I am trying to report against my project.
I can't find a way of showing the progress which SHOULD have been made
according to the plan.
I want to show, by project phase, % of activity which was planned to have
completed and % of activity which has actually completed.

Can anyone help ?

Re: How do I measure actual progress % versus planned progress % by Gérard

Gérard
Fri Jun 03 01:57:18 CDT 2005

Hello Claire,
Display the Earned Value table : View / Table / More Tables...
and look at the definition of the BCWS, BCWP and ACWP fields.
NB : All these fields are calculated by Project with reference to the Status
Date entered in Project / Project Information and to the Baseline : Tools /
Tracking / Save baseline

Gérard Ducouret

"Claire Brereton" <Claire Brereton@discussions.microsoft.com> a écrit dans
le message de news:1FA88543-A4A7-4B5C-BC85-3DCB883D3C36@microsoft.com...
> I am trying to report against my project.
> I can't find a way of showing the progress which SHOULD have been made
> according to the plan.
> I want to show, by project phase, % of activity which was planned to have
> completed and % of activity which has actually completed.
>
> Can anyone help ?



Re: How do I measure actual progress % versus planned progress % by Dirk

Dirk
Fri Jun 03 02:00:54 CDT 2005

Hi Claire,

I am not completely sure, that I do understand your question: When you
plan your tasks, you put in your planned run-rate - that's basically
what determines the lead time of the tasks. So when done properly, the
position of the 'current day marker' shows you the progress, which
SHOULD have been made.

Additionally, you put in the completion factor of your tasks. If the
completion of your task matches the position of the current day marker,
you are on track.

Does this answer your question?

BR,
Dirk

Claire Brereton wrote:
> I am trying to report against my project.
> I can't find a way of showing the progress which SHOULD have been made
> according to the plan.
> I want to show, by project phase, % of activity which was planned to have
> completed and % of activity which has actually completed.
>
> Can anyone help ?

Re: How do I measure actual progress % versus planned progress % by ClaireBrereton

ClaireBrereton
Tue Jun 14 19:10:02 CDT 2005

Hello Dirk,
No it doesn't really answer my question. I can tell if I am not on track
using the method you suggest, but I can't tell how far behind I am !
I think I am going to have to use the "Earned Value" fields and put in a
virtaul hourly rate, then I believe I can get the ionformation I need
Thanks anyway,
Claire

"Dirk Macke" wrote:

> Hi Claire,
>
> I am not completely sure, that I do understand your question: When you
> plan your tasks, you put in your planned run-rate - that's basically
> what determines the lead time of the tasks. So when done properly, the
> position of the 'current day marker' shows you the progress, which
> SHOULD have been made.
>
> Additionally, you put in the completion factor of your tasks. If the
> completion of your task matches the position of the current day marker,
> you are on track.
>
> Does this answer your question?
>
> BR,
> Dirk
>
> Claire Brereton wrote:
> > I am trying to report against my project.
> > I can't find a way of showing the progress which SHOULD have been made
> > according to the plan.
> > I want to show, by project phase, % of activity which was planned to have
> > completed and % of activity which has actually completed.
> >
> > Can anyone help ?
>

Re: How do I measure actual progress % versus planned progress % by ClaireBrereton

ClaireBrereton
Tue Jun 14 19:11:01 CDT 2005

Thankyou very much Gerard.
I had started to look at these fields. I have not been putting costs against
resources but it looks as though I will have to, then I can use the Earned
Valued fields in the way you suggest. I also worked out that you have to put
these resource costs in before you save the baseline, otherwise the values
remain on zero.

Thanks again, Claire

"Gérard Ducouret" wrote:

> Hello Claire,
> Display the Earned Value table : View / Table / More Tables...
> and look at the definition of the BCWS, BCWP and ACWP fields.
> NB : All these fields are calculated by Project with reference to the Status
> Date entered in Project / Project Information and to the Baseline : Tools /
> Tracking / Save baseline
>
> Gérard Ducouret
>
> "Claire Brereton" <Claire Brereton@discussions.microsoft.com> a écrit dans
> le message de news:1FA88543-A4A7-4B5C-BC85-3DCB883D3C36@microsoft.com...
> > I am trying to report against my project.
> > I can't find a way of showing the progress which SHOULD have been made
> > according to the plan.
> > I want to show, by project phase, % of activity which was planned to have
> > completed and % of activity which has actually completed.
> >
> > Can anyone help ?
>
>
>

Re: How do I measure actual progress % versus planned progress % by Steve

Steve
Wed Jun 15 05:49:36 CDT 2005

Project progress is driven by work being performed. Earned value uses costs
of work as a standard unit to measure the work performed by a certain date
compared to the work that should have been performed by that date. While it
normally s as a unit of measure, there's actually nothing that says you have
to do it that way. If dollars spent aren't an issue, just enter standard and
OT rates of $1 for your resources and what you'll be seeing in the Earned
Value will really be man-hours. You can go to the Tools Options View menu
and delete the "$" from the currency units field and the Earned Value won't
print with dollar signs, making it clearer that it is man-hours. But as an
aside, I can't imagine a scenario where resource costs aren't really an
issue. A PM is usually required to organize the project so it comes in
on-schedule and under-budget. Even if the budget is already been determined
or you're not going outside the firm to acquire the resources, unless you
track resource costs you don't have a clue whether you under, over, or
on-track viz a viz your expenditures. Even internal employees have a cost
since the fact that they are working on the project means they're not doing
something else and the costs of their work represents a true incremental
cost to the company of doing this specific project. Even if the cash flow
is the same regardless of whether you do this project or not, the lost
opportunity of not doing the alternate actviities the resources could have
been doing is a cost.

--
Steve House [MVP]
MS Project Trainer & Consultant
Visit http://www.mvps.org/project/faqs.htm for the FAQs


"Claire Brereton" <ClaireBrereton@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:0072E474-B6A9-498A-BE65-2BF90108D297@microsoft.com...
> Thankyou very much Gerard.
> I had started to look at these fields. I have not been putting costs
> against
> resources but it looks as though I will have to, then I can use the Earned
> Valued fields in the way you suggest. I also worked out that you have to
> put
> these resource costs in before you save the baseline, otherwise the values
> remain on zero.
>
> Thanks again, Claire
>
> "Gérard Ducouret" wrote:
>
>> Hello Claire,
>> Display the Earned Value table : View / Table / More Tables...
>> and look at the definition of the BCWS, BCWP and ACWP fields.
>> NB : All these fields are calculated by Project with reference to the
>> Status
>> Date entered in Project / Project Information and to the Baseline : Tools
>> /
>> Tracking / Save baseline
>>
>> Gérard Ducouret
>>
>> "Claire Brereton" <Claire Brereton@discussions.microsoft.com> a écrit
>> dans
>> le message de news:1FA88543-A4A7-4B5C-BC85-3DCB883D3C36@microsoft.com...
>> > I am trying to report against my project.
>> > I can't find a way of showing the progress which SHOULD have been made
>> > according to the plan.
>> > I want to show, by project phase, % of activity which was planned to
>> > have
>> > completed and % of activity which has actually completed.
>> >
>> > Can anyone help ?
>>
>>
>>


Re: How do I measure actual progress % versus planned progress % by Carolina

Carolina
Wed May 10 11:37:02 CDT 2006

I understand Claire question, I have the same problem I need to report to the
Client the % planned progress versus actual progress %. I cannot informed the
client the cost of the project!! but they request to have this comparation. I
will tried to work it out with the Earned value.

"Steve House [Project MVP]" wrote:

> Project progress is driven by work being performed. Earned value uses costs
> of work as a standard unit to measure the work performed by a certain date
> compared to the work that should have been performed by that date. While it
> normally s as a unit of measure, there's actually nothing that says you have
> to do it that way. If dollars spent aren't an issue, just enter standard and
> OT rates of $1 for your resources and what you'll be seeing in the Earned
> Value will really be man-hours. You can go to the Tools Options View menu
> and delete the "$" from the currency units field and the Earned Value won't
> print with dollar signs, making it clearer that it is man-hours. But as an
> aside, I can't imagine a scenario where resource costs aren't really an
> issue. A PM is usually required to organize the project so it comes in
> on-schedule and under-budget. Even if the budget is already been determined
> or you're not going outside the firm to acquire the resources, unless you
> track resource costs you don't have a clue whether you under, over, or
> on-track viz a viz your expenditures. Even internal employees have a cost
> since the fact that they are working on the project means they're not doing
> something else and the costs of their work represents a true incremental
> cost to the company of doing this specific project. Even if the cash flow
> is the same regardless of whether you do this project or not, the lost
> opportunity of not doing the alternate actviities the resources could have
> been doing is a cost.
>
> --
> Steve House [MVP]
> MS Project Trainer & Consultant
> Visit http://www.mvps.org/project/faqs.htm for the FAQs
>
>
> "Claire Brereton" <ClaireBrereton@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
> message news:0072E474-B6A9-498A-BE65-2BF90108D297@microsoft.com...
> > Thankyou very much Gerard.
> > I had started to look at these fields. I have not been putting costs
> > against
> > resources but it looks as though I will have to, then I can use the Earned
> > Valued fields in the way you suggest. I also worked out that you have to
> > put
> > these resource costs in before you save the baseline, otherwise the values
> > remain on zero.
> >
> > Thanks again, Claire
> >
> > "G�©rard Ducouret" wrote:
> >
> >> Hello Claire,
> >> Display the Earned Value table : View / Table / More Tables...
> >> and look at the definition of the BCWS, BCWP and ACWP fields.
> >> NB : All these fields are calculated by Project with reference to the
> >> Status
> >> Date entered in Project / Project Information and to the Baseline : Tools
> >> /
> >> Tracking / Save baseline
> >>
> >> G�©rard Ducouret
> >>
> >> "Claire Brereton" <Claire Brereton@discussions.microsoft.com> a �©crit
> >> dans
> >> le message de news:1FA88543-A4A7-4B5C-BC85-3DCB883D3C36@microsoft.com...
> >> > I am trying to report against my project.
> >> > I can't find a way of showing the progress which SHOULD have been made
> >> > according to the plan.
> >> > I want to show, by project phase, % of activity which was planned to
> >> > have
> >> > completed and % of activity which has actually completed.
> >> >
> >> > Can anyone help ?
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Re: How do I measure actual progress % versus planned progress % by Steve

Steve
Thu May 11 17:52:33 CDT 2006

You can use earned value without using real costs if you assign a rate of $1
per hour as the resource rate. Go to the options menu and on the "view" tab
set it to not use a currency symbol. Now your earned value number will be
in work hours instead of dollars.
--
Steve House [Project MVP]
MS Project Trainer & Consultant
Visit http://www.mvps.org/project/faqs.htm for the FAQs

"Carolina" <Carolina@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:064C392C-40EA-4866-AE73-BDCA55605CE4@microsoft.com...
>I understand Claire question, I have the same problem I need to report to
>the
> Client the % planned progress versus actual progress %. I cannot informed
> the
> client the cost of the project!! but they request to have this
> comparation. I
> will tried to work it out with the Earned value.
>
> "Steve House [Project MVP]" wrote:
>
>> Project progress is driven by work being performed. Earned value uses
>> costs
>> of work as a standard unit to measure the work performed by a certain
>> date
>> compared to the work that should have been performed by that date. While
>> it
>> normally s as a unit of measure, there's actually nothing that says you
>> have
>> to do it that way. If dollars spent aren't an issue, just enter standard
>> and
>> OT rates of $1 for your resources and what you'll be seeing in the Earned
>> Value will really be man-hours. You can go to the Tools Options View
>> menu
>> and delete the "$" from the currency units field and the Earned Value
>> won't
>> print with dollar signs, making it clearer that it is man-hours. But as
>> an
>> aside, I can't imagine a scenario where resource costs aren't really an
>> issue. A PM is usually required to organize the project so it comes in
>> on-schedule and under-budget. Even if the budget is already been
>> determined
>> or you're not going outside the firm to acquire the resources, unless you
>> track resource costs you don't have a clue whether you under, over, or
>> on-track viz a viz your expenditures. Even internal employees have a
>> cost
>> since the fact that they are working on the project means they're not
>> doing
>> something else and the costs of their work represents a true incremental
>> cost to the company of doing this specific project. Even if the cash
>> flow
>> is the same regardless of whether you do this project or not, the lost
>> opportunity of not doing the alternate actviities the resources could
>> have
>> been doing is a cost.
>>
>> --
>> Steve House [MVP]
>> MS Project Trainer & Consultant
>> Visit http://www.mvps.org/project/faqs.htm for the FAQs
>>
>>
>> "Claire Brereton" <ClaireBrereton@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
>> message news:0072E474-B6A9-498A-BE65-2BF90108D297@microsoft.com...
>> > Thankyou very much Gerard.
>> > I had started to look at these fields. I have not been putting costs
>> > against
>> > resources but it looks as though I will have to, then I can use the
>> > Earned
>> > Valued fields in the way you suggest. I also worked out that you have
>> > to
>> > put
>> > these resource costs in before you save the baseline, otherwise the
>> > values
>> > remain on zero.
>> >
>> > Thanks again, Claire
>> >
>> > "GÃf©rard Ducouret" wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hello Claire,
>> >> Display the Earned Value table : View / Table / More Tables...
>> >> and look at the definition of the BCWS, BCWP and ACWP fields.
>> >> NB : All these fields are calculated by Project with reference to the
>> >> Status
>> >> Date entered in Project / Project Information and to the Baseline :
>> >> Tools
>> >> /
>> >> Tracking / Save baseline
>> >>
>> >> GÃf©rard Ducouret
>> >>
>> >> "Claire Brereton" <Claire Brereton@discussions.microsoft.com> a
>> >> Ãf©crit
>> >> dans
>> >> le message de
>> >> news:1FA88543-A4A7-4B5C-BC85-3DCB883D3C36@microsoft.com...
>> >> > I am trying to report against my project.
>> >> > I can't find a way of showing the progress which SHOULD have been
>> >> > made
>> >> > according to the plan.
>> >> > I want to show, by project phase, % of activity which was planned to
>> >> > have
>> >> > completed and % of activity which has actually completed.
>> >> >
>> >> > Can anyone help ?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>