windows defender definition updates

TheMSsForum.com: The Microsoft Software Forum

The MSS Forum ‹ Security
- Archive
  - Biz
  - MCSE
  - CRM
  - Drivers
  - Framework
  - ADO
  - ASP
  - Compact
  - Forms
  - Dotnet
  - C#
  - VB
  - FontpageGen
  - Excel
  - WorkSheet
  - Exchange
  - Setup
  - Fox
  - Fontpage
  - ASP
  - IIS
  - Entourage
  - Money
  - Messanger
  - PocketPC
  - Powerpoint
  - Project
  - Publisher
  - Excel
  - VB
  - Security
  - Portal
  - Services
  - SQLServerDev
  - SVCS
  - SQLServer
  - VB
  - VC
  - MFC
  - ExcelGen

- Previous
  - 1
    - Loading a flash page Hi Can anyone help me. I am working on a client PC on a Windows 2003 Server, I have recently signed up for a training course that I wish to run through the internet and the website uses flas to run the course. When I logon to the site it will not load the training page on the client pc's, if I try to access the training course on the server I can go directly in. It seems to be that the proxy server is blocking it. Has anybody got any suggections on this??? Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82936
  - 2
    - Media Player DRM Update HELP!! I have tried downloading the security update for Media Player 10 from http://drmlicense.one.microsoft.com/indivsite/en/indivit.asp but everytime I try I receive the following error message after pressing the "Upgrade" button: "Windows media player cannot play the file because a network problem occurred. Verify that you are connected to the network and try again", even though I am connected. I have XP SP2. My Media Player has all other updates applied. Any help appreciated. Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82933
  - 3
    - Is Welfare Part of Capitalism? This article is dedicated to: A man I met, with most of his body heavily burned, simply because he was a Chinese during the 1998 May Riot in Indonesia. Lots of capitalists that are slaughtered during the cultural evolution. Ten thousands of peaceful smugglers that are massacred in Banda island by the Dutch for conducting peaceful spice trade and all that are similar to them. All minority groups and individuals that face discrimination, even genocide, for economically contributing too much for their society. All customers that have to pay higher products due to protection of tariff and trades. Productive people that are fined with income tax for the victimless crime of making honest money. Smart students that are slowed down so not to move too fast. Industries that do not get subsidy, or even banned to protect unproductive industry and laborers that earn much less due to such restrictions. Poor starving people that could have been rich had their countries choose to embrace free market. Women and males that are trapped in unhappy marriage which they have a hard time getting out. Women and children that have lots of their best choices taken under the pretext of protection. Immigrants and refuges. Is welfare part of capitalism? In short, no. In consensually, punishing the productive through income tax to reward parasitic behavior is the biggest affront against the principle of free market. In fact, from many governments intervention in economy, the one that proponents of free market often oppose the most is welfare. However, when we look further, capitalism and welfare is not really total opposites. Most importantly, properly done, a straight forward welfare program can cause less market distortion, and hence an efficient replacement to buy votes from losers, than farm subsidies, public schools, minimum wage, trades restrictions, tariffs, and sex laws. If it's done by taxing wealth, rather than income, the amount of market distortion can be minimized further. Welfare is also cheap. It'll cost $5000/year to a welfare recipient in USA, for example. However, we need to remember that the recipients' lifestyle worth only $500. The other $4500 goes to implicit welfare due to higher living costs. That implicit welfare includes minimum wage, immigrations laws, and food subsidy, or protections. If somehow a straight forward explicit welfare program can replace all relatively more evil governments' interventions, then capitalists are probably better of not opposing welfare so much. Even Milton Friedman supports schemes called guaranteed minimum income, which is like welfare but with much less market distortion. That's not where the similarity ends. One of the main creeds of capitalism is that consent and competition should be preferred over force. Without that consent, anyone can simply make us choose to make our self worst of under the pretext that it is for our own good. In fact, most laws against consensual acts can be traced down to protection of some disgruntled competitors often done under the pretext of the consenting parties' own good. Anti prostitution and anti polygamy laws, for example, is there to ration females to poor dumb males under the pretext of protecting the consenting women. Of course, all natural resources tend to be rationed somewhat proportional to ones' voting power. And that does explain why democracy and anti polygamy laws go hand in hand too. One man one vote soon leads to one man one wife. Well, at least Matt Ridley agrees with me and he's a well known mainstream scientific researchers. I guess that's also why so many uncompetitive people want to ensure that evolution theory is not taught in school. You can also read a famous psikiatrist book, "The road less traveled," you'll see that life long monogamous marriage is just a trap to prevent highly desirable people from being available to those who they want more, and romance is just the lure to that trap. On the women side, anti pornography laws is really meant to prevent highly desirable women from advertising her assets and hence protecting less pretty women from the higher industry standard a public display of superior desirability might cause. Countries that embrace porn tend to have prettier women. Where did all the unsexy ones go? They're all shifting out of the gene pool, and hence are doing their best to oppose porn preaching religious doctrines that men should judge women based on any features but beauty, which they can't offer. Another issue is consent. Welfare program is not consensual; however, it's relatively more consensual then civil war. In ancient time, when we have different ideological opinions, we end up killing each other to proof who are "right." The Catholic would kill the Gnostic, the Sunni would kill the Shiah. One King would kill the other. A younger prince will argue that the older prince is demon. Might makes right. Such differences of opinions are of course solved with war, which is a very cost inefficient way to know who're "right." However it does work in some subjective practical sense. If we look in the past and try to figure out whether the Gnostic or the Catholic is the one that's heretical or "right" respectively, we need only to see who won. The Gnostics are slaughtered, so they must be the heretic, or do they? At least I bet there are way more people in the world that think that way than the other way around, excluding me actually. It doesn't matter how many books many institutionalized religions burned, how much restrictions of freedom of speech and irrationality they embraced, how many witnesses they snuffed outs and all other techniques that would not have stand the scrutiny of a peer reviewed scientific journal, or even a reasonable jury in the court of law. Too many people don't believe who are right and reasonable, they believe who are mighty. Right or wrong, the win will always become right anyway. Now, under democratic context, we don't kill those who oppose us, rather we try to persuade enough people to join our cause. How do we persuade them? By money of course. Welfare program is then a reasonably cost efficient method to buy votes. When too many people are on a side, we will sort of know that going to war will hurt the other side; hence we comply anyway with the whim of majority avoiding the costly alternatives. While not ideal, this is indeed how right and wrong is really decided, proper assessments of each sides' bargaining position and mutually cherished compromised line of war, plus a bunch of lies covering what's going on to safe each sides' face. No matter how noble the purpose, lies and prejudices lead to misunderstanding, that leads to more war. Hence, the best contribution is simply to unmask all lies. All in all, peaceful democracy is indeed a more cost efficient ways to measure ones' bargaining position. While democracy often lead to decisions opposites of freedom, like popularly supported victimless crime, income tax, and welfare, it's indeed relatively more cost efficient than civil war. That's not when the coherency end. Various natural laws restrict various possible political outcomes. We can't expect a stone will fly to the sky when we drop it as much as we cannot expect a human to be generally unselfish. If we want to kill our enemies, we'll do well dropping a big stone on top of our enemies head rather than dropping the stone on top of our own head expecting the stone to somewhat magically fly to the enemies head. The same way, we can't demand market distortion and expect that the best and brightest among us to still magically be a nice tax payer rather than dictators and corruptors. In a country where selling porn or building a good franchise chain is more difficult and less lucrative than becoming a dictator, guess what the smart would end up doing? Ask Saddam. If we want rich and prosperous countries, we must know that it will and only will happen when we properly align individuals' interests with productivity. Such coherency tends to make certain things come in package with another. We can expect that moving electric field will induce magnetic field. The same way, in life, we observe similar things. Communism and socialism, for example, always come in package with dictatorship and corruptions when smart people realize that being dictators pay more than building a business empire. To the opposite capitalistic countries comes in package with softer deals for losers, such as, guess what, welfare. We know from our economic classes that free market capitalism brings prosperity within market mechanism. However, it turns out that the prosperity that free market brings also profit the less successful beyond market mechanism. Capitalism and the prosperity that come with it tend to facilitate ideological changes in ways that benefit the less successful. One such ideological change is the popular support for losers' benefits. One such benefit is, guess what, welfare. The most obvious samples of such ideological shifts the free market bring are the elimination of slavery in US. What happened? As usual, the northern part of America is an industrial country. At that time, steel industries are relatively more modern than the farming industry. Higher tech industry increase labors' productivity. When labor's productivity goes up, entrepreneurs will want to hire as many workers as possible. Hence, labors' salary will go up. This will kill of industries with less labor's productivity. At the end, the marginal productivity of labors in the least productive industry will go up. That value is labors' salary. Under competitive equilibrium, the more productive and efficient a person is, the more he benefits everyone in the chain of productivity except those similar to him. Hence, an entrepreneurs coming up with ways to improve labors' productivity would benefit everyone, including workers and consumers, at the expense of other entrepreneurs and capitalists. Read that Karl Marx! Then what? When labors' salary goes up, obviously labors will move to the employers that pay them higher. Hence, farm labors in the south want to move to the north. They can't do so legally though because they were slaves. Hence, the northern capitalists in US want to free slaves so they can hire more workers. And then the southern capitalists in US want to keep slavery. This then results in war. The bigger the labors' productivity, the more intensive capitalists have to free slaves. The more supporters there will be on a cause the more likely the cause won. Hence, slaves were freed. Unfortunately, people still want to help losers and buy votes from those who are too expensive and too stubborn to switch. That explains why the farms in US gets subsidy. If losing means not as successful as the other, then there will always be losers. However, we see how free market shifts the worlds' system in ways that benefits the losers too. Unlike the commies' propaganda, capitalism does not cause or even enlarge disparity of wealth. Capitalism only changes the way such disparity are earned to the benefits of all. At the end of the warring states period in China, the king of Chin, Shih Huang Ti, and his prime minister, Li Si were the winner. Within one generation they have all their family slaughtered. If that's what winning means, what did losing means in pre-capitalistic countries? In ancient time, losing meant having all the males slaughtered, enslaved, or castrated and all the females raped and winning means risking your whole family slaughtered by rebels. In socialists countries the rich are corruptors and dictators that slice each other throats while the poor are starving. Now, thanks to the prosperity only free market can bring, losing means they can leave on welfare, with plenty of chance to climb back and proof their worth, like J. K. Rowling. Now, slaves are so free and highly paid thanks to increase in labors' productivity. In fact, when slave jobs are moving to China under globalization, slaves in US refused to be emancipated and want to keep their slave jobs in US rather than evolving into entrepreneurs. So, much for the land of the free and the place of the brave. Some people don't mind dying for what they believe in but are too scared to start a business. Evolutions will fix that I guess. Free market gives abundances to everyone. The benefits the free market brings benefit those less capable from being successful not only within the system but also through non market mechanism, like the ending of slavery and the start of reverse slavery we call welfare. But how do those really work? Is there a general principle? Each of us is greedy and selfish that we want as many as possible for us. Humans' greed and selfishness is an undisputable scientific facts, as sure as the sun rise in the east, as sure as a stone will fall to the ground pulled by gravity. We're not just greedy and selfish. Greed and selfishness doesn't explain all the war, suffering, and poverty we face. In fact, greed is good. Properly aligned, under free market, the greatest among us shall be the one productively providing the best service to the most customers. Blessed be the productive because they'll be rich. This will encourage higher and higher standard of living that we are currently enjoying. Free market allows those who serve more to grow richer. To those who have more profit, to those more capital are given. Even kingdom of heaven don't mind using this nice positive feedback effect. Who needs new deals to break up companies? Also, women prefer the rich. The next time you watch soap opera, make sure it's made in some country with the highest IQ in the world, like Hong Kong. Free sex means richer males will consensually attract and mate with more women producing more kids. That's the whole point of getting rich by the way. Duh? In fact, that's what being a living human male is all about: 1. Gain control ship of as much money or power as possible. 2. Attract or in anyway acquire as many females as possible. 3. Make kids. 4. Use that kids as tools to make grand children. You bet it's right because it's science. Of course, they don't teach this important fact in biology class because government interfere in education. Hence, when we're free, without genocide, without war, even with humanitarians aids given to appease enemies, the meek will indeed inherit the earth. More than greedy and selfish, some humans are simply not humans because they embrace the root of all evil, envy. That explains why we have so many laws against mutually beneficial consensual acts and governments regulations to protect us from our own choices. The truth is, all those laws and restrictions are more often not there to protect stupid people from making mistakes. All such laws are there to prevent the smart from making the right choices. That's why, for example, every body has to move equally slowly in school, to prevent the smart from moving faster. That's why various reproductive techniques are politically incorrect proportional to the expected quality of genetic material that will be duplicated. In particular, life long monogamous marriage, free sex, prostitution, polygamy, and cloning are sequences that both have increasingly expected value of genetic quality outcome and politically incorrectness. In Europe and China, the smart monks are encouraged not to get married. When some minority groups don't buy the bullshit and hence greatly improving their productively earned wealth and genetic quality, such minority groups somehow become victims of genocide. Life is like a real time strategy games. That means when we're not at war, we're in a race. That's simply how we evolve. Morality, religions, and ideologies, are stuffs created by really smart people to persuade us to run backward. Peace means we're in a race. Freedom means we are in a competition. Some people just don't want to compete. Hence, they craft lies and prejudices against those who are in front preventing progress to prosperity. I'll tell you the scientific truth. It's from the fruit we knows the tree. Anyone opposing free trades and globalization is more evil than Hitler or Nazi. If only Japan and German could have acquired natural resources through consensual peaceful trade, Nazism wouldn't have been popular there and Hitler wouldn't have risen to power. With his mass hypnotic skills, he may have ended up as seminar speaker I guess. If only those who had wanted to incite the Second World War see all the miracles and prosperity the free market brings, they would have repented and embrace free market. Yet, after all the prosperity and wealth the free market is bringing to all of us, still many people choose to oppose competition, and hence, miss-properly align our interests from productivity. That is the cause of all evil in the world. All causes opposing free market can be negotiated and appeased. However, if the very thing that a group of people want to prevent is the success of the others, then the situation is pretty much kill or be killed zero sum game. How does such situation usually end up? What would be our optimum solutions for such situation? Under normal circumstances, an optimum solution of any business decisions is a solution where the marginal revenue equals to the marginal costs. Hence, in a zero sum game, each party will try to maximize its benefit to that point. Sometimes, the marginal costs have a spike. There is a certain point where increasing a resources allocation beyond a certain point will create adverse costs. For example, increasing the number of labors will increase revenue. After a certain point, increasing one additional labor will mean buying a new machine or building a new factory. We may end up choosing to do it, we may not. In either case, discretions are the better part of the valor when it comes to that line. The same way, in most countries, each of us can increase our profits using property we own or consensually rent. When we maximize our profit that way, the public will, ideally and some times truly, not interfere, and defend us from being prevented to enjoy our "rights" by others. However, when we start using others' property to maximize our gain, say by stealing, public opinions may shift from protecting us to against us. Hence, the choice whether we should steal or not depends on the extra costs of crossing the politically correctness line of war. If a person sees that the potential gain justifies the increase costs of public support shifts, he'll still steal and make a great career out of it. Otherwise he'll stop stealing while coming up with a pretext to justify his cowardly decisions, such as morality. But what do the people choose their reaction to a specific act like stealing? They do so based on their sense of fairness, justice, and right-wrong discernment. How do people get that sense? From ideology. The ideology, religions, or whatever, then decides the line of war where the rest of us should consider before crossing. But how does the line gets drawn? By estimates of bargaining position. Let's examine an example. Is the King (or Queen?) of England the King of France? Don't know. How do we know? In the beginning, a ruling class from France went to England and become king of England. Then they lost control of France. Hence, king of England wanted to take back the controls they have lost. Well, such conflicts are solved by war. In this particular case, the war lasted 100 years. The British attacked France and successfully route knights with long bows. Then, the Frances stroke back driving the British back to their isolated islands. However, the France cannot move further and go all the way to attack British because of the Strait of Dover separating the two nations. Finally both sides realized that the straits somehow became the sacred line of war. It's not auspicious to cross the line of war for either side. The France, having more army and larger population would beat up the British on land, and the British being stronger at sea can always repulsed France sea invasion. Hence, we got peace. Such natural separators like straits and mountains explain why Europeans are divided into many different countries. The Chinese, not having that natural line of war, end up getting united all the time. Now, let's get back to the question whether welfare is part of capitalism. If all of us have just enough food, and some people don't work, what would we end up doing to those who are not productive? Humans' basic instincts and preferences lead to gene pool survival. When food is scarce, such as when the people demand centralized planning, it would serve ones' gene pool survival to slaughter the parasites rather than sharing food to them. That's because sharing food to those who do not earn it means starving ones own self. In fact, humans will kill each other to literally eat each other when food is scarce. Such is what happened in China and Rusia when centralized planning, governments' intervention in economy, and prejudices against successful capitalists became the norm. However, when food and money are abundance, such as when the people embrace free market, fighting the parasites might cause more gene pool survival lost than feeding them. On the other hand, simply giving and yielding toward threaten will motivate people to keep pushing us around. Moreover, giving in to those who can use force against us will motivate countries to build arms rather than say, better video games. Hence, one possible strategy to minimize open war while still properly aligning ones interest with other individuals around them is to give to those who ask nicely and ask less. As free market brings a lot of abundance, those who are needy can be appeased much more cheaply than those who are envy, and hence, we got welfare program. To be frank, I'd rather see the unproductive people have bigger TV rather than letting them make more kids. It's more humane, and cheaper. Guess what? Most people that know they're not very capable either would rather have that too. Back to the France vs British. If only both sides have realized the true bargaining positions of each, they wouldn't have to resort to such expensive 100 years war right? The thing is, the 100 years war are the most credible and accurate ways to measure ones' bargaining position. War shows which one is stronger, and hence leads to a mutual understanding of where the line of war might be. If only we can wave our gun and scare the enemies, it'll be great. However, the only threats that are credible are those actually done. How do we know a cause's bargaining position? Democracy might give some light by counting the number of those who are in favor or against what we consider lesser evil. However, number counting can be deceiving. We hold this truth with plenty of evidences, that humans are inherently different. We have difference capability and preferences, and hence different choices and outcome. It's useless to lay net in front of anything with wings. Those who are genetically predestined to be successful will get rich anyway whether through honest capitalistic means or through dictatorship. Those who are small in numbers can hence be quite strong. Preventing the smart from making money honestly will then turn them into corruptors and dictators. When the Chileans demand to prosecute their entrepreneurs, they end up getting a dictator, the way any country that demand slavery over freedom deserves. Fortunately, Pinochet are relatively benign compared to others dictator and embrace free market giving the miraculous prosperity that the Chilean now enjoy. Now, US government arrested his daughter for a crime of tax evasion. An act that wouldn't have been a crime if making honest money is free. The miracle of Chili becomes the model of China's moving to free market. It also helps to end communism all over the world peacefully. If capitalists fail to show thanks to Pinochet family, I don't know what would happen to all of us. So, beyond number counting, the more accurate ways are then through skirmishes. When people cross the public's opinion line of war and we don't strike back, the line of war will shift against the coward by precedence. By fighting back, we'll then have a more accurate knowledge of which one the public would agree with. Hence, it's very important to retaliate to what others do to us, either good or bad. It's a pleasure to serve my friends, it's also a pleasure to wipe out envy enemies that are on our ways, should my friends wish or don't mind. When a fraudster tricks my brother over $3,900, my main concern is not to get my money back. My main concern is to get the fraudster to jail even if that will costs far more money than the $3,900. When a thief steals my money on 2001, my concern is also not to get my property back. What's just is to encourage the whole world to post any thieves conviction records on the net to prevent further larcenies. It makes me wonder though. Why people consider it cruel to damage a thief or a fraudster' reputation? The mere acts of making honest money are punishable by income tax. When Everett O. Lasher makes an argument in court, the case leads to $5000 fine, and understandably, a suicide. The mere acts of successfully fending of ones' home from thieves lead to a life long jail term for Tony Martin. Thousands would march against WTO demanding harsh laws to punish those exercising consensual trades. In Iran, the mere acts of switching religions can lead to death penalty. In Indonesia, new laws are being drafted giving years in prison for kissing in public. Of course, public rape during May riot are still far from being punished. This while murderers of Vincent Chin went free without jail term. Thousands would march to end death penalty against murderers. In Indonesia, religious fundamentalists can come to a house and destroy properties from houses providing consensual entertainment with polices watching. Those people often get away or lightly punish. If consensual productive acts are punished while damaging inconsensual forces are not, soon, all highly productive people would end up in gas chamber after the next Cultural Revolution, or what ever. Those who are left are those smart enough to be dictators enslaving the rest of us. Prejudices reminds me of an envy old hag that's so determined to ruin my reputation for being friendly to her and her friends, after her own friendly communication. I never intended to fraud anyone or steal her money yet I got my reputation ruined. I am very disappointed to see that there are people in the world that want to bring me down more than they want to bring down a thief. I have tried to resolve the issue privately by suggesting to that thing that she's really not important enough for anyone to pretend to be her friend. Moreover, I didn't need her as a friend. All this was just a damage-less misunderstanding caused by her own friendly communication which I could simply publicly straighten out. At least, it used to be. However, that vermin really wished to get the issue public telling lies that she never communicated with me, possibly to boost that things' feeling of importance her genes deny her. Well, if she got so mad over a few friendly introductions, I can only wonder what that thing would do when it finds out that her true envy natures are revealed to 55000 newsgroups several times. It'll happen again and again whenever I feel like. Hence, just look for "envy vermin" on the net to find out what's really going on including what she said privatedly. Let the public decide who are more honest, rational, scientific, and straightforward. Let the market decides which one are worthy and who are worthless. It's a great mistake to ever consider such thing as a friend, a mistake no body should do. It's her kind that turns people of from making money productively. Hopefully we can undermine public opinions against all form of envy motivated lies and prejudices. At the end, we'll greatly weaken laws against victimless crime and easily out compete all envy people out of the gene pool. That'll ensure that the free fair market competition would reign over war when all lies and prejudices against those more successful are gone. Now that being said, I want to move all jobs that can be done online to Asia, especially, copy writers. Take advantage of the value difference and leverage like hell is how we all make money in any system. Who's with me? Free market is all merciful and all compassionate. At the end, even those that oppose free market will benefits from free trades. Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82932
  - 4
    - On password expiration Hi, In another group I posted a question on security for some of our external users. They will access a messaging system (not MS Exchange) and I wanted to set their passwords to expire every N days. Lots of admins on that group argue that this is an evil thing. If user Joe already has a secure password it is evil to make him change it and possibly come up with a weaker password after N days. The consequences for my users on this system may be extreme if the passwords are compromised. How do you argue, to expire or not expire - that's the question. Martin S Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82930
  - 5
    - Encryption What is this I keep hearing about 512bit algorithms. Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82928
  - 6
    - spyware What is spyware? Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82920
  - 7
    - MBSA 1.2 End of Life date extended The previously-posted March 31, 2006 end-of-life (EOL) date for MBSA 1.2.1 and the MSSecure.XML file has been rescinded. The new End-Of-Life date for both MBSA 1.2.1 and the MSSecure.XML file is being extended to an undetermined time. Microsoft is extending support for the MBSA 1.2.1 tool and updates to the MSSecure.XML catalog file beyond March 31, 2006 in order to collect customer feedback on the MBSA suite of tools and security update detection needs. A new support lifecycle end date for MBSA 1.2.1 will be updated by June 30, 2006. Communicating this change: This week the MBSA Home Page and MBSA 1.2.1 FAQ pages will be updated to explain this change. KB articles 306460 and 914791 will also be updated in the coming weeks. Answers to common questions: Q: Why is the MBSA product team extending the MBSA 1.2.1 EOL date? A: Removing MBSA 1.2.1 support at this time would create a gap in security update detection for Microsoft products still in mainstream support but below the WSUS baseline of supported products (MBSA 2.0 supports only products supported by WSUS). Since the MBSA 2.0 tool alone does not provide complete security update detection for customers with products below the MBSA 2.0/WSUS baseline, support for the MBSA 1.2.1 and Enterprise Scan Tools are being extended to ensure these customers of continued and complete update support. Extending the MBSA 1.2.1 EOL date provides customers additional time to use MBSA 1.2.1 + the Enterprise Scan Tool to detect current and upcoming security updates while providing additional time for Microsoft to assess the needs of customers before setting a new EOL date. Q: Why is there no MBSA 1.2.1 EOL date posted at this time? A: The MBSA product team is looking for additional customer feedback to provide the best solution for customers who still require features available in the MBSA suite of scan tools. Instead of setting a new date that may be subject to change, the MBSA team is taking additional time to further assess customer needs to ensure the next solution provides a more comprehensive patch scanning solution before a new date will be announced. This further update will come on or before June 30, 2006. Q: From the updated message, it sounds like you might be planning a survey? A: Yes. One of the methods the MBSA team will use to gather detailed customer insights will be through a survey that is planned for posting in the coming weeks. Check the MBSA home page for updates and a link to the customer survey when it is available. Q: Does this affect SMS 2.0 or 2003 customers using Software Update Inventory Tool? A: No. SMS customers would have had continued, unbroken SUIT scanning and deployment support (which is based on MBSA 1.2.1 technologies) even if MBSA 1.2.1 had been end-of-life'd as planned. There is no effect on SMS customers using the SUIT or Extended SUIT tools. -- Doug Neal [MSFT] dugn@online.microsoft.com This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. If newsgroup discussion with experts and MVPs is unable to solve a problem to your satisfaction, feel free to contact PSS for support on the Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer (MBSA). Information is available at the following link: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx This e-mail address does not receive e-mail, but is used for newsgroup postings only. Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82917
  - 8
    - Denied access I had a problem starting up windows xp home edition, it would get as far as the screen for loading settings, then freeze. I put in a new hard drive and reinstalled xp on it. I then tried to copy my documents from the old hard drive to the new one, but it will not give me access to anything in my, "Documents and settings" folder because it was not a shared folder, Keeps saying, Access is denied. Is there any way of retrieving the files from the old hard drive?, I have a lot of important files that i dont want to loose. Thanks for any assistance Mav Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82916
  - 9
    - MSSOAP refuses to accept self-signed certificate Hi all MSSOAP toolkit relies on WinHTTP and throws following error while connecting to WebLogic server with self-seigned certificate Connector/IID_NULL: Connector:WinHTTP is unfamiliar with the Certificate Authority that generated the server's certificate. HRESULT=0x800A1529] Is there any solution? How to make certificate familiar? Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82915
  - 10
    - No permssions on private key Dear all, i have a strange problem. Sometimes a new private key is created in the folder U:\Application Data\Microsoft\Crypto\RSA\%usersname% (we have folder redirection from application data ativated and U is our homeshare) and only the administrator group has access although inheritance is enabled and the user should have the permission modify. The end is that our vpn connection is not working. This problem occurs at times. Anyone an idea that the problem can be ? Thanks a lot for your information Regards Dirk Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82914
  - 11
    - removing SID from an object hello ppl... can anybody help me ? im trying to remove the sid from a folder with the sidwalk tool but si far i cant make it.... thanks Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82910
  - 12
    - Is it possible to access Windows memory We are developing and application which keeps in the memory in clean state some security information - such as passwords, etc. My question is: is it possible in Windows OS to get this secure information using some programs etc. I have played DOS hit'n'run games a long time ago and it was possible to increase you life by such cheating programs which were accessing memory of the game and changing some of the values. Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82907
  - 13
    - arp poisoning Hi to all of you. I would like to know if in my network someone is doing arp poisoning. How can I discover it ? Thanks CArlo Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82906
  - 14
    - firewall How does a firewall work? Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82899
  - 15
    - Firewalls What is a firewall? Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82897
  - 16
    - "Up One Level" button Greetings, I have a bit of a mystery. I run a high school network and I block students from accessing the c:\ drive using Group Policy. In most programs, I can not navigate to the any part of the c:\ drive except "My Documents" even using "Save As..." and "Open" dialog boxes. HOWEVER, I have one program called Tax Cut that allows me to navigate the c:\ drive using the "Up One Level" button in the "Open" dialog box. Like I said Microsoft programs behave, but this particular program grants everybody access all the way to china! So what do you think? Have you ever seen this? I look forward to your replies! - Thanks! Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82896
  - 17
    - Can't Open This Item. An error occurred in underlying security sys I have XP SP2 and Outlook 2002. I am getting the following error when I try to open a digitally signed message for a mail group I'm a member of. I currently do not have a digital signature, but a couple of others in the group do and they are getting the same error message. Anyone have any ideas on what to check? Error: Can't open this item. An error occurred in the underlying security system. Thanks! Cindy Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82894
  - 18
    - Newbie questions... Hi, I have what I believe is a stand alone CA in my environment running W2K3 that issues quite a few certs to different types of servers. What I'm wondering is: 1. How can I tell if it's truly stand-alone? 2. If that server were to have issues would I be out of the water completley? Would existing certs not work or would I just not be able to issue new certs? 3. If indeed it is stand-alone, how can I provide some sort of redundancy in case an issue arises? Can I easily convert to domain based or add some sort of secondary CA to the stand-alone? Thanks, Dan Thanks, Dan Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82893
  - 19
    - Ports usage I am scanning my IIS host and I find the following ports running, whose purpose I can not identify: 1077/tcp -> inetinfo.exe As well I would like to find away to have the Task Scheduler not use a network port. I have searched all over the place and have found no information on this sort of thing. Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82892
  - 20
    - Removing the context menu from desktop right-click Is there any way to remove the context menu or at least the "NEW" item from the menu that comes up as a result of a right click on the desktop. I am trying to lock down several tablet PCs for our outside crews. damonm(removethis)@swcp.com -- DamonM Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82886
  - 21
    - Warning: Virus-infected Email A new version of the scam at http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/email/ms_genuine_mail.mspx is out on the Internet, and I am urging users NOT to open the attachment. The subject of the message is Last Network Pack. The offending file's name is Installation363.exe and it has the W32/Gibe-F virus. Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82882
  - 22
    - How to catch Trespassing Hi there Is there a way to know if someone is using my office computer while I am away? I have a windows password but anyone who knows my password or knows the administrator password can get into my computer, right? If the trespasser has the administrator password, it's no use for me to change my windows password then? How do I know for sure if people are getting in? And how to stop that? Also, is there a way to secure my emails (I use Microsoft Outlook) through some password so that no one can read them? Thanks Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82877
  - 23
    - Authentication across untrusted domains Hello all, Heres my senario. I have two untrusted domains(in 2 diffrent untrusted forests), domain1 and domain2. Machine1 is a machine in domain1. Machine2 is a machine in domain2 which runs SQL Server 2000. I am trying to connect to the sql server on machine2(in domain2) from machine1 using the credentials 'domain2\administrator'. I use 'LogonUser' with the LOGON32_LOGON_NEW_CREDENTIALS flag and do a ImpersonateLoggedOnUser later. accoding to MSDN documentation for using the LOGON32_LOGON_NEW_CREDENTIALS flag " This logon type allows the caller to clone its current token and specify new credentials for outbound connections. The new logon session has the same local identifier but uses different credentials for other network connections. This logon type is supported only by the LOGON32_PROVIDER_WINNT50 logon provider. Windows NT: This value is not supported. ". Both LogonUser and ImpersonateLoggedOnUser succeed. This is expected Later when i do a 'Open' call on a ADODB::Connection object (to connect to the SQL Server on machine2.domain2 ) i can connect to it successfully I am curious to know how this work? Does it work using Kerberos or NTLM ? i expected it to be NTML. I used ethereal to trap the communication. I noticed that machine1 tries to authenticate with the domain controlller of domain2. i would like to know how a machine (here machine1 in domain1) can authenticate with a domain controller in an untrusted forest. Its kinda of a longish question. Thanks for the patience. Regards Swapnil D. Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82873
  - 24
    - Patches released for zero-day IE threat... UPDATE: Hundreds of malicious Web sites are attempting to exploit the most critical of two flaws announced last week in Microsoft's browser, convincing two companies to release workarounds late Monday to head off the threat. http://www.securityfocus.com/news/11384?ref=rss Im Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82868
  - 25
    - Consolidate Services logon account? On a Windows 2003 server, what are the pros and cons of using the same "Log On As" account information for various services, such as Backup Exec, SQL Server, and Mcafee EPO? Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82866
- Next
  - 1
    - Repetative Account Logon I have notice that one user account is repetativly logging in about every 30 seconds. Not sure why this is happening. The event log that keeps getting registered is Event680: Event ID: 680 Source Security Type Success Audit Description Account Used for Logon by: <authentication package> Account Name: <user name> Workstation: <computer name> Any ideas why this is happening? Thanks for your help. Regards, Brent Bortnick Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82864
  - 2
    - Norton Antivirus 2006 Subscription problem ? Just bought a new copy of Norton Antivirus 2006. I had a previous copy of 2005, I fully uninstalled all of that first. Once 2006 was installed I noticed that the subscription service only has 300 days to go ? It seems to have picked up from earlier in the year when the 2005 version subscription expired. Is there anyway I can make it restart from when I installed 2006 ? TIA Chris Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82862
  - 3
    - HELP! i've been hacked! i forgot to log off at the cyber cafe..and someone logged in my msn..and changed my password..my main account is being hacked..and i don't know my secret answer and stuff..hoping tt the MSN Staff could help me.. and help me change the passowrd and send it to me.. my main account is very important to me ..because i have many contacts in it.. please please PLEASE PLEASE!!...HELP ME... my another account is yee_alison@hotmail.com i tried sending mail to the staffs but it failed..so i tink this is the only way that i can contact the Staffs...i really need help now..because somebody changed my password..and my old password doesn't work.. Please kindly send me my new password for my main account to this account ..please! help me..i really can't bare to lose so many contacts in one shot.. Thankyou, Alison Tan ..sob... Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82857
  - 4
    - Using SSL Certificate for TSAC on NLB Windows 2003 Terminal Server We have 2-load balanced Terminal Severs on our Intranet called TERMSRV1 and TERMSRV2. We want to enable SSL on both for employee access via the Internet. The Intranet NLB Cluster Name is TERMSRV and the FQDN on the Internet is TERMSRV. We redirect HTTP requests for TERMSRV from the Internet to the Intranet FQDN/NLB Cluster name TERMSRV via redirection using ISA2004 and can do the same for HTTPS. Would the certificates for both TERMSRV1 IIS and TERMSRV2 IIS be unique to each server's FQDN or the NLB FQDN CLuster Name? Thanks, scott -- Scott Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82852
  - 5
    - SmartCard and Key Archival I'm setting up Key archival and recovery in a Windows 2003 PKI. I've created a KRA user and issued a KRA certificate to him . Then I enabled the CA for Key archival selecting the user just created as KRA. I have modified a Smartcard User template , which I've been using successfully so far , to enable key archival . Then I tried to submit a certificate request on behalf of another user from the web enrollment pages to issue the new certificate template . The process fails with the following error ( logged on the CA ) I'm using E-Token from Alladin. Is this a problem with the token? If i issue a certificate where the CSP is "Microsoft..." it wotks fine. The problem is when I try to issue smartcard certificates Origine evento: CertSvc ID evento: 53 Descrizione: Certificate Services denied request 16 because The request is missing a required private key for archival by the server. 0x80094804 (-2146875388). The request was for DOMAIN\pkitestuser. Additional information: Denied by Policy Module Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82848
  - 6
    - The Phishing Incident Reporting and Termination Squad is Looking For a Few Good Men and Women Here is a new venture to fight phishing activity, which leads to identity theft and financial crimes, that is looking for help (volunteers). It was put together by Sunbelt Security Software CEO (Alex Eckleberry) and Castle Cops founder (Paul Laudanski). This isn't a "baiting" effort and the intent is to shut down rogue sites and provide information to prosecute the people behind this to law enforcement. http://fraudwar.blogspot.com/2006/03/phishing-incident-reporting-and.html Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82838
  - 7
    - Get rid of spyware and malware www.anti-malwaresoftware.com Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82824
  - 8
    - Spyware identification I've been tasked with developing a process for a help desk to follow when dealing with spyware/malware. Detailing remediation instructions is easy. The biggest challenge I see is the need to illustrate procedures for identifiying the problem as spyware to begin with. I'm suspicious of a number of new "spyware" issues and that this is becoming a techinical support bit bucket. Here's what I have to help them identify spyware: - Your computer slows down or "hangs" for no apparent reason - Your home page changes for no apparent reason - You experience slow network or Internet performance when other people are working fine - When you type an address in your browser (such as www.google.com) you are directed to a different search site - New toolbars appear within your browser - New Icons appear on your desktop - You have an increasing number of "pop-up" ads - especially on sites where you know no pop-up ads are generated (such as google or emory.edu) - You receive pop-up ads even when you are not surfing the internet Any thoughts, I'm particularly looking for those of you who've worked/are working for a help desk/call center now and what you've experienced. Thanks, B Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82813
  - 9
    - chat filters could somebody please help me turn off chat filter in the Degree Texas Holdum? Thank you so much! aloha Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82791
  - 10
    - appears to loose authentication I have a server here that appears to be loosing authentication. The server is windows 2000. Here is what happens: The user will log onto their computer, and they try to open a network app. The app will not open, and no error appears. The user will then try to open the G:\ from My computer, and they receive a message access denied. I may try typing into run: \\server to view the shares, but I am prompted with a logon box which the domain admin can not even log onto. The only way I have found to resolve it to have the user reboot their computer. Any help is greatly appreciated. Rob Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82789
  - 11
    - Three more security holes in IE "Microsoft has urged users to be wary as three newly discovered bugs leave people open to attack while using the net. All three bugs affect the software firm's Internet Explorer browser." http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4849904.stm Imhotep Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82788
  - 12
    - Stop Using Internet Explorer NOW! http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2006/03/attacks_on_internet_explorer_f_1.html Of course one of MS's solutions is to download and use its buggy beta of IE7, that's how much they care about its users! Use any browser that doesn't use the IE engine at all. I use Firefox, myself. Anyone that uses IE is asking for problems, and MS is too slow to get out a patch to its users. Dump IE! It is the ONLY intelligent solution! Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82786
  - 13
    - LockDrives "Microsoft has a free, unsupported tool called LockDrives. V1.3.6 released 23.01.2005. It can control access to floppy, CD and USB drives, based on group membership." Does somebody know where I can find the LockDrives application? I know some colleagues who use it in their environment, and like to use it within our network. Thanks... Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82784
  - 14
    - 100% FREE FUNNY VIDEO CLIP DOWNLOADS :-) have a giggle and send funny video clips to your freinds http://www.howididit.tk i thought i would bring a little bit of a smile marie x x x Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82781
  - 15
    - turning a wireless router on and off can a person turn on a wireless router in a home and expose that computer with the DSL connection to viruses via use of the wireless connection with a laptop? Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82775
  - 16
    - Microsoft Antispyware Problem When trying to run a scan the program initializes the scan but never actually does the scan. Any suggestions? Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82772
  - 17
    - Greyed -out toolbar list Under headings on toolbar, e.g. File, Edit, View etc....whenever I click on them, the list is grey instead of white. The IE icon is by each item in Favorites though. Whenever I use right click, it is also greyed out. I am unsure what is causing this. Is this a possible security problem. Is there a problem with my browser? Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82769
  - 18
    - Notify me When someone access my Pc through LAN Dears; Can advice about software can notfy me in case of someone access my Pc through LAN Thx Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82763
  - 19
    - IPSEC Will not start I have tried looking for this error message and I can find the exact message. I have few systems that this is occurring on but, with the MS Firewall and without. I donâ??t have any special policies running on these systems. Event Type: Error Event Source: Service Control Manager Event Category: None Event ID: 7023 Date: 3/24/2006 Time: 5:41:42 PM User: N/A Computer: Description: The IPSEC Services service terminated with the following error: An invalid argument was supplied. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. Please, let me know if you know why these are failing. Thanks, Joe Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82762
  - 20
    - Is Cybercrime Taking the Lead in Profit Margin for Criminals? IBM says it is costing businesses more than regular crime and then there was the statement recently that it is more profitable than the narcotics trade. http://fraudwar.blogspot.com/2006/03/is-cybercrime-overtaking-physical.html Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82746
  - 21
    - clean up programs Hi. I use 'clean up' on 2 of my desk tops. It appears to work fine and have never had a problem with that progrm. I installed 'clean up" on my new HP Laptop.and as soon as I finished runing the program, everything went weird. I did a system restore in safe mode, and all is fine now. luckily for me. after this I did a bit of reading and it appears that this has been the case for HP laptops from other people. Can anyone recomend a clean up program that is safe to use and does not require for me to be a pro at computers . I like keeping my pc's junk free (as can be) thnks Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82745
  - 22
    - Pop ups Just wondering if anyone can help. I seem to have been hit by something that has disabled all my pop-up stoppers and also prevents me from doing a Cntrl/Alt/Delete. Have checked the system through Norton, but no virus is showing up. Any ideas anyone ? Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82739
  - 23
    - Pipe & DDE activity Hi NG, Is there any command line utility(ies) for displaying current pipe & DDE activity? Thanks, rusga Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82738
  - 24
    - Javascript Code to make of ur IE.. BOOOM!! http://www.cracks.mu/download/4U_WMA_MP3_Converter_5.1.1_203592.html Just to point my finger to this malicious code. I cant figure out if this is the practice of any already opened exploit of IE through Javascript. But the fact is that when I met this friendly code, I get angry. Ciao Daniele Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82735
  - 25
    - User Profiles being automatically created for local user accounts Sometime over the past three months our web server is now automatically creating User profiles when users change their password while accessing a web site. Something similar is also happening to our Windows XP SP2 machines. For example, if I run a script against all our computers to check if a modem is installed a User Profile will be created for my account. This has never happened before so I can only suspect a Microsoft patch did this. Any idea on how this can be stopped? What initiated it? I appreciate any responses. Thank you -brian- Tag: windows defender definition updates Tag: 82733

Help -
windows update - indicates update is ready for download to defender pgm -the
process is then performed - indicating update completed- here is the problem
-the updates show again to be installed- also the defender log shows as not
being updated in x days??

Top

Re: windows defender definition updates by Roger

Roger
Sat Apr 01 02:25:31 CST 2006

Please use the Windows Defender newsgroups for this.
news:OtmzgogUGHA.5468@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl
http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/spyware/software/newsgroups/default.mspx

"JLH" <JLH@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:D576E77E-880A-4021-B3FF-5F35DFA5F1C8@microsoft.com...
> Help -
> windows update - indicates update is ready for download to defender
> pgm -the
> process is then performed - indicating update completed- here is the
> problem
> -the updates show again to be installed- also the defender log shows as
> not
> being updated in x days??

Top