linker?

Hi, I'd like to have my exe running without framework.
I've seen postbuild xenocode but it 's not for me...
Is there a way to have a self-executing exe without framework and
having small filesize?
Thanks for your attention

Spam
Thu Mar 13 13:58:06 CDT 2008

Alcibiade <panda17x@libero.it> wrote in news:0bd52b18-5f23-4e9c-a836-
19d4f25d6740@n75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:

> Hi, I'd like to have my exe running without framework.
> I've seen postbuild xenocode but it 's not for me...
> Is there a way to have a self-executing exe without framework and
> having small filesize?

Nope.


--
spamhoneypot@rogers.com (Do not e-mail)

Armin
Thu Mar 13 13:57:52 CDT 2008

"Alcibiade" <panda17x@libero.it> schrieb
> Hi, I'd like to have my exe running without framework.
> I've seen postbuild xenocode but it 's not for me...
> Is there a way to have a self-executing exe without framework and
> having small filesize?

No. Used VC++ without making use of managed extensions for this purpose.
But maybe you need some VC runtimes.


Armin

kimiraikkonen
Thu Mar 13 14:03:57 CDT 2008

On Mar 13, 8:27=A0pm, Alcibiade <panda...@libero.it> wrote:
> Hi, I'd like to have my exe running without framework.
> I've seen postbuild xenocode but it 's not for me...
> Is there a way to have a self-executing exe without framework and
> having small filesize?
> Thanks for your attention

If your program is programmed in VB with .NET, one chance would be
downgrading and compiling your project in VB6 and if you succeed
converting your project to VB6, you won't need .NET framework any
longer for your application.

Spam
Thu Mar 13 15:17:35 CDT 2008

kimiraikkonen <kimiraikkonen85@gmail.com> wrote in news:ad2a519c-4f68-4729-
8946-9d18b2bc352f@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com:

> If your program is programmed in VB with .NET, one chance would be
> downgrading and compiling your project in VB6 and if you succeed
> converting your project to VB6, you won't need .NET framework any
> longer for your application.

The changes between .NET and VB6 are so radically that you might as well
rewrite the application in VB6.

--
spamhoneypot@rogers.com (Do not e-mail)

kimiraikkonen
Thu Mar 13 15:35:42 CDT 2008

On Mar 13, 10:17=A0pm, Spam Catcher <spamhoney...@rogers.com> wrote:
> kimiraikkonen <kimiraikkone...@gmail.com> wrote in news:ad2a519c-4f68-4729=
-
> 8946-9d18b2bc3...@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
>
> > If your program is programmed in VB with .NET, one chance would be
> > downgrading and compiling your project in VB6 and if you succeed
> > converting your project to VB6, you won't need .NET framework any
> > longer for your application.
>
> The changes between .NET and VB6 are so radically that you might as well
> rewrite the application in VB6.
>
> --
> spamhoney...@rogers.com (Do not e-mail)

I agree, though OP manages to implement the appropriate classes into
VB6, there are also some subroutine / procedure, variables... changes
between two versions.

Good link:
http://www.thescarms.com/vbasic/vb6vsvbnet.aspx

Cor
Thu Mar 13 23:42:34 CDT 2008

Alcibiade,

There are options, but that means that you have to buy runtimes, that is not
free while the effect will be the same (or better said "worse").

Be aware that if there was no framework, the Exes would be probably than 10
times larger, as they are in Net normally extremely small as we compare that
with all kind of others Exe's from the past.

Cor

"Alcibiade" <panda17x@libero.it> schreef in bericht
news:0bd52b18-5f23-4e9c-a836-19d4f25d6740@n75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> Hi, I'd like to have my exe running without framework.
> I've seen postbuild xenocode but it 's not for me...
> Is there a way to have a self-executing exe without framework and
> having small filesize?
> Thanks for your attention