Susan
Thu Oct 07 07:08:14 CDT 2004
thanks, Steve...I think I'll relax a little and take your
advice!
>-----Original Message-----
>In my opinion weekly is fine unless you have reason to
suspect otherwise or
>have poor performance or unusual activity on your
computer. I suggest that
>you use an antivirus program like Norton that monitors
your computer all the
>time for suspicious activity, can keep itself up to date
automatically, and
>also scans ALL of your emails no matter who they come
from. Also be sure to
>use a strong password for your user accounts as many
trojans or worms will
>run a dictionary attack against the administrator account
[assuming you are
>using W2K/XP ], keep your computer current with critical
updates at Windows
>Updates which you may be able to do automatically, and
consider implementing
>the minimum Internet Explorer security settings in the
link below. A lot of
>the stuff your scans find may be relatively harmless such
as a tracking
>cookie that AdAware always will find. I would also only
scan with one
>program for parasites such as AdAware and keep the other
ones in case you
>run into a difficult problem such as a home page
hijacking where it often
>helps to try various programs.--- Steve
>
>
http://mvps.org/winhelp2002/unwanted.htm
>
http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/protect/default.a
spx
>
>"Susan" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message
>news:0efc01c4abd6$e1661050$a401280a@phx.gbl...
>> Is there a recommended schedule for scanning a PC for
>> viruses/trojans/malware/etc.? I use most of the
programs
>> suggested in this newsgroup (Spyware Blaster, Ad-Aware,
>> Spybot S&D, WinPatrol, CW Shredder, etc.), plus I have
>> active anti-virus and firewall in place. I run each of
the
>> scans daily, and I always seem to find something
lurking.
>> At times this seems like paranoia, but I'm trying to
>> prevent greater problems. Is daily too often? Or is
there
>> no such thing as too often? The problem is that these
>> scans take quite a while to run. Any recommendations
would
>> be appreciated!
>
>
>.
>