Windows Information Toolbar

The new security feature in Windows XP Service Pack 2 (SP2), the information
toolbar, used to appear. It has suddenly stopped appearing. How do I turn
it on again?

Denise

siljaline
Sat Sep 02 22:50:32 CDT 2006

"HartsVideo" wrote:
> The new security feature in Windows XP Service Pack 2 (SP2), the information
> toolbar, used to appear. It has suddenly stopped appearing. How do I turn
> it on again?

'Description of the Internet Explorer Information Bar in Windows XP SP2'
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;843017

Silj

--
siljaline

MS - MVP Windows (IE/OE) & Windows Security, AH-VSOP

Security Tools Updates
http://aumha.net/viewforum.php?f=31

Reply to group, as return address is invalid that we may all benefit.

HartsVideo
Sat Sep 02 23:47:01 CDT 2006

What do you mean by: "Reply to group, as return address is invalid that we
may all benefit?"

siljaline
Sun Sep 03 00:03:55 CDT 2006

"HartsVideo" wrote:
> What do you mean by: "Reply to group, as return address is invalid that we
> may all benefit?"

Meaning two things - my return address will not work since it is "munged"
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/munad.htm
'Munge Email Address'

Two - replying to the Group of which you have posted, benefits all that
are reading your query.

Silj

--
siljaline

MS - MVP Windows (IE/OE) & Windows Security, AH-VSOP

Security Tools Updates
http://aumha.net/viewforum.php?f=31

Reply to group, as return address is invalid that we may all benefit.

B
Sun Sep 03 00:21:41 CDT 2006

On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 01:03:55 -0400, "siljaline" <siljaline@nospam.com>
wrote:

>"HartsVideo" wrote:
>> What do you mean by: "Reply to group, as return address is invalid that we
>> may all benefit?"
>
>Meaning two things - my return address will not work since it is "munged"
>http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/munad.htm
>'Munge Email Address'

How is the address siljaline@nospam.com munged? - Seems like a
perfectly valid address to me.

>Two - replying to the Group of which you have posted, benefits all that
>are reading your query.
>
>Silj

/B. Nice

---
Comments or advice I may provide is primarily aimed at home users.

HartsVideo
Sun Sep 03 00:49:02 CDT 2006

I still have no idea what you're talking about. What's munged? What do you
want?

Denise

siljaline
Sun Sep 03 01:22:45 CDT 2006

"HartsVideo" wrote:
>I still have no idea what you're talking about. What's munged? What do you
> want?

I do not wish anything from you, Denise. (Other than to help you.)

Munged means the reply email address for *my* replies will not work
since the address is not real or valid/working....

Silj

--
siljaline

MS - MVP Windows (IE/OE) & Windows Security, AH-VSOP

Security Tools Updates
http://aumha.net/viewforum.php?f=31

Reply to group, as return address is invalid that we may all benefit.

B
Sun Sep 03 02:28:41 CDT 2006

On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 02:22:45 -0400, "siljaline" <siljaline@nospam.com>
wrote:

>"HartsVideo" wrote:
>>I still have no idea what you're talking about. What's munged? What do you
>> want?
>
>I do not wish anything from you, Denise. (Other than to help you.)
>
>Munged means the reply email address for *my* replies will not work
>since the address is not real or valid/working....

Since nospam.com is a valid (and in use) domain name,
siljaline@nospam.com is a valid e-mail address.

>
>Silj


/B. Nice

---
Comments or advice I may provide is primarily aimed at home users.

Robert
Sun Sep 03 02:40:53 CDT 2006

On 2006-09-03 08:28:41 +0100, B. Nice <b__nice@hotmail.com> said:

>
> Comments or advice I may provide is primarily aimed at home users.

I think the intention was perfectly clear and being picky about things
isn't helping the OP understand. Still you are correct. If we're being
picky about things though, then your Sig delimiter is broken.

--
Robert Moir
Microsoft MVP for Security

www.robertmoir.com

B
Sun Sep 03 03:30:07 CDT 2006

On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 08:40:53 +0100, Robert Moir <bofh@mvps.org> wrote:

>On 2006-09-03 08:28:41 +0100, B. Nice <b__nice@hotmail.com> said:
>
>>
>> Comments or advice I may provide is primarily aimed at home users.
>
>I think the intention was perfectly clear and being picky about things
>isn't helping the OP understand.

I have'nt addressed the OP.

>Still you are correct.

Not nescessarily. siljaline may have an agreement with the owner of
nospam.com that I don't know of. I just wanted to make sure that
siljaline follows the recommendations him/her-self. The link he/she
provided clearly states: "You also need to verify the domain does not
exist. If it exists, you are then causing them to get the spam and you
may possibly be breaking the law."

If you consider that being "picky", feel free.

If someone wants to use a fake mail address I see at least two better
options:

1) make a valid hotmail address for it and set up a default delete
rule.

2) name the e-mail address with the extension .invalid as suggested by
RFC 2606.

>If we're being picky about things though, then your Sig delimiter is broken.

If so, please let me know why so I can correct it. I don't mind being
corrected for a good reason.

Malke
Sun Sep 03 06:23:09 CDT 2006

B. Nice wrote:
>
> If so, please let me know why so I can correct it. I don't mind being
> corrected for a good reason.

Your sig delimiter should be only two dashes - you've got three.

Malke
--
Elephant Boy Computers
www.elephantboycomputers.com
"Don't Panic!"
MS-MVP Windows - Shell/User

Robert
Sun Sep 03 11:14:56 CDT 2006

Malke wrote:
> B. Nice wrote:
>>
>> If so, please let me know why so I can correct it. I don't mind being
>> corrected for a good reason.
>
> Your sig delimiter should be only two dashes - you've got three.

and the space. "-- " on a line by itself.

http://lipas.uwasa.fi/~ts/http/signatur.html

I did say I was being picky!