I can't find an update for wpa on 2003 server

Re: wpa on 2003 server by siljaline

siljaline
Sun Jan 11 00:50:30 CST 2004


"curious" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> I can't find an update for wpa on 2003 server

http://tinyurl.com/3xbh9

HTH


--
siljaline

MS - MVP Windows IE/OE
______________________

(Reply to group, as return address
is invalid - that we may all benefit)


Re: wpa on 2003 server by Bill

Bill
Sun Jan 11 14:12:57 CST 2004

I don't think so--valiant effort, though!

This is one where the multiple uses of an acronym bites.

You're citing WPA as Windows Product Activation, whereas I'm guessing that
the O.P. meant WiFi Protected Access.

This isn't easy information to find. Near as I can tell, this press report
is probably the correct information:

http://www.computerweekly.com/Article125608.htm

It indicates SP1 for Windows Server 2003 will include server-side services
to implement this.

There are a number of pieces to this puzzle--client OS, client nic drivers,
access points, and the server OS must all provide bits of the
implementation.

"siljaline" <siljaline@spamco.com> wrote in message
news:ereuz8A2DHA.2888@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>
> "curious" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>> I can't find an update for wpa on 2003 server
>
> http://tinyurl.com/3xbh9
>
> HTH
>
>
> --
> siljaline
>
> MS - MVP Windows IE/OE
> ______________________
>
> (Reply to group, as return address
> is invalid - that we may all benefit)
>



Re: wpa on 2003 server by siljaline

siljaline
Sun Jan 11 17:44:33 CST 2004


"Bill Sanderson" <Bill_Sanderson@msn.com.plugh.org> wrote:
> I don't think so--valiant effort, though!

Hi Bill,

At least it was an effort <g>

> This is one where the multiple uses of an acronym bites.

The mutiple use of acronyms bite - quite well.

> You're citing WPA as Windows Product Activation, whereas I'm guessing that
> the O.P. meant WiFi Protected Access.
>
> This isn't easy information to find. Near as I can tell, this press report
> is probably the correct information:
>
> http://www.computerweekly.com/Article125608.htm
>
> It indicates SP1 for Windows Server 2003 will include server-side services
> to implement this.
>
> There are a number of pieces to this puzzle--client OS, client nic drivers,
> access points, and the server OS must all provide bits of the
> implementation.
>

Thanks for jumping in!

--
siljaline

MS - MVP Windows IE/OE
______________________

(Reply to group, as return address
is invalid - that we may all benefit)


Re: wpa on 2003 server by Bill

Bill
Sun Jan 11 18:52:27 CST 2004

Initially, I was just checking out your TinyURL, 'cause I don't like those
much--especially in security-related forums.

Then I was trying to figure out where WPA was in your article!



Re: wpa on 2003 server by siljaline

siljaline
Sun Jan 11 19:31:18 CST 2004


"Bill Sanderson" <Bill_Sanderson@msn.com.plugh.org> wrote:
> Initially, I was just checking out your TinyURL, 'cause I don't like those
> much--especially in security-related forums.
>
> Then I was trying to figure out where WPA was in your article!

Noted on the Tiny - "Snurl" URL's.
As you were saying, it was a "stab" ;)

Regards,


--
siljaline

MS - MVP Windows IE/OE
______________________

(Reply to group, as return address
is invalid - that we may all benefit)




Re: wpa on 2003 server by Bill

Bill
Sun Jan 11 19:45:55 CST 2004

I trust your posts to be safe, but I worry about getting folks in the habit
of clicking on URL's that they can't easily see lead to reliable sites.

The long URL I posted isn't a whole lot better--if it was malicious, it'd be
hard for someone to type by hand for verification.


"siljaline" <siljaline@spamco.com> wrote in message
news:uV3mHvK2DHA.1720@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>
> "Bill Sanderson" <Bill_Sanderson@msn.com.plugh.org> wrote:
>> Initially, I was just checking out your TinyURL, 'cause I don't like
>> those
>> much--especially in security-related forums.
>>
>> Then I was trying to figure out where WPA was in your article!
>
> Noted on the Tiny - "Snurl" URL's.
> As you were saying, it was a "stab" ;)
>
> Regards,
>
>
> --
> siljaline
>
> MS - MVP Windows IE/OE
> ______________________
>
> (Reply to group, as return address
> is invalid - that we may all benefit)
>
>
>