Hi,

Assuming the security group DARN\MIS exists in a Server 2003 AD domain, why
isn't the following working:

cacls *.* /e /r /g darn\mis /c /t

Re: CACLS to remove security by Roger

Roger
Tue Jun 17 03:35:41 CDT 2008


> cacls *.* /e /r /g darn\mis /c /t
is undefined syntax
cacls *.* /e /r darn\mis /c /t
revokes any existing grants held by darn\mis
Consider use of xcacls or icacls dependiung on OS version
as they are newer and more capable.


"Gis Bun" <GisBun@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:AAA7D48F-8437-4003-8968-A5F1858A6AF0@microsoft.com...
> Hi,
>
> Assuming the security group DARN\MIS exists in a Server 2003 AD domain,
> why
> isn't the following working:
>
> cacls *.* /e /r /g darn\mis /c /t
>
>



Re: CACLS to remove security by GisBun

GisBun
Tue Jun 17 14:45:01 CDT 2008


Wooops. I was thinking that the /E and /R went together - they do if I was
adding a user and not a group. :-)

Thanks

"Roger Abell [MVP]" wrote:

>
> > cacls *.* /e /r /g darn\mis /c /t
> is undefined syntax
> cacls *.* /e /r darn\mis /c /t
> revokes any existing grants held by darn\mis
> Consider use of xcacls or icacls dependiung on OS version
> as they are newer and more capable.
>
>
> "Gis Bun" <GisBun@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:AAA7D48F-8437-4003-8968-A5F1858A6AF0@microsoft.com...
> > Hi,
> >
> > Assuming the security group DARN\MIS exists in a Server 2003 AD domain,
> > why
> > isn't the following working:
> >
> > cacls *.* /e /r /g darn\mis /c /t
> >
> >
>
>
>