should administrator lock pages in memory?

Dear, all.

Windows 2003 default setting, nobody could lock pages in memory. But in
microsoft recommend in high security organization, should define
administrator have this right. Could you tell me the reason?

Thanks.
Frank

Steven
Sun Sep 18 20:42:00 CDT 2005

I would leave it a defined with no users which is what the Threats and
Countermeasures Guide for Windows 2003 and XP from Microsoft Recommends. I
can't think of a reason why the Security Guide would recommend that
administrators be defined. --- Steve


"Frank" <Frank@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6B12573A-0275-4742-979A-3F2512282306@microsoft.com...
> Dear, all.
>
> Windows 2003 default setting, nobody could lock pages in memory. But in
> microsoft recommend in high security organization, should define
> administrator have this right. Could you tell me the reason?
>
> Thanks.
> Frank

Frank
Sun Sep 18 23:49:01 CDT 2005


Thanks, Steven.

Frank




â??Steven L Umbachâ??ç¼?å??ï¼?

> I would leave it a defined with no users which is what the Threats and
> Countermeasures Guide for Windows 2003 and XP from Microsoft Recommends. I
> can't think of a reason why the Security Guide would recommend that
> administrators be defined. --- Steve
>
>
> "Frank" <Frank@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:6B12573A-0275-4742-979A-3F2512282306@microsoft.com...
> > Dear, all.
> >
> > Windows 2003 default setting, nobody could lock pages in memory. But in
> > microsoft recommend in high security organization, should define
> > administrator have this right. Could you tell me the reason?
> >
> > Thanks.
> > Frank
>
>
>