jeff
Wed Sep 15 15:53:52 CDT 2004
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:19:50 -0700, "Jimmy"
<anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>Seriously? If that is the case, Microsoft SUCKS! Why am I
>doing the "scanning" for them? Why can't THEY do it???
>
>This is confusing! I read down the list of Affected
>Software and it's like links to EACH thing, like SEPARATE
>undates.
They are separate updates. You update those which meet your needs,
and don't need the others. Not all software or all patches are able
to use Windows Updates to install, some of these predate WU. It's
getting better, but if you truly believe Microsoft sucks, you may wish
to investigate alternatives.
Jeff
>>-----Original Message-----
>>"Do I have to read down the list of affected
>>software and update manually."
>>
>>Yes.
>>
>>Tom
>>"Jimmy" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
>message
>>news:0dfa01c49a97$65c205d0$a601280a@phx.gbl...
>>| I read on microsoft.com/technet about (critical
>>| update) "Buffer Overrun in JPEG Processing (GDI+) Could
>>| Allow Code Execution (833987)" and (important
>>| update) "Vulnerability in WordPerfect Converter Could
>>| Allow Code Execution (884933)".
>>|
>>| If I visit Microsoft Office Downloads Home Page
>>| (
http://office.microsoft.com/en-
>>| us/officeupdate/default.aspx) and also
>>| www.windowsupdate.com, will these two sites tell me if I
>>| need to install these two updates?
>>|
>>| I have Windows 2000 (not XP) but I do have Office XP.
>Why
>>| won't office.microsoft.com (updates) or
>windowsupdate.com
>>| tell me? Do I have to read down the list of affected
>>| software and update manually.
>>|
>>| So confused,
>>| Jimmy
>>|
>>|
>>
>>
>>.
>>