The use of Skype is completely based on internet. I wonder if the software
is secure. Any severe security problems found in this software?

Any technical comments would be much appreciated.

Re: Is Skype safe for user? by S

S
Tue May 03 05:36:37 CDT 2005

No, nothing severe. Substantial prerequisites in terms of insecurity are
required to eavesdrop the communications or convert your system to an audio
bug with skype client. I would say, it's equal to the traditional analogue
phone.

--
Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE
-= F1 is the key =-

"cc" <anonymous@disscussion.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:uWEO4o8TFHA.4056@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> The use of Skype is completely based on internet. I wonder if the software
> is secure. Any severe security problems found in this software?
>
> Any technical comments would be much appreciated.
>
>



Re: Is Skype safe for user? by François

François
Tue May 03 06:29:21 CDT 2005


"Juergen Nieveler" <juergen.nieveler.nospam@arcor.de> a écrit dans le
message de news:Xns964B80BA6E4F3juergennieveler@nieveler.org...
> "cc" <anonymous@disscussion.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> > The use of Skype is completely based on internet. I wonder if the
> > software is secure. Any severe security problems found in this
> > software?
>

80 and 443 tcp open ports. Possible flaws.

> As the source code is not available for review, nobody could really look
> for critical stuff yet...
>

Skype should be a play-ground to reversers. (Even with packed .exe)



--
Dialoguer pour une meilleure sécurité
Chat for a better security

Communauté sécurité Microsoft (French Microsoft security community) :
http://www.rezalfr.org/securite



Re: Is Skype safe for user? by cc

cc
Tue May 03 07:38:54 CDT 2005

If the system is cracked, would the voice communications be eavesdroped?
What do you mean by "converting the system to an audio bug with skype
client"?

"S. Pidgorny <MVP>" <slavickp@yahoo.com> дÈëÏûÏ¢ÐÂÎÅ:uy4sZw8TFHA.2304@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
No, nothing severe. Substantial prerequisites in terms of insecurity are
required to eavesdrop the communications or convert your system to an audio
bug with skype client. I would say, it's equal to the traditional analogue
phone.

--
Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE
-= F1 is the key =-

"cc" <anonymous@disscussion.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:uWEO4o8TFHA.4056@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> The use of Skype is completely based on internet. I wonder if the software
> is secure. Any severe security problems found in this software?
>
> Any technical comments would be much appreciated.
>
>




Re: Is Skype safe for user? by Mark

Mark
Tue May 03 09:19:27 CDT 2005

None that are known by me, I suggest turning off alternate port 80 in it
tho.

- Mark R

"cc" <anonymous@disscussion.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:uWEO4o8TFHA.4056@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> The use of Skype is completely based on internet. I wonder if the software
> is secure. Any severe security problems found in this software?
>
> Any technical comments would be much appreciated.
>
>



Re: Is Skype safe for user? by Tim

Tim
Tue May 03 16:42:21 CDT 2005

Has anyone successfully managed to block Skype with a firewall ?

Regards,

Tim

"Mark Randall" <markyr@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:u9aqEt%23TFHA.4092@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> None that are known by me, I suggest turning off alternate port 80 in it
> tho.
>
> - Mark R
>
> "cc" <anonymous@disscussion.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:uWEO4o8TFHA.4056@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>> The use of Skype is completely based on internet. I wonder if the
>> software
>> is secure. Any severe security problems found in this software?
>>
>> Any technical comments would be much appreciated.
>>
>>
>
>



Re: Is Skype safe for user? by Bigbruva

Bigbruva
Wed May 04 02:09:38 CDT 2005

Yes, I know of one very large company that blocks it through it's firewall
as a matter of policy.
They are using ISA Server 2004 to filter it using application layer
filtering.

BB

"Tim Holman (MVP - Windows Security)" <tim_holman@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:usc%239jCUFHA.1148@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Has anyone successfully managed to block Skype with a firewall ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Tim
>
> "Mark Randall" <markyr@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:u9aqEt%23TFHA.4092@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>> None that are known by me, I suggest turning off alternate port 80 in it
>> tho.
>>
>> - Mark R
>>
>> "cc" <anonymous@disscussion.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:uWEO4o8TFHA.4056@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>>> The use of Skype is completely based on internet. I wonder if the
>>> software
>>> is secure. Any severe security problems found in this software?
>>>
>>> Any technical comments would be much appreciated.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>



Re: Is Skype safe for user? by S

S
Wed May 04 06:58:51 CDT 2005

I'm not certain about that, but I heard that there are tools that allow to
reconstruct conversation from a network capture - thus potential for
eavesdropping exists even without the need to compromise the system. On the
other hand, Skype has encryption.

Converting to a bug: this bit does require a backdoor to the system. Once
there, you can enable mike and dial yourself - the compromised system will
send all audio from the room.

VoIP opens the whole world of opportunities - and also reminds us about
inherent insecurities in traditional telephony, which is in many casess
considered a trusted communication channel, to my eternal wonder.

--
Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE
-= F1 is the key =-

"cc" <anonymous@disscussion.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:uA4UO09TFHA.2388@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> If the system is cracked, would the voice communications be eavesdroped?
> What do you mean by "converting the system to an audio bug with skype
> client"?
>
> "S. Pidgorny <MVP>" <slavickp@yahoo.com>
дÈëÏûÏ¢ÐÂÎÅ:uy4sZw8TFHA.2304@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> No, nothing severe. Substantial prerequisites in terms of insecurity are
> required to eavesdrop the communications or convert your system to an
audio
> bug with skype client. I would say, it's equal to the traditional analogue
> phone.
>
> --
> Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE
> -= F1 is the key =-
>
> "cc" <anonymous@disscussion.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:uWEO4o8TFHA.4056@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> > The use of Skype is completely based on internet. I wonder if the
software
> > is secure. Any severe security problems found in this software?
> >
> > Any technical comments would be much appreciated.
> >
> >
>
>
>



Re: Is Skype safe for user? by cc

cc
Wed May 04 08:04:10 CDT 2005

Thank you. Svyatoslave.
Do you mean that analogue signals has inherent insecurity problems without
accessing to the internet?

"the compromised system will send all audio from the room"--Do you mean it
is a method to test if the system is compromised?

"S. Pidgorny <MVP>" <slavickp@yahoo.com> дÈëÏûÏ¢ÐÂÎÅ:OjJmwCKUFHA.580@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
I'm not certain about that, but I heard that there are tools that allow to
reconstruct conversation from a network capture - thus potential for
eavesdropping exists even without the need to compromise the system. On the
other hand, Skype has encryption.

Converting to a bug: this bit does require a backdoor to the system. Once
there, you can enable mike and dial yourself - the compromised system will
send all audio from the room.

VoIP opens the whole world of opportunities - and also reminds us about
inherent insecurities in traditional telephony, which is in many casess
considered a trusted communication channel, to my eternal wonder.

--
Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE
-= F1 is the key =-

"cc" <anonymous@disscussion.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:uA4UO09TFHA.2388@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> If the system is cracked, would the voice communications be eavesdroped?
> What do you mean by "converting the system to an audio bug with skype
> client"?
>
> "S. Pidgorny <MVP>" <slavickp@yahoo.com>
дÈëÏûÏ¢ÐÂÎÅ:uy4sZw8TFHA.2304@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> No, nothing severe. Substantial prerequisites in terms of insecurity are
> required to eavesdrop the communications or convert your system to an
audio
> bug with skype client. I would say, it's equal to the traditional analogue
> phone.
>
> --
> Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE
> -= F1 is the key =-
>
> "cc" <anonymous@disscussion.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:uWEO4o8TFHA.4056@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> > The use of Skype is completely based on internet. I wonder if the
software
> > is secure. Any severe security problems found in this software?
> >
> > Any technical comments would be much appreciated.
> >
> >
>
>
>




Re: Is Skype safe for user? by S

S
Thu May 05 04:57:43 CDT 2005

This is all based on rumour and as such sould be considered very
questionable until rpoven otherwise. From what I see now, Skype isn't that
bad see the analysis at
http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/~salman/skype/Skype_Analysis_1_3.pdf

If somebody can compromise your computer, Skype won't be a preferred way to
grab information from the system. And it's not too complicated to write code
that will use microfone and send audio stream to the Internet.

Cheers

Slav


"cc" <anonymous@disscussion.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:eh765nKUFHA.1152@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Thank you. Svyatoslave.
> Do you mean that analogue signals has inherent insecurity problems without
> accessing to the internet?
>
> "the compromised system will send all audio from the room"--Do you mean it
> is a method to test if the system is compromised?
>
> "S. Pidgorny <MVP>" <slavickp@yahoo.com>
дÈëÏûÏ¢ÐÂÎÅ:OjJmwCKUFHA.580@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> I'm not certain about that, but I heard that there are tools that allow to
> reconstruct conversation from a network capture - thus potential for
> eavesdropping exists even without the need to compromise the system. On
the
> other hand, Skype has encryption.
>
> Converting to a bug: this bit does require a backdoor to the system. Once
> there, you can enable mike and dial yourself - the compromised system will
> send all audio from the room.
>
> VoIP opens the whole world of opportunities - and also reminds us about
> inherent insecurities in traditional telephony, which is in many casess
> considered a trusted communication channel, to my eternal wonder.
>
> --
> Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE
> -= F1 is the key =-
>
> "cc" <anonymous@disscussion.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:uA4UO09TFHA.2388@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > If the system is cracked, would the voice communications be eavesdroped?
> > What do you mean by "converting the system to an audio bug with skype
> > client"?
> >
> > "S. Pidgorny <MVP>" <slavickp@yahoo.com>
> дÈëÏûÏ¢ÐÂÎÅ:uy4sZw8TFHA.2304@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > No, nothing severe. Substantial prerequisites in terms of insecurity are
> > required to eavesdrop the communications or convert your system to an
> audio
> > bug with skype client. I would say, it's equal to the traditional
analogue
> > phone.
> >
> > --
> > Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE
> > -= F1 is the key =-
> >
> > "cc" <anonymous@disscussion.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> > news:uWEO4o8TFHA.4056@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> > > The use of Skype is completely based on internet. I wonder if the
> software
> > > is secure. Any severe security problems found in this software?
> > >
> > > Any technical comments would be much appreciated.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>



Re: Is Skype safe for user? by Tom

Tom
Thu May 05 07:00:39 CDT 2005

I did much research before installing and using the most recent version(s)
of Skype, and all the conclusions I found were that it is safe and secure.

Tom

"S. Pidgorny <MVP>" <slavickp@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:OKjOojVUFHA.2128@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
| This is all based on rumour and as such sould be considered very
| questionable until rpoven otherwise. From what I see now, Skype isn't that
| bad see the analysis at
| http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/~salman/skype/Skype_Analysis_1_3.pdf
|
| If somebody can compromise your computer, Skype won't be a preferred way
to
| grab information from the system. And it's not too complicated to write
code
| that will use microfone and send audio stream to the Internet.
|
| Cheers
|
| Slav
|
|
| "cc" <anonymous@disscussion.microsoft.com> wrote in message
| news:eh765nKUFHA.1152@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
| > Thank you. Svyatoslave.
| > Do you mean that analogue signals has inherent insecurity problems
without
| > accessing to the internet?
| >
| > "the compromised system will send all audio from the room"--Do you mean
it
| > is a method to test if the system is compromised?
| >
| > "S. Pidgorny <MVP>" <slavickp@yahoo.com>
| дÈëÏûÏ¢ÐÂÎÅ:OjJmwCKUFHA.580@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
| > I'm not certain about that, but I heard that there are tools that allow
to
| > reconstruct conversation from a network capture - thus potential for
| > eavesdropping exists even without the need to compromise the system. On
| the
| > other hand, Skype has encryption.
| >
| > Converting to a bug: this bit does require a backdoor to the system.
Once
| > there, you can enable mike and dial yourself - the compromised system
will
| > send all audio from the room.
| >
| > VoIP opens the whole world of opportunities - and also reminds us about
| > inherent insecurities in traditional telephony, which is in many casess
| > considered a trusted communication channel, to my eternal wonder.
| >
| > --
| > Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE
| > -= F1 is the key =-
| >
| > "cc" <anonymous@disscussion.microsoft.com> wrote in message
| > news:uA4UO09TFHA.2388@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
| > > If the system is cracked, would the voice communications be
eavesdroped?
| > > What do you mean by "converting the system to an audio bug with skype
| > > client"?
| > >
| > > "S. Pidgorny <MVP>" <slavickp@yahoo.com>
| > дÈëÏûÏ¢ÐÂÎÅ:uy4sZw8TFHA.2304@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
| > > No, nothing severe. Substantial prerequisites in terms of insecurity
are
| > > required to eavesdrop the communications or convert your system to an
| > audio
| > > bug with skype client. I would say, it's equal to the traditional
| analogue
| > > phone.
| > >
| > > --
| > > Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE
| > > -= F1 is the key =-
| > >
| > > "cc" <anonymous@disscussion.microsoft.com> wrote in message
| > > news:uWEO4o8TFHA.4056@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
| > > > The use of Skype is completely based on internet. I wonder if the
| > software
| > > > is secure. Any severe security problems found in this software?
| > > >
| > > > Any technical comments would be much appreciated.
| > > >
| > > >
| > >
| > >
| > >
| >
| >
| >
|
|



Re: Is Skype safe for user? by cc

cc
Thu May 05 07:54:19 CDT 2005

Why don't Skype use built-in digital certificates like AIM?

Or the encrytion algorithm it solely uses is more secure?

"S. Pidgorny <MVP>" <slavickp@yahoo.com> дÈëÏûÏ¢ÐÂÎÅ:OKjOojVUFHA.2128@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
This is all based on rumour and as such sould be considered very
questionable until rpoven otherwise. From what I see now, Skype isn't that
bad see the analysis at
http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/~salman/skype/Skype_Analysis_1_3.pdf

If somebody can compromise your computer, Skype won't be a preferred way to
grab information from the system. And it's not too complicated to write code
that will use microfone and send audio stream to the Internet.

Cheers

Slav


"cc" <anonymous@disscussion.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:eh765nKUFHA.1152@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Thank you. Svyatoslave.
> Do you mean that analogue signals has inherent insecurity problems without
> accessing to the internet?
>
> "the compromised system will send all audio from the room"--Do you mean it
> is a method to test if the system is compromised?
>
> "S. Pidgorny <MVP>" <slavickp@yahoo.com>
дÈëÏûÏ¢ÐÂÎÅ:OjJmwCKUFHA.580@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> I'm not certain about that, but I heard that there are tools that allow to
> reconstruct conversation from a network capture - thus potential for
> eavesdropping exists even without the need to compromise the system. On
the
> other hand, Skype has encryption.
>
> Converting to a bug: this bit does require a backdoor to the system. Once
> there, you can enable mike and dial yourself - the compromised system will
> send all audio from the room.
>
> VoIP opens the whole world of opportunities - and also reminds us about
> inherent insecurities in traditional telephony, which is in many casess
> considered a trusted communication channel, to my eternal wonder.
>
> --
> Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE
> -= F1 is the key =-
>
> "cc" <anonymous@disscussion.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:uA4UO09TFHA.2388@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > If the system is cracked, would the voice communications be eavesdroped?
> > What do you mean by "converting the system to an audio bug with skype
> > client"?
> >
> > "S. Pidgorny <MVP>" <slavickp@yahoo.com>
> дÈëÏûÏ¢ÐÂÎÅ:uy4sZw8TFHA.2304@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > No, nothing severe. Substantial prerequisites in terms of insecurity are
> > required to eavesdrop the communications or convert your system to an
> audio
> > bug with skype client. I would say, it's equal to the traditional
analogue
> > phone.
> >
> > --
> > Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE
> > -= F1 is the key =-
> >
> > "cc" <anonymous@disscussion.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> > news:uWEO4o8TFHA.4056@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> > > The use of Skype is completely based on internet. I wonder if the
> software
> > > is secure. Any severe security problems found in this software?
> > >
> > > Any technical comments would be much appreciated.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>




Re: Is Skype safe for user? by D

D
Thu May 05 10:18:11 CDT 2005

because it's free

cc wrote in news:%23FJdRGXUFHA.3244@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl
> Why don't Skype use built-in digital certificates like AIM?
>
> Or the encrytion algorithm it solely uses is more secure?
>
> "S. Pidgorny <MVP>" <slavickp@yahoo.com>
> дÈëÏûÏ¢ÐÂÎÅ:OKjOojVUFHA.2128@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... This is all based on
> rumour and as such sould be considered very questionable until rpoven
> otherwise. From what I see now, Skype isn't that bad see the analysis at
> http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/~salman/skype/Skype_Analysis_1_3.pdf
>
> If somebody can compromise your computer, Skype won't be a preferred way to
> grab information from the system. And it's not too complicated to write code
> that will use microfone and send audio stream to the Internet.
>
> Cheers
>
> Slav
>
>
> "cc" <anonymous@disscussion.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:eh765nKUFHA.1152@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>> Thank you. Svyatoslave.
>> Do you mean that analogue signals has inherent insecurity problems without
>> accessing to the internet?
>>
>> "the compromised system will send all audio from the room"--Do you mean it
>> is a method to test if the system is compromised?
>>
>> "S. Pidgorny <MVP>" <slavickp@yahoo.com>
> дÈëÏûÏ¢ÐÂÎÅ:OjJmwCKUFHA.580@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>> I'm not certain about that, but I heard that there are tools that allow to
>> reconstruct conversation from a network capture - thus potential for
>> eavesdropping exists even without the need to compromise the system. On
> the
>> other hand, Skype has encryption.
>>
>> Converting to a bug: this bit does require a backdoor to the system. Once
>> there, you can enable mike and dial yourself - the compromised system will
>> send all audio from the room.
>>
>> VoIP opens the whole world of opportunities - and also reminds us about
>> inherent insecurities in traditional telephony, which is in many casess
>> considered a trusted communication channel, to my eternal wonder.
>>
>> --
>> Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE
>> -= F1 is the key =-
>>
>> "cc" <anonymous@disscussion.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:uA4UO09TFHA.2388@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>>> If the system is cracked, would the voice communications be eavesdroped?
>>> What do you mean by "converting the system to an audio bug with skype
>>> client"?
>> >
>>> "S. Pidgorny <MVP>" <slavickp@yahoo.com>
>> дÈëÏûÏ¢ÐÂÎÅ:uy4sZw8TFHA.2304@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>>> No, nothing severe. Substantial prerequisites in terms of insecurity are
>>> required to eavesdrop the communications or convert your system to an
>> audio
>>> bug with skype client. I would say, it's equal to the traditional
> analogue
>>> phone.
>> >
>>> --
>>> Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE
>>> -= F1 is the key =-
>> >
>>> "cc" <anonymous@disscussion.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>>> news:uWEO4o8TFHA.4056@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>>>> The use of Skype is completely based on internet. I wonder if the
>> software
>>>> is secure. Any severe security problems found in this software?
>> > >
>>>> Any technical comments would be much appreciated.
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>




Re: Is Skype safe for user? by Ray

Ray
Thu May 05 13:52:52 CDT 2005

Take a look at your firewall logs using your computer as the source IP and
you'll see your little friend Skype is accessing computers continuously all
over the world. That traffic entering and leaving my corporate network is
not my definition of "safe and secure."

Ray

"Tom Pepper Willett" <tompepper@mvps.org> wrote in message
news:eSgW%23oWUFHA.2520@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> I did much research before installing and using the most recent version(s)
> of Skype, and all the conclusions I found were that it is safe and secure.
>
> Tom
>
> "S. Pidgorny <MVP>" <slavickp@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:OKjOojVUFHA.2128@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> | This is all based on rumour and as such sould be considered very
> | questionable until rpoven otherwise. From what I see now, Skype isn't
that
> | bad see the analysis at
> | http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/~salman/skype/Skype_Analysis_1_3.pdf
> |
> | If somebody can compromise your computer, Skype won't be a preferred way
> to
> | grab information from the system. And it's not too complicated to write
> code
> | that will use microfone and send audio stream to the Internet.
> |
> | Cheers
> |
> | Slav
> |
> |
> | "cc" <anonymous@disscussion.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> | news:eh765nKUFHA.1152@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> | > Thank you. Svyatoslave.
> | > Do you mean that analogue signals has inherent insecurity problems
> without
> | > accessing to the internet?
> | >
> | > "the compromised system will send all audio from the room"--Do you
mean
> it
> | > is a method to test if the system is compromised?
> | >
> | > "S. Pidgorny <MVP>" <slavickp@yahoo.com>
> | дÈëÏûÏ¢ÐÂÎÅ:OjJmwCKUFHA.580@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> | > I'm not certain about that, but I heard that there are tools that
allow
> to
> | > reconstruct conversation from a network capture - thus potential for
> | > eavesdropping exists even without the need to compromise the system.
On
> | the
> | > other hand, Skype has encryption.
> | >
> | > Converting to a bug: this bit does require a backdoor to the system.
> Once
> | > there, you can enable mike and dial yourself - the compromised system
> will
> | > send all audio from the room.
> | >
> | > VoIP opens the whole world of opportunities - and also reminds us
about
> | > inherent insecurities in traditional telephony, which is in many
casess
> | > considered a trusted communication channel, to my eternal wonder.
> | >
> | > --
> | > Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE
> | > -= F1 is the key =-
> | >
> | > "cc" <anonymous@disscussion.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> | > news:uA4UO09TFHA.2388@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> | > > If the system is cracked, would the voice communications be
> eavesdroped?
> | > > What do you mean by "converting the system to an audio bug with
skype
> | > > client"?
> | > >
> | > > "S. Pidgorny <MVP>" <slavickp@yahoo.com>
> | > дÈëÏûÏ¢ÐÂÎÅ:uy4sZw8TFHA.2304@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> | > > No, nothing severe. Substantial prerequisites in terms of insecurity
> are
> | > > required to eavesdrop the communications or convert your system to
an
> | > audio
> | > > bug with skype client. I would say, it's equal to the traditional
> | analogue
> | > > phone.
> | > >
> | > > --
> | > > Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE
> | > > -= F1 is the key =-
> | > >
> | > > "cc" <anonymous@disscussion.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> | > > news:uWEO4o8TFHA.4056@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> | > > > The use of Skype is completely based on internet. I wonder if the
> | > software
> | > > > is secure. Any severe security problems found in this software?
> | > > >
> | > > > Any technical comments would be much appreciated.
> | > > >
> | > > >
> | > >
> | > >
> | > >
> | >
> | >
> | >
> |
> |
>
>



Re: Is Skype safe for user? by S

S
Sat May 07 20:11:41 CDT 2005

That is not a good explanation. One may wish not to use public CAs for
establishing trust - self-made certificates are equally good for privacy and
integrity protection.

The right answer is: because Skype decided to do so. The product is not
using any of the standards for VoIP, so it's not a big deal they're using
proprietary stuff.

--
Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE
-= F1 is the key =-

"D@annyBoy" <origin@ld@nnyboy@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:OR4STWYUFHA.2768@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> because it's free
>
> cc wrote in news:%23FJdRGXUFHA.3244@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl
> > Why don't Skype use built-in digital certificates like AIM?
> >
> > Or the encrytion algorithm it solely uses is more secure?
> >