Re: Local Caching by Karl
Karl
Sat Jul 30 16:36:54 CDT 2005
I agree completely. For almost all environments, changing this setting will
not increase your security and has the potential to cause significant
inconveniences for you and your users. This setting only applies to people
who have physical access to your computer, and in that case, those people
have a large variety of ways to get into that computer and will no doubt
crack the computer eventually. If you're really concerned about people with
physical access to your computes breaking in, that's pretty hard to prevent,
but there are a lot of other more important settings and countermeasures to
worry about first. Encrypting the entire hard disk partition with a third
party encryption software, for example.
"Roger Abell" <mvpNOSpam@asu.edu> wrote in message
news:OGCEhQUlFHA.2396@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Unless you have some requirement whereby you want to insist that
> domain account logins cannot happen unless the domain controller(s)
> can be contacted, then you are better off just leaving the credential
> caching alone, IOW if your concern is about the strength of the cache
> storage and whether it presents a vulnerability to your environment,
> I would not be worried if I were you, the caching is quite strong .
> --
> Roger Abell
> Microsoft MVP (Windows Security)
> MCSE (W2k3,W2k,Nt4) MCDBA
> "Keith" <Keith@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:FE0E24EB-46AE-4421-92BC-50191250765A@microsoft.com...
> > Where is the user's password cached when you have a GPO setting on
> > Interactive logon: Number of previous logons to cache (in case domain
> > controller is not available)? Is it store in LSASS secrets?
> >
> > If we set our server to not store local cache of user's password what
> > application or other things will break? I u nderstand that if you turn
> that
> > off and there is no domain controller available that you will be unable
to
> > logon to that server in that domain...But what other hidden gotchas are
> out
> > there that I might not be thinking of?
> >
> >
>
>