John
Wed Nov 15 10:16:04 CST 2006
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0221_01C7088E.4B5BE3C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The security update was re-released on Sept 26 specifically for this =
issue.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-049.mspx
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Related to This Security Update=20
Why did Microsoft reissue this bulletin on September 26, 2006?
Microsoft updated this bulletin and the associated security updates to =
address and resolve the issues identified in Microsoft Knowledge Base =
Article 920958 There are no additional security benefits as a result of =
reinstalling this update.
=E2=80=A2 V2.0 (September 26, 2006): The update has been revised =
and re-released for Microsoft Windows 2000 Service Pack 4 to address =
issues identified in Microsoft Knowledge Base Article 920958.
=20
"Canuck geoff" <Canuckgeoff@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message =
news:622D1050-D271-4268-854B-9F27A3BF4586@microsoft.com...
> This new article speaks to a fix to the problem created by 06-049. If =
the=20
> patch is broken why is this not a re-release of the patch? I see none =
of the=20
> usual "Microsoft only recommends applying this to systems experiencing =
the=20
> problem..." =20
>=20
> I take it then that every system on which 06-049 is installed is still =
> potentially vulnerable to file corruption. If so then 925308 is in =
fact a=20
> vital patch not for security's sake but for data protection's sake.
>=20
> MS please respond. Should we apply this fix to all systems that have =
06-049=20
> installed.
------=_NextPart_000_0221_01C7088E.4B5BE3C0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="Utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=EF=BB=BF<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.5730.11" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The security update was re-released on =
Sept 26=20
specifically for this issue.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><A=20
href=3D"
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-049.mspx"=
><FONT=20
face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-049.mspx=
</FONT></A></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>
<TABLE cellSpacing=3D0 cellPadding=3D0 border=3D0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 6px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-BOTTOM: =
0px; PADDING-TOP: 6px"><FONT=20
face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT></TD>
<TD class=3DsecLabel>
<SCRIPT language=3Djavascript>startA('s'+sID)</SCRIPT>
<A style=3D"TEXT-DECORATION: none" =
href=3D"javascript:Toggle('s3l1-E4E')">
<H3><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) =
Related to=20
This Security Update</FONT></H3>
<SCRIPT language=3Djavascript>endA()</SCRIPT>
</A></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<DIV id=3Ds3l1-E4E>
<SCRIPT language=3Djavascript>chkHide('s'+sID);</SCRIPT>
<DIV class=3DexpandoIndent>
<P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Why did Microsoft reissue this bulletin =
on=20
September 26, 2006?<BR>Microsoft updated this bulletin and the =
associated=20
security updates to address and resolve the issues identified in =
</FONT><A=20
href=3D"
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/920958" target=3D_blank><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>Microsoft Knowledge Base Article 920958</FONT></A><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
size=3D2> There are no additional security benefits as a result of =
reinstalling=20
this update.</FONT></P></DIV></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV>
<TABLE cellSpacing=3D0 cellPadding=3D0 border=3D0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD class=3DlistBullet vAlign=3Dtop>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2>=E2=80=A2</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></TD>
<TD class=3DlistItem>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>V2.0 (September 26, 2006): The =
update has=20
been revised and re-released for Microsoft Windows 2000 Service =
Pack 4=20
to address issues identified in </FONT><A=20
href=3D"
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/920958" =
target=3D_blank><FONT=20
face=3DArial size=3D2>Microsoft Knowledge Base Article=20
920958</FONT></A><FONT face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>.</FONT></P></BLOCKQUOTE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>"Canuck geoff" <</FONT><A=20
href=3D"mailto:Canuckgeoff@discussions.microsoft.com"><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2>Canuckgeoff@discussions.microsoft.com</FONT></A><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>> wrote in message </FONT><A=20
href=3D"news:622D1050-D271-4268-854B-9F27A3BF4586@microsoft.com"><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>news:622D1050-D271-4268-854B-9F27A3BF4586@microsoft.com</FONT></=
A><FONT=20
face=3DArial size=3D2>...</FONT></DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>> =
This new article=20
speaks to a fix to the problem created by 06-049. If the <BR>> =
patch is=20
broken why is this not a re-release of the patch? I see none of =
the=20
<BR>> usual "Microsoft only recommends applying this to systems =
experiencing=20
the <BR>> problem..." <BR>> <BR>> I take it then that =
every=20
system on which 06-049 is installed is still <BR>> potentially =
vulnerable to=20
file corruption. If so then 925308 is in fact a <BR>> vital =
patch not=20
for security's sake but for data protection's sake.<BR>> <BR>> MS =
please=20
respond. Should we apply this fix to all systems that have 06-049 =
<BR>>=20
installed.</FONT></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0221_01C7088E.4B5BE3C0--