Thanks, I've been so busy trying to remove this thing I
forgot to submit it to spybot. It wouldn't be that hard to
remove it if the system would recognize it but this guy
pulled off a sneaky deal. The bad thing is it doesn't show
any connection or trace route or any way to get to it.
Thanks again to all.

Re: reply to spyware jerks by jjs

jjs
Wed Aug 25 15:25:25 CDT 2004


"johnnyre" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:01f801c48adf$eafc4d40$a401280a@phx.gbl...
> Thanks, I've been so busy trying to remove this thing I
> forgot to submit it to spybot. It wouldn't be that hard to
> remove it if the system would recognize it but this guy
> pulled off a sneaky deal. The bad thing is it doesn't show
> any connection or trace route or any way to get to it.
> Thanks again to all.

I would be surprised if Spy Sweeper missed it. Grab a free trial version, if
you haven't already.



reply to spyware jerks by asdfsdfsdfsafd

asdfsdfsdfsafd
Wed Aug 25 15:28:10 CDT 2004

Keep this in the original thread!

>-----Original Message-----
> Thanks, I've been so busy trying to remove this thing I
>forgot to submit it to spybot. It wouldn't be that hard
to
>remove it if the system would recognize it but this guy
>pulled off a sneaky deal. The bad thing is it doesn't
show
>any connection or trace route or any way to get to it.
>Thanks again to all.
>.
>

Re: reply to spyware jerks by Phillip

Phillip
Wed Aug 25 16:14:57 CDT 2004

"jjs" <Nospam@please.net> wrote in message
news:10iptdm1e1mcs29@news.supernews.com...
> I would be surprised if Spy Sweeper missed it. Grab a free trial version,
> if you haven't already.

Yea, just go to the right site thorugh. There is a bogus one called
www.spysweeper.com . The *real* one is www.webroot.com. If your read the
fake one, it is even written in "broken english", or at least improper
grammer at best.

--

Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com




Re: reply to spyware jerks by clown_girl

clown_girl
Thu Aug 26 08:41:25 CDT 2004

Umm, that's "grammar," not "grammer." And, it's "though,"
not "thorugh." Plus, it's "broken English" with a
capital "E," not "broken english."

LOL, you speak of the fake site's bad grammar, yet your
spelling isn't any better!

You are right, though: there are rogue sites out there.

>-----Original Message-----
>Yea, just go to the right site thorugh. There is a bogus
one called
>www.spysweeper.com . The *real* one is www.webroot.com.
If your read the
>fake one, it is even written in "broken english", or at
least improper
>grammer at best.
>
>Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]


Re: reply to spyware jerks by Phillip

Phillip
Thu Aug 26 10:44:50 CDT 2004

"clown_girl@hotmail.com" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:0a6b01c48b72$6181b6c0$a401280a@phx.gbl...
> Umm, that's "grammar," not "grammer." And, it's "though,"
> not "thorugh." Plus, it's "broken English" with a
> capital "E," not "broken english."
>
> LOL, you speak of the fake site's bad grammar, yet your
> spelling isn't any better!

Just wait till you see me really get excited and start typing fast with all
three fingers.


--

Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com



Re: reply to spyware jerks by clown_girl

clown_girl
Thu Aug 26 10:59:05 CDT 2004

>-----Original Message-----
>Just wait till you see me really get excited and start
>typing fast with all three fingers.

lol

Re: reply to spyware jerks by Immanuel

Immanuel
Fri Aug 27 14:54:45 CDT 2004


> LOL, you speak of the fake site's bad grammar, yet your
> spelling isn't any better!

Ha.

In all fairness, there is really no rule that says you can't put down other
people when you're just as bad as they are (or even worse). Presidential
election comes to mind.





"clown_girl@hotmail.com" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:0a6b01c48b72$6181b6c0$a401280a@phx.gbl...
> Umm, that's "grammar," not "grammer." And, it's "though,"
> not "thorugh." Plus, it's "broken English" with a
> capital "E," not "broken english."
>
> LOL, you speak of the fake site's bad grammar, yet your
> spelling isn't any better!
>
> You are right, though: there are rogue sites out there.
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >Yea, just go to the right site thorugh. There is a bogus
> one called
> >www.spysweeper.com . The *real* one is www.webroot.com.
> If your read the
> >fake one, it is even written in "broken english", or at
> least improper
> >grammer at best.
> >
> >Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
>



Re: reply to spyware jerks by clown_girl

clown_girl
Fri Aug 27 22:42:52 CDT 2004


>-----Original Message-----
>Ha.
>
>In all fairness, there is really no rule that says you
can't put down other
>people when you're just as bad as they are (or even
worse). Presidential
>election comes to mind.

No, there is no rule for that, but it sure makes the
person who is making the comment look like an idiot when
they are not in a position to criticize either.

Anyway, I was harmlessly ribbing Phillip Windell with
these comments. ;)