dont
Thu Sep 18 23:15:39 CDT 2003
"YoKenny" <YKnot@home.invalid> writes:
>
http://www.zdnet.com/anchordesk/stories/story/0,10738,2914667,00.html
>"MSBlast, the recent worm that exploited the buffer overflow in Windows's
>DCOM RPC protocol, wasn't the sort of e-mail-borne pest that antivirus
>software is good at catching. Instead, it infiltrated computers directly
>through their Internet connections.
>Although installing the latest Microsoft patches should prevent infections
>from this sort of worm, a simple software firewall will do the trick, too,
>whether or not you have antivirus software installed. "
I'm puzzled by this and perhaps someone can explain this to me and to
everyone else.
If I, for example, go buy Norton Firewall and install it then I'm pretty
sure it doesn't delete ALL the software written by Microsoft that has to
do with networking (good and bad, bugs and quality code) and replace it
with good known reliable code to handle all the networking.
So how does this firewall protect us from bugs in Microsoft written
network code that is running our systems.?
I think I can understand how buying an external router with built-in
firewall could provide this protection, the bad packets don't ever
get through the router to the Microsoft code.
I think I can understand how running BSD unix on an old 486 under the
table and having it set up as the router could do the same.
But it isn't clear to me how turning on Microsoft's firewall, or any
other firewall that is running on the same box and that doesn't erase
the existing network software protects us from bugs in the existing
network software. There must be something in this I don't understand
Thank you for any enlightenment