Joann or Brian -- Could you please walk through the SPECIFIC steps to install
Pub 2000 and Pub 2003 side by side, so one does not overwrite the other? I
saw previous post by Joann about how she and Brian both run multiple versions
on their PCs without problems. But we ran into problems following the general
advice given.

Our club purchased freestanding versions of Pub 2003 and Pub 2000 for its
newsletter editor, who needs both for various reasons. Pub 2003 was installed
after Office 2003 was installed. Editor next tried to install Pub 2000. The
editor's explanation of problems encountered during the install appears
below. He would prefer I provide procedures rather than help him directly
with the install.

Curt,
How did it go with installing Publisher 2000, side by
side?
-Tom

Tom,
Microsoft installed Pub2000 on top of my software. I was able to re-install
my copy of Pub2002. I am going to try to install Pub2000 to my D drive this
weekend.
Curt

Re: Installing Pub 2000 and Pub 2003 on same PC by Brian

Brian
Fri Oct 14 12:02:29 CDT 2005

Tom,

I always recommend installing the newest version first. Install Publisher
2003 to the default directory that is offered by the Publisher 2003 setup
routine.

When installing older versions, such as Publisher 2000, choose a custom path
to install this version too. You can choose the folder location during
setup.

For example, Publisher 2003 would install to the Office 11 folder. For
Publisher 2000, I would create a custom folder called Publisher 2000 to
install to.

I also recommend installing Publisher 2003 then updating it with the latest
service pack, SP2 before installing Publisher 2000.

The only problem you might encounter with the above scenario is that
Publisher 2000 will probably take over as the "default" version of
Publisher...meaning anytime you try to open ANY Publisher files, including
2003, Publisher 2000 will try to open them, giving you an error that Pub
2000 can't open newer files. When this happens, you open Publisher 2003, go
to Help > Detect and Repair, and that will make Publisher 2003 the default
version.

When I do installs, I install in the following order on my machines:

1. Pub 2003
2. Pub 2002
3. Pub 2000
4. Pub 98
5. Pub 97
6. Pub 95
7. Pub 2.0
8. Pub 1.0a

When install in that order, I don't have issues.
--
Brian Kvalheim
Microsoft Publisher MVP
http://www.publishermvps.com

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
confers no rights.
"Tom C" <TomC@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:F311A507-BC95-4B1A-B7EC-8C3E8AB370F4@microsoft.com...
> Joann or Brian -- Could you please walk through the SPECIFIC steps to
> install
> Pub 2000 and Pub 2003 side by side, so one does not overwrite the other?
> I
> saw previous post by Joann about how she and Brian both run multiple
> versions
> on their PCs without problems. But we ran into problems following the
> general
> advice given.
>
> Our club purchased freestanding versions of Pub 2003 and Pub 2000 for its
> newsletter editor, who needs both for various reasons. Pub 2003 was
> installed
> after Office 2003 was installed. Editor next tried to install Pub 2000.
> The
> editor's explanation of problems encountered during the install appears
> below. He would prefer I provide procedures rather than help him directly
> with the install.
>
> Curt,
> How did it go with installing Publisher 2000, side by
> side?
> -Tom
>
> Tom,
> Microsoft installed Pub2000 on top of my software. I was able to
> re-install
> my copy of Pub2002. I am going to try to install Pub2000 to my D drive
> this
> weekend.
> Curt



Re: Installing Pub 2000 and Pub 2003 on same PC by TomC

TomC
Fri Oct 14 14:39:07 CDT 2005

Brian,
Thanks for fast reply! I have passed this on.
-Tom

"Brian Kvalheim [MSFT MVP]" wrote:

> Tom,
>
> I always recommend installing the newest version first. Install Publisher
> 2003 to the default directory that is offered by the Publisher 2003 setup
> routine.
>
> When installing older versions, such as Publisher 2000, choose a custom path
> to install this version too. You can choose the folder location during
> setup.
>
> For example, Publisher 2003 would install to the Office 11 folder. For
> Publisher 2000, I would create a custom folder called Publisher 2000 to
> install to.
>
> I also recommend installing Publisher 2003 then updating it with the latest
> service pack, SP2 before installing Publisher 2000.
>
> The only problem you might encounter with the above scenario is that
> Publisher 2000 will probably take over as the "default" version of
> Publisher...meaning anytime you try to open ANY Publisher files, including
> 2003, Publisher 2000 will try to open them, giving you an error that Pub
> 2000 can't open newer files. When this happens, you open Publisher 2003, go
> to Help > Detect and Repair, and that will make Publisher 2003 the default
> version.
>
> When I do installs, I install in the following order on my machines:
>
> 1. Pub 2003
> 2. Pub 2002
> 3. Pub 2000
> 4. Pub 98
> 5. Pub 97
> 6. Pub 95
> 7. Pub 2.0
> 8. Pub 1.0a
>
> When install in that order, I don't have issues.
> --
> Brian Kvalheim
> Microsoft Publisher MVP
> http://www.publishermvps.com
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
> confers no rights.
> "Tom C" <TomC@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:F311A507-BC95-4B1A-B7EC-8C3E8AB370F4@microsoft.com...
> > Joann or Brian -- Could you please walk through the SPECIFIC steps to
> > install
> > Pub 2000 and Pub 2003 side by side, so one does not overwrite the other?
> > I
> > saw previous post by Joann about how she and Brian both run multiple
> > versions
> > on their PCs without problems. But we ran into problems following the
> > general
> > advice given.
> >
> > Our club purchased freestanding versions of Pub 2003 and Pub 2000 for its
> > newsletter editor, who needs both for various reasons. Pub 2003 was
> > installed
> > after Office 2003 was installed. Editor next tried to install Pub 2000.
> > The
> > editor's explanation of problems encountered during the install appears
> > below. He would prefer I provide procedures rather than help him directly
> > with the install.
> >
> > Curt,
> > How did it go with installing Publisher 2000, side by
> > side?
> > -Tom
> >
> > Tom,
> > Microsoft installed Pub2000 on top of my software. I was able to
> > re-install
> > my copy of Pub2002. I am going to try to install Pub2000 to my D drive
> > this
> > weekend.
> > Curt
>
>
>

Re: Installing Pub 2000 and Pub 2003 on same PC by Maudie

Maudie
Fri Oct 14 15:09:02 CDT 2005

I don't have standalone software only Office 2000 and Office 2003. Due to
the problems I am having in trying to work with my web site in Pub 2003 I
want to go back to Pub 2000. Is it possible to just re-install Publisher
2000 from with Office 2000 - or do I have to just go back completely to
Office 2000?
--
Thank you.


"Tom C" wrote:

> Brian,
> Thanks for fast reply! I have passed this on.
> -Tom
>
> "Brian Kvalheim [MSFT MVP]" wrote:
>
> > Tom,
> >
> > I always recommend installing the newest version first. Install Publisher
> > 2003 to the default directory that is offered by the Publisher 2003 setup
> > routine.
> >
> > When installing older versions, such as Publisher 2000, choose a custom path
> > to install this version too. You can choose the folder location during
> > setup.
> >
> > For example, Publisher 2003 would install to the Office 11 folder. For
> > Publisher 2000, I would create a custom folder called Publisher 2000 to
> > install to.
> >
> > I also recommend installing Publisher 2003 then updating it with the latest
> > service pack, SP2 before installing Publisher 2000.
> >
> > The only problem you might encounter with the above scenario is that
> > Publisher 2000 will probably take over as the "default" version of
> > Publisher...meaning anytime you try to open ANY Publisher files, including
> > 2003, Publisher 2000 will try to open them, giving you an error that Pub
> > 2000 can't open newer files. When this happens, you open Publisher 2003, go
> > to Help > Detect and Repair, and that will make Publisher 2003 the default
> > version.
> >
> > When I do installs, I install in the following order on my machines:
> >
> > 1. Pub 2003
> > 2. Pub 2002
> > 3. Pub 2000
> > 4. Pub 98
> > 5. Pub 97
> > 6. Pub 95
> > 7. Pub 2.0
> > 8. Pub 1.0a
> >
> > When install in that order, I don't have issues.
> > --
> > Brian Kvalheim
> > Microsoft Publisher MVP
> > http://www.publishermvps.com
> >
> > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
> > confers no rights.
> > "Tom C" <TomC@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> > news:F311A507-BC95-4B1A-B7EC-8C3E8AB370F4@microsoft.com...
> > > Joann or Brian -- Could you please walk through the SPECIFIC steps to
> > > install
> > > Pub 2000 and Pub 2003 side by side, so one does not overwrite the other?
> > > I
> > > saw previous post by Joann about how she and Brian both run multiple
> > > versions
> > > on their PCs without problems. But we ran into problems following the
> > > general
> > > advice given.
> > >
> > > Our club purchased freestanding versions of Pub 2003 and Pub 2000 for its
> > > newsletter editor, who needs both for various reasons. Pub 2003 was
> > > installed
> > > after Office 2003 was installed. Editor next tried to install Pub 2000.
> > > The
> > > editor's explanation of problems encountered during the install appears
> > > below. He would prefer I provide procedures rather than help him directly
> > > with the install.
> > >
> > > Curt,
> > > How did it go with installing Publisher 2000, side by
> > > side?
> > > -Tom
> > >
> > > Tom,
> > > Microsoft installed Pub2000 on top of my software. I was able to
> > > re-install
> > > my copy of Pub2002. I am going to try to install Pub2000 to my D drive
> > > this
> > > weekend.
> > > Curt
> >
> >
> >

Re: Installing Pub 2000 and Pub 2003 on same PC by Ed

Ed
Fri Oct 14 15:46:24 CDT 2005

Maudie <Maudie@discussions.microsoft.com> was very recently heard to
utter:
> I don't have standalone software only Office 2000 and Office 2003.
> Due to the problems I am having in trying to work with my web site in
> Pub 2003 I want to go back to Pub 2000. Is it possible to just
> re-install Publisher 2000 from with Office 2000 - or do I have to
> just go back completely to Office 2000?

Simply reinstall Office 2000 CD2 - this is the one with Publisher on it.

A custom install will let you pick and choose what you install.

--
Ed Bennett - MVP Microsoft Publisher



Re: Installing Pub 2000 and Pub 2003 on same PC by JoAnn

JoAnn
Fri Oct 14 21:36:57 CDT 2005

Sorry I didn't respond. I've had bronchitis and have spent very little time
online this week. I've been in bed and getting very good at solving sudoku
puzzles.

--

JoAnn Paules
MVP Microsoft [Publisher]



"Tom C" <TomC@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:F311A507-BC95-4B1A-B7EC-8C3E8AB370F4@microsoft.com...
> Joann or Brian -- Could you please walk through the SPECIFIC steps to
> install
> Pub 2000 and Pub 2003 side by side, so one does not overwrite the other?
> I
> saw previous post by Joann about how she and Brian both run multiple
> versions
> on their PCs without problems. But we ran into problems following the
> general
> advice given.
>
> Our club purchased freestanding versions of Pub 2003 and Pub 2000 for its
> newsletter editor, who needs both for various reasons. Pub 2003 was
> installed
> after Office 2003 was installed. Editor next tried to install Pub 2000.
> The
> editor's explanation of problems encountered during the install appears
> below. He would prefer I provide procedures rather than help him directly
> with the install.
>
> Curt,
> How did it go with installing Publisher 2000, side by
> side?
> -Tom
>
> Tom,
> Microsoft installed Pub2000 on top of my software. I was able to
> re-install
> my copy of Pub2002. I am going to try to install Pub2000 to my D drive
> this
> weekend.
> Curt