Paul
Thu Jun 08 13:25:58 CDT 2006
"mayayana" <mayaXXyana1a@mindXXspring.com> wrote in message
news:wYVhg.10525$921.7356@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
>> I am looking to do a lot of scritpt writing training on my one. I have
> found
>> Don Jones training at
>>
http://www.scriptingoutpost.com/category.aspx?categoryID=3 as was looking
> for
>> comments.
>> I am wanting to start with some type of classroom training without having
> to
>> sit in the class all day. More of an hour a day type of thing...
>>
>> Any thought?
>
<snip>
> In the case of Microsoft, it's part of their business model
> to continually change the technology and then offer overpriced
> courses, often with trumped-up "certifications". Since all
> their stuff constantly changes, there are always courses to
> take. (Interestingly, there was an article linked at Slashdot
> recently indicating that people with Microsoft certification
> had less chance at getting jobs because so many people are
> getting certification *instead of* experience.)
I don't think there's anything wrong with getting Microsoft certifications
per se. What is objectionable is the mis-representation of the amount of
knowledge required to do the job properly, and this is where the disparity
between the candidates hopes, and the employers disappointment arises. The
sheer volume of material to be learned and understood in order to
successfully build, configure and maintain servers under Win 2000 including
all the resource books and all the possible configurations required is
vast - but this is not pointed out by the certificate sellers. According to
them you can take a 5, 10, 15, or 20 day course and then become an *expert*
in Win*** for only $xxxxxx thousand pounds or dollars! This is rubbish.
The Microsoft courses themselves in order to be "delivered" in only five
days necessarily skim the subject and have to be closely tailored to the
exam questions. No wonder employers complain about certificate holding IT
personnel of little use to them.
I self - studied MCSE NT4 and it took for ever, months of my time off work
to get the six exams because I was thorough about it, because I couldn't see
how you could do the job without having tested every process in practice.
Of course it would be far cheaper to pay for the 5 or 10 day courses and get
back to work but knowing what? The whole system is screwed. These courses
should be two years at further education colleges but it isn't set-up like
that is it?
Sorry, this has nothing to do with .vbs (which I am presently learning
slowly) but I know how you feel about M$
Incidentally I did follow the link given to the Sapien stuff and I have to
say it looked ok and I don't mind the money for VS101, I thought it looks
ok.
Paul