Firewall

Having nothing but troubles with the new 5.0 version of
ZoneAlarm Pro. Considering other alternatives. Anyone
had experience with Tiny Personal Firewall and care to
share your thoughts?
Thanks!

anonymous
Sun Jun 06 09:38:54 CDT 2004

See here http://forums.zonelabs.com/zonelabs/board?
board.id=inst for the
multitude of problems people are having with the new
ZoneAlarm version!

revert to the older version of zonealarm

>-----Original Message-----
>Having nothing but troubles with the new 5.0 version of
>ZoneAlarm Pro. Considering other alternatives. Anyone
>had experience with Tiny Personal Firewall and care to
>share your thoughts?
>Thanks!
>.
>

N
Mon Jun 07 02:05:02 CDT 2004

In article <18c0301c44baa$acc45cd0$a501280a@phx.gbl>, Undecided says...

> Having nothing but troubles with the new 5.0 version of
> ZoneAlarm Pro. Considering other alternatives. Anyone
> had experience with Tiny Personal Firewall and care to
> share your thoughts?

I don't have any opinions on Tiny. I am using an older version of Kerio
Personal Firewall (version 2.1.5), which used to belong to Tiny until the
authors parted company, and set up Kerio. Very nice, but possibly getting a
bit old...

--
Norman
~Win dain a lotica, En vai tu ri, Si lo ta
~Fin dein a loluca, En dragu a sei lain
~Vi fa-ru les shutai am, En riga-lint

Undecided
Mon Jun 07 03:46:46 CDT 2004

Thanks. Since my initial post, I have downloaded,
updated and am trying on a 28-day free trial Tiny
Personal Firewall v. 5.5. So far, I'm well pleased.


>-----Original Message-----
>In article <18c0301c44baa$acc45cd0$a501280a@phx.gbl>,
Undecided says...
>
>> Having nothing but troubles with the new 5.0 version
of
>> ZoneAlarm Pro. Considering other alternatives.
Anyone
>> had experience with Tiny Personal Firewall and care to
>> share your thoughts?
>
>I don't have any opinions on Tiny. I am using an older
version of Kerio
>Personal Firewall (version 2.1.5), which used to belong
to Tiny until the
>authors parted company, and set up Kerio. Very nice, but
possibly getting a
>bit old...
>
>--
>Norman
>~Win dain a lotica, En vai tu ri, Si lo ta
>~Fin dein a loluca, En dragu a sei lain
>~Vi fa-ru les shutai am, En riga-lint
>.
>

John
Mon Jun 07 08:37:08 CDT 2004

"Undecided" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:18c0301c44baa$acc45cd0$a501280a@phx.gbl...
> Having nothing but troubles with the new 5.0 version of
> ZoneAlarm Pro. Considering other alternatives. Anyone
> had experience with Tiny Personal Firewall and care to
> share your thoughts?
> Thanks!

If you are having problems with the newest version why not use the newest
but one? Version 4.5.594 was as stable as any software I've used and was
extremely effective.
--
John McGaw
[Knoxville, TN, USA]

Return address will not work. Please
reply in group or through my website:
http://johnmcgaw.com

Undecided
Mon Jun 07 12:47:38 CDT 2004

John,
I agree. That is the version I was running before I
updated to v. 50_590_015. Reversion didn't correct the
problems that
I was having. Since then, I have read a post giving
instructions for making a clean installation of
ZoneAlarm. No attempt now, though, because I am trying
Tiny Personal Firewall on a 28-day free trial basis.
When the trial period expires, I will have 10 months left
on my subscription to ZoneAlarm Pro, and I
plan to try one more time to get a good installation of
version 45_594_000. If successful, I will make a decision
about the direction to take next May. So far, Tiny
Personal Firewall is highly impressive, and it might be
my
program of choice to replace ZoneAlarm whenever that time
evolves.



>-----Original Message-----
>"Undecided" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote
in message
>news:18c0301c44baa$acc45cd0$a501280a@phx.gbl...
>> Having nothing but troubles with the new 5.0 version of
>> ZoneAlarm Pro. Considering other alternatives. Anyone
>> had experience with Tiny Personal Firewall and care to
>> share your thoughts?
>> Thanks!
>
>If you are having problems with the newest version why
not use the newest
>but one? Version 4.5.594 was as stable as any software
I've used and was
>extremely effective.
>--
>John McGaw
>[Knoxville, TN, USA]
>
>Return address will not work. Please
>reply in group or through my website:
>http://johnmcgaw.com
>
>
>.
>