4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0

TheMSsForum.com: The Microsoft Software Forum

The MSS Forum ‹ Security
- Archive
  - Biz
  - MCSE
  - CRM
  - Drivers
  - Framework
  - ADO
  - ASP
  - Compact
  - Forms
  - Dotnet
  - C#
  - VB
  - FontpageGen
  - Excel
  - WorkSheet
  - Exchange
  - Setup
  - Fox
  - Fontpage
  - ASP
  - IIS
  - Entourage
  - Money
  - Messanger
  - PocketPC
  - Powerpoint
  - Project
  - Publisher
  - Excel
  - VB
  - Security
  - Portal
  - Services
  - SQLServerDev
  - SVCS
  - SQLServer
  - VB
  - VC
  - MFC
  - ExcelGen

- Previous
  - 1
    - virus? At who's end? One contact occasionally gets my mail with an attachment. This attachment is her MY Documents directory and it contains all her personal files. What causes this? My virus defs are updated and complete scans find nothing. My updated spybot and several other spy apps find nothing. I have current ver of Zone Alarm. It must be at the other end, but I find nothing in web searches about this threat. If I could find some info, then I could send it to her, Otherwise it is just me saying "its not me". She has never gotten this form anyone else. help. tks, Paul Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65370
  - 2
    - Mail merge sntil recently I was able to merge 500 plus client specific documents through word and fax them via outlook to customers. A security update had resulted in my confirming that each fax should be sent to the receiver. Is there a way of switching off these security confirmation questions or changing my user profile in outlook or on the exchange server to stop this tedious task? Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65369
  - 3
    - Norton Internet Security A few months ago I upgaded my Norton A/V by installing Internet Security, which has the firewall. A couple of times a medium sized window pops up alerting me to...I'm not sure to what, Norton's booklet doesn't explain it. But it looks like some sort of hacking attempt. The warning had something to do with a specific virus's, trojans, but they had different names. One was Netbus something and the other was some sort of backdoor trojan. But what exactly are these warnings? Are they really hacking attempts? Since I have the firewall, can I assume they couldn't get in? Anyway, I don't download much of anything, I update Norton weekly and in fact scanned for virus's after the last warning. Found nothing. I tried it again in Safe Mode, and it also found nothing (and looked through 60 more files). So I don't think I have these virus's. But I don't understand, do these warnings mean I have the virus's (then why isn't Norton picking them up?) or are the warnings telling me that someone is USING these virus's to try and hack in? These warnings don't happen often, maybe 5 times the last 3 or 4 months. And each time I get them, I disconnect from the internet - I'm on dial-up - and sign on again. I'm just wondering what these warnings are warning me to. Thanks. Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65366
  - 4
    - Group Question Is there a newsgroup specifically for discussions of the patches that microsoft releases.. Thanks.. Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65360
  - 5
    - Access Blocked Virus warning I currently can only access websites from help and support centre if a try manually entering any url i see a poorly miss-spelt page obviously trying to look like a microsoft warning of some kind. It will only let me use one search engine which changes in appearence each time but is the same site i believe. All websites it allowes me to view have hsdoclc.dll in the title which appears to be a file on my hard drive in windows/system32 if i remove it the next time explorer is run it replaces itself. The search site it allows me to use is Fast-seek or something and it only has ads for porn pharmocuticals and other useless rubbish. I have never registered with any site such as this and this attack is obviuosly intentional by them. I have tried removing and installing internet explorer, disabling all ie add ons and no strange processes are running. This happened wthout my knowledge and not at the same time as any software upddate or install so i dont understand how? Can anyone help cos im aout of ideas and this is the only site i can get to. i have xp pro service pack 2 and all updates Dan, Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65359
  - 6
    - File version check built-in Microsoft security patches/Service Pac We are planning to deploy SP 4 for windows 2000 to our clients. What will happen with the post-sp4 security patches that have been deployed this last year? Will they be overwritten by sp4 or is there an intelligent file version check built-in, so that the newest files are left untouched by sp4 installation? Or do we have to reinstall all post-sp4 sec patches after installing sp4? Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65357
  - 7
    - Third Party PopUp Blockers vs. IE6 PopUp Blocker I have been using a third party PopUp Blocker (PopUpCop) in addition to the more recent native Popup Blocker in Windows XP SP2. I am trying to determine if having the third party blocker working at the same time as the Windows blocker is helping or hurting my chances of keeping out the popups. Any thoughts on that ? Thanks. -- John Hanley <><><><><><><><> To send return email: jphanley @ ix. netcom. com ----- Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65350
  - 8
    - strange process I've been seeing a process running called "navsse.exe" - it's stored in the \system32 folder and is marked read-only. It shows up in the usual places in the registry (run key, run services key, etc.). It can be deleted from the registry and re-installs itself there prior to being able to rename the file, which I was able to do by starting in safe mode. File also seems to be network-aware. Tough file to get rid of, and none of the anti-virus sites or google have anything on it. Has anybody heard of this file, and better, how to kill it? Thanks very much. Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65346
  - 9
    - web folder in "my computer" system folder we had a trojan detected a few weeks ago. appears to be removed now, but it caused an icon named "web folders" to be present in "my computer". if i right click on it the list is explore,open, or create shortcut. how can i get rid of this. it has spread to 3 of our for machines. thanks, -- bw Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65344
  - 10
    - SNMP Patch MIB Is there or will there be a SNMP MIB that contains the ability to query patches installed on the OS for Windows XP, 2000, 2003? Thanks Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65341
  - 11
    - Audit Logon Events Is it possible to audit successful logon event for a single group of users or computers? Our default domain controller policy currently only audits failure events. We'd like to know if people are successfully logging into a specific set of computers in the domain (they are all in the same OU). Thanks. Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65339
  - 12
    - Is there a bug with CertAdminLib.RevokeCertificate() method ? I handle certificates in a certificates store thanks to XEnroll, CertClientLib and CertAdminLib. Almost all methods works fine... but I encountered a problem with CertAdminLib.RevokeCertificate() method. Actually, certificate revokation works without any problem, but I aim at unrevoking certificate by using RevokeCertificate method, as explained on MSDN : "If a currently revoked certificate has CRL_REASON_CERTIFICATE_HOLD as its reason code, you can reinstate the certificate by calling RevokeCertificate with MAXDWORD (defined in Winnt.h) as the value for its reason code (the Reason parameter). After it is reinstated, the certificate will not appear in future CRLs" winnt.h defines MAXDWORD as follow : #define MAXDWORD 0xffffffff Althoug, with dotNet, RevokeCertificate method reason code waits for an int. So I can't use MAXDWORD. RevokeCertificate crash when reason code is int.maxvalue. System.Convert.ToInt32 crash when its parameter is 0xffffffff... and compiler doesn't run if I use directly 0xffffffff or System.Convert.ToInt64(0xffffffff)... Is there a way to unrevoke a certificate in dotNet ? -- C# developper Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65334
  - 13
    - Is there a bug with CertAdminLib.RevokeCertificate() method ? I handle certificates in a certificates store thanks to XEnroll, CertClientLib and CertAdminLib. Almost all methods works fine... but I encountered a problem with CertAdminLib.RevokeCertificate() method. Actually, certificate revokation works without any problem, but I aim at unrevoking certificate by using RevokeCertificate method, as explained on MSDN : "If a currently revoked certificate has CRL_REASON_CERTIFICATE_HOLD as its reason code, you can reinstate the certificate by calling RevokeCertificate with MAXDWORD (defined in Winnt.h) as the value for its reason code (the Reason parameter). After it is reinstated, the certificate will not appear in future CRLs" winnt.h defines MAXDWORD as follow : #define MAXDWORD 0xffffffff Althoug, with dotNet, RevokeCertificate method reason code waits for an int. So I can't use MAXDWORD. RevokeCertificate crash when reason code is int.maxvalue. System.Convert.ToInt32 crash when its parameter is 0xffffffff... and compiler doesn't run if I use directly 0xffffffff or System.Convert.ToInt64(0xffffffff)... Is there a way to unrevoke a certificate in dotNet ? -- C# developper Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65333
  - 14
    - best of awards too... coolwebsearch I suggest this group acknowledge the best in class. It's time to salute the most devious. I cast my vote for coolwebsearch - an creative piece of shit that took out our entire IT dept (nerds and uS ceritified combined), Norton Corp, Microsoft, and all of about a half dozen tools collected on the net. Someone needs to hire these guys or put them in jail. Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65332
  - 15
    - Key Distribution Center Service Account When I try to enable the krbtgt(KDC)account I get the message Windows cannot enable object krbtgt because its a built-in account. How can I enable this account? Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65331
  - 16
    - CA Issues 2 Year cert I created a template, from the web server template, on my enterprise CA. I set it for 6 Years, so it can be used for my Cisco ACS server. The root is good for 20 years. When I request the certificate, it shows up as a 2 year certificate! Whats wrong? Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65320
  - 17
    - Does expired digital certificates causes text to be sent in clear text ?? OWA server's digital certificate expired. Besides the yellow icon that indicates it is expired, does the text is sent unencrypted by any chance ? I don't think it is unencrypted, but a co-worker claims that's what happens with expired certificates... Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65312
  - 18
    - More before-the-fact advice for 2K and XP? I'm consulting for several firms who are using Win2K and XP Pro as limited users, which so far is keeping the current crop of viruses and other garbage off the machines. Hardware firewalls do the rest. I believe future exploits will be deliberately designed to run as a limited user. That means a trojan, or virus or what-have-you will work only while a specific user's logged on to the machine. But it will still run. It wouldn't need to take advantage of raw sockets, UPnP or other "supposedly dangerous" technologies to do its dirty work. So the question I ask is, how to prevent unauthorized software from running even as the limited user? Here are the things I've ruled out so far: * Signed programs are difficult to maintain. A lot of sites use old apps that can work as a limited user, but aren't digitally signed. And nothing stops a disreputable company with a code certificate from writing a bad program that happens to be signed. * "Outbound firewalls" are an annoyance to the average user, because they warn you about every single little applet that wants network access. That includes the Windows Firewall when you enable outbound connection monitoring. Besides, it's one more thing that runs in the background using up CPU time that a useful app can use instead. And they don't stop bad programs that use file system APIs instead of network APIs to spread. * I would love to see "ZIP file type restrictions" in the Compressed Folders shell extension for Windows XP. Like the attachment restrictions built into Outlook 2002 and later, I could disallow opening certain file types from within ZIP and other archive files. There's no such functionality yet, so I've had to block ZIPs as "level 1" and allow "level 2" access only to people I've trained in handling ZIP archives safely. This sucks because even a trained user can make mistakes. * I already change the security ACLs for the root of Drive C to read-only for limited users, and apply special ACLs to the "RECYCLER" folder so limited users can still create and use Recycle Bins. I borrowed the same ACL for "Shared Documents" to accomplish this. The only folders that need to be on the root of Drive C are "Documents and Settings," "Program Files," "Windows," and "RECYCLER." And these folders (except for RECYCLER) have default ACLs that are perfect for before-the-fact security. I also create a separate volume exclusively for the paging file and make that unreadable to limited users entirely. Which comes to my latest idea which I have no clue how to implement: Deny (or remove) Execute permissions by default to Documents and Settings for limited users. I don't know how to implement this because I don't know where the default ACL for a user's profile is stored. Whatever it is, it's normally "Full Control" for the user. There's also the matter of setting up the same or similar ACL for whatever the user's Home directory is (on an Active Directory network) or their Profile directory (also on AD). Even if there were an ACL template I could change, I'd have to change it in three places: for the user's local profile, the user's roving profile (if any) and the user's home directory (if any). If this were possible, it would eliminate last remaining problem I can figure out: How to keep limited users from running unauthorized programs for good. A privilege elevation exploit won't work if it can't run in the first place. -- PGP key (0x0AFA039E): <http://www.pan-am.ca/consulting@pan-am.ca.asc> What's a PGP Key? See <http://www.pan-am.ca/free.html> GOD BLESS AMER, er, THE INTERNET. <http://vmyths.com/rant.cfm?id=401&page=4> Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65310
  - 19
    - Mouse Movie by itself! If you mouse moves by itself, UP & Down or Left - Right! system only dose it when you are not moving the mouse! Will not lock the system! & you can take back controll of the mouse without any problem! Ball or Optical Microsoft or Ligitec brand! If anyone else has had this problem, please let me know! new installs with XPpro and SP2 with 8 diffrent known MBs -- Thank you, I hope this Infomation is Helpfull! Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65297
  - 20
    - YWRIVR Trojan Seeing a process running as a subprocess of Explorer.exe. This process appears to be opening internet explorer windows. Google knows nothing (amazing!) Winternals makes reference to Qoolaid.v.2.7.1, but all info on that leads to blind alleys. Anybody else seeing this. Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65296
  - 21
    - YWRIVR Trojan Seeing a process running as a subprocess of Explorer.exe. This process appears to be opening internet explorer windows. Google knows nothing (amazing!) Winternals makes reference to Qoolaid.v.2.7.1, but all info on that leads to blind alleys. Anybody else seeing this. Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65295
  - 22
    - Will file permissions need to be changed? Curently i'm creating a new domain for a small company and migrating users and resources over from their old domain and I have a question about file permissions. First off, the environment is all WIndows 2003 DC's and file servers. I used ADMT v2 to migrate users and groups over and I did migrate SID's and passwords. Now during testing, users can login to the new domain but don't have permission to their roaming profiles or shared folders that reside on servers still on the old domain. From my understanding, migrating the SID's would allow users access to resources on the old domain. I do have a two way trust between the domains and can validate them with no issues. Should I go ahead and bring the servers into the new domain? And if so, would I need to reset permissions on their folders and profiles? And if you're going to say "Use the domain renaming tool". The company has a lot of major issues with their current AD DB and I believe it would be more stable if we just started from scratch. Thank you for your time and help! Chris Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65294
  - 23
    - Easy Question: Determining CA Server Role OS: Windows 2003 Server Standard Edition How does one determine the CA type that a server is running? I have tried working with certutil and looking at the Certificates MMC console and can't figure out if this server is installed as an Enterprise CA or a Stand-Alone CA. I'm probably missing a very simple step somewhere. Thanks in advance, Bob Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65293
  - 24
    - Installing Hotfixes via a VBS Script Does anyone know or have examples on how to install hotfixes via a vbs script. Thanks for any help, Johnnyweb Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65291
  - 25
    - Microsoft Security Bulletins for 12/14/04 December 14, 2004 Today Microsoft released the following Security Bulletin(s). Note: www.microsoft.com/technet/security and www.microsoft.com/security are authoritative in all matters concerning Microsoft Security Bulletins! ANY e-mail, web board or newsgroup posting (including this one) should be verified by visiting these sites for official information. Microsoft never sends security or other updates as attachments. These updates must be downloaded from the microsoft.com download center or Windows Update. See the individual bulletins for details. Because some malicious messages attempt to masquerade as official Microsoft security notices, it is recommended that you physically type the URLs into your web browser and not click on the hyperlinks provided. Bulletin Summary: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/ms04-dec.mspx Important Bulletins: Vulnerability in WordPad Could Allow Code Execution (885836) http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/ms04-041.mspx Vulnerability in DHCP Could Allow Remote Code Execution and Denial of Service (885249) http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/ms04-042.mspx Vulnerability in HyperTerminal Could Allow Code Execution (873339) http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/ms04-043.mspx Vulnerabilities in Windows Kernel and LSASS Could Allow Elevation of Privilege (885835) http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/ms04-044.mspx Vulnerability in WINS Could Allow Remote Code Execution (870763) http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/ms04-045.mspx Re-released Bulletins: Buffer Overrun in JPEG Processing (GDI+) Could Allow Code Execution (833987) http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/ms04-028.mspx This represents our regularly scheduled monthly bulletin release (second Tuesday of each month). Please note that Microsoft may release bulletins out side of this schedule if we determine the need to do so. If you have any questions regarding the patch or its implementation after reading the above listed bulletin you should contact Product Support Services in the United States at 1-866-PCSafety (1-866-727-2338). International customers should contact their local subsidiary. -- Regards, Jerry Bryant - MCSE, MCDBA Microsoft IT Communities Get Secure! www.microsoft.com/security This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65288
- Next
  - 1
    - New MSSecure.XML Version 2004.12.14.0 Now Available MSSECURE.XML Data Version 2004.12.14.0 (for use by MBSA 1.2 and SMS SUS Feature Pack) was last modified today, December 1, 2004, and is now available for all supported languages (English, French, German and Japanese). Today's release contains 5 new bulletins - which are fully supported for MBSA detection and SMS deployment. There are NO unsupported products or Note Messages in today's release. This does not include the re-release of MS04-028 (GDI+) that is not supported for MBSA detection. This release fully supports the following new bulletins: MS04-041 (Wordpad) - 885836 MS04-042 (DHCP) - 885249 MS04-043 (HyperTerminal) - 873339 MS04-044 (LSASRV and Kernel) - 885835 MS04-045 (WINS) - 870736 This release also includes a critical bug fix for MS04-040 to provided SUS Mapping information. This affected customers who used MBSA in conjunction with a SUS server to limit the reported patches to only those items approved on the Microsoft SUS Server. This problem has been corrected in this release. -- Doug Neal [MSFT] dugn@online.microsoft.com This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. If newsgroup discussion with experts and MVPs is unable to solve a problem to your satisfaction, feel free to contact PSS for the Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer (MBSA) at the following link: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=fh;en-us;Prodoffer20a This e-mail address does not receive e-mail, but is used for newsgroup postings only. Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65287
  - 2
    - hijack 69.20... coolwebsearch 2 Just an update. Anyone who gets this may want to consider just blowing away the box. I posted yesterday, got a few suggestions, tried the latest, and nothing worked. THe most interesting read I got here http://cwshredder.net/cwshredder/cwschronicles.html What ever it is I am now of the opin that it can't be removed by any normal uS certified IT guy. You need special skills - a phd in nerd. Thanks for the help - going to reinstall. Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65286
  - 3
    - hijack 69.20... coolwebsearch 2 Just an update. Anyone who gets this may want to consider just blowing away the box. I posted yesterday, got a few suggestions, tried the latest, and nothing worked. THe most interesting read I got here http://cwshredder.net/cwshredder/cwschronicles.html What ever it is I am now of the opin that it can't be removed by any normal uS certified IT guy. You need special skills - a phd in nerd. Thanks for the help - going to reinstall. Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65285
  - 4
    - LCS requires a certificate that has a key Hello, I'm trying to create a Connection for my Live Communication Server 2005. But if I choose TLS and not TCP, LCS requires a certificate that has a key My own certificate is a duplicate from the computer-certificate (Windows 2003 Server Standard) I've create the Certificate like the description in Microsoft Deployment Guide "Microsoft Office Live Communications Server 2005 Certificate Configuration" Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65283
  - 5
    - Publishing a Certifictae Template in AD Hi, I want to publish a Certficate Template in AD but on the template/General Tab the check box is greyed out. This applies to all templates so I can't unpublish existing published certificates. The server is a Domain Controller and I am logging on with e Domain Admin Account. The server is running 2003 Server Standard Edition. Any Ideas would be much appreciated"! Thanks Chris Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65281
  - 6
    - Strange CA error I managed to produce the first certificate fine through web enrollment. The next one however, complained with this: No certificate templates could be found. You do not have permission to request a certificate from this CA, or an error occurred while accessing the Active Directory. What does this mean? I've already tried the info at this site with no luck: http://support.microsoft.com/?id=811418 Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65278
  - 7
    - MS Debuts Desktop Search Tool - Reuters Microsoft Debuts Desktop Search Tool Mon Dec 13, 2004 06:40 PM ET http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=technologyNews&storyID=7080615&src=rss/technologyNews or http://tinyurl.com/5br6d SEATTLE (Reuters) - Microsoft Corp. (MSFT.O: Quote, Profile, Research) on Monday unveiled a new, preliminary version of its search tool for finding documents, e-mail and other files stored on personal computer hard drives. <snip> Honest, I really like Windows. I started with MSDOS 3.1 and have been upgrading ever since. But with MS's past history with IE & OE and today's internet environment, there is no way I could even think of sticking this thing in my computer. Lance ***** Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65271
  - 8
    - hijack browser 69.20... Virus/spyware tools seem to have met their match. I've run a dozen tools, have Symantec corp installation, it "pros" to help and nobody can fix it. Has anyone actually ever fixed this without 2 pages of instructions on how to do so? (which don't work). 2k, ie6, all sp's. This is one that hijacks the hosts file. Browser suddenly opens to wherever and so on. Popups too! Very neat. Can anyone tell me how the infection is spread? (You wouldn't believe what my company spends with Symantec!) Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65268
  - 9
    - CAPICOM and ASP.NET I am developing an ASP.NET application using VB.NET, and need to access a users certificate. I have successfully issued a certificate from our own CA and this can be seen through IE. So far, using CAPICOM 2, I am only returning certificates that are associated with the Web server (W2K3). I have tried setting the <identity impersonate="true"/> in the web.config file as was suggested in another post but this hasn't made a difference. Is there anyway to access the client-side "My" store in order to retrieve the certificate or am I barking up the wrong tree? Any help greatfully received. S Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65264
  - 10
    - File permissions I have a very old software package that is to be used on 30 lab machines. This is an old authorware 2.1 presentation. When the package is run it creates a directory APW_DATA in the c:\windows directory. not only does this directory have to be there the user running the application must have read and write permissions to this directory. Becuase users only get read permissions by default I have to manually change the permissions on this folder for users to be able to use the software. I want to know if there is a way that I can automate this process. What I have in mind is writing a script that will 1) add a shortcut to the start menu 2) create the APW_DATA folder with read write permissions for all users. I have been unable to figure out how to create or copy APW_DATA with the correct permissions. Is this possable and how can I do it. Thanks in advance. Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65262
  - 11
    - Inconsistent scan results? Hello! I have a puzzling situation here. Whenever I run Spy Bouncer, I get the following four items: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Window\CurrentVersion\InternetSettings\P3P\History â??gator.comâ? HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Window\CurrentVersion\InternetSettings\P3P\Hstory â??gator.comâ? HKEY_CURRENT_USER\\Software\Microsoft\Window\CurrentVersion\InternetSettings\ZoneMap\Domain â??gator.comâ? HKEY_CURRENT_USER\\Software\Microsoft\Window\CurrentVersion\InternetSettings\ZoneMap\Domain â??kazaa-lite.comâ?? I am running up to date W2K with SpywareBlaster and Spywareguard running in the background, also up to date. When I scan with Hijack This, Spybot S&D or Ad-Aware, they come up clean, but I always get these four when scanned with Spy Bouncer. My questions are: Are these a threat? Why wonâ??t the other three programs find them? Should I just delete them manually, or ignore them? I have never knowingly installed either Gator or Kazaa. Any input would be greatly appreciated! Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65261
  - 12
    - Cannot find server / Still have a trojan horse I've posted about this Dell 2400 (XP) before (Dec 9); I've been working on it to remove viruses, adware, etc 'cuz it was loaded with junk and had no AV program installed. I finally got Grisoft's AVG to load. When I first tried to update the definitions, it started then popped up "Virus found!". I ran the scan - it had 28 viruses (removed 27). When I tried to go online after that, I could connect (dial-up), but I couldn't get to a page. A box popped up saying the Internet connection failed. The address showed "res:shdoclc.dll/dnserror.htm" on the Cannot find server page. How can I fix this??? -- Also, the one remaining that couldn't be fixed (deleted) was a Trojan horse - Downloader.VB.S. After searching on Symantec's website, I couldn'd find a fix or reference to it. It was in the file C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\Cip9g.exe. Is this a valid file or just trash?? Is this affecting the Internet? Please help!! Barb Zakrzewski -- Barb Zakrzewski Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65259
  - 13
    - How to query a dns server? Hi, with nslookup command I want to see that my name is registered with an Ip address as the contact person. what is the command to do this ? thanks !!!! Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65253
  - 14
    - McAfee self-disables I have Windows XP home edition and Verizon internet with MSN(, which includes McAfee anti-virus. I've had this system for more than 6 months, but just recently, McAfee has taken to dusabling itself with no warning and for no apparent reason. I tried getting help from Verizon/MSN, but they were totally useless. And since it is all bundled together, I can't access any McAfee help directly, it always goes back to Verizon. Can anybody help with the McAfee problem? Why is it doing this and how can I fix it? Thanks. Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65244
  - 15
    - Reasons and examples for security I am looking for examples to support my case for tighter security. I am looking in the area of having to renew passwords at set time period which is not currently being done. I am also looking to find any supporting arguments for not having all home folders of everyone on the network available to everyone else on the network. Any stories and or arguments that would help my case for stronger security would be appreciated. Thanks, Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65241
  - 16
    - Decoding Internet headers in email Is any way to translate the SMPT-id or message-id codes to show the real sender, date or time in a faked email? Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65228
  - 17
    - Smartsecurity Desktop Backgound and Spyware My desktop background is now a big warning sign that goes to the smartsecurity website when clicked on. I have tried everything to get rid of this but it won't work. Adware, spybot etc etc. seems to have removed the spyware but not this. What can I do? Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65227
  - 18
    - stopping a user from copying files I've been looking for more information on the "full control" permissions option when setting up share permissions on a specific directory or file. I have setup all my users to read/write/modify, but i want to make sure that they cannot copy or move any of their files to another location. Is there anything else i should be configuring to restrict this access. Any help would be most appreciated. Graham Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65219
  - 19
    - Email content Can't read email content from some senders,for example when I recieve a bill I can't read it,it looks like its encrypted.Even my emails from my personal trainer seem encrypted.Tried to adjust my options but doesn't work. Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65215
  - 20
    - DHCP issues Subnet IP to computer on another domain For the past year our firewall has been managed by a third party, our ISP. About 2 weeks ago, I looked at the DHCP clients that were being issued IP addresses and noticed for a computer that is not on our domain and was in fact on another domain. I deleted it and the next day found that the lease had been renewed. Over the weekend I disconnected the third party firewall and installed an ISA 2004 Server and deleted the computer from the the scope. It has again renewed it's lease. We have several users that use RDP to access our terminal server and we have an Exchange 2003 server with POP3. I have checked and none of our users are logging in from a computer with this particular name or from that domain. Have we been HACKED or is there another explanation? -- Many thanks, Bill Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65209
  - 21
    - Looking for information I have been looking and looking for information about what are the laws on recovering lost passwords at Microsoft. I know there are tools and techniques are available but in a public forum that I moderate we don't allow these tools to be discussed for security reasons. I am just trying to come up and find a policy that Microsoft lists in general for all versions of Windows and not specific to an operating system so we don't get into anything illegal. If I can find this list and follow it then it will be a big help. I have even tried visiting http://www.microsoft.com/security/default.mspx but cannot seem to find any information. Any suggestions? Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65208
  - 22
    - Best Practice for User Accounts Afternoon all, I'm having a debate with a friend regarding best practices for old user accounts. He's insisting that old user accounts should be deleted ASAP and that there is MS documentation to that effect. If anyone knows of this documentation, could you please point it out to me? In my opinion, the user account should be just disabled and not deleted. If the account is deleted then all audit trails will be deleted also, and if the the data is required to be retained for any number of years, it will also be lost. Sure the account cna be re-enabled, but if someone has access to do that, then they also have access to recreate an account also. Thanks in advance for any input (and location of the MS document that talks about this, if there is one) Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65206
  - 23
    - Can't access secure websites... I have an IBM PC. My subscription to Norton ran out. So I uninstalled it and bought Anti-Virus 2005 and installed that. Now, when I try to access any secure website I get the message that that page cannot be displayed...cannot find server. Do you guys think this is an XP thing? or a Norton thing? I've tried changing the security settings to no avail. I have a guy coming out tomorrow to the house @ $55 per 1/2 to try to help. Can you guys help?? Please!! Thank you. Amy Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65197
  - 24
    - PEAP Radius steps with user and machine authetication Environment: Supplicant: XP SP2, Authenticator: Ethernet 10/100 switch Aujthetication Server: IAS Protocol: PEAPv0 I would to understand if in that environment when MACHINE AUTH is enabled either in 802.1X client and in the Radius server, the RADIUS ACCESS ACCEPT message happens only after the USER is authenticated, that means that in the first phase of the process when the MACHINE AUTH finish, the server doesn't send this RADIUS message until the USER is authenticated. This is what is happening and I would like to understand if it is normal because I have seen other Radius implementations that send RADIUS ACCESS ACCEPT message either after the MACHINE AUTH as the USER AUTH Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65196
  - 25
    - Difference in authentication between using IP address and DNS name Can anyone point me in the right direction to understand this problem. What is the difference between accessing a web-site, POP /smtp email account, or network share using the IP address (10.1.1.1) vs it's DNS name site.domain.com. We have a web site that if you browse to it using 10.1.1.1 it will ask you for a username and password. If you browse to site.domain.com, you get access without being prompted for username. Another problem, In outlook if you put your smtp and pop3 addresses as IP addresses, you get access everytime with no problem (username & password saved). If you use the fully qualified name, it does not let you access. And this is different pc to pc. There is probably a white paper somewhere that explains it all. Thanks, Tag: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 Tag: 65190

Hi

On 15th-December-2004 I updated Windows XP Professional, SP2 with 4 security
updates. Since then the update procedure (via Internet Explorer) of McAfees
VirusScan 8.0 gets so far but the windows it opens remain blank.

McAfees:
Version 8.0, Build 8.0.41, Engine Version: 4.3.20

I notice also that in the bottom right corner of IE is "Unknown Zone".

Anything I can do to put it right?

Cheers

Stephen Howe

Top

Re: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 by Stephen

Stephen
Thu Dec 16 22:37:25 CST 2004

Seems to okay after a reboot. Mystifying.

Stephen Howe

Top

Re: 4 security updates on 15th Dec to WinXP SP2 seem to have screwed McAfees 8.0 by TOM

TOM
Fri Dec 17 16:49:16 CST 2004

Mine locked up when McAfee updater and Windows updater
both auto-fired at the same time right after boot up. Required a
forced power-down. then power-up. I then manually updated
McAfee then windows. Seems OK now.

-- Tom

"Stephen Howe" <sjhoweATdialDOTpipexDOTcom> wrote in message
news:egcBae%234EHA.3616@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Hi
>
> On 15th-December-2004 I updated Windows XP Professional, SP2 with 4
> security updates. Since then the update procedure (via Internet Explorer)
> of McAfees VirusScan 8.0 gets so far but the windows it opens remain
> blank.
>
> McAfees:
> Version 8.0, Build 8.0.41, Engine Version: 4.3.20
>
> I notice also that in the bottom right corner of IE is "Unknown Zone".
>
> Anything I can do to put it right?
>
> Cheers
>
> Stephen Howe
>
>

Top