Alan
Wed Apr 21 23:15:14 CDT 2004
Alun
Thanks for your reply.
Using your example, are you suggesting that I :
1. Setup an e-mail account in OE6 for fred+verisignID@example.com ?
2. Enrol for a Verisign Digital ID with fred+verisignID@example.com ?
3. Send my public key to my e-mail correspondents using
fred+verisignID@example.com ?
4. Tell my correspondents to use fred+verisignID@example.com only when
sending me encrypted messages ?
5. Use fred+verisignID@example.com only when sending digitally signed and
encrypted e-mail messages ?
Although doing this would detect whether I'm receiving spam as a result of
enrolling with Verisign, nevertheless if spamming does occur, then
presumambly both my fred+verisignID@example.com and normal e-mail address,
fred@example.com , are compromised anyway, and therefore there is really no
advantage to using fred+verisignID@example.com for enrolling with Verisign.
Am I missing something, &/or misunderstanding you ?
Alan C. Brown
-----------
"Alun Jones [MS MVP]" <alun@texis.invalid> wrote in message
news:fZ9hc.11914$Ml3.7373@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com...
> >
>No, that is correct. However, many people have the ability to generate
>unique addresses - "fred+fish@example.com", for instance, would (on most
>mail servers) go to "fred@example.com".
>Sign up with "fred+verisignID@example.com", and you can use that as your
>secured ID, and know that anything received back to that same address comes
>through responses to your emails, or from people that have been given the
>address by Verisign (or anyone else that you've passed that address on to).
>Sign up for a Digital ID a few weeks before you send any messages from that
>email account, and you quickly find out whether Verisign is sending your
>email address to spammers. While Verisign have done some really bad things
>in the past (approving certificates without checking the requester's
>information, passing failed DNS requests to their own web site for
>advertising, sending out mail implying that domain owners have to renew
>through them, refusing to return money for services that they aren't
>rendering, that kind of thing), I don't think this is the sort of thing
>they'd be interested in - it'd bring down too much heat.
>
> Alun.
> ~~~~
>
> [Please don't email posters, if a Usenet response is appropriate.]
> --
> Texas Imperial Software | Find us at
http://www.wftpd.com or email
> 1602 Harvest Moon Place | alun@texis.com.
> Cedar Park TX 78613-1419 | WFTPD, WFTPD Pro are Windows FTP servers.
> Fax/Voice +1(512)258-9858 | Try our NEW client software, WFTPD Explorer.