<char*>>, where as you notice that the key is a set of ints and the value corresponding to it is a set of strings. However, when I try to map a key to a set of strings such that the set contains more than 20 strings, the mapped value is empty. For example if I do something like this: ---------------------------------------------- std::map<std::set<int>,std::set<char*>> mapInt2Char; std::set<int> setKey; std::set<char*> setValues; char *pChar = null; setKey.insert(1); for(i - 0;i < 25;i++) { pChar = new char[10]; sprintf(pChar,10,"%d",i); setValues.insert(pChar); } mapInt2Char[setKey] = setValues; ----------------------------- I find that the value corresponding to the key {1} in the map is empty. It works fine as long as the number of strings in the set is less than or equal to 20. I don't get this problem when the mapped value is a set of ints. Does anybody know why this is happening? I'm using VS 2005. Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285628
  - 7
    - DLLs and Sharing Memory I'm not even sure if this is actually considered 'Shared Memory', and that's partly why Googling this particular problem of mine has failed me for the most part. Please read the following and maybe you can determine the problem I'm trying to solve, and possibly point me in the right direction: I have an application, and a DLL. The application was linked to the DLL via a .lib file, and was accessing the exported functions just fine. One particular example of the relationship was this: void _stdcall GetHosts(vector<string> * vszHostsD); // In which the DLL would require a pointer to a vector<string> as input, and modify its contents. // And the application would call this function in the appropriate way: vector<string> * vszHosts; GetHost(vszHosts); MessageBox(...vszHosts.at(0).c_str()...); // The contents of the vector were filled correctly Then I noticed that on certain systems (particularly, WinXP SP1), the program failed to run. So I researched a bit, and found two solutions. 1. Add the msvc8 DLLs to my distribution, and 2. change my compiler's configuration. I opted for the latter, because my program is written entirely in Win32 API and meant to be a very small executable. My original configuration was this: Configuration Properties -> C/C++ -> Code Generation -> Runtime Library == /MD I followed some advice, and changed this value to /MT Now, the program runs on other systems, but occasionally crashes when the DLL functions are called. When debugging on my system (WinXP SP2), the application always breaks. It looks like its having trouble allocating memory correctly, or more likely, modifying memory from the calling process. I suppose this makes sense. I am not entirely sure if this qualifies as a 'Shared memory' problem, but basically I'd like those 3 lines of code above to work, on all systems, without needing to include any extra files. Code changes and compiler configurations are not a problem at all. Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks in advance, Jimmie Tyrrell Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285623
  - 8
    - [OT] - Dr Dobbs Portal Article (March 01, 2000) Hi, I recently came accross an interesting article on DDP's website: http://www.ddj.com/database/184401205?pgno=1. Unfortunately, the link to the code that was discussed in the article is no longer available. I tried contacting the author (Ben M. Faul), but received a delivery failure notification when I contacted him athe address he provided in the article. I was wondering, by chance, does anyone in here have a copy copy of the original code lying about somewhere?. If so, I'd be very grateful if you could mail it to me at the following address: takashi_[MAGIC_NUMBER]@[opposite_of_cold]mail.com Where the magic number is 950 - 1 Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285601
  - 9
    - unexpected exception handler Hello everyone, This question is about when it is allowed to call throw to re-throw exception -- make the exception re-throw. I can only think of two situations, 1. in catch block of an exception; 2. in unexpected handler. For (2), in unexpected handler, since the input parameter is null, so in order to get the exception information, we need to re-throw it and catch it to get exception informaiton. Is my understanding correct? Here is some pseudo code from Bjarne's book. [Code] // suppose throwY is unexpcted handler void throwY() throw (Yunexpected) { try{ throw; // have to re-throw and catch in order to get exception information since current input parameter is null and has no exception information, my understanding correct? } catch (Network_exception& p) { throw (Yunexpected (&p)); } catch (...) { throw (Yunexpected (0)); } } [/Code] thanks in advance, George Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285598
  - 10
    - using swap to make assignment operator exception safe Hello everyone, The following swap technique is used to make assignment operator exception safe (means even if there is exception, the current object instance's state is invariant). It used a temporary object "temp" in this sample, and assignment is made on a to temp ar first. Even if there is exception, the current this object's state is not corrupted. My question is, the pattern works only if there is no exception thrown by swap function. If there are exception in swap function, the state of current object instance may still be corrupted (swap may invoke the assignment operator of member variables). Is my understanding correct? [Code] class A; A& A::operator= (const A& a) { A temp; temp = a; // exception may be thrown swap (*this, temp); return *this; } [/Code] thanks in advance, George Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285596
  - 11
    - exporting data from a dll - unresolved externals I have a DLL project that I need to export a data variable from. I have defined the variable in a .cpp file in the project like this //C++ file (DLL Project) class MYPROJ_API data_type { //Impl here ... }; MYPROJ_API data_type exported_data; //header file (project that consumes DLL) extern MYPROJ_API data_type exported_data ; where MYPROJ_API is amacro that handles declspec import/export I checked the DLL project to ensure that the symbols are exported correctly in the generated library - and they all are there - including the exported data - yet when I try to build the other dependent project, I am getting linkage errors (unresolved externals). BTW, I have checked my library paths etc, and all is in order - anyone come accross this before? - what am I missing? Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285581
  - 12
    - VS online helo Hi there, This isn't meant to start a war as I'm honestly looking for opinions. Does anyone find the VS help as substandard as I do (for .NET in particular). I don't understand MSFT. Today's documentation is worse than what VC6 offered. Whenever I run a search (Ctrl+Alt+F3) for instance, I almost never find what I'm looking for. In fact, most of the time the topics that come up are irrelevant. You can't search previous search results (why on earth was this removed), wildcards are no longer supported, etc. What they do give us (the ability to confine a search to "Language", "Technology" and "Content "Type") is almost useless given how broad the topics listed here are (the latter two in particular). It almost never improves the search results. Even the "Index Results" can be incredibly annoying. If I type "Control class" in the "Look for" edit box for instance and then press <Enter>, the "Index Results" window that shows up at the bottom currently displays three (3) different versions of this class in VS2008 (for "presentation framework", "system.web" and "system.windows.forms" - the situation is basically the same in VS2005). You then have to pick one even though the first in the list shows up in the top (main) window automatically (which is incredibly irritating since I didn't explicitly pick it and it's almost always the wrong one). This occurs for many different classes but in reality most people are only working with one of these technologies at a time. Would it have been so difficult to provide an option to always pick the one we're working with and bring it up (say, "system.windows.forms"). And what about case-sensitve searches and regular searching in general. These are technical documents after all and they frequently require a high-degree of search precision. Lastly, and by far the worst problem, the amount of information provided for many .NET classes is woefully inadequate to get the job done. I almost always have to augment the information by conducting painful web searches when MSDN should have been the definitive source. It's also dangerous to trust anyone outside of MSFT and nobody should have to. In fact, I calculate (without exaggeration) that the program I've been working on for the past 20 months (now winding down at last) has literally taken 50% longer than the (WinAPI-based) C++ programs I used to work on (on a proportional basis). It's caused no end of grief and frustration and it's mostly been due to a serious lack of documentation. If MSFT doesn't realize how serious the problem is then they should take some advice from someone who's been working on their platforms since the XT. I don't normally denigrate MSFT (just the opposite in fact), but the docs are in serious need of a major overhaul. Tell me I'm not the only one who's suffering with these problems? End rant. Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285576
  - 13
    - I have a pointer, need to call method that takes a const I am writing a method that gets called with a pointer to a CDWordArray, I want to call the member function Copy (), which takes a const. I know I can copy each element by looping through, but there must be a better way. I feel like this should be simple and I'm just missing it. The following compiles, but fails at runtime in a call to memcpy. void CMyClass::MethodA (CDWordArray *pArray) { CDWordArray OrigArray; OrigArray.Copy (*pArray); //the memcpy is done within Copy () ... } TIA Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285572
  - 14
    - CTreeView update plus sign Hi In my VC++ 6 app I create a CTreeView with just the root element and display the GUI to the user. When I later add some child elements to the CTreeView (in response to an action in another part of the application) I find that the elements are hidden (which is fine), but no "+" sign appears by the root element to notify the user. If the user clicks where the "+" sign would be, the "+" sign appears (along with the child elements). What do I need to run when adding elements to the view to ensure that any new "+" signs appear ? Many thanks, Neil. Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285566
  - 15
    - Heap or Stack Corruptions? void CSimplusView::ProcessMovement() { CSimplusDoc *pDoc = GetDocument(); int lastcount = 0; D3DXVECTOR3 a(10.0f, 0.0f, 14.0f); D3DXVECTOR3 b(20.0f, 0.0f, 24.0f); m_iTotalCharToProcess = 1; FINFO *m_finfo = new FINFO; <<<<< Kazboom char strg[50]; I am tracking an error of my application. I've got a heap or stack corruption near m_finfo... Without knowledge of which one it actually is, I wonder if the above statements pose immediate danger or not? Thanks Jack Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285548
  - 16
    - SEO World News!!! Info for 2008 Well, the new year is finally here. If it wasn't clear enough in 2007 that phone books and print advertising is a thing of the past like the obsolete telegram. In 2008 it is part of the average businesses everyday budget to waste big money on Pay Per Click, the cold hard facts are 70% of payper click is FRAUD. Just ask any advertiser that got billed 120.00 dollars or more, and didn't get one single lead. The only answer to the dilema is organic search engine development. The main benefits of getting the best seo company http://www.atomicseo.net is that when you finally do decide to terminate services with an seo company all the link popularity and Page Rank is still there and won't just dissapear over night, it might take a few months, therefore giving you a window of advertising that you do not get when you stop paying Google. http://www.atomicseo.net Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285539
  - 17
    - slick dialogs I noticed that many CD and DVD playing programs have slick looking dialogs. Is there an easy way to create these? Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285538
  - 18
    - C Question! How to declare 8 bit types? Hello, I am trying a peice of code in VC++ which always worked in my embeded compiler. The code works fine when you pass it an address as we are suppossed to since it takes a pointer. The code however did fail when its parameters come directly from a structure. Now I would like to try this in VC++ and see if it still fails to calculate. However for me carry out the exact same test in VC++ 2003, I need to declare 8 bit type variables! I tried to use byte and small. I found the 8 bit type coded this way: __int8 or __int8 nsmall However the calculation does not get carried out right! Here is the code: ========================================== #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <conio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <malloc.h> struct xxx { __int8 a; __int8 b; __int8 c; }d[]={0,0,1}; void INC_ADDR( __int8 INCBY, __int8 *A2, __int8 *A1, __int8 *A0) { short carry; carry = (*A0 > 255 - INCBY); //If the calculation is true then carry = true (*A0) += INCBY; if (carry) { ++(*A1); if ((*A1) == 0) { (*A2)++; }} } int main(void) { INC_ADDR( 176, &(d[0].c), &(d[0].b), &(d[0].a)); INC_ADDR( 176, &(d[0].c), &(d[0].b), &(d[0].a)); return 0; } ================================================= All help appreciated! -- Best regards Robert Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285536
  - 19
    - memory leak in the code? Hello everyone, Should I delete memory pointed by pointer a if there is bad_alloc when allocating memory in memory pointed by pointer b? I am not sure whether there will be memory leak if I do not delete a. [Code] try { a = new int [N]; b = new int [M]; } catch (bad_alloc) { // if a success, but b fail, should we try to delete[] a here to avoid memory leak? } [/Code] thanks in advance, George Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285530
  - 20
    - bad_alloc Hello everyone, I am wondering except when there is no memory on heap, are there any other situations when we will get bad_alloc exceptions? For example, invalid input of the size (e.g. very huge number or zero or negative number) will cause exception? thanks in advance, George Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285522
  - 21
    - CVS interface Does anyone know if there's any plan to add a CVS interface into the next version of Visual Studio? Does anyone know of any other CVS-VSS add-on other then the following? TamTam CVS SCC http://www.daveswebsite.com/software/tamtam/index.shtml CVS SCC plug-in http://www.pushok.com/soft_download.php?idprogram=2 CVS Suite http://march-hare.com/cvsnt/ I'm looking into getting a plugin for CVS SCC, and I want to see what's available, and take into account if this interface may be included in the next version of Visual Studio. Thanks -- ----------------------------------------------- Top Ten Expert in Experts-Exchange C++ and MFC topic area. http://www.experts-exchange.com/Cplusplus ------------------------------------------------ Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285513
  - 22
    - Invalid pointer I am doing the following: InsertDependencies oInsertDependencies = pLink->GetInsertDependencies(); // ID and MustBeforeLink is _bstr_t with correct data InsertDependency* pInsertDependency = new InsertDependency((LPCTSTR) ID, (LPCTSTR) MustBeforeLink); fDebug << "Test" << endl; oInsertDependencies.push_back(pInsertDependency); // Invalid pointer On the last line, it generates the "Invalid pointer" error. The word "Test" writes out fine. InsertDependencies had the following definition. typedef std::list<InsertDependency*> InsertDependencies; Appreciate your help. -- Be Cool! Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285510
  - 23
    - SetWindowsHookEx - code example \error C2664: 'SetWindowsHookExA' : cannot convert parameter 2 from 'HOOKPROC (int,WPARAM,LPARAM)' to 'HOOKPROC' I'm trying to play with this function, and I can't get the VC++ 7.0 compiler to accept the callback func in the 2nd arg. Here's the def: HOOKPROC wireKeyboardProc( int code, // hook code WPARAM wParam, // virtual-key code LPARAM lParam // keystroke-message information ); And here's the code: SetWindowsHookEx (WH_KEYBOARD,wireKeyboardProc,NULL,0); I've tried typecasts and typdefs, to no avail. I tried passing a func with no args, but then it said HOOKPROC(void) doesn't match HOOKPROC. ??? Thanks for any help. Ihor Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285509
  - 24
    - Writing binary data to sql server Hi everybody, I need to write strings and some binary data into a (previously created) table that resides on a MS SQL server 2005. What is the best way to do this, given the facts that the write access shall be as fast as possible, that there will never be any read access and that I would like to avoid ODBC MFC classes :)....any suggestions? Best wishes, Peter Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285504
  - 25
    - unhandled exception at 0x7832530f (mfc80ud.dll) when close Hi, When i close my application i have the following error message. Unhandled exception at 0x7832530f (mfc80ud.dll) in AvatarClip.exe: 0xC0000005:Access violation reading location 0xfeeeff56. Just after that i find my cursor in winfrm.cpp file on : // detect the case that this is the last frame on the document and // shut down with OnCloseDocument instead. if (pDocument != NULL && pDocument->m_bAutoDelete) { BOOL bOtherFrame = FALSE; ------------>POSITION pos = pDocument->GetFirstViewPosition(); while (pos != NULL) { CView* pView = pDocument->GetNextView(pos); ENSURE_VALID(pView); if (pView->GetParentFrame() != this) { bOtherFrame = TRUE; break; } } if (!bOtherFrame) { pDocument->OnCloseDocument(); return; } plesae reply me as soon as possible I have tried a lot to solve this problem Athar khan Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285501
- Next
  - 1
    - STL sort throw exception? Hello everyone, In Bjarne's book, it is mentioned that sort of STL may throw exception, like sorting elements in a vector. In what situation will sort throw exception? I can not find a case. thanks in advance, George Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285497
  - 2
    - Current Directory? We're using Visual Studio 2005 (2.0 of the framework) and while I have considerable experience with VB and C#, I have not so much with VC++. I've run into something that's puzzling me, and can't find anything addressing it online (not using the proper search terms, I expect).. I'm working on an existing application which I've retrtieved from a repository. One of the pre-existing unit tests is failing, it's trying to locate a particular file using a relative path (up four levels and then down another directory branch). I added some code to see what exactly the current directory is, and it's one level higher than I expected. I was thinking it would be in the "Debug" folder (running in debug mode) inside the application's folder, which is where it normally is for C# and VB. But the current directory is one level above the Debug folder. If the current directory was the Debug folder, then the relative path would lead to the file it's looking for. These unit tests work for other developers, so it's obvious their current directories are one level lower than mine, in the "Debug" or "Release" folders. I've tried looking for some setting but don't see one out of the ordinary. Project Properties shows the output directory to be $(SolutionDir)$(ConfigurationName). What am I missing? Any help will be greatly appreciated. Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285493
  - 3
    - casting Hi I've just started using Visual C++ 2008. I'd previously being using a non-MS compiler. I get an error:- error C2664: 'MessageBoxW' : cannot convert parameter 2 from 'const char [22]' to 'LPCWSTR' for this line MessageBox(NULL, "Goodbye, cruel world!", "Note", MB_OK); it then went on to suggest I needed a cast. I'd rather not do that if I can avoid it I note that I specified MessageBox() but the error specifies MessageBoxW(). Have I somehow got some sort of wchar option turned on? I'd always assumed MessageBox would take normal C strings. -- nick keighley Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285492
  - 4
    - C++ style typecast ambiguity How screwed up am I? C++ offers two typecast styles. For example, to typecast x to an int I can do (int)x or int(x). So take a look at the following do-nothing example: void fcn() { int x, y; // Okay x; // Okay y = int(x); // Okay int(x); // NOT Okay!!!!! (int)x; // Okay } The compiler obviously treates int(x) as a declaration, as it should. However, what if I want (for whatever bizarre reason) to have a non-side effect statement consisting only of a C++ typecast? I can have such a statement for C typecasts and every other form of expression I know of, so why should this be an exception? It reminds me of the early days of C where the compound operators were =+ =- =* etc. instead of the current += -+ *= etc. Since the problem with these was seen quickly, they were changed. Oh well, I'm probably just missing something, but any thoughts are welcome. Thanks, Ray Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285465
  - 5
    - Can't compile! Hello, Most probably many of you have read my previous post entitled "Malloc code". You all have given very good feedback in that post. I am using in an embeded compiler, and one of the feedbacks this news groups suggested was a hint (I believe!) that said, since my embede compiler might slightly compile C code diffrently, I should take this code and replicate it in MS VC++ .NET to see if it compiles right before posting for help in this newsgroup thread. I am using VC++ 2003 vresion. I agree with this because if it compiles in the VC++ compiler, it will be easier for this thread to debug. Anyhow I used to code in VC++ (as a beginer!) but had to stop two years ago, and today I tried to get some code from the embeded compiler and replicated it in MSVC++ and I get an error. It has something to do with the fact that it doesn't see the other files! Here is the error: c:\_DTS_PROGRAMMING\C_PROGRAMMING\c\CCS_TESTS\Test1\Test\Main.c(6): fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'LCD.h': No such file or directory Here is the code: (Please notice this is just test code to see if I can compile in VC++) ==============================================Main.c #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <conio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <malloc.h> #include <LCD.h> #include <TCP.h> #include <LCD.c> #include <TCP.c> void TCP_CONFIG_GMM(struct MCB *MCBptrs[3]) { struct MCB *y; MCBptrs[0] = malloc(11*(sizeof(struct MCB))); y = MCBptrs[1]; } int main(void) { int a=1; struct MCB *MCBptrs[3]; TCP_CONFIG_GMM(MCBptrs); return 0; } ============================================== ===========================================LCD.h //No code for now =============================================== ===========================================LCD.c //No code for now =============================================== ===========================================TCP.h struct MCB{ int A0; int A1; int A2; }; =============================================== ===========================================TCP.c //No code for now ==================================================== I have looked in properties of VC++ but I don't know what setting I should set to rectify this error. Can someone please help. Thanking all in advace! -- Best regards Robert Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285462
  - 6
    - Dynamic linking a dll Dynamic linking a dll I want from my application choose a dll file from a directory, and see witch functions the dll have, run one of them and get the result of the function. The objective is could have more than one dll available with different functions available, to customize some operations, operations that could be specific to a costumer. This way, my application could dependently of the costumer, choose a customized function/dll that what run to do a particular operation. How can I do this? Thanks, Rui Oliveira Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285450
  - 7
    - How to import an existing folder into Visual Studio Hi, I am new to Visual Studio. We have some C++ source code along with some Lex/yacc files. Till now, we used to build on Linux. The source code is arranged in several folders and there is a makefile for each folder. The toplevel makefile calls make on each folder and then builds the final executable. I need to transfer this C++ source code onto Visual Studio to build it for windows and to use the Visual Studio's debugger. (I tried building on CL compiler using the makefile but could not make a debug build after trying all the debug options like /Zi /Z7 etc.) Can somebody tell me how I can import this whole directory structure into the Visual Studio ? I do not want to manually create the several folders and then add files to it. Ideally, It would be so good if Visual Studio could take in the Makefile and then create the directory structure itself. Can this be done ? Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285443
  - 8
    - Visual C++ 2005 redistribution not working on XP SP2 Hi, I developed simple "Hello world "application using Visual C++ 2005 then I tried to run on fresh installed XP SP2 machine. I got error message "Configuration Incorrect" . I went on Internet and made search for it. I got answer that install redistribution package for it. I installed and still my application is not running. Please let me know possible solution for it. -- With regards thanks Anand Choubey Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285434
  - 9
    - File Compressed or not? Hi All, How to find a particular file is compressed or not? I tried with FindFirstFile API. It always returns 32 as dwFileAttributes only. And IsCompressed() of CFileFind. I couldn't success here also.The input of this module is complete file path. Is there any way to find whether it is compressed or not? -- Thanks & Regards, Alex. Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285430
  - 10
    - Single Sourcing GUI - native and HTML I am wondering what tools are there to create a single source application that can be compiled for native Windows GUI and also HTML? Specifically, we have a large 10+ year old MFC application where for some parts (utilities) we want to make it Web enabled. So ideally, a DIALOG resource file converted to HTML would be something I think to start with. But I not all sure of the current state of current technology and the direction. One of the reasons we got Visual Studio 2005 a few years back was based on the recommending from a colleague who felt it would be something to do what we wanted. But I haven't gone all the way with VS2005 to port our software yet to it not knowing all that needs to be done, especially with the constant flux in the Dynamic HTML area. So essentially I would like to get the skinny on to best use these tools today to basically "single source" our applications. Any comments or insights would be appreciated. Thanks -- Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285422
  - 11
    - File map performance Hello everyone, I have several physical file and I want to use file map (MapViewOfFileEx) to map the file into memory to improve performance. Each file is about several hundred M bytes. All the memory mapped files are kept open during my application. The mapping is successful, but the strange thing is, 1. the performance to access the files which are opened at first is very fast; 2. the performance to access the files which are opened later is slower and slower (the performance to access the 10th file is very bad). Any ideas to improve performance? thanks in advance, George Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285395
  - 12
    - unmanaged resource Hello everyone, I think unmanaged resource means the resources (e.g. memory and file handler) which is used directly (new, FILE*) other than using a wrapper class (Resource Acquisition Is Initialization) or auto_ptr to wrap it. Is my understanding correct? Here is a sample about what is unmanaged resource. -------------------- http://www.gotw.ca/gotw/066.htm Moral #3: Always perform unmanaged resource acquisition in the constructor body, never in initializer lists. In other words, either use "resource acquisition is initialization" (thereby avoiding unmanaged resources entirely) or else perform the resource acquisition in the constructor body. -------------------- thanks in advance, George Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285387
  - 13
    - COM interface function calling problem using different thread Hi, I wrote an application using Google COM api. I wrote a class (name CGoogleEarthCtrl) for initialize COM interfaces and calling all COM functions. CGoogleEarthCtrl class implemented on Single-ton design. I used successfully this rapper class in my application. I faced problem when I created a thread, take instance of the CGoogleEarthCtrl class and call COM function using CGoogleEarthCtrl instance. Initially application gave me exception, "CoInitialize function not called", but why? I called CoInitialize function in rapper class. After call CoInitialize(NULL) function in thread, application gave exception on COM function calling, Unhandled exception at 0x7c812a5b in GeotelWithGE.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: _com_error at memory location 0x0123f8ec.. and statement of exception, The application called an interface that was marshalled for a different thread. Please guide where I am doing mistake? why marshaling problem is coming? what I do to fix this problem? I placed try-catch block around COM function but application is not catching exception in catch block but vs2k5 open "googleearth.tli" file. why my application is not catching exception? "googleearth.tli" file code inline HRESULT IApplicationGE::SetCameraParams ( double lat, double lon, double alt, AltitudeModeGE altMode, double Range, double Tilt, double Azimuth, double speed ) { HRESULT _hr = raw_SetCameraParams(lat, lon, alt, altMode, Range, Tilt, Azimuth, speed); if (FAILED(_hr)) _com_issue_errorex(_hr, this, __uuidof(this)); return _hr; } my application is not catching exception cause of no throw statement on library. right? Regards, -aimslife . Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285385
  - 14
    - Synchronization and volatile Hello everyone, Through myself study and previous discussion here, I share the conclusion here that, if some object is synchronized (mutex, critical section, etc.), there is no need to add volatile keyword. Here is the reference, (refer to section volatile, Critical Sections, and Race Conditions) http://www.ddj.com/cpp/184403766 if my understanding is wrong or you have any other options, please feel free to add here. thanks in advance, George Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285384
  - 15
    - reference to local variable I was reviewing some visual c++ code which appears to suffer from a reference-to-local bug. However, I didn't see any compiler warning to that effect. (I don't think that the warning level was the issue.) In this code, the offending line is of the form return (*something).somethingelse; Could it be that the lack of transparency of the variable type is preventing the warning? Is it the case that warnings can show up with return x; but not with return (*something).somethingelse; Thank you for your help, Paul Epstein Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285379
  - 16
    - decimal or hex debug display In the VC++ 6.0 IDE I can toggle the debug display between hex and decimal by checking a box under Tools/Options/Debug. Where did they hide that setting in the Visual Studio 2005 IDE? The Options/Debugging dialog has about 20 items in it and I don't see anything about hex or decimal display. Thanks. Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285373
  - 17
    - M`I,5.Persec ution . ab use in set-u p situations an d in pu blic -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= abuse in set-up situations and in. public -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Strangers in the street have recognized me on sight many times, and. shown awareness of the current thread of abuse. To give you one example, in. 1992 I was seriously ill, and a. manager at work somewhat humorously said that "it wasn't fair" that people were bullying me. A. few days later, I attended for the first time a clinic in. London as an outpatient, and on my way out was accosted by someone who asked if "they had paid my fare", with. emphasis on the. word "fare". He repeated the word several times in this different context; that they should have. paid my "fare", each time emphasizing the word. For two and a half years from the time their harassment started. until November. 1992 I refused to see a psychiatrist, because I reasoned that I was not ill of my own action or fault, but through the stress caused. by harassment, and that a lessening of the illness would have to. be consequent to a removal of its immediate cause, in other words a cessation. of harassment.. I also reasoned that since they were taunting me with jokes about mental illness, if I were to seek treatment then. the abusers would think. that they had "won" and been proved "right". Remember, the constant theme of any persecution is,. "we must destroy you because you're X", whether X is a racial or other. attribute. In this case the X was "we persecute you because you have brain. disease". The similarity of this logic to Nazi attitudes. to the mentally ill is striking. The same manager who'd. said "it wasn't fair" asked me in winter 1992 why I didn't. seek help from a psychiatrist; was it, he asked, because "they would think they had won" if I sought treatment? That was. something I'd never said. at work... again, taken separately it proves nothing, but many such things over a period. of months proves conclusively that people in the company knew what was going. on, and in quite a lot of detail. Usually harassment in public lacks the. level of finesse of "paying your fare". Most people's imagination does not go. beyond moronic parroting of the current. term of denigration. That is not surprising given the average level. of the abusers; if they do not have the intelligence to distinguish wrong from. right then neither will they have the capacity for anything other. than mindless repetition of a monosyllabic term calculated to fit into their. minds. The first incidents of verbal. assault in public were in again in the summer of 1990, although they increased in. frequency and venom with time. In July 1990 the first public incident occurred on. a tube train on the Northern line. Two men and their girlfriends recognised me; the women sprang to. my defence, saying "He looks perfectly normal, he. doesn't look ill". Their boyfriends of course knew better, and followed the party line;. one of them made. reference to an "operation", apparently to work at the tube station but implicitly to a visit that I had made to hospital a. couple of weeks previously. In August 1990 going home from college, soon after getting on a tube. train at Gloucester. Road I was followed by a group of four youths, who started a chant of abuse. That they were targeting. me was confirmed by other people in the carriage, one of whom asked. the other "who are they going on at, is it the bloke who just got on?". to which the second replied "yes, I think so". I was tempted to reply, but as in every. other instance the abusers are enabled. in their cowardice by physically outnumbering the abused; any confrontation would result in my. being beaten up, followed by a complaint to the police that "he. attacked us", and of course he's ill, so he must have been imagining that we were getting. at him. Shitty, aren't they? But the shittiness of the four youths on. the tube train is as nothing compared to the episode on the National Express. coach to Dover in the summer of 1992. While going on holiday to the. Continent I was verbally set upon by a. couple travelling sitting a few rows behind. The boy did the talking,. his female companion contributing only a continuous empty giggling noise. He spoke loudly. to ensure other people on the coach heard, always about "they" and "this bloke" but never naming either. the abusers or the person he. was talking about. He said "they" had "found somebody from his school, and he. was always really stressed at school". They must have dug deep. to find enemies there; perhaps someone who dropped out of school, someone who didn't. do too well later, who was jealous and keen to get their own back? The boy also said "he. was in a bed and breakfast for only one night. and they got him". By a not unexpected coincidence I had been in a B&B in Oxford a. week previously, which had been booked from work; other things. lead me to the conclusion that the company's offices were bugged for most of the 2 1/2 years that I was there, so "they" would have. known a room in the B&B had been booked. (But. I'll bet "they" didn't tell the company's managers their. offices were bugged, did they?). After a few minutes of this I went back. to where they were sitting and asked where. they were travelling. The boy named a village in France, and the girl's giggling suddenly ceased; presumably it permeated to. her brain cell what the purpose of the boy's abuse. was. This and other set-up situations are obviously. calculated to provoke a direct confrontation. which would bring in the police, with the abusers claiming that they were the ones attacked. Again in. 1992, outside the house where I was living in Oxford I was physically attacked. by someone - not punched, just grabbed by the coat, with some verbals thrown in. for good measure. That was something the people at work. shouldn't have known about... but soon after a couple of people were talking right in. front of me about, "I heard he was attacked". The. UK police have a responsibility for preventing assault occurring, but they do not seem. to take any interest in meeting that responsibility. I suppose their attitude is that. harassment does not come within their remit unless it involves physical assault,. and they will only become involved once that happens.. That is of course quite the wrong attitude for them to take, but as. I now understand, the police investigate only the crime they wish to investigate; if they. do not take your complaints seriously then there is nothing. you can do to make them take. action. 3263 Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285368
  - 18
    - M.I 5.Persecutio n - why wo n't the Bri tish poli ce do th eir j ob a nd pu t a sto p to i t? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= why won't. the British police do their job and put a stop to it? -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- The British police. obviously do know what is taking place. Besides my interpretations of what individual officers have. said which forces that conclusion, it would be inconceivable for them. to be unaware of something on. this scale. If they know, then they will know that the abusers have broken laws in. the UK and abroad. Recently the. UK introduced laws against electronic spying which carry a. penalty of several years jail if caught. If the police know illegal harassment is taking place,. and do nothing about it, then they are failing. in their responsibilities. Last Easter (1995). I went into the local police station in London and spoke to an officer about the harassment against me. But. I couldn't provide tangible evidence; what people said,. in many cases years ago, is beyond proof, and without something to support my statements I cannot expect. a police. officer to take the complaint seriously. The current situation with regard to the police is not one which allows. a breakthrough in dealing with the. problem. On the one hand, most individual officers at a local police station may not know about. the ongoing assaults, so. a complaint at that level will not yield results. Yet the police as an organisation do know of the harassment, and they must be aware that. a complaint has been made at a police station. So. it is clearly their duty to take preventative action against the continuing. molestation, but because the criminals are operating on behalf of a state agency, the police are. not carrying out. their duty. 833 Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285366
  - 19
    - M,I.5,Pers ecution wh y won 't th e Briti sh pol ice do their jo b a nd put a st op to i t? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= why won't the British police do their job and put a stop. to it? -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- The. British police obviously do know what is taking place. Besides my interpretations of what individual officers have. said which forces that conclusion, it would be inconceivable for them to. be unaware of something on this. scale. If they know, then they will know that the abusers have broken laws. in the UK and abroad. Recently the UK. introduced laws against electronic spying which carry a penalty of several years jail if caught. If the police. know illegal harassment is taking. place, and do nothing about it, then they are failing in their. responsibilities. Last Easter (1995) I went into the local. police station in London and spoke to an officer about the harassment against me. But I. couldn't provide tangible evidence; what people said, in many cases. years ago, is beyond proof, and without something to support my statements. I cannot expect a police officer. to take the complaint seriously. The current situation with regard. to the police is not one which allows a breakthrough. in dealing with the problem. On the one hand, most individual officers at a local police. station may not know about the ongoing assaults, so a complaint at that level will not. yield results. Yet the police as an organisation do know. of the harassment, and they must be aware that a complaint has been made at a police station. So it is clearly. their duty to take. preventative action against the continuing molestation, but because the criminals are operating on behalf of. a state agency, the police are not carrying out their. duty. 833 Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285365
  - 20
    - M,I-5,Perse cution , Berna rd Levi n ex presses hi s view s The article of which part is reproduced below. was penned by Bernard Levin for the Features section of. the Times on 21 September 1991. To my mind, it described the situation at the time and in particular a. recent meeting with a friend, during which I for the first. time admitted to someone other than my GP that I had been subjected to. a conspiracy of harassment over the previous. year and a half. >There is a madman running loose. about London, called David Campbell; I have >no reason to. believe that he is violent, but he should certainly be >approached with caution. You may know him by the curious glitter in. his >eyes and. a persistent trembling of his hands; if that does not suffice, you >will find him attempting to thrust no fewer than 48. books into your arms, >all hardbacks, with a promise that, if you should return to. the same >meeting-place next year,. he will heave another 80 at you. > >If, by now, the police. have arrived and are keeping a close watch on him, >you may feel sufficiently. emboldened to examine the books. The jackets are >a model of uncluttered typography, elegantly and simply. laid out; there is >an unobtrusive colophon of. a rising sun, probably not picked at random. >Gaining confidence - the lunatic is smiling by now,. and the policemen, who >know about such things, have significantly removed their helmets -. you >could do worse than take the jacket. off the first book in the pile. The >only word possible to describe the binding is sumptuous; real cloth in. a >glorious shade of dark green, with the title and author. in black and gold >on the. spine. > >Look at it more closely; your eyes do not deceive you - it truly. does have >real top-bands and tail-bands, in yellow, and, for good measure,. a silk >marker ribbon in a lighter green.. The paper is cream-wove and acid-free, >and the. book is sewn, not glued. > >Throughout. the encounter, I should have mentioned, our loony has been >chattering away, although what he is trying to. say is almost impossible to >understand; after a time, however,. he becomes sufficiently coherent to make >clear that he is trying to sell the books to you. Well,. now, such quality >in bookmaking today can only. be for collectors' limited editions at a >fearsome price -. #30, #40, #50? > >No, no, he says, the glitter more powerful. than ever and the trembling of >his hands. rapidly spreading throughout his entire body; no, no - the books >are priced variously at #7, #8 or. #9, with the top price #12. > >At this, the policemen understandably put. their helmets back on; one of >them draws his. truncheon and the other can be heard summoning >reinforcements on his. walkie-talkie. The madman bursts into tears, and >swears it is. all true. > >And it. is. > >David Campbell has acquired the entire rights to. the whole of the >Everyman's Library,. which died a lingering and shameful death a decade or >so ago, and he proposes. to start it all over again - 48 volumes this >September and 80 more. next year, in editions I have described, at the >prices. specified. He proposes to launch his amazing venture simultaneously >in Britain and the United States,. with the massive firepower of Random >Century at his back in this country, and the dashing cavalry. of Knopf >across the water, and. no one who loves literature and courage will forbear >to. cheer. At the time this article was written I had believed for some time. that columnists in. the Times and other journalists had been making references to my. situation. Nothing unusual about this you may think, plenty of people have the same sort of. ideas and obviously the papers aren't writing about them, so why. should my beliefs not be as false as those of others? What makes this. article so extraordinary is that three or four days immediately preceding its publication, I had a meeting with a. friend, during the course of which we. discussed the media persecution, and in particular that by Times. columnists. It seemed to me, reading the article by Levin in Saturday?s paper, that he was describing in some. detail his "artist?s impression" of that meeting. Most telling. are the final sentences, when he writes, "The. madman bursts into tears, and swears it is all true. And it is." Although I did not "burst into tears" (he seems to. be using. a bit of poetic licence and exaggerating) I did try hard to convince my friend that it was all. true; and I am able to concur with Mr Levin, because,. of course, it is. At the beginning of the piece Levin reveals a fear. of being attacked by the "irrational" subject of his story, saying "I have no reason to. believe that he is violent, but he should certainly be approached with caution".. This goes. back to the xenophobic propaganda of "defence" against a "threat" which was seen at the very beginning. of the harassment. The impression of a "madman running loose" who needs. to be controlled through an agency which assigns to itself the mantle of. the "police" is also one which had been expressed. elsewhere. In the final paragraph of. this extract, his reference to Everyman?s Library as having "died a lingering. and shameful death a decade or so ago" shows clearly what sort of conclusion they wish to their campaign. They want. a permanent solution, and as they are prevented. from achieving that solution directly, they waste significant resources on. methods which have been repeatedly shown to. be ineffective for such a purpose. 833 Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285364
  - 21
    - M'I.5 Persecuti on , Berna rd L evin express es h is vi ews The article of which part is reproduced below was penned by Bernard. Levin for the Features section of the Times. on 21 September 1991. To my mind, it described the. situation at the time and in particular a recent meeting with a friend, during which. I for the first time admitted to someone other than my GP. that I had been subjected to a conspiracy of harassment over the previous. year and a half. >There is a madman running loose. about London, called David Campbell; I have >no reason to believe that he is. violent, but he should certainly be >approached with caution. You. may know him by the curious glitter in his >eyes and a persistent. trembling of his hands; if that does not suffice, you >will find him attempting to thrust no. fewer than 48 books into your arms, >all hardbacks, with. a promise that, if you should return to the same >meeting-place next year, he will heave another 80. at you. > >If,. by now, the police have arrived and are keeping a close watch on him, >you may feel sufficiently emboldened to examine. the books. The jackets are >a. model of uncluttered typography, elegantly and simply laid out; there is >an unobtrusive. colophon of a rising sun, probably not picked at random. >Gaining. confidence - the lunatic is smiling by now, and the policemen, who >know about such things, have significantly removed their helmets -. you >could do worse than take the jacket. off the first book in the pile. The >only word possible to describe the binding is. sumptuous; real cloth in a >glorious shade of dark green, with the title and author in black and. gold >on the. spine. > >Look at it more closely; your eyes do not deceive you -. it truly does have >real top-bands and tail-bands, in yellow, and, for. good measure, a silk >marker ribbon in a lighter green. The paper is cream-wove and. acid-free, >and the book is sewn, not. glued. > >Throughout. the encounter, I should have mentioned, our loony has been >chattering away, although what he is trying to. say is almost impossible to >understand; after a time, however, he becomes sufficiently coherent. to make >clear that. he is trying to sell the books to you. Well, now, such quality >in bookmaking today can only be for collectors' limited editions at. a >fearsome. price - #30, #40, #50? > >No, no, he says, the glitter more powerful than ever and. the trembling of >his hands. rapidly spreading throughout his entire body; no, no - the books >are priced variously. at #7, #8 or #9, with the top price #12. > >At this, the policemen understandably put their helmets. back on; one of >them draws his. truncheon and the other can be heard summoning >reinforcements on his walkie-talkie. The madman bursts into. tears, and >swears it is. all true. > >And it. is. > >David Campbell. has acquired the entire rights to the whole of the >Everyman's Library, which died a lingering and shameful death a decade. or >so ago, and he proposes to start. it all over again - 48 volumes this >September and 80 more next year, in editions. I have described, at the >prices specified. He proposes. to launch his amazing venture simultaneously >in Britain and the United. States, with the massive firepower of Random >Century at his. back in this country, and the dashing cavalry of Knopf >across the water, and no one who loves. literature and courage will forbear >to. cheer. At. the time this article was written I had believed for some time that columnists. in the Times and other journalists had been making references to my situation. Nothing unusual. about this you may think, plenty of people have. the same sort of ideas and obviously the papers aren't writing about them, so why should my beliefs not be as. false as those of others? What makes this article. so extraordinary is that three or four days immediately preceding its publication, I had a meeting. with a friend, during the course of. which we discussed the media persecution, and in particular that by Times columnists. It seemed to. me, reading the article by Levin in Saturday?s paper, that he was describing in some. detail his "artist?s. impression" of that meeting. Most telling are the final sentences, when he writes, "The madman bursts into tears,. and swears it is all true. And. it is." Although I did not "burst into tears" (he seems to be using a bit of poetic licence and exaggerating) I did try hard. to convince my friend that it was all. true; and I am able to concur with Mr Levin, because,. of course, it is. At the beginning of the piece. Levin reveals a fear of being attacked by the "irrational" subject of his story, saying "I. have no reason to believe that he is violent, but he should certainly be approached with. caution". This goes back to the xenophobic propaganda of "defence" against. a "threat" which was seen at the very beginning of. the harassment. The impression of a "madman running loose" who needs to be controlled through an. agency which assigns to itself the. mantle of the "police" is also one which had been expressed. elsewhere. In the. final paragraph of this extract, his reference to Everyman?s Library as having "died a lingering and shameful. death a decade or so ago" shows clearly what sort of conclusion they wish to. their campaign. They want a permanent solution, and. as they are prevented from achieving that solution directly, they waste significant resources on methods which. have been repeatedly shown to. be ineffective for such a purpose. 5693 Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285363
  - 22
    - M`I,5`Pe rsecution . w ho kn ows abou t i t? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= who knows. about it? =- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Many people know, both in the. establishment and media, and among the general. public. Despite an absence of its target from the UK for more than two years, the echoes of paranoia can still be. heard loud and clear from across. the water. When it started in 1990, the only people who knew were those in BBC television who. were spying on my home, and a few radio broadcasters. There were a few cases of public harassment, but. very little compared to the situation that developed a couple of. years later. The list today includes BBC. TV staff (newsreaders such as Martyn Lewis, Michael. Buerk, Nicholas Witchell), people from radio stations such as Chris Tarrant of Capital and Radio 1 DJs, people in. the print media, but also. many people in the general public. All united in a conspiracy which breaks the laws which. the UK does have regarding harassment, and all completely uncaring for any. semblance of decency or elementary respect for individual. rights. The British police (obviously) do. know the nature of the harassment and in all probability the identity of those behind it. Some. time ago I made a complaint to my local police station in London, without. positive result. The UK police are failing in their duty to see. the law enforced in not checking. the abuse. 3263 Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285362
  - 23
    - M,I.5,Persecut ion ' h ow and w hy d id it start ? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= how. and why did it start? -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- The harassment didn't. start by itself, so someone must have been there at the outset to give it. a firm push and set the "animals" after me. It looks as if I was set up in June 1990, and the. timing indicates someone from university was. responsible. >One thing which has been missing from this discussion. is this simple >prognosis: that maybe he is right and that,. despite his admitted >mental condition, there. really is a campaign against him organised by >now-influential ex-students. of his university. In May or June 1990, Alan Freeman on Radio 1 read out a. letter from someone who had known me for a few years, who wrote of the one who "wore out. his welcome. with random precision" (from the Pink Floyd song). Freeman went on to say to the writer "that's a hell of a. letter you wrote there". The indication is strongly. that people I had parted from soon before nursed a grudge against me and were trying to cause. trouble for me. The suggestion is that Freeman might have shown the. letter to other people, and things could have snowballed from. there. Right from the start the real source (security services presumed) didn't announce themselves. as the origin, but let the. "talkers", the radio DJs, believe that they were the originators. Think about it; if. you announce, "we're MI5 and we have a campaign against this bloke" then people might not go. along with it; but if you say, "everyone else is getting at this bloke because he. 'deserves' it" then people will join in with. fewer qualms. >Why would "they" wish. to assassinate your character? It's the classic case of hitting. a cripple to prove you're stronger. Why would the security services expend hundreds of thousands of pounds. and more than six years of manpower to try to. kill a British citizen? Because they are motivated by. people who knew me at university and feel personal animosity; because they knew me to be emotionally weak, and it. is in the nature of bullies to prey on those known to be weak; and because. they can rely on the complicity of the establishment, which. the security services manipulate and derive. funding from. This is England's biggest humiliation today, and the British security services. are intent on preventing their humiliation becoming reality by continuing their campaign. of attempted murder to suppress the truth from. becoming public. 833 Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285360
  - 24
    - M-I'5`Persecutio n . h ow an d wh y d id it star t? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -=. how and why did it start? -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- The harassment didn't start by itself, so someone. must have been there at the outset to give it a firm push and set the "animals". after me. It looks as if I was set up in June 1990, and. the timing indicates someone from university. was responsible. >One thing which has been missing from this discussion is. this simple >prognosis: that maybe he is. right and that, despite his admitted >mental condition, there really is a campaign against. him organised by >now-influential ex-students of. his university. In. May or June 1990, Alan Freeman on Radio 1 read out a letter from someone who had known me for a few years, who. wrote of the one who "wore out his welcome. with random precision" (from the Pink Floyd song). Freeman went on to say to the writer "that's a. hell of a letter you wrote there". The indication is strongly that people I had parted from soon before nursed. a grudge against me and were trying to cause trouble. for me. The suggestion is that Freeman might. have shown the letter to other people, and things could have snowballed from there.. Right from the start the real source (security services presumed). didn't announce themselves as the origin,. but let the "talkers", the radio DJs, believe that they were the originators. Think about it; if you announce, "we're MI5 and. we have a campaign against. this bloke" then people might not go along with it; but if you say, "everyone else is getting at this. bloke because he 'deserves' it" then people will join in with. fewer qualms. >Why would "they" wish to assassinate. your character? It's the classic. case of hitting a cripple to prove you're stronger. Why would the security services expend hundreds of thousands of. pounds and more than six years of manpower to try to kill a British. citizen? Because they are motivated by people who knew me at. university and feel personal animosity; because they knew me to be. emotionally weak, and it is in the nature of bullies to prey on those known to be weak; and. because they can rely on the. complicity of the establishment, which the security services manipulate and. derive funding from. This is England's biggest humiliation today, and the British security services are. intent on preventing their humiliation becoming reality by. continuing their campaign of attempted murder to suppress the. truth from becoming public. 10553 Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285359
  - 25
    - Problem with porting from 2003 I have a very strange problem with an application that I have been porting from VS 2003 to VS 2005. I started this with Visual C++ 6.0, so it's all nmake based, so it's not the IDE I am having problems with - it's the compiler. I have a system with a fairly large number of libraries. I build each of these libraries as a DLL for development purposes. When I ship the application, I do a static link. I change a directive call PUBLIC from dllimport to dllexport appropriately as a either use a library, or build a library. When I do a static link, PUBLIC is defined to be blank. The approach works well as it reduces the cycle time for the compile link. It also forces cleaner partitioning of the system. The configuration can build libraries with circular dependency, but I usually avoid this. Anyway, all this worked sweetly with VS 2003. Now, with VS 2005, for some of the libraries, I receive the following cryptic error: C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\VC\ATLMFC\INCLUDE \afxcoll.h(689) : error C2248: 'CObject::CObject' : cannot access private member declared in class 'CObject' C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\VC\ATLMFC\INCLUDE \afx.h(551) : see declaration of 'CObject::CObject' C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\VC\ATLMFC\INCLUDE \afx.h(522) : see declaration of 'CObject' This diagnostic occurred in the compiler generated function 'CPtrList::CPtrList(const CPtrList &)' This occurs near the end of the compile and does not tell me the line in my code that has initiated the problem. I did some reverse engineering of this and found the class that seemed to be causing this. It was a derivative of a Rogue Wave Stingray class (call it class DERIVED). I was compiling a file in one directory, including the header for DERIVED located in another directory. The class DERIVED was prefixed with dllimport and all the classes in the library being built are prefixed with dllexport. The reason I am mentioning this is that I think its the import/export mechanism that is failing. When I move the file that failed compilation to the same directory as DERIVED, the file compiles! It seems to me that this must be a bug. Another point to note is that I am make very extensive usage of templates in my own code. Has anyone seen something like this? Thanks, Stan ps I tried the same code with VS 2008 and receievd the same failure. Tag: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map Tag: 285358

I am using Visual C++ Express 2008 and I am new to the .net world so I
just need to know what I can do to get a map object out of .net.

using these includes

#include <cliext/hash_map>
#include <cliext/hash_set>
#include <cliext/map>

and

declaring a map like this or this
cliext::map<int,int>^ m_map1;

or this

cliext::hash_map<int,int>^ m_map2;

gets me an error something like this.
error LNK2020: unresolved token (060000E8)
cliext.hash_map<int,int>::Clone

and if I try
cliext::map<int,int>^ m_map1;

I get an error like this.
error LNK2020: unresolved token (060000E8) cliext.map<System::String
^,System::String ^>::Clone

what my end goal is a simple map from a string to a class of mine,
I would assume I need something like this eventually
cliext::map<String^,CMyClass^>^ m_map1;
but I would first like to get some form of map working. and am having
a hard time getting google to tell me the answer.

Thanks in advance
Howie

Top

Re: issues with cliext::map and cliext::hash_map by Alexander

Alexander
Wed Jan 09 13:27:46 CST 2008

Wrong group. C++/CLI questions should go here instead:

microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vc

--
=====================================
Alexander Nickolov
Microsoft MVP [VC], MCSD
email: agnickolov@mvps.org
MVP VC FAQ: http://vcfaq.mvps.org
=====================================

"hswerdfe" <google.com@howard.swerdfeger.com> wrote in message
news:ba2c4940-6b32-409f-bb21-09ae6ee60517@r60g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>I am using Visual C++ Express 2008 and I am new to the .net world so I
> just need to know what I can do to get a map object out of .net.
>
> using these includes
>
> #include <cliext/hash_map>
> #include <cliext/hash_set>
> #include <cliext/map>
>
> and
>
> declaring a map like this or this
> cliext::map<int,int>^ m_map1;
>
> or this
>
> cliext::hash_map<int,int>^ m_map2;
>
> gets me an error something like this.
> error LNK2020: unresolved token (060000E8)
> cliext.hash_map<int,int>::Clone
>
> and if I try
> cliext::map<int,int>^ m_map1;
>
> I get an error like this.
> error LNK2020: unresolved token (060000E8) cliext.map<System::String
> ^,System::String ^>::Clone
>
> what my end goal is a simple map from a string to a class of mine,
> I would assume I need something like this eventually
> cliext::map<String^,CMyClass^>^ m_map1;
> but I would first like to get some form of map working. and am having
> a hard time getting google to tell me the answer.
>
> Thanks in advance
> Howie

Top