Steve
Thu Oct 28 12:38:20 CDT 2004
I'm guessing that a) it's far more complex than a simple file viewer for
products like Word due to the large number of views etc to be accomodated;
and b) it would compete with Project Server/PWA. I've always thought Server
should be a lot cheaper and simpler to implement than it is, a small
fraction of its current costs and include in the package everything that is
required to install and run except the hardware and OS, but they didn't ask
me <grin>. OTOH, as a student of mine said when I mentioned server was a
relatively expensive product when you took into account everything that has
to go with it like SQL Server and licenses "Our typical project budget runs
between 15 and 25 million dollars. 25K for the software and another 25K in
consulting or IT overhead costs to get it up and running is mere pocket
change."
I don't know why users should want to limit data access within the file on a
user by user basis but they do whether it makes sense or not. There's a
thread posted just this morning from someone who wished to distribute copies
of the mpp file to users in accounting and engineering with cost data only
visible to the people in accounting. Another post was seeking to hide
salary info for full-time resources while letting it be displayed for
part-timers. Neither makes a lot of sense to me because it seems they are
circulating the working file way too widely but different strokes and all
that.
--
Steve House [MVP]
MS Project Trainer/Consultant
Visit
http://www.mvps.org/project/faqs.htm for the FAQs
"John" <mjensen@theriver.com> wrote in message
news:mjensen-F91CE9.09555528102004@msnews.microsoft.com...
>
> Steve,
> I'm not sure why the viewer would need to limit the accessible data but
> I can certainly conceive the feasibility of doing so if necessary.
> Perhaps one reason Microsoft has not developed a "read only" Project
> viewer is that several other companies already have filled that niche.
> Just guessing.
>
> John