Re: PowerArchiver (good and bad) by mayayana
mayayana
Thu Sep 06 18:40:02 PDT 2007
> Mayayana, I followed your advice about PowerArchiver (from
> a previous posting recommending it), and have some good-and-
> bad feedback.
>
> Good: It does what you say, and seems a powerful package.
>
> Bad: When you install P.A. it inserts itself into EVERY
> context menu in the system, with always two, and sometimes
> four extra context menu entries. I found this to be
> _EXTREMELY_ annoying. Ever since installing P.A. I have
> been fiddling with the registry, cleaning up those extra
> context menus entries one-by-one, and muttering curses under
> my breath for every context menu that I had to clean up.
>
I noticed that it adds a "New" context menu.
And I share your feeling about that sort of thing.
I finally made a VBScript shortcut to start Paint
Shop Pro at one point because it drove me crazy
that PSP would add to the context menu on every
start-up without asking! (So I wrote the script to
start PSP, wait 10 seconds, then clean the Registry.)
I'm not really a cheerleader for PA. I've found
that it doesn't really handle some of the exotic
types that it claims to, like tar.gz. I have to use
7-Zip for that.
But I like to tell people about PA 6.1 (the last free
version) because it pretty much does everything one
needs in a zip program. It works dependably. It's free.
And zip-ing is really not such a big deal. There are lots
of free zip programs around. I imagine most of them
probably work fine. (Though I don't know how common
it is to have SFX capability.) It amazes me that WinZip
has made a permanent business out of endless updates
to the same basic, overpriced program that really just
does zip-ing... And as far as I know their code is actually
derived from the free Info-ZIP code, anyway.
PA eventually took the approach of copying everything
about WinZip, getting more bloated and "wizard-infested"
with each new version. But the older, free version is
relatively clean, once one gets rid of the "tip-of-the-day"
nonsense.