http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/06/21/173237&from=rss

-Im

Re: MS targeting BitTorret? by S

S
Wed Jun 22 06:54:41 CDT 2005

That crowd didn't get over the "RSA Key" thing and now they have more
conspiracy theoies? How boring.

"Imhotep" <NoSpam@NoThanks.com> wrote in message
news:FH_te.2747$Lr4.1344@fed1read03...
> http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/06/21/173237&from=rss
>
> -Im



Re: MS targeting BitTorret? by Imhotep

Imhotep
Wed Jun 22 14:04:43 CDT 2005

S. Pidgorny wrote:

> That crowd didn't get over the "RSA Key" thing and now they have more
> conspiracy theoies? How boring.
>
> "Imhotep" <NoSpam@NoThanks.com> wrote in message
> news:FH_te.2747$Lr4.1344@fed1read03...
>> http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/06/21/173237&from=rss
>>
>> -Im

I think the point is that Microsoft is using it's default policy. When
Microsoft, misses the boat on an idea, they try to do a policy of miss
information and terror tactics. That is the point. "That crowd" is the most
familar with it since it is used on "them" the most. If you shut your mouth
and open your mind you just might learn something.

-Im

Re: MS targeting BitTorret? by Phillip

Phillip
Wed Jun 22 14:19:30 CDT 2005

Terror Tactics??


--

Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com

"Imhotep" <NoSpam@NoThanks.com> wrote in message
news:eDiue.27$8o.24@fed1read03...
> S. Pidgorny wrote:
>
> > That crowd didn't get over the "RSA Key" thing and now they have more
> > conspiracy theoies? How boring.
> >
> > "Imhotep" <NoSpam@NoThanks.com> wrote in message
> > news:FH_te.2747$Lr4.1344@fed1read03...
> >> http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/06/21/173237&from=rss
> >>
> >> -Im
>
> I think the point is that Microsoft is using it's default policy. When
> Microsoft, misses the boat on an idea, they try to do a policy of miss
> information and terror tactics. That is the point. "That crowd" is the
most
> familar with it since it is used on "them" the most. If you shut your
mouth
> and open your mind you just might learn something.
>
> -Im



Re: MS targeting BitTorret? by Imhotep

Imhotep
Wed Jun 22 14:45:45 CDT 2005

Phillip Windell wrote:

> Terror Tactics??
>
>

Terror Tactics: Scaring people into believing something for your own
personal gain...


-Im

Re: MS targeting BitTorret? by Imhotep

Imhotep
Wed Jun 22 15:00:32 CDT 2005

Phillip Windell wrote:

> Terror Tactics??
>
>

Or if you prefer "Scare Tactics" either way it is the same technique...

What they do not tell you with avalanche is that is monitors your content.
Funny how they leave that out...

-Im



Re: MS targeting BitTorret? by S

S
Thu Jun 23 03:19:51 CDT 2005

This time Dvorak is so unbelievably crappy with his ridiculous suggestins
that even /. folk had enough: the discussion of the topic is quite robust.
However you are the proof that there are religious people like yourself that
take anything anti-Microsoft as a fair dinkum.

--
Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE
-= F1 is the key =-

"Imhotep" <NoSpam@NoThanks.com> wrote in message
news:eDiue.27$8o.24@fed1read03...
> S. Pidgorny wrote:
>
> > That crowd didn't get over the "RSA Key" thing and now they have more
> > conspiracy theoies? How boring.
> >
> > "Imhotep" <NoSpam@NoThanks.com> wrote in message
> > news:FH_te.2747$Lr4.1344@fed1read03...
> >> http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/06/21/173237&from=rss
> >>
> >> -Im
>
> I think the point is that Microsoft is using it's default policy. When
> Microsoft, misses the boat on an idea, they try to do a policy of miss
> information and terror tactics. That is the point. "That crowd" is the
most
> familar with it since it is used on "them" the most. If you shut your
mouth
> and open your mind you just might learn something.
>
> -Im



Re: MS targeting BitTorret? by Imhotep

Imhotep
Thu Jun 23 05:15:34 CDT 2005

S. Pidgorny wrote:

> This time Dvorak is so unbelievably crappy with his ridiculous
> that even /. folk had enough: the discussion of the topic is quite robust.
> However you are the proof that there are religious people like yourself
> that take anything anti-Microsoft as a fair dinkum.
>

Why don't you do everyone a favor and make your points on what you disagree
with about the article instead of talking so vague that you do not say
anything of meaning (or intellect). You illustrate the saying Microsoft
Zombie...

...it is ok to disagree but at least *try* to sound intelligent about it...

-Imhotep